The endoscopy evolution: 'the superscope era'

Developments to the design of the flexible endoscope are transforming the field of gastroenterology. There is a drive to improve colonic adenoma detection rates leading to advancements in the design of the colonoscope. Novel endoscopes now allow increased visualisation of colonic mucosa, including behind colonic folds, and aim to reduce pain associated with the procedure. In addition, a shift in surgical paradigm towards minimally invasive endoluminal surgery has meant innovations in flexible platforms are being sought. There are a number of limitations of the basic endoscope. These include a lack of stability and triangulation of instruments. Modifications to the flexible endoscope design form the basis of a number of newly developed and research platforms, some of which are discussed in this review

Robotics and Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Updated Review of the Literature and State of the Art

Abstract Purpose of Review Gastrointestinal endoscopy includes a wide range of procedures that has dramatically evolved over the past decades. Robotic endoscopy and artificial intelligence are expanding the horizons of traditional techniques and will play a key role in clinical practice in the near future. Understanding the main available devices and procedures is a key unmet need. This review aims to assess the current and future applications of the most recently developed endoscopy robots. Recent Findings Even though a few devices have gained approval for clinical application, the majority of robotic and artificial intelligence systems are yet to become an integral part of the current endoscopic instrumentarium. Some of the innovative endoscopic devices and artificial intelligence systems are dedicated to complex procedures such as endoscopic submucosal dissection, whereas others aim to improve diagnostic techniques such as colonoscopy. Summary A review on flexible endoscopic robotics and artificial intelligence systems is presented here, showing the m3ost recently approved and experimental devices and artificial intelligence systems for diagnosis and robotic endoscopy

A Review of Locomotion Systems for Capsule Endoscopy

Wireless capsule endoscopy for gastrointestinal (GI) tract is a modern technology that has the potential to replace conventional endoscopy techniques. Capsule endoscopy is a pill-shaped device embedded with a camera, a coin battery, and a data transfer. Without a locomotion system, this capsule endoscopy can only passively travel inside the GI tract via natural peristalsis, thus causing several disadvantages such as inability to control and stop, and risk of capsule retention. Therefore, a locomotion system needs to be added to optimize the current capsule endoscopy. This review summarizes the state-of-the-art locomotion methods along with the desired locomotion features such as size, speed, power, and temperature and compares the properties of different methods. In addition, properties and motility mechanisms of the GI tract are described. The main purpose of this review is to understand the features of GI tract and diverse locomotion methods in order to create a future capsule endoscopy compatible with GI tract properties

Feasibility of joystick guided colonoscopy

The flexible endoscope is increasingly used to perform minimal invasive interventions. A novel add-on platform allows single-person control of both endoscope and instrument at the site of intervention. The setup changes the current routine of handling the endoscope. This study aims to determine if the platform allows effective and efficient manipulation to position the endoscope at potential intervention sites throughout the bowel. Five experts in flexible endoscopy first performed three colonoscopies on a computer simulator using the conventional angulation wheels. Next they trained with the joystick interface to achieve their personal level of intubation time with low pain score. 14 PhD students (novices) without hands-on experience performed the same colonoscopy case using either the conventional angulation wheels or joystick interface. Both novice groups trained to gain the average expert level. The cecal intubation time, pain score and visualization performance (% of bowel wall) were recorded. All experts reached their personal intubation time in 6 ± 6 sessions. Three experts completed their learning curve with low pain score in 8 ± 6 sessions. The novices required 11 ± 6 sessions using conventional angulation wheels, and 12 ± 6 sessions using the joystick interface. There was no difference in the visualization performance between the novice and between the expert groups. This study shows that the add-on platform enables endoscope manipulation required to perform colonoscopy. Experts need only a relatively short training period. Novices are as effective and as efficient in endoscope manipulation when comparing the add-on platform with conventional endoscope contro

Endorobots for Colonoscopy:Design Challenges and Available Technologies

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer death worldwide, after lung cancer (Sung et al., 2021). Early stage detection is key to increase the survival rate. Colonoscopy remains to be the gold standard procedure due to its dual capability to optically inspect the entire colonic mucosa and to perform interventional procedures at the same time. However, this causes pain and discomfort, whereby it requires sedation or anaesthesia of the patient. It is a difficult procedure to perform that can cause damage to the colonic wall in some cases. Development of new technologies aims to overcome the current limitations on colonoscopy by using advancements in endorobotics research. The design of these advanced medical devices is challenging because of the limited space of the lumen, the contorted shape, and the long tract of the large bowel. The force applied to the colonic wall needs to be controlled to avoid collateral effects such as injuries to the colonic mucosa and pain during the procedure. This article discusses the current challenges in the colonoscopy procedure, the available locomotion technologies for endorobots used in colonoscopy at a prototype level and the commercial products available

Capsule endoscopy of the future: What's on the horizon?

Capsule endoscopes have evolved from passively moving diagnostic devices to actively moving systems with potential therapeutic capability. In this review, we will discuss the state of the art, define the current shortcomings of capsule endoscopy, and address research areas that aim to overcome said shortcomings. Developments in capsule mobility schemes are emphasized in this text, with magnetic actuation being the most promising endeavor. Research groups are working to integrate sensor data and fuse it with robotic control to outperform today's standard invasive procedures, but in a less intrusive manner. With recent advances in areas such as mobility, drug delivery, and therapeutics, we foresee a translation of interventional capsule technology from the bench-top to the clinical setting within the next 10 years

Analysis of the 'Endoworm' prototype's ability to grip the bowel in in vitro and ex vivo models

[EN] Access to the small bowel by means of an enteroscope is difficult, even using current devices such as single-balloon or double-balloon enteroscopes. Exploration time and patient discomfort are the main drawbacks. The prototype 'Endoworm' analysed in this paper is based on a pneumatic translation system that, gripping the bowel, enables the endoscope to move forward while the bowel slides back over its most proximal part. The grip capacity is related to the pressure inside the balloon, which depends on the insufflate volume of air. Different materials were used as in vitro and ex vivo models: rigid polymethyl methacrylate, flexible silicone, polyester urethane and ex vivo pig small bowel. On measuring the pressure-volume relationship, we found that it depended on the elastic properties of the lumen and that the frictional force depended on the air pressure inside the balloons and the lumen's elastic properties. In the presence of a lubricant, the grip on the simulated intestinal lumens was drastically reduced, as was the influence of the lumen's properties. This paper focuses on the Endoworm's ability to grip the bowel, which is crucial to achieving effective endoscope forward advance and bowel foldingThe author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The study was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through Project (PI18/01365) and by the UPV/IIS LA Fe through the (Endoworm 3.0) Project. CIBER-BBN is an initiative funded by the VI National R&D&I Plan 2008-2011, Iniciativa Ingenio 2010, Consolider Program, CIBER Actions and financed by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III with the assistance of the European Regional Development FundTobella, J.; Pons-Beltrán, V.; Santonja, A.; Sánchez-Diaz, C.; Campillo Fernandez, AJ.; Vidaurre, A. (2020). Analysis of the 'Endoworm' prototype's ability to grip the bowel in in vitro and ex vivo models. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H Journal of Engineering in Medicine. 234(5):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544119209014141102345Iddan, G., Meron, G., Glukhovsky, A., & Swain, P. (2000). Wireless capsule endoscopy. Nature, 405(6785), 417-417. doi:10.1038/35013140Yamamoto, H., Sekine, Y., Sato, Y., Higashizawa, T., Miyata, T., Iino, S., … Sugano, K. (2001). Total enteroscopy with a nonsurgical steerable double-balloon method. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 53(2), 216-220. doi:10.1067/mge.2001.112181Arnott, I. D. R., & Lo, S. K. (2004). REVIEW: The Clinical Utility of Wireless Capsule Endoscopy. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 49(6), 893-901. doi:10.1023/b:ddas.0000034545.58486.e6Hosoe, N., Takabayashi, K., Ogata, H., & Kanai, T. (2019). Capsule endoscopy for small‐intestinal disorders: Current status. Digestive Endoscopy, 31(5), 498-507. doi:10.1111/den.13346Fukumoto, A., Tanaka, S., Shishido, T., Takemura, Y., Oka, S., & Chayama, K. (2009). Comparison of detectability of small-bowel lesions between capsule endoscopy and double-balloon endoscopy for patients with suspected small-bowel disease. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 69(4), 857-865. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2008.06.007Akerman, P. A., Agrawal, D., Chen, W., Cantero, D., Avila, J., & Pangtay, J. (2009). Spiral enteroscopy: a novel method of enteroscopy by using the Endo-Ease Discovery SB overtube and a pediatric colonoscope. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 69(2), 327-332. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2008.07.042Moreels, T. G. (2017). Update in enteroscopy: New devices and new indications. Digestive Endoscopy, 30(2), 174-181. doi:10.1111/den.12920Pasha, S. F. (2012). Diagnostic yield of deep enteroscopy techniques for small-bowel bleeding and tumors. Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 14(2), 100-105. doi:10.1016/j.tgie.2012.02.001Lenz, P., & Domagk, D. (2012). Double- vs. single-balloon vs. spiral enteroscopy. Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology, 26(3), 303-313. doi:10.1016/j.bpg.2012.01.021Baniya, R., Upadhaya, S., Subedi, S. C., Khan, J., Sharma, P., Mohammed, T. S., … Jamil, L. H. (2017). Balloon enteroscopy versus spiral enteroscopy for small-bowel disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 86(6), 997-1005. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2017.06.015Menciassi, A., & Dario, P. (2003). Bio-inspired solutions for locomotion in the gastrointestinal tract: background and perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 361(1811), 2287-2298. doi:10.1098/rsta.2003.1255Zarrouk, D., Sharf, I., & Shoham, M. (2011). Analysis of Wormlike Robotic Locomotion on Compliant Surfaces. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 58(2), 301-309. doi:10.1109/tbme.2010.2066274Poon, C. C. Y., Leung, B., Chan, C. K. W., Lau, J. Y. W., & Chiu, P. W. Y. (2015). Design of wormlike automated robotic endoscope: dynamic interaction between endoscopic balloon and surrounding tissues. Surgical Endoscopy, 30(2), 772-778. doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4224-8Kassim, I., Phee, L., Ng, W. S., Feng Gong, Dario, P., & Mosse, C. A. (2006). Locomotion techniques for robotic colonoscopy. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, 25(3), 49-56. doi:10.1109/memb.2006.1636351Kim, Y.-T., & Kim, D.-E. (2010). Novel Propelling Mechanisms Based on Frictional Interaction for Endoscope Robot. Tribology Transactions, 53(2), 203-211. doi:10.1080/10402000903125337Massalou, D., Masson, C., Foti, P., Afquir, S., Baqué, P., Berdah, S.-V., & Bège, T. (2016). Dynamic biomechanical characterization of colon tissue according to anatomical factors. Journal of Biomechanics, 49(16), 3861-3867. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.10.023Egorov, V. I., Schastlivtsev, I. V., Prut, E. V., Baranov, A. O., & Turusov, R. A. (2002). Mechanical properties of the human gastrointestinal tract. Journal of Biomechanics, 35(10), 1417-1425. doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(02)00084-2Hoeg, H. D., Slatkin, A. B., Burdick, J. W., & Grundfest, W. S. (s. f.). Biomechanical modeling of the small intestine as required for the design and operation of a robotic endoscope. Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065). doi:10.1109/robot.2000.844825Terry, B. S., Passernig, A. C., Hill, M. L., Schoen, J. A., & Rentschler, M. E. (2012). Small intestine mucosal adhesivity to in vivo capsule robot materials. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 15, 24-32. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.06.018Kim, J.-S., Sung, I.-H., Kim, Y.-T., Kwon, E.-Y., Kim, D.-E., & Jang, Y. H. (2006). Experimental investigation of frictional and viscoelastic properties of intestine for microendoscope application. Tribology Letters, 22(2), 143-149. doi:10.1007/s11249-006-9073-0Lyle, A. B., Luftig, J. T., & Rentschler, M. E. (2013). A tribological investigation of the small bowel lumen surface. Tribology International, 62, 171-176. doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2012.11.018De Simone, A., & Luongo, A. (2013). Nonlinear viscoelastic analysis of a cylindrical balloon squeezed between two rigid moving plates. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 50(14-15), 2213-2223. doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.03.028Sliker, L. J., Ciuti, G., Rentschler, M. E., & Menciassi, A. (2016). Frictional resistance model for tissue-capsule endoscope sliding contact in the gastrointestinal tract. Tribology International, 102, 472-484. doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2016.06.003Zhang, C., Liu, H., & Li, H. (2014). Experimental investigation of intestinal frictional resistance in the starting process of the capsule robot. Tribology International, 70, 11-17. doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2013.09.019Zhang, C., Liu, H., & Li, H. (2013). Modeling of Frictional Resistance of a Capsule Robot Moving in the Intestine at a Constant Velocity. Tribology Letters, 53(1), 71-78. doi:10.1007/s11249-013-0244-5Zhang, C., Liu, H., Tan, R., & Li, H. (2012). Modeling of Velocity-dependent Frictional Resistance of a Capsule Robot Inside an Intestine. Tribology Letters, 47(2), 295-301. doi:10.1007/s11249-012-9980-1Woo, S. H., Kim, T. W., Mohy-Ud-Din, Z., Park, I. Y., & Cho, J.-H. (2011). Small intestinal model for electrically propelled capsule endoscopy. BioMedical Engineering OnLine, 10(1), 108. doi:10.1186/1475-925x-10-108Sliker, L. J., & Rentschler, M. E. (2012). The Design and Characterization of a Testing Platform for Quantitative Evaluation of Tread Performance on Multiple Biological Substrates. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 59(9), 2524-2530. doi:10.1109/tbme.2012.2205688Sánchez-Diaz, C., Senent-Cardona, E., Pons-Beltran, V., Santonja-Gimeno, A., & Vidaurre, A. (2018). Endoworm: A new semi-autonomous enteroscopy device. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 232(11), 1137-1143. doi:10.1177/0954411918806330Persson, B. N. J., & Spencer, N. D. (1999). Sliding Friction: Physical Principles and Applications. Physics Today, 52(1), 66-68. doi:10.1063/1.882557Gerson, L. B., Flodin, J. T., & Miyabayashi, K. (2008). Balloon-assisted enteroscopy: technology and troubleshooting. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 68(6), 1158-1167. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2008.08.012Glozman, D., Hassidov, N., Senesh, M., & Shoham, M. (2010). A Self-Propelled Inflatable Earthworm-Like Endoscope Actuated by Single Supply Line. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 57(6), 1264-1272. doi:10.1109/tbme.2010.2040617Baek, N.-K., Sung, I.-H., & Kim, D.-E. (2004). Frictional resistance characteristics of a capsule inside the intestine for microendoscope design. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 218(3), 193-201. doi:10.1243/095441104323118914Kwon, J., Cheung, E., Park, S., & Sitti, M. (2006). Friction enhancement via micro-patterned wet elastomer adhesives on small intestinal surfaces. Biomedical Materials, 1(4), 216-220. doi:10.1088/1748-6041/1/4/007Kim, B., Lee, S., Park, J. H., & Park, J.-O. (2005). Design and Fabrication of a Locomotive Mechanism for Capsule-Type Endoscopes Using Shape Memory Alloys (SMAs). IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 10(1), 77-86. doi:10.1109/tmech.2004.842222Terry, B. S., Lyle, A. B., Schoen, J. A., & Rentschler, M. E. (2011). Preliminary Mechanical Characterization of the Small Bowel for In Vivo Robotic Mobility. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 133(9). doi:10.1115/1.400516