Эколого-хозяйственное обоснование географических приоритетов регулирования территориальной структуры землепользования в Самарской области

Приведены результаты оценки степени деградации земель в зависимости от масштаба и выраженности повреждений земель, ранжирование районов по потенциальной эффективности мер экологизации землепользования и моделирование поэтапного регулирования территориальной структуры землепользовани

Ecosystem services and nature's contribution to people:negotiating diverse values and trade-offs in land systems

Land is increasingly managed to serve multiple societal demands. Beyond food, fiber, habitation, and recreation, land is now being called on to meet demands for carbon sequestration, water purification, biodiversity conservation, and many others. Meeting these multiple demands requires negotiating trade-offs among the choices and differing values placed on them by diverse stakeholders and institutions. Here, we review recent advances in understanding the role of diverse values and trade-offs in managing landscapes to support multiple demands, from a land systems perspective. Recent work by the IPBES and others has recognized the need to accommodate a greater diversity of values into decision-making through the framework of nature's contributions to people (NCP) providing a perspective on human nature relations that goes beyond a stock-flow, ecosystem services, decision-making framing. NCP offers real potential to enable land system science to better integrate the many diverse value systems of stakeholders and institutions into efforts to better understand and more fairly govern the increasingly wicked tradeoffs of land systems in the Anthropocene, especially under conditions of less well functioning institutions and governance. © 2019 Elsevier B.V.This study contributes to the Global Land Programme. Pascual acknowledges the support by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness , under BC3 ‘Unit of excellence’ (MIMECO, MDM-2017-0714 )

An Ecological-Economic Approach to Assess Impacts of the Expansion of Eucalyptus Plantations in Agroforest Landscapes of Northern Ethiopia

The conversion of fertile croplands to Eucalyptus woodlots in Ethiopian highlands, due to its business attractiveness to smallholders, raises concerns related to food production, water resources, carbon and other ecosystem services. This study was therefore designed to examine land allocation and plantation management decisions. Our emphasis was on the analysis of tradeoffs between the economic gains obtained from harvesting Eucalyptus timber and food production, carbon and water use. For that purpose, we considered a 1987 ha agroforest landscape in the Amhara region, Northern Ethiopia. With a planning horizon covering nine one-year periods, we developed and used nine Model I single objective linear programming (LP) models, and analyzed tradeoffs between objectives (e.g., land expectation value (LEV), Carbon, volume of ending inventory (VolEI), crop production and water use) using an LP-based Pareto frontier approach. The study revealed that the objective of maximizing the total economic gain from the sale of Eucalyptus wood poles favored a complete conversion of the available cropland into Eucalyptus woodlots. To meet the minimum annual crop production/consumption/requirements of households in the study area, the land under Eucalyptus should be limited to 1772 ha, with a sequestration potential of 1.5 to 1.57 × 107 kg yr−1 of carbon in the aboveground biomass. However, this land cover limit should be decreased to 921 ha so as to limit the total annual water use (for biomass production) below the amount available from rainfall (11,000 m3 ha−1 yr−1). Moreover, the study highlighted that maximizing the harvested wood volume or LEV would come at the cost of a decreased aboveground carbon stock and volume of ending inventory and higher total water use. It also provided alternative optimal Pareto-front points, among which decision makers will be able to select their preferred targets. The current study also showed the potential for the application of Pareto frontier approaches to support the development of effective ecological/economic management strategies and the design of land use policies in an Ethiopian context

The sustainable management of land and fisheries resources using multicriteria techniques: A meta-analysis

In recent years modern societies have attached a multifunctional requirement to the use of renewable resources, making their optimal sustainable management more complex. In the last decades, in many cases, this complexity is addressed by formulating management models with the help of the concepts and methods belonging to the well-known multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) paradigm. The purpose of this paper was to undertake a hermeneutic meta-analysis of the literature provided in primary journals on issues related to the management of these resources with the help of the MCDM paradigm. In this way, the paper aimed to obtain new, basic insights with considerations that might improve the efficiency of future research in the field studied. The meta-analysis was implemented by formulating and testing a battery of hypotheses of how the MCDM methods have been used in the past for the formulation of management models for the type of resource analyzed.The work of Carlos Romero, Carlos Iglesias-Merchan, and Luis Diaz-Balteiro was funded by the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of Spain under project AGL2015-68657-R. Additionally, this research was partially financed by the European Union’s H2020 Research and Innovation Programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions, grant agreement No. 691149–SuFoRun

Metaheuristic Algorithms for Spatial Multi-Objective Decision Making

Spatial decision making is an everyday activity, common to individuals and organizations. However, recently there is an increasing interest in the importance of spatial decision-making systems, as more decision-makers with concerns about sustainability, social, economic, environmental, land use planning, and transportation issues discover the benefits of geographical information. Many spatial decision problems are regarded as optimization problems, which involve a large set of feasible alternatives, multiple conflicting objectives that are difficult and complex to solve. Hence, Multi-Objective Optimization methods (MOO)—metaheuristic algorithms integrated with Geographical Information Systems (GIS) are appealing to be powerful tools in these regards, yet their implementation in spatial context is still challenging. In this thesis, various metaheuristic algorithms are adopted and improved to solve complex spatial problems. Disaster management and urban planning are used as case studies of this thesis.These case studies are explored in the four papers that are part of this thesis. In paper I, four metaheuristic algorithms have been implemented on the same spatial multi-objective problem—evacuation planning, to investigate their performance and potential. The findings show that all tested algorithms were effective in solving the problem, although in general, some had higher performance, while others showed the potential of being flexible to be modified to fit better to the problem. In the same context, paper II identified the effectiveness of the Multi-objective Artificial Bee Colony (MOABC) algorithm when improved to solve the evacuation problem. In paper III, we proposed a multi-objective optimization approach for urban evacuation planning that considered three spatial objectives which were optimized using an improved Multi-Objective Cuckoo Search algorithm (MOCS). Both improved algorithms (MOABC and MOCS) proved to be efficient in solving evacuation planning when compared to their standard version and other algorithms. Moreover, Paper IV proposed an urban land-use allocation model that involved three spatial objectives and proposed an improved Non-dominated Sorting Biogeography-based Optimization algorithm (NSBBO) to solve the problem efficiently and effectively.Overall, the work in this thesis demonstrates that different metaheuristic algorithms have the potential to change the way spatial decision problems are structured and can improve the transparency and facilitate decision-makers to map solutions and interactively modify decision preferences through trade-offs between multiple objectives. Moreover, the obtained results can be used in a systematic way to develop policy recommendations. From the perspective of GIS - Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) research, the thesis contributes to spatial optimization modelling and extended knowledge on the application of metaheuristic algorithms. The insights from this thesis could also benefit the development and practical implementation of other Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques to enhance the capabilities of GIS for tackling complex spatial multi-objective decision problems in the future

An Analysis of Agricultural Systems Modelling Approaches and Examples to Support Future Policy Development under Disruptive Changes in New Zealand

Agricultural systems have entered a period of significant disruption due to impacts from change drivers, increasingly stringent environmental regulations and the need to reduce unwanted discharges, and emerging technologies and biotechnologies. Governments and industries are developing strategies to respond to the risks and opportunities associated with these disruptors. Modelling is a useful tool for system conceptualisation, understanding, and scenario testing. Today, New Zealand and other nations need integrated modelling tools at the national scale to help industries and stakeholders plan for future disruptive changes. In this paper, following a scoping review process, we analyse modelling approaches and available agricultural systems’ model examples per thematic applications at the regional to national scale to define the best options for the national policy development. Each modelling approach has specificities, such as stakeholder engagement capacity, complex systems reproduction, predictive or prospective scenario testing, and users should consider coupling approaches for greater added value. The efficiency of spatial decision support tools working with a system dynamics approach can help holistically in stakeholders’ participation and understanding, and for improving land planning and policy. This model combination appears to be the most appropriate for the New Zealand national context

Evaluation of land suitability methods with reference to neglected and underutilised crop species: A scoping review

In agriculture, land use and land classification address questions such as “where”, “why” and “when” a particular crop is grown within a particular agroecology. To date, there are several land suitability analysis (LSA) methods, but there is no consensus on the best method for crop suitability analysis. We conducted a scoping review to evaluate methodological strategies for LSA. Secondary to this, we assessed which of these would be suitable for neglected and underutilised crop species (NUS). The review classified LSA methods reported in articles as traditional (26.6%) and modern (63.4%). Modern approaches, including multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods such as analytical hierarchy process (AHP) (14.9%) and fuzzy methods (12.9%); crop simulation models (9.9%) and machine learning related methods (25.7%) are gaining popularity over traditional methods. The MCDM methods, namely AHP and fuzzy, are commonly applied to LSA while crop models and machine learning related methods are gaining popularity. A total of 67 parameters from climatic, hydrology, soil, socio-economic and landscape properties are essential in LSA. Unavailability and the inclusion of categorical datasets from social sources is a challenge

Considering scale within optimization procedures for water management decisions: Balancing environmental flows and human needs

A key issue in optimization model development is the selection of spatial and temporal scale representing the system. This study proposes a framework for reasoning about scale in this context, drawing on a review of studies applying multi-objective optimization for water management involving environmental flows. We suggest that scale is determined by the management problem, constrained by data availability, computational, and model capabilities. There is therefore an inherent trade-off between problem perception and available modelling capability, which can either be resolved by obtaining data needed or tailoring analysis to the data available. In the interest of fostering transparency in this trade-off process, this paper outlines phases of model development, associated decisions, and available options, and scale implications of each decision. The problem perception phase collects system information about objectives, limiting conditions, and management options. The problem formulation phase collects and uses data, information, and methods about system structure and behaviour.Joseph Guillaume received funding from an Australian Research Council Discovery Early Career Researcher Award (project no. DE190100317). Avril Horne received funding from Australian Research Council Discovery Early Career Researcher Award (project no. DE180100550

Analyzing spatial patterns and dynamics of landscapes and ecosystem services – Exploring fine-scale data and indicators

In den vergangenen Jahrzehnten hat der Einfluss des Menschen auf Ökosysteme stark zugenommen. Tendenzen der Landnutzungsänderung, darunter die Ausdehnung von Städten und die Intensivierung der Landwirtschaft als Folge des Bevölkerungsanstiegs und damit des Nahrungsmittel- und Energiebedarfs, führen zu Umweltproblemen wie dem Verlust von Lebensraum und biologischer Vielfalt. Die zunehmende Verfügbarkeit von Daten mit feiner räumlicher Auflösung kann die Analyse von Merkmalen und Prozessen in Landschaften mit Hilfe von räumlichen Metriken unterstützen. Das Ziel dieser Arbeit ist es, feinskalige Daten und räumliche Metriken zu integrieren, um Indikatoren zur Messung und Bewertung von Landnutzung, Ökosystemdienstleistungen und deren räumlichen Mustern zu entwickeln und folgende Fragen zu beantworten: Wie können Landnutzungsänderungen und Ökosystemleistungen einer Landschaft beschrieben und analysiert werden? Und, wie kann die Landschaftsperspektive zu unserem Verständnis von Landsystemen beitragen? In zwei verschiedenen Weltregionen werden Landschaften mit Hilfe von Hexagonen als räumliche Einheiten untersucht. Diese dienen zur Analyse von räumlichen Mustern und Beziehungen zwischen verschiedenen Indikatoren (z. B. Ökosystemdienstleistungen) und die Konzeptualisierung von Prozessen auf Landschaftsebene. Obwohl sich einige Phänomene auf feinen räumlichen Skalen manifestieren, ist es für die Operationalisierung und Überwachung dieser Prozesse notwendig, ‚herauszuzoomen‘. Der Landschaftsansatz im Zusammenhang mit Ökosystemleistungen bietet wichtige Perspektiven im Hinblick auf Umweltauswirkungen, die durch Landnutzungsänderungen verursacht werden. Dabei können Indikatoren, die die ökologische, ökonomische und soziale Dimension verknüpfen, dazu beitragen, regionalspezifisches Wissen über Landschaftsdynamiken zu erlangen und dieses Wissen an Entscheidungsträger weiterzugeben, um gezielte Maßnahmen für ein nachhaltiges Landmanagement zu entwickeln.Over the last decades, anthropogenic pressures on ecosystems have been increasing. Trends of land use change including urban expansion and agricultural intensification driven by population increase, and hence food and energy demand, cause environmental challenges including habitat and biodiversity loss. Analyzing major trends of land use change requires additional metrics to capture local processes on a landscape spatial scale. Increasing fine-scale data availability can support analyses of characteristics and processes of landscapes with the help of spatial metrics, e.g. distance or density measures. The aims of this thesis are to incorporate fine-scale data and spatial metrics to develop indicators to measure and assess land-use, ecosystem services (ESS) and their spatial patterns to answer the following questions: How can land use change and ecosystem services of landscapes be described and analyzed? And how can the landscape perspective contribute to our understanding of land systems? The thesis includes three case studies in two different world regions: 1) characteristics of land use within a peri-urban gradient in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, 2) characteristics of agricultural landscapes in Brandenburg, Germany, and 3) ecosystem service relationships at different spatial units and scales. In both regions, landscapes are investigated with hexagons as spatial units for the analysis of spatial patterns and relationships among different indicators (i.e., ESS) and conceptualize processes on a landscape level. The landscape approach in context with ecosystem services offers important perspectives regarding environmental impacts caused by land use change. Thereby, metrics integrating the ecological, economic, and social dimensions can support obtaining region-specific knowledge on landscape dynamics and transferring this knowledge to decision-makers to design targeted measures towards sustainable land management

Introductory Overview: Optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms and other Metaheuristics

Environmental models are used extensively to evaluate the effectiveness of a range of design, planning, operational, management and policy options. However, the number of options that can be evaluated manually is generally limited, making it difficult to identify the most suitable options to consider in decision-making processes. By linking environmental models with evolutionary and other metaheuristic optimization algorithms, the decision options that make best use of scarce resources, achieve the best environmental outcomes for a given budget or provide the best trade-offs between competing objectives can be identified. This Introductory Overview presents reasons for embedding formal optimization approaches in environmental decision-making processes, details how environmental problems are formulated as optimization problems and outlines how single- and multi-objective optimization approaches find good solutions to environmental problems. Practical guidance and potential challenges are also provided.</p