690 research outputs found

    Cooperative localization by dual foot-mounted inertial sensors and inter-agent ranging

    Full text link
    The implementation challenges of cooperative localization by dual foot-mounted inertial sensors and inter-agent ranging are discussed and work on the subject is reviewed. System architecture and sensor fusion are identified as key challenges. A partially decentralized system architecture based on step-wise inertial navigation and step-wise dead reckoning is presented. This architecture is argued to reduce the computational cost and required communication bandwidth by around two orders of magnitude while only giving negligible information loss in comparison with a naive centralized implementation. This makes a joint global state estimation feasible for up to a platoon-sized group of agents. Furthermore, robust and low-cost sensor fusion for the considered setup, based on state space transformation and marginalization, is presented. The transformation and marginalization are used to give the necessary flexibility for presented sampling based updates for the inter-agent ranging and ranging free fusion of the two feet of an individual agent. Finally, characteristics of the suggested implementation are demonstrated with simulations and a real-time system implementation.Comment: 14 page

    PDR with a Foot-Mounted IMU and Ramp Detection

    Get PDF
    The localization of persons in indoor environments is nowadays an open problem. There are partial solutions based on the deployment of a network of sensors (Local Positioning Systems or LPS). Other solutions only require the installation of an inertial sensor on the personโ€™s body (Pedestrian Dead-Reckoning or PDR). PDR solutions integrate the signals coming from an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU), which usually contains 3 accelerometers and 3 gyroscopes. The main problem of PDR is the accumulation of positioning errors due to the drift caused by the noise in the sensors. This paper presents a PDR solution that incorporates a drift correction method based on detecting the access ramps usually found in buildings. The ramp correction method is implemented over a PDR framework that uses an Inertial Navigation algorithm (INS) and an IMU attached to the personโ€™s foot. Unlike other approaches that use external sensors to correct the drift error, we only use one IMU on the foot. To detect a ramp, the slope of the terrain on which the user is walking, and the change in height sensed when moving forward, are estimated from the IMU. After detection, the ramp is checked for association with one of the existing in a database. For each associated ramp, a position correction is fed into the Kalman Filter in order to refine the INS-PDR solution. Drift-free localization is achieved with positioning errors below 2 meters for 1,000-meter-long routes in a building with a few ramps

    Enhanced Indoor Localization System based on Inertial Navigation

    Get PDF
    An algorithm for indoor localization of pedestrians using an improved Inertial Navigation system is presented for smartphone based applications. When using standard inertial navigation algorithm, errors in sensors due to random noise and bias result in a large drift from the actual location with time. Novel corrections are introduced for the basic system to increase the accuracy by counteracting the accumulation of this drift error, which are applied using a Kalman filter framework. A generalized velocity model was applied to correct the walking velocity and the accuracy of the algorithm was investigated with three different velocity models which were derived from the actual velocity measured at the hip of walking person. Spatial constraints based on knowledge of indoor environment were applied to correct the walking direction. Analysis of absolute heading corrections from magnetic direction was performed . Results show that the proposed method with Gaussian velocity model achieves competitive accuracy with a 30\% less variance over Step and Heading approach proving the accuracy and robustness of proposed method. We also investigated the frequency of applying corrections and found that a 4\% corrections per step is required for improved accuracy. The proposed method is applicable in indoor localization and tracking applications based on smart phone where traditional approaches such as GNSS suffers from many issues

    ์ ๋ถ„ ๋ฐ ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ• ์œตํ•ฉ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์Šค๋งˆํŠธํฐ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๋™์ž‘์—์„œ ๋ณดํ–‰ ํ•ญ๋ฒ•

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„ํ•ญ๊ณต๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2020. 8. ๋ฐ•์ฐฌ๊ตญ.In this dissertation, an IA-PA fusion-based PDR (Pedestrian Dead Reckoning) using low-cost inertial sensors is proposed to improve the indoor position estimation. Specifically, an IA (Integration Approach)-based PDR algorithm combined with measurements from PA (Parametric Approach) is constructed so that the algorithm is operated even in various poses that occur when a pedestrian moves with a smartphone indoors. In addition, I propose an algorithm that estimates the device attitude robustly in a disturbing situation by an ellipsoidal method. In addition, by using the machine learning-based pose recognition, it is possible to improve the position estimation performance by varying the measurement update according to the poses. First, I propose an adaptive attitude estimation based on ellipsoid technique to accurately estimate the direction of movement of a smartphone device. The AHRS (Attitude and Heading Reference System) uses an accelerometer and a magnetometer as measurements to calculate the attitude based on the gyro and to compensate for drift caused by gyro sensor errors. In general, the attitude estimation performance is poor in acceleration and geomagnetic disturbance situations, but in order to effectively improve the estimation performance, this dissertation proposes an ellipsoid-based adaptive attitude estimation technique. When a measurement disturbance comes in, it is possible to update the measurement more accurately than the adaptive estimation technique without considering the direction by adjusting the measurement covariance with the ellipsoid method considering the direction of the disturbance. In particular, when the disturbance only comes in one axis, the proposed algorithm can use the measurement partly by updating the other two axes considering the direction. The proposed algorithm shows its effectiveness in attitude estimation under disturbances through the rate table and motion capture equipment. Next, I propose a PDR algorithm that integrates IA and PA that can be operated in various poses. When moving indoors using a smartphone, there are many degrees of freedom, so various poses such as making a phone call, texting, and putting a pants pocket are possible. In the existing smartphone-based positioning algorithms, the position is estimated based on the PA, which can be used only when the pedestrian's walking direction and the device's direction coincide, and if it does not, the position error due to the mismatch in angle is large. In order to solve this problem, this dissertation proposes an algorithm that constructs state variables based on the IA and uses the position vector from the PA as a measurement. If the walking direction and the device heading do not match based on the pose recognized through machine learning technique, the position is updated in consideration of the direction calculated using PCA (Principal Component Analysis) and the step length obtained through the PA. It can be operated robustly even in various poses that occur. Through experiments considering various operating conditions and paths, it is confirmed that the proposed method stably estimates the position and improves performance even in various indoor environments.๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ €๊ฐ€ํ˜• ๊ด€์„ฑ์„ผ์„œ๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๋ณดํ–‰ํ•ญ๋ฒ•์‹œ์Šคํ…œ (PDR: Pedestrian Dead Reckoning)์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ–ฅ์ƒ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณดํ–‰์ž๊ฐ€ ์‹ค๋‚ด์—์„œ ์Šค๋งˆํŠธํฐ์„ ๋“ค๊ณ  ์ด๋™ํ•  ๋•Œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋™์ž‘ ์ƒํ™ฉ์—์„œ๋„ ์šด์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก, ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ธก์ •์น˜๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ์ ๋ถ„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ๋ณดํ–‰์ž ํ•ญ๋ฒ• ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ํƒ€์›์ฒด ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ž์„ธ ์ถ”์ • ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์—ฌ ์™ธ๋ž€ ์ƒํ™ฉ์—์„œ๋„ ๊ฐ•์ธํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ž์„ธ๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„ํ•™์Šต ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ๋™์ž‘ ์ธ์‹ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉ, ๋™์ž‘์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ธก์ •์น˜ ์—…๋ฐ์ดํŠธ๋ฅผ ๋‹ฌ๋ฆฌํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์œ„์น˜ ์ถ”์ • ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚จ๋‹ค. ๋จผ์ € ์Šค๋งˆํŠธํฐ ๊ธฐ๊ธฐ์˜ ์ด๋™ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์„ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ํƒ€์›์ฒด ๊ธฐ๋ฒ• ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ ์‘ ์ž์„ธ ์ถ”์ •์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ž์„ธ ์ถ”์ • ๊ธฐ๋ฒ• (AHRS: Attitude and Heading Reference System)์€ ์ž์ด๋กœ๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ์ž์„ธ๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜๊ณ  ์ž์ด๋กœ ์„ผ์„œ์˜ค์ฐจ์— ์˜ํ•ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ๋“œ๋ฆฌํ”„ํŠธ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ •ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ธก์ •์น˜๋กœ ๊ฐ€์†๋„๊ณ„์™€ ์ง€์ž๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ€์† ๋ฐ ์ง€์ž๊ณ„ ์™ธ๋ž€ ์ƒํ™ฉ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ž์„ธ ์ถ”์ • ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด ๋–จ์–ด์ง€๋Š”๋ฐ, ์ถ”์ • ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ํƒ€์›์ฒด ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ ์‘ ์ž์„ธ ์ถ”์ • ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ธก์ •์น˜ ์™ธ๋ž€์ด ๋“ค์–ด์˜ค๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์™ธ๋ž€์˜ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ํƒ€์›์ฒด ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ ์ธก์ •์น˜ ๊ณต๋ถ„์‚ฐ์„ ์กฐ์ •ํ•ด์คŒ์œผ๋กœ์จ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ์ ์‘ ์ถ”์ • ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•๋ณด๋‹ค ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ธก์ •์น˜ ์—…๋ฐ์ดํŠธ๋ฅผ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ์™ธ๋ž€์ด ํ•œ ์ถ•์œผ๋กœ๋งŒ ๋“ค์–ด์˜ค๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์€ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•ด ๋‚˜๋จธ์ง€ ๋‘ ์ถ•์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ์—…๋ฐ์ดํŠธ ํ•ด์คŒ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์ธก์ •์น˜๋ฅผ ๋ถ€๋ถ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ ˆ์ดํŠธ ํ…Œ์ด๋ธ”, ๋ชจ์…˜ ์บก์ณ ์žฅ๋น„๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์˜ ์ž์„ธ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋จ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์Œ์œผ๋กœ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋™์ž‘์—์„œ๋„ ์šด์šฉ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ์ ๋ถ„ ๋ฐ ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์œตํ•ฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋ณดํ–‰ํ•ญ๋ฒ• ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์Šค๋งˆํŠธํฐ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•ด ์‹ค๋‚ด๋ฅผ ์ด๋™ํ•  ๋•Œ์—๋Š” ์ž์œ ๋„๊ฐ€ ํฌ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ „ํ™” ๊ฑธ๊ธฐ, ๋ฌธ์ž, ๋ฐ”์ง€ ์ฃผ๋จธ๋‹ˆ ๋„ฃ๊ธฐ ๋“ฑ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋™์ž‘์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ์Šค๋งˆํŠธํฐ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋ณดํ–‰ ํ•ญ๋ฒ•์—์„œ๋Š” ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ์œ„์น˜๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ, ์ด๋Š” ๋ณดํ–‰์ž์˜ ์ง„ํ–‰ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ๊ณผ ๊ธฐ๊ธฐ์˜ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์ด ์ผ์น˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—๋งŒ ์‚ฌ์šฉ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์ผ์น˜ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ž์„ธ ์˜ค์ฐจ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ์œ„์น˜ ์˜ค์ฐจ๊ฐ€ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ ๋ถ„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ์ƒํƒœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜๊ณ  ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋‚˜์˜ค๋Š” ์œ„์น˜ ๋ฒกํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ธก์ •์น˜๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋งŒ์•ฝ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„ํ•™์Šต์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ธ์‹ํ•œ ๋™์ž‘์„ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ์ง„ํ–‰ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ๊ณผ ๊ธฐ๊ธฐ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์ด ์ผ์น˜ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์ฃผ์„ฑ๋ถ„ ๋ถ„์„์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•œ ์ง„ํ–‰๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•ด ์ง„ํ–‰ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์„, ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์–ป์€ ๋ณดํญ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ์—…๋ฐ์ดํŠธํ•ด ์คŒ์œผ๋กœ์จ ๋ณดํ–‰ ์ค‘ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๋™์ž‘์—์„œ๋„ ๊ฐ•์ธํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์šด์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋™์ž‘ ์ƒํ™ฉ ๋ฐ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์œ„์—์„œ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์‹ค๋‚ด ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ๋„ ์•ˆ์ •์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ„์น˜๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๊ณ  ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋จ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Motivation and Background 1 1.2 Objectives and Contribution 5 1.3 Organization of the Dissertation 6 Chapter 2 Pedestrian Dead Reckoning System 8 2.1 Overview of Pedestrian Dead Reckoning 8 2.2 Parametric Approach 9 2.2.1 Step detection algorithm 11 2.2.2 Step length estimation algorithm 13 2.2.3 Heading estimation 14 2.3 Integration Approach 15 2.3.1 Extended Kalman filter 16 2.3.2 INS-EKF-ZUPT 19 2.4 Activity Recognition using Machine Learning 21 2.4.1 Challenges in HAR 21 2.4.2 Activity recognition chain 22 Chapter 3 Attitude Estimation in Smartphone 26 3.1 Adaptive Attitude Estimation in Smartphone 26 3.1.1 Indirect Kalman filter-based attitude estimation 26 3.1.2 Conventional attitude estimation algorithms 29 3.1.3 Adaptive attitude estimation using ellipsoidal methods 30 3.2 Experimental Results 36 3.2.1 Simulation 36 3.2.2 Rate table experiment 44 3.2.3 Handheld rotation experiment 46 3.2.4 Magnetic disturbance experiment 49 3.3 Summary 53 Chapter 4 Pedestrian Dead Reckoning in Multiple Poses of a Smartphone 54 4.1 System Overview 55 4.2 Machine Learning-based Pose Classification 56 4.2.1 Training dataset 57 4.2.2 Feature extraction and selection 58 4.2.3 Pose classification result using supervised learning in PDR 62 4.3 Fusion of the Integration and Parametric Approaches in PDR 65 4.3.1 System model 67 4.3.2 Measurement model 67 4.3.3 Mode selection 74 4.3.4 Observability analysis 76 4.4 Experimental Results 82 4.4.1 AHRS results 82 4.4.2 PCA results 84 4.4.3 IA-PA results 88 4.5 Summary 100 Chapter 5 Conclusions 103 5.1 Summary of the Contributions 103 5.2 Future Works 105 ๊ตญ๋ฌธ์ดˆ๋ก 125 Acknowledgements 127Docto

    Map matching and heuristic elimination of gyro drift for personal navigation systems in GPS-denied conditions

    Full text link
    This paper introduces a method for the substantial reduction of heading errors in inertial navigation systems used under GPS-denied conditions. Presumably, the method is applicable for both vehicle-based and personal navigation systems, but experiments were performed only with a personal navigation system called 'personal dead reckoning' (PDR). In order to work under GPS-denied conditions, the PDR system uses a foot-mounted inertial measurement unit (IMU). However, gyro drift in this IMU can cause large heading errors after just a few minutes of walking. To reduce these errors, the map-matched heuristic drift elimination (MAPHDE) method was developed, which estimates gyro drift errors by comparing IMU-derived heading to the direction of the nearest street segment in a database of street maps. A heuristic component in this method provides tolerance to short deviations from walking along the street, such as when crossing streets or intersections. MAPHDE keeps heading errors almost at zero, and, as a result, position errors are dramatically reduced. In this paper, MAPHDE was used in a variety of outdoor walks, without any use of GPS. This paper explains the MAPHDE method in detail and presents experimental results.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/90785/1/0957-0233_22_2_025205.pd

    Pedestrian dead reckoning employing simultaneous activity recognition cues

    Get PDF
    Cataloged from PDF version of article.We consider the human localization problem using body-worn inertial/magnetic sensor units. Inertial sensors are characterized by a drift error caused by the integration of their rate output to obtain position information. Because of this drift, the position and orientation data obtained from inertial sensors are reliable over only short periods of time. Therefore, position updates from externally referenced sensors are essential. However, if the map of the environment is known, the activity context of the user can provide information about his position. In particular, the switches in the activity context correspond to discrete locations on the map. By performing localization simultaneously with activity recognition, we detect the activity context switches and use the corresponding position information as position updates in a localization filter. The localization filter also involves a smoother that combines the two estimates obtained by running the zero-velocity update algorithm both forward and backward in time. We performed experiments with eight subjects in indoor and outdoor environments involving walking, turning and standing activities. Using a spatial error criterion, we show that the position errors can be decreased by about 85% on the average. We also present the results of two 3D experiments performed in realistic indoor environments and demonstrate that it is possible to achieve over 90% error reduction in position by performing localization simultaneously with activity recognition
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore