14 research outputs found

    On Cooperative Coevolution and Global Crossover

    Full text link
    Cooperative coevolutionary algorithms (CCEAs) divide a given problem in to a number of subproblems and use an evolutionary algorithm to solve each subproblem. This short paper is concerned with the scenario under which only a single, global fitness measure exists. By removing the typically used subproblem partnering mechanism, it is suggested that such CCEAs can be viewed as making use of a generalised version of the global crossover operator introduced in early Evolution Strategies. Using the well-known NK model of fitness landscapes, the effects of varying aspects of global crossover with respect to the ruggedness of the underlying fitness landscape are explored. Results suggest improvements over the most widely used form of CCEAs, something further demonstrated using other well-known test functions

    CES-485 Approximating the Set of Pareto Optimal Solutions in Both the Decision and Objective Spaces by an Estimation of Distribution Algorithm

    Get PDF
    Most existing multiobjective evolutionary algorithms aim at approximating the PF, the distribution of the Pareto optimal solutions in the objective space. In many real-life applications, however, a good approximation to the PS, the distribution of the Pareto optimal solutions in the decision space, is also required by a decision maker. This paper considers a class of MOPs, in which the dimensionalities of the PS and PF are different so that a good approximation to the PF might not approximate the PS very well. It proposes a probabilistic model based multiobjective evolutionary algorithm, called MMEA, for approximating the PS and the PF simultaneously for a MOP in this class. In the modelling phase of MMEA, the population is clustered into a number of subpopulations based on their distribution in the objective space, the PCA technique is used to detect the dimensionality of the centroid of each subpopulation, and then a probabilistic model is built for modelling the distribution of the Pareto optimal solutions in the decision space. Such modelling procedure could promote the population diversity in both the decision and objective spaces. To ease the burden of setting the number of subpopulations, a dynamic strategy for periodically adjusting it has been adopted in MMEA. The experimental comparison between MMEA and the two other methods, KP1 and Omni-Optimizer on a set of test instances, some of which are proposed in this paper, have been made in this paper. It is clear from the experiments that MMEA has a big advantage over the two other methods in approximating both the PS and the PF of a MOP when the PS is a nonlinear manifold, although it might not be able to perform significantly better in the case when the PS is a linear manifold

    A nondominated sorting genetic algorithm for bi-objective network coding based multicast routing problems

    Get PDF
    Network coding is a new communication technique that generalizes routing, where, instead of simply forwarding the packets they receive, intermediate nodes are allowed to recombine (code) together some of the data packets received from different incoming links if necessary. By doing so, the maximum information flow in a network can always be achieved. However, performing coding operations (i.e. recombining data packets) incur computational overhead and delay of data processing at the corresponding nodes. In this paper, we investigate the optimization of the network coding based multicast routing problem with respect to two widely considered objectives, i.e. the cost and the delay. In general, reducing cost can result into a cheaper multicast solution for network service providers, while decreasing delay improves the service quality for users. Hence we model the problem as a bi-objective optimization problem to minimize the total cost and the maximum transmission delay of a multicast. This bi-objective optimization problem has not been considered in the literature. We adapt the Elitist Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) for the new problem by introducing two adjustments. As there are many infeasible solutions in the search space, the first adjustment is an initialization scheme to generate a population of feasible and diversified solutions. These initial solutions help to guide the search towards the Pareto-optimal front. In addition, the original NSGA-II is very likely to produce a number of solutions with identical objective values at each generation, which may seriously deteriorate the level of diversity and the optimization performance. The second adjustment is an individual delegate scheme where, among those solutions with identical objective values, only one of them is retained in the population while the others are deleted. Experimental results reveal that each adopted adjustment contributes to the adaptation of NSGA-II for the problem concerned. Moreover, the adjusted NSGA-II outperforms a number of state-of-the-art multiobjective evolutionary algorithms with respect to the quality of the obtained nondominated solutions in the conducted experiments

    Study of hybrid strategies for multi-objective optimization using gradient based methods and evolutionary algorithms

    Get PDF
    Most of the optimization problems encountered in engineering have conflicting objectives. In order to solve these problems, genetic algorithms (GAs) and gradient-based methods are widely used. GAs are relatively easy to implement, because these algorithms only require first-order information of the objectives and constraints. On the other hand, GAs do not have a standard termination condition and therefore they may not converge to the exact solutions. Gradient-based methods, on the other hand, are based on first- and higher-order information of the objectives and constraints. These algorithms converge faster to the exact solutions in solving single-objective optimization problems, but are inefficient for multi-objective optimization problems (MOOPs) and unable to solve those with non-convex objective spaces. The work in this dissertation focuses on developing a hybrid strategy for solving MOOPs based on feasible sequential quadratic programming (FSQP) and nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II). The hybrid algorithms developed in this dissertation are tested using benchmark problems and evaluated based on solution distribution, solution accuracy, and execution time. Based on these performance factors, the best hybrid strategy is determined and found to be generally efficient with good solution distributions in most of the cases studied. The best hybrid algorithm is applied to the design of a crushing tube and is shown to have relatively well-distributed solutions and good efficiency compared to solutions obtained by NSGA-II and FSQP alone

    Evolutionary algorithm for multiobjective optimization: Cooperative coevolution and new features

    Get PDF
    Master'sMASTER OF ENGINEERIN

    Scalable parallel evolutionary optimisation based on high performance computing

    Get PDF
    Evolutionary algorithms (EAs) have been successfully applied to solve various challenging optimisation problems. Due to their stochastic nature, EAs typically require considerable time to find desirable solutions; especially for increasingly complex and large-scale problems. As a result, many works studied implementing EAs on parallel computing facilities to accelerate the time-consuming processes. Recently, the rapid development of modern parallel computing facilities such as the high performance computing (HPC) bring not only unprecedented computational capabilities but also challenges on designing parallel algorithms. This thesis mainly focuses on designing scalable parallel evolutionary optimisation (SPEO) frameworks which run efficiently on the HPC. Motivated by the interesting phenomenon that many EAs begin to employ increasingly large population sizes, this thesis firstly studies the effect of a large population size through comprehensive experiments. Numerical results indicate that a large population benefits to the solving of complex problems but requires a large number of maximal fitness evaluations (FEs). However, since sequential EAs usually requires a considerable computing time to achieve extensive FEs, we propose a scalable parallel evolutionary optimisation framework that can efficiently deploy parallel EAs over many CPU cores at CPU-only HPC. On the other hand, since EAs using a large number of FEs can produce massive useful information in the course of evolution, we design a surrogate-based approach to learn from this historical information and to better solve complex problems. Then this approach is implemented in parallel based on the proposed scalable parallel framework to achieve remarkable speedups. Since demanding a great computing power on CPU-only HPC is usually very expensive, we design a framework based on GPU-enabled HPC to improve the cost-effectiveness of parallel EAs. The proposed framework can efficiently accelerate parallel EAs using many GPUs and can achieve superior cost-effectiveness. However, since it is very challenging to correctly implement parallel EAs on the GPU, we propose a set of guidelines to verify the correctness of GPU-based EAs. In order to examine these guidelines, they are employed to verify a GPU-based brain storm optimisation that is also proposed in this thesis. In conclusion, the comprehensively experimental study is firstly conducted to investigate the impacts of a large population. After that, a SPEO framework based on CPU-only HPC is proposed and is employed to accelerate a time-consuming implementation of EA. Finally, the correctness verification of implementing EAs based on a single GPU is discussed and the SPEO framework is then extended to be deployed based on GPU-enabled HPC
    corecore