Prevalence of haptic feedback in robot-mediated surgery : a systematic review of literature

© 2017 Springer-Verlag. This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Journal of Robotic Surgery. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0763-4With the successful uptake and inclusion of robotic systems in minimally invasive surgery and with the increasing application of robotic surgery (RS) in numerous surgical specialities worldwide, there is now a need to develop and enhance the technology further. One such improvement is the implementation and amalgamation of haptic feedback technology into RS which will permit the operating surgeon on the console to receive haptic information on the type of tissue being operated on. The main advantage of using this is to allow the operating surgeon to feel and control the amount of force applied to different tissues during surgery thus minimising the risk of tissue damage due to both the direct and indirect effects of excessive tissue force or tension being applied during RS. We performed a two-rater systematic review to identify the latest developments and potential avenues of improving technology in the application and implementation of haptic feedback technology to the operating surgeon on the console during RS. This review provides a summary of technological enhancements in RS, considering different stages of work, from proof of concept to cadaver tissue testing, surgery in animals, and finally real implementation in surgical practice. We identify that at the time of this review, while there is a unanimous agreement regarding need for haptic and tactile feedback, there are no solutions or products available that address this need. There is a scope and need for new developments in haptic augmentation for robot-mediated surgery with the aim of improving patient care and robotic surgical technology further.Peer reviewe

Haptics in Robot-Assisted Surgery: Challenges and Benefits

Robotic surgery is transforming the current surgical practice, not only by improving the conventional surgical methods but also by introducing innovative robot-enhanced approaches that broaden the capabilities of clinicians. Being mainly of man-machine collaborative type, surgical robots are seen as media that transfer pre- and intra-operative information to the operator and reproduce his/her motion, with appropriate filtering, scaling, or limitation, to physically interact with the patient. The field, however, is far from maturity and, more critically, is still a subject of controversy in medical communities. Limited or absent haptic feedback is reputed to be among reasons that impede further spread of surgical robots. In this paper objectives and challenges of deploying haptic technologies in surgical robotics is discussed and a systematic review is performed on works that have studied the effects of providing haptic information to the users in major branches of robotic surgery. It has been tried to encompass both classical works and the state of the art approaches, aiming at delivering a comprehensive and balanced survey both for researchers starting their work in this field and for the experts

Robotics in neurosurgery: A literature review

Robotic surgery has been the forte of minimally invasive stereo-tactic procedures for some decades now. Ongoing advancements and evolutionary developments require substantial evidence to build the consensus about its efficacy in the field of neurosurgery. Main obstacle in obtaining successful results in neurosurgery is fine neural structures and other anatomical limitations. Currently, human rationalisation and robotic precision works in symbiosis to provide improved results. We reviewed the current data about recent interventions. Robots are capable of providing virtual data, superior spatial resolution and geometric accuracy, superior dexterity, faster manoeuvring and non-fatigability with steady motion. Robotic surgery also allows simulation of virtual procedures which turn out to be of great succour for young apprentice surgeons to practise their surgical skills in a safe environment. It also allows senior professionals to rehearse difficult cases before involving into considerable risky procedures

Virtual reality and surgical oncology

More than 80% of people diagnosed with cancer will require surgery. However, less than 5% have access to safe, affordable and timely surgery in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) settings mostly due to the lack of trained workforce. Since its creation, virtual reality (VR) has been heralded as a viable adjunct to surgical training, but its adoption in surgical oncology to date is poorly understood. We undertook a systematic review to determine the application of VR across different surgical specialties, modalities and cancer pathway globally between January 2011 and 2021. We reviewed their characteristics and respective methods of validation of 24 articles. The results revealed gaps in application and accessibility of VR with a proclivity for high-income countries and high-risk, complex oncological surgeries. There is a lack of standardisation of clinical evaluation of VR, both in terms of clinical trials and implementation science. While all VR illustrated face and content validity, only around two-third exhibited construct validity and predictive validity was lacking overall. In conclusion, the asynchrony between VR development and actual global cancer surgery demand means the technology is not effectively, efficiently and equitably utilised to realise its surgical capacity-building potential. Future research should prioritise cost-effective VR technologies with predictive validity for high demand, open cancer surgeries required in LMICs.</p

The Challenge of Augmented Reality in Surgery

Imaging has revolutionized surgery over the last 50 years. Diagnostic imaging is a key tool for deciding to perform surgery during disease management; intraoperative imaging is one of the primary drivers for minimally invasive surgery (MIS), and postoperative imaging enables effective follow-up and patient monitoring. However, notably, there is still relatively little interchange of information or imaging modality fusion between these different clinical pathway stages. This book chapter provides a critique of existing augmented reality (AR) methods or application studies described in the literature using relevant examples. The aim is not to provide a comprehensive review, but rather to give an indication of the clinical areas in which AR has been proposed, to begin to explain the lack of clinical systems and to provide some clear guidelines to those intending pursue research in this area

Robotics Applications in Neurology: A Review of Recent Advancements and Future Directions

Robotic technology has the potential to revolutionize the field of neurology by providing new methods for diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of neurological disorders. In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in the development of robotics applications for neurology, driven by advances in sensing, actuation, and control systems. This review paper provides a comprehensive overview of the recent advancements in robotics technology for neurology, with a focus on three main areas: diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation. In the area of diagnosis, robotics has been used for developing new imaging techniques and tools for more accurate and non-invasive mapping of brain structures and functions. For treatment, robotics has been used for developing minimally invasive surgical procedures, including stereotactic and endoscopic approaches, as well as for the delivery of therapeutic agents to specific targets in the brain. In rehabilitation, robotics has been used for developing assistive devices and platforms for motor and cognitive training of patients with neurological disorders. The paper also discusses the challenges and limitations of current robotics technology for neurology, including the need for more reliable and precise sensing and actuation systems, the development of better control algorithms, and the ethical implications of robotic interventions in the human brain. Finally, the paper outlines future directions and opportunities for robotics applications in neurology, including the integration of robotics with other emerging technologies, such as neuroprosthetics, artificial intelligence, and virtual reality. Overall, this review highlights the potential of robotics technology to transform the field of neurology and improve the lives of patients with neurological disorders

A double-blinded randomised controlled trial exploring the effect of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation and uni-lateral robot therapy for the impaired upper limb in sub-acute and chronic stroke

BACKGROUND:Neurorehabilitation technologies such as robot therapy (RT) and transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) can promote upper limb (UL) motor recovery after stroke. OBJECTIVE:To explore the effect of anodal tDCS with uni-lateral and three-dimensional RT for the impaired UL in people with sub-acute and chronic stroke. METHODS:A pilot randomised controlled trial was conducted. Stroke participants had 18 one-hour sessions of RT (Armeo®Spring) over eight weeks during which they received 20 minutes of either real tDCS or sham tDCS during each session. The primary outcome measure was the Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA) for UL impairments and secondary were: UL function, activities and stroke impact collected at baseline, post-intervention and three-month follow-up. RESULTS:22 participants (12 sub-acute and 10 chronic) completed the trial. No significant difference was found in FMA between the real and sham tDCS groups at post-intervention and follow-up (p = 0.123). A significant ‘time’ x ‘stage of stroke’ was found for FMA (p = 0.016). A higher percentage improvement was noted in UL function, activities and stroke impact in people with sub-acute compared to chronic stroke. CONCLUSIONS:Adding tDCS did not result in an additional effect on UL impairment in stroke. RT may be of more benefit in the sub-acute than chronic phase

Augmented navigation

Spinal fixation procedures have the inherent risk of causing damage to vulnerable anatomical structures such as the spinal cord, nerve roots, and blood vessels. To prevent complications, several technological aids have been introduced. Surgical navigation is the most widely used, and guides the surgeon by providing the position of the surgical instruments and implants in relation to the patient anatomy based on radiographic images. Navigation can be extended by the addition of a robotic arm to replace the surgeon’s hand to increase accuracy. Another line of surgical aids is tissue sensing equipment, that recognizes different tissue types and provides a warning system built into surgical instruments. All these technologies are under continuous development and the optimal solution is yet to be found. The aim of this thesis was to study the use of Augmented Reality (AR), Virtual Reality (VR), Artificial Intelligence (AI), and tissue sensing technology in spinal navigation to improve precision and prevent surgical errors. The aim of Paper I was to develop and validate an algorithm for automatizing the intraoperative planning of pedicle screws. An AI algorithm for automatic segmentation of the spine, and screw path suggestion was developed and evaluated. In a clinical study of advanced deformity cases, the algorithm could provide correct suggestions for 86% of all pedicles—or 95%, when cases with extremely altered anatomy were excluded. Paper II evaluated the accuracy of pedicle screw placement using a novel augmented reality surgical navigation (ARSN) system, harboring the above-developed algorithm. Twenty consecutively enrolled patients, eligible for deformity correction surgery in the thoracolumbar region, were operated on using the ARSN system. In this cohort, we found a pedicle screw placement accuracy of 94%, as measured according to the Gertzbein grading scale. The primary goal of Paper III was to validate an extension of the ARSN system for placing pedicle screws using instrument tracking and VR. In a porcine cadaver model, it was demonstrated that VR instrument tracking could successfully be integrated with the ARSN system, resulting in pedicle devices placed within 1.7 ± 1.0 mm of the planed path. Paper IV examined the feasibility of a robot-guided system for semi-automated, minimally invasive, pedicle screw placement in a cadaveric model. Using the robotic arm, pedicle devices were placed within 0.94 ± 0.59 mm of the planned path. The use of a semi-automated surgical robot was feasible, providing a higher technical accuracy compared to non-robotic solutions. Paper V investigated the use of a tissue sensing technology, diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS), for detecting the cortical bone boundary in vertebrae during pedicle screw insertions. The technology could accurately differentiate between cancellous and cortical bone and warn the surgeon before a cortical breach. Using machine learning models, the technology demonstrated a sensitivity of 98% [range: 94-100%] and a specificity of 98% [range: 91-100%]. In conclusion, several technological aids can be used to improve accuracy during spinal fixation procedures. In this thesis, the advantages of adding AR, VR, AI and tissue sensing technology to conventional navigation solutions were studied