SDDs are Exponentially More Succinct than OBDDs

Introduced by Darwiche (2011), sentential decision diagrams (SDDs) are essentially as tractable as ordered binary decision diagrams (OBDDs), but tend to be more succinct in practice. This makes SDDs a prominent representation language, with many applications in artificial intelligence and knowledge compilation. We prove that SDDs are more succinct than OBDDs also in theory, by constructing a family of boolean functions where each member has polynomial SDD size but exponential OBDD size. This exponential separation improves a quasipolynomial separation recently established by Razgon (2013), and settles an open problem in knowledge compilation

Construction of Decision Diagrams for Product Configuration

Knowledge compilation is a well-researched field focused on translating propositional logic formulas into efficient data structures that allow polynomial-time online queries related to the SAT problem. Knowledge compilation techniques can be used to partition product configuration tasks into two distinct phases: fast online processing and slow offline preprocessing. Binary Decision Diagrams (BDDs) are widely studied in this area and provide a graph representation of Boolean formulas. However, BDD construction can be time-consuming, particularly for large instances, as their size grows exponentially with the number of variables. This paper explores methods to improve BDD construction time, including optimizing variable ordering. The evaluation involves applying these techniques to formulas in Rich Conjunctive Normal Form, comparing the results with Sentential Decision Diagrams. The experiments use CAS Software AG benchmarks

Top-Down Knowledge Compilation for Counting Modulo Theories

Propositional model counting (#SAT) can be solved efficiently when the input formula is in deterministic decomposable negation normal form (d-DNNF). Translating an arbitrary formula into a representation that allows inference tasks, such as counting, to be performed efficiently, is called knowledge compilation. Top-down knowledge compilation is a state-of-the-art technique for solving #SAT problems that leverages the traces of exhaustive DPLL search to obtain d-DNNF representations. While knowledge compilation is well studied for propositional approaches, knowledge compilation for the (quantifier free) counting modulo theory setting (#SMT) has been studied to a much lesser degree. In this paper, we discuss compilation strategies for #SMT. We specifically advocate for a top-down compiler based on the traces of exhaustive DPLL(T) search.Comment: 9 pages; submitted to Workshop on Counting and Sampling 2023 at SAT202

Optimized Framework based on Rough Set Theory for Big Data Pre-processing in Certain and Imprecise Contexts” -- Marie Sklodowska-Curie Project: Open Problems’

Peer reviewe

Separating Incremental and Non-Incremental Bottom-Up Compilation

The aim of a compiler is, given a function represented in some language, to generate an equivalent representation in a target language L. In bottom-up (BU) compilation of functions given as CNF formulas, constructing the new representation requires compiling several subformulas in L. The compiler starts by compiling the clauses in L and iteratively constructs representations for new subformulas using an "Apply" operator that performs conjunction in L, until all clauses are combined into one representation. In principle, BU compilation can generate representations for any subformulas and conjoin them in any way. But an attractive strategy from a practical point of view is to augment one main representation - which we call the core - by conjoining to it the clauses one at a time. We refer to this strategy as incremental BU compilation. We prove that, for known relevant languages L for BU compilation, there is a class of CNF formulas that admit BU compilations to L that generate only polynomial-size intermediate representations, while their incremental BU compilations all generate an exponential-size core

Three Modern Roles for Logic in AI

We consider three modern roles for logic in artificial intelligence, which are based on the theory of tractable Boolean circuits: (1) logic as a basis for computation, (2) logic for learning from a combination of data and knowledge, and (3) logic for reasoning about the behavior of machine learning systems.Comment: To be published in PODS 202