Effect of Gamification on students’ motivation and learning achievement in Second Language Acquisition within higher education: a literature review 2011-2019

[EN] This paper focuses on a fairly new motivational technique, the so-called Gamification, which consists of introducing game mechanics in non-game environments to promote motivation and engagement. By the turn of the 21rst century, Gamification took off in the business field and soon after became an attractive concept for researchers and professionals in education as it appears to be an increasingly popular method to motivate learners. Nevertheless, it is still a nascent field in terms of empirical evidence available to firmly support its educational benefits. This paper intends to shed some more light on this topic through a comprehensive review of literature published in the most prominent journals. The present study is framed within the field of Second Language Acquisition (SLA) in higher education and Computer-Assisted Language Learning, and focuses on the effects of gamified learning environments on student’s motivation and learning. A Meta-analysis method was used to explore relevant empirical research published between 2011 and 2019. After reviewing a corpus of 68  papers drawn from the leading databases Scopus and Web Of Science, and from which only 15 could be included in the study, we can point out two main findings: (i) there is still very limited literature in the field of SLA and, (ii) results seem to be predominantly positive in terms of motivation and engagement but only a few studies confirm clear interconnections with learning outcomes. The results suggest a lack of solid correlations between Gamification, motivation and cognitive processes. Azzouz Boudadi, N.; Gutiérrez-Colón, M. (2020). Effect of Gamification on students’ motivation and learning achievement in Second Language Acquisition within higher education: a literature review 2011-2019. The EuroCALL Review. 28(1):40-56. https://doi.org/10.4995/eurocall.2020.12974OJS4056281Bandura, A. (2012). Social cognitive theory. In P. A. Van Lange A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins Handbook of theories of social psychology: volume 1 (pp. 349-374). London: SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n18Barcena, E., & Sanfilippo, M. (2015). The audiovisual knowledge pill as a gamification strategy in second language online courses. Circulo de Linguistica Aplicada a La Comunicacion, 63, 22- 151. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_CLAC.2015.v63.50172Bartle, R. (1996). Hearts, clubs, diamonds, spades: Players who suit MUDs. Journal of MUD Research, 1(1), 19-42. Retrieved from https://urlzs.com/HTjvG%0ABeatty, K. (2013). Teaching and researching computer-assisted language learning, second edition. London, UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833774Berns, A., Isla-Montes, J.-L., Palomo-Duarte, M., & Dodero, J.-. (2016). Motivation, students' needs and learning outcomes: A hybrid game-based app for enhanced language learning. SpringerPlus, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2971-1Bustillo, J., Rivera, C., Guzmán, J., & Ramos, L. (2017). Benefits of using a mobile application in learning a foreign language. Sistemas & Telemática, 15(40), 55- 68. https://doi.org/10.18046/syt.v15i40.2391Cardoso, W., Rueb, A., & Grimshaw, J. (2017). Can an interactive digital game help French learners improve their pronunciation? In K. Borthwick, L. Bradley & S. Thouësny (Eds), CALL in a climate of change: adapting to turbulent global conditions - short papers from EUROCALL 2017 (pp. 67-72). Researchpublishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2017.eurocall2017.691Castañeda, D. A., & Cho, M.-H. (2016). Use of a game-like application on a mobile device to improve accuracy in conjugating spanish verbs. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(7), 1195-1204. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2016.1197950Chapelle, C. A. (2003). English Language Learning and Technology: Lectures on applied linguistics in the age of information and communication technology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.7Chapelle, C. A. (2009). The relationship between second language acquisition theory and computer-assisted language learning. Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 741- 753. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00970.xChapelle, C. A. (2016). Call in the year 2000: A look back from 2016. Language Learning and Technology, 20(2), 159-161. https://doi.org/http://hdl.handle.net/10125/44468Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1991). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, USA: Academy of Management Review.Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Self-Determination. In The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0834Deterding, S., Khaled, R., Nacke L.E. and Dixon, D. (2011). Gamification: Toward a Definition. In CHI 2011 Gamification Workshop Proceedings, Vancouver, 2011 (pp. 1215.). https://doi.org/978-1-4503-0268-5/11/0Dichev, C., & Dicheva, D. (2017). Gamifying education: what is known, what is believed and what remains uncertain: a critical review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0042-5Dicheva, D., Dichev, C., Agre, G., & Angelova, G. (2015). Gamification in education: A systematic mapping study. Educational Technology and Society, 18(3), 75- 88. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2014.6826129Domínguez, A., Saenz-De-Navarrete, J., De-Marcos, L., Fernández-Sanz, L., Pagés, C., & Martínez-Herráiz, J. J. (2013). Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes. Computers and Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.020Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. Routledge. New York. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315779553Figueroa Flores, J. F. (2015). Using gamification to enhance second language learning. Digital Education Review, 27, 32-54. Retrieved from http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/der/article/view/11912/pdfGafni, R., Biran Achituv, D., & Rahmani, G. (2017). Learning Foreign Languages Using Mobile Applications. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 16, 301- 317. https://doi.org/10.28945/3855Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitudes and Motivation in Second Language Learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.Godwin-Jones, R. (2015). Emerging technologies the evolving roles of language teachers: trained coders, local researchers, global citizens. Language, Learning and Technology, 19(1), 10-22.Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? - A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 3025-3034). https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377Hew, K., Huang, B., Wah Samuel Chu, K., & Chiu, D. (2016). Engaging Asian students through game mechanics: Findings from two experiment studies. Computers & Education, 92-93, 221- 236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.010Hubbard, P. (2008). CALL and the Future of Language Teacher Education. CALICO Journal, 25(2), 175. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.25.2.175-188Hung, H.-T. (2017). Clickers in the flipped classroom: bring your own device (BYOD) to promote student learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(8), 983-995. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1240090Iaremenko, N. (2017). Enhancing English language learners' motivation through online games. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 59, 126-133. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v59i3.1606Kapp, K. M. (2012). The Gamification of Learning and Instruction: Game-based Methods and Strategies for Training and Education. San Francisco, USA: Pfeiffer & Company. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207270.2211316Kétyi, A. (2016, September 1). From Mobile Language Learning to Gamification: an Overlook of Research Results with Business Management Students over a Five-Year Period. Innovating in the Didactic Second Language Scenario Innovating in the Didactic Second Language Scenario: New Mobile, Open and Social Model, Edition: Monográfico I., 45-59. Retrieved from https://urlzs.com/iZXtMLi, L. (2016). Benefits of CALL in lexico-grammatical acquisition. The Routledge Handbook of English Language Teaching (p. 463). London and New York: Routledge.Liu, Y., Holden, D., & Zheng, D. (2016). Analyzing students' Language Learning Experience in an Augmented Reality Mobile Game: An Exploration of an Emergent Learning Environment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 228, 369-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.055MacIntyre, P. D. (2002). Motivation, anxiety and emotion in second language acquisition. Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning, 2, 45-68. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.2.05macMarczewski, A. (2019). Introduction to Gamification Part 4: Motivation (R.A.M.P, Maslow, SDT and more). Retrieved from https://www.gamified.uk/2019/01/30/introduction-to-gamification-part4-motivation-r-a-m-p-maslow-sdt-and-more/Mateo-Gallego, C., & Ruiz Yepes, G. (2018). Terapias de errores con aprendizaje móvil y gamificación: estudio comparativo en español de los negocios. Folios, 48, 121-135. https://doi.org/10.17227/folios.48-8139Munday, P. (2016). The case for using Duolingo as part of the language classroom experience. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 19 (1), 83-101. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.19.1.14581Palomo-Duarte, M., Berns, A., Cejas, A., Dodero, J. M., Caballero, J. A., & Ruiz-Rube, I. (2016). Assessing Foreign Language Learning Through Mobile Game-Based Learning Environments. International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals (IJHCITP), 7(2), 53-67. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJHCITP.2016040104Perry, B. (2015). Gamifying French Language Learning: A Case Study Examining a Quest-based, Augmented Reality Mobile Learning-tool. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2308- 2315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.892Plass, J. L., Homer, B. D., & Kinzer, C. K. (2015). Foundations of Game-Based Learning. Educational Psychologist, 50, 258-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1122533Purgina, M., Mozgovoy, M., & Blake, J. (2019). WordBricks: Mobile Technology and Visual Grammar Formalism for Gamification of Natural Language Grammar Acquisition. Journal of Educational Computing Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119833010Rickinson, M., & May, H. (2009). A Comparative Study of Methodological Approaches to Reviewing Literature. UK : Higher Education AcademySeverengiz, M., Roeder, I., Schindler, K., & Seliger, G. (2018). Influence of Gaming Elements on Summative Assessment in Engineering Education for Sustainable Manufacturing. In Procedia Manufacturing (pp. 429-437). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.141Sheldon, L. (2012). The Multiplayer Classroom: Designing Coursework as a Game. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.Skinner, B. F. (1958). Teaching machines. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.128.3330.969Werbach, K., & Hunter, D. (2012a). For the win: How game thinking can revolutionize your business. Wharton Digital Press.Werbach, K., & Hunter, D. (2012b). The Gamification Toolkit Game Elements. In For the Win: How Game Thinking Can Revolutionize Your Business. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004Zichermann, G. (2011). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in Gamification. Retrieved from https://www.gamification.co/2011/10/27/intrinsic-and-extrinsic-motivation-in-gamification

Using Mobile Devices for Improving Learning Outcomes and Teachers’ Professionalization

Teaching in higher education is changing due to the influence of technology. More and more technological tools are replacing old teaching methods and strategies. Thus, mobile devices are being positioned as a key tool for new ways of understanding educational practices. The present paper responds to a systematic review about the benefits that mobile devices have for university students’ learning. Using inclusion and exclusion criteria in theWeb of Science and Scopus databases, 16 articles were selected to argue why Mobile learning (Mlearning) has become a modern innovative approach. The results point to an improvement in students’ learning through Mlearning, factors that encourage the use of mobile devices in universities have been identified, and e ective mobile applications in improving teaching and learning processes have been presented. The inclusion of this methodology requires a new role for teachers, whose characterization is also specified

Educational Technology Topic Guide

This guide aims to contribute to what we know about the relationship between educational technology (edtech) and educational outcomes by addressing the following overarching question: What is the evidence that the use of edtech, by teachers or students, impacts teaching and learning practices, or learning outcomes? It also offers recommendations to support advisors to strengthen the design, implementation and evaluation of programmes that use edtech. We define edtech as the use of digital or electronic technologies and materials to support teaching and learning. Recognising that technology alone does not enhance learning, evaluations must also consider how programmes are designed and implemented, how teachers are supported, how communities are developed and how outcomes are measured (see http://tel.ac.uk/about-3/, 2014). Effective edtech programmes are characterised by: a clear and specific curriculum focus the use of relevant curriculum materials a focus on teacher development and pedagogy evaluation mechanisms that go beyond outputs. These findings come from a wide range of technology use including: interactive radio instruction (IRI) classroom audio or video resources accessed via teachers’ mobile phones student tablets and eReaders computer-assisted learning (CAL) to supplement classroom teaching. However, there are also examples of large-scale investment in edtech – particularly computers for student use – that produce limited educational outcomes. We need to know more about: how to support teachers to develop appropriate, relevant practices using edtech how such practices are enacted in schools, and what factors contribute to or mitigate against successful outcomes. Recommendations: 1. Edtech programmes should focus on enabling educational change, not delivering technology. In doing so, programmes should provide adequate support for teachers and aim to capture changes in teaching practice and learning outcomes in evaluation. 2. Advisors should support proposals that further develop successful practices or that address gaps in evidence and understanding. 3. Advisors should discourage proposals that have an emphasis on technology over education, weak programmatic support or poor evaluation. 4. In design and evaluation, value-for-money metrics and cost-effectiveness analyses should be carried out

Mobile learning: a meta-ethical taxonomy

In this paper I discuss some of the ethical issues relating to the use of mobile technologies in education. I argue that the frames of reference used by educators and technologists fail to capture the nature, scope and impact of ethical issues in mobile learning. A taxonomy of ethical issues based on dominant positions in meta-ethical moral theory is proposed. Using categories from the Mobile Technologies in Lifelong Learning (MOTILL) project, I show how this taxonomy can be applied in such a way as to facilitate understanding of ethical issues in mobile learning

Mobile Usability in Educational Contexts: What have we learnt?

The successful development of mobile learning is dependent on human factors in the use of new mobile and wireless technologies. The majority of mobile learning activity continues to take place on devices that were not designed with educational applications in mind, and usability issues are often reported. The paper reflects on progress in approaches to usability and on recent developments, with particular reference to usability findings reported in studies of mobile learning. The requirements of education are considered as well as the needs of students participating in distance education; discipline-specific perspectives and accessibility issues are also addressed. Usability findings from empirical studies of mobile learning published in the literature are drawn together in the paper, along with an account of issues that emerged in two mobile learning projects based at The Open University, UK, in 2001 and 2005. The main conclusions are: that usability issues are often reported in cases where PDAs have been used; that the future is in scenario-based design which should also take into account the evolution of uses over time and the unpredictability of how devices might be used; and that usability issues should be tracked over a longer period, from initial use through to a state of relative experience with the technology

Enhancing Information Language Learning with Mobile Technology - Does it Work?

There are many theories that attempt to explain second language acquisition processes and factors determining success or failure. Despite a lack of general agreement between proponents of these theories, research has convincingly shown that the amount of exposure to target language input is one important predictor of ultimate achievement levels. ‘Time on task’ is as important in language learning as it is in many other domains (cf. Reber, 1993) and it is therefore important to identify ways in which this can be increased. An obvious possibility is to encourage learners to engage with (and in) the language outside the classroom. Informal learning, in the sense of learning outside of formal education, has been shown to be a major aspect of adult learning (Cross, 2007) and, given appropriate preparation and support, learners can greatly increase opportunities for learning if they can do so independently. Mobile technologies have obvious potential in this regard. However, is it possible to improve language skills in this way? In this article we report on an exploratory study into the use of cellphones for extensive listening practice. We used input enhancement to draw learners’ attention to not only the meaning of the materials but also the formal (grammatical) aspects of the input. We found that the use of mobile technology presented a number of challenges and in this study did not result in learners acquiring the target structures. We conclude with a number of recommendations for the use and future study of mobile technologies for (language) learning

mHealth Research Applied to Regulated and Unregulated Behavioral Health Sciences

Behavioral scientists are developing new methods and frameworks that leverage mobile health technologies to optimize individual level behavior change. Pervasive sensors and mobile apps allow researchers to passively observe human behaviors “in the wild” 24/7 which supports delivery of personalized interventions in the real-world environment. This is all possible because these technologies contain an incredible array of sensors that allow applications to constantly record user location and can contextualize current environmental conditions through barometers, thermometers, and ambient light sensors and can also capture audio and video of the user and their surroundings through multiple integrated high-definition cameras and microphones. These tools are a game changer in behavioral health research and, not surprisingly, introduce new ethical, regulatory/legal and social implications described in this article