Conformance Testing with Labelled Transition Systems: Implementation Relations and Test Generation

This paper studies testing based on labelled transition systems, presenting two test generation algorithms with their corresponding implementation relations. The first algorithm assumes that implementations communicate with their environment via symmetric, synchronous interactions. It is based on the theory of testing equivalence and preorder, as is most of the testing theory for labelled transition systems, and it is found in the literature in some slightly different variations. The second algorithm is based on the assumption that implementations communicate with their environment via inputs and outputs. Such implementations are formalized by restricting the class of labelled transition systems to those systems that can always accept input actions. For these implementations a testing theory is developed, analogous to the theory of testing equivalence and preorder. It consists of implementation relations formalizing the notion of conformance of these implementations with respect to labelled transition system specifications, test cases and test suites, test execution, the notion of passing a test suite, and the test generation algorithm, which is proved to produce sound test suites for one of the implementation relations

Congruent Weak Conformance

This research addresses the problem of verifying implementations against specifications through an innovative logic approach. Congruent weak conformance, a formal relationship between agents and specifications, has been developed and proven to be a congruent partial order. This property arises from a set of relations called weak conformations. The largest, called weak conformance, is analogous to Milner\u27s observational equivalence. Weak conformance is not an equivalence, however, but rather an ordering relation among processes. Weak conformance allows behaviors in the implementation that are unreachable in the specification. Furthermore, it exploits output concurrencies and allows interleaving of extraneous output actions in the implementation. Finally, reasonable restrictions in CCS syntax strengthen weak conformance to a congruence, called congruent weak conformance. At present, congruent weak conformance is the best known formal relation for verifying implementations against specifications. This precongruence derives maximal flexibility and embodies all weaknesses in input, output, and no-connect signals while retaining a fully replaceable conformance to the specification. Congruent weak conformance has additional utility in verifying transformations between systems of incompatible semantics. This dissertation describes a hypothetical translator from the informal simulation semantics of VHDL to the bisimulation semantics of CCS. A second translator is described from VHDL to a broadcast-communication version of CCS. By showing that they preserve congruent weak conformance, both translators are verified

Pseudo-contractions as Gentle Repairs

Updating a knowledge base to remove an unwanted consequence is a challenging task. Some of the original sentences must be either deleted or weakened in such a way that the sentence to be removed is no longer entailed by the resulting set. On the other hand, it is desirable that the existing knowledge be preserved as much as possible, minimising the loss of information. Several approaches to this problem can be found in the literature. In particular, when the knowledge is represented by an ontology, two different families of frameworks have been developed in the literature in the past decades with numerous ideas in common but with little interaction between the communities: applications of AGM-like Belief Change and justification-based Ontology Repair. In this paper, we investigate the relationship between pseudo-contraction operations and gentle repairs. Both aim to avoid the complete deletion of sentences when replacing them with weaker versions is enough to prevent the entailment of the unwanted formula. We show the correspondence between concepts on both sides and investigate under which conditions they are equivalent. Furthermore, we propose a unified notation for the two approaches, which might contribute to the integration of the two areas