303 research outputs found
The proper explanation of intuitionistic logic: on Brouwer's demonstration of the Bar Theorem
Brouwer's demonstration of his Bar Theorem gives rise to provocative questions regarding the proper explanation of the logical connectives within intuitionistic and constructivist frameworks, respectively, and, more generally, regarding the role of logic within intuitionism. It is the purpose of the present note to discuss a number of these issues, both from an historical, as well as a systematic point of view
Computability and analysis: the legacy of Alan Turing
We discuss the legacy of Alan Turing and his impact on computability and
analysis.Comment: 49 page
Computability in constructive type theory
We give a formalised and machine-checked account of computability theory in the Calculus of Inductive Constructions (CIC), the constructive type theory underlying the Coq proof assistant. We first develop synthetic computability theory, pioneered by Richman, Bridges, and Bauer, where one treats all functions as computable, eliminating the need for a model of computation. We assume a novel parametric axiom for synthetic computability and give proofs of results like Riceâs theorem, the Myhill isomorphism theorem, and the existence of Postâs simple and hypersimple predicates relying on no other axioms such as Markovâs principle or choice axioms. As a second step, we introduce models of computation. We give a concise overview of definitions of various standard models and contribute machine-checked simulation proofs, posing a non-trivial engineering effort. We identify a notion of synthetic undecidability relative to a fixed halting problem, allowing axiom-free machine-checked proofs of undecidability. We contribute such undecidability proofs for the historical foundational problems of computability theory which require the identification of invariants left out in the literature and now form the basis of the Coq Library of Undecidability Proofs. We then identify the weak call-by-value λ-calculus L as sweet spot for programming in a model of computation. We introduce a certifying extraction framework and analyse an axiom stating that every function of type â â â is L-computable.Wir behandeln eine formalisierte und maschinengeprĂŒfte Betrachtung von Berechenbarkeitstheorie im Calculus of Inductive Constructions (CIC), der konstruktiven Typtheorie die dem Beweisassistenten Coq zugrunde liegt. Wir entwickeln erst synthetische Berechenbarkeitstheorie, vorbereitet durch die Arbeit von Richman, Bridges und Bauer, wobei alle Funktionen als berechenbar behandelt werden, ohne Notwendigkeit eines Berechnungsmodells. Wir nehmen ein neues, parametrisches Axiom fĂŒr synthetische Berechenbarkeit an und beweisen Resultate wie das Theorem von Rice, das Isomorphismus Theorem von Myhill und die Existenz von Postâs simplen und hypersimplen PrĂ€dikaten ohne Annahme von anderen Axiomen wie Markovâs Prinzip oder Auswahlaxiomen. Als zweiten Schritt fĂŒhren wir Berechnungsmodelle ein. Wir geben einen kompakten Ăberblick ĂŒber die Definition von verschiedenen Berechnungsmodellen und erklĂ€ren maschinengeprĂŒfte Simulationsbeweise zwischen diesen Modellen, welche einen hohen Konstruktionsaufwand beinhalten. Wir identifizieren einen Begriff von synthetischer Unentscheidbarkeit relativ zu einem fixierten Halteproblem welcher axiomenfreie maschinengeprĂŒfte Unentscheidbarkeitsbeweise erlaubt. Wir erklĂ€ren solche Beweise fĂŒr die historisch grundlegenden Probleme der Berechenbarkeitstheorie, die das Identifizieren von Invarianten die normalerweise in der Literatur ausgelassen werden benötigen und nun die Basis der Coq Library of Undecidability Proofs bilden. Wir identifizieren dann den call-by-value λ-KalkĂŒl L als sweet spot fĂŒr die Programmierung in einem Berechnungsmodell. Wir fĂŒhren ein zertifizierendes Extraktionsframework ein und analysieren ein Axiom welches postuliert dass jede Funktion vom Typ NâN L-berechenbar ist
Sofia A. Yanovskaya: The Marxist Pioneer of Mathematical Logic in the Soviet Union
K. Marxâs 200th jubilee coincides with the celebration of the 85 years from the first
publication of his âMathematical Manuscriptsâ in 1933. Its editor, Sofia Alexandrovna
Yanovskaya (1896â1966), was a renowned Soviet mathematician, whose significant studies on the foundations of mathematics and mathematical logic, as well as on the history and philosophy of mathematics are unduly neglected nowadays. Yanovskaya, as a militant Marxist, was actively engaged in the ideological confrontation with idealism and its influence on modern mathematics and their interpretation. Concomitantly, she was one of the pioneers of mathematical logic in the Soviet Union, in an era of fierce disputes on its compatibility with Marxist philosophy. Yanovskaya managed to embrace in an originally Marxist spirit the contemporary level of logico-philosophical research of her time. Due to her highly esteemed status within Soviet academia, she became one of the most significant pillars for the culmination of modern mathematics in the Soviet Union. In this paper, I attempt to trace the influence of the complex socio-cultural context of the first decades of the Soviet Union on Yanovskayaâs work. Among the several issues I discuss, her encounter with L. Wittgenstein is striking
Experiments in integrating constraints with logical reasoning for robotic planning within the twelf logical framework and the prolog language
Ankara : The Department of Computer Engineering and the Institute of Engineering and Sciences of Bilkent University, 2008.Thesis (Master's) -- Bilkent University, 2008.Includes bibliographical references leaves 92-96.The underlying domain of various application areas, especially real-time systems
and robotic applications, generally includes a combination of both discrete
and continuous properties. In robotic applications, a large amount of different
approaches are introduced to solve either a discrete planning or control theoretic
problem. Only a few methods exist to solve the combination of them. Moreover,
these methods fail to ensure a uniform treatment of both aspects of the domain.
Therefore, there is need for a uniform framework to represent and solve such
problems. A new formalism, the Constrained Intuitionistic Linear Logic (CILL),
combines continuous constraint solvers with linear logic. Linear logic has a great
property to handle hypotheses as resources, easily solving state transition problems.
On the other hand, constraint solvers deal well with continuous problems
defined as constraints. Both properties of CILL gives us powerful ways to express
and reason about the robotics domain. In this thesis, we focus on the implementation
of CILL in both the Twelf Logical Framework and Prolog. The reader of
this thesis can find answers of why classical aspects are not proper for the robotics
domain, what advantages one can gain from intuitionism and linearity, how one
can define a simple robotic domain in a logical formalism, how a proof in logical
system corresponds to a plan in the robotic domain, what the advantages and
disadvantages of logical frameworks and Prolog have and how the implementation
of CILL can or cannot be done using both Twelf Logical Framework and Prolog.Duatepe, MertM.S
A Burgessian critique of nominalistic tendencies in contemporary mathematics and its historiography
We analyze the developments in mathematical rigor from the viewpoint of a
Burgessian critique of nominalistic reconstructions. We apply such a critique
to the reconstruction of infinitesimal analysis accomplished through the
efforts of Cantor, Dedekind, and Weierstrass; to the reconstruction of Cauchy's
foundational work associated with the work of Boyer and Grabiner; and to
Bishop's constructivist reconstruction of classical analysis. We examine the
effects of a nominalist disposition on historiography, teaching, and research.Comment: 57 pages; 3 figures. Corrected misprint
- âŠ