Some Preconditioning Techniques for Saddle Point Problems

Saddle point problems arise frequently in many applications in science and engineering, including constrained optimization, mixed finite element formulations of partial differential equations, circuit analysis, and so forth. Indeed the formulation of most problems with constraints gives rise to saddle point systems. This paper provides a concise overview of iterative approaches for the solution of such systems which are of particular importance in the context of large scale computation. In particular we describe some of the most useful preconditioning techniques for Krylov subspace solvers applied to saddle point problems, including block and constrained preconditioners.\ud \ud The work of Michele Benzi was supported in part by the National Science Foundation grant DMS-0511336

Combination preconditioning of saddle point systems for positive definiteness

Amongst recent contributions to preconditioning methods for saddle point systems, standard iterative methods in nonstandard inner products have been usefully employed. Krzyzanowski (Numer. Linear Algebra Appl. 2011; 18:123–140) identified a two-parameter family of preconditioners in this context and Stoll and Wathen (SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 2008; 30:582–608) introduced combination preconditioning, where two preconditioners, self-adjoint with respect to different inner products, can lead to further preconditioners and associated bilinear forms or inner products. Preconditioners that render the preconditioned saddle point matrix nonsymmetric but self-adjoint with respect to a nonstandard inner product always allow a MINRES-type method (W-PMINRES) to be applied in the relevant inner product. If the preconditioned matrix is also positive definite with respect to the inner product a more efficient CG-like method (W-PCG) can be reliably used. We establish eigenvalue expressions for Krzyzanowski preconditioners and show that for a specific choice of parameters, although the Krzyzanowski preconditioned saddle point matrix is self-adjoint with respect to an inner product, it is never positive definite. We provide explicit expressions for the combination of certain preconditioners and prove the rather counterintuitive result that the combination of two specific preconditioners for which only W-PMINRES can be reliably used leads to a preconditioner for which, for certain parameter choices, W-PCG is reliably applicable. That is, combining two indefinite preconditioners can lead to a positive definite preconditioner. This combination preconditioner outperforms either of the two preconditioners from which it is formed for a number of test problems