52 research outputs found
A Non-wellfounded, Labelled Proof System for Propositional Dynamic Logic
We define a infinitary labelled sequent calculus for PDL, G3PDL^{\infty}. A
finitarily representable cyclic system, G3PDL^{\omega}, is then given. We show
that both are sound and complete with respect to standard models of PDL and,
further, that G3PDL^{\infty} is cut-free complete. We additionally investigate
proof-search strategies in the cyclic system for the fragment of PDL without
tests
Proof-theoretic Semantics for Intuitionistic Multiplicative Linear Logic
This work is the first exploration of proof-theoretic semantics for a substructural logic. It focuses on the base-extension semantics (B-eS) for intuitionistic multiplicative linear logic (IMLL). The starting point is a review of Sandqvist’s B-eS for intuitionistic propositional logic (IPL), for which we propose an alternative treatment of conjunction that takes the form of the generalized elimination rule for the connective. The resulting semantics is shown to be sound and complete. This motivates our main contribution, a B-eS for IMLL
, in which the definitions of the logical constants all take the form of their elimination rule and for which soundness and completeness are established
Minimal Proof Search for Modal Logic K Model Checking
Most modal logics such as S5, LTL, or ATL are extensions of Modal Logic K.
While the model checking problems for LTL and to a lesser extent ATL have been
very active research areas for the past decades, the model checking problem for
the more basic Multi-agent Modal Logic K (MMLK) has important applications as a
formal framework for perfect information multi-player games on its own.
We present Minimal Proof Search (MPS), an effort number based algorithm
solving the model checking problem for MMLK. We prove two important properties
for MPS beyond its correctness. The (dis)proof exhibited by MPS is of minimal
cost for a general definition of cost, and MPS is an optimal algorithm for
finding (dis)proofs of minimal cost. Optimality means that any comparable
algorithm either needs to explore a bigger or equal state space than MPS, or is
not guaranteed to find a (dis)proof of minimal cost on every input.
As such, our work relates to A* and AO* in heuristic search, to Proof Number
Search and DFPN+ in two-player games, and to counterexample minimization in
software model checking.Comment: Extended version of the JELIA 2012 paper with the same titl
Mechanised Uniform Interpolation for Modal Logics K, GL, and iSL
The uniform interpolation property in a given logic can be understood as the definability of propositional quantifiers. We mechanise the computation of these quantifiers and prove correctness in the Coq proof assistant for three modal logics, namely: (1) the modal logic K, for which a pen-and-paper proof exists; (2) Gödel-Löb logic GL, for which our formalisation clarifies an important point in an existing, but incomplete, sequent-style proof; and (3) intuitionistic strong Löb logic iSL, for which this is the first proof-theoretic construction of uniform interpolants. Our work also yields verified programs that allow one to compute the propositional quantifiers on any formula in this logic
Mechanised Uniform Interpolation for Modal Logics K, GL, and iSL
The uniform interpolation property in a given logic can be understood as the definability of propositional quantifiers. We mechanise the computation of these quantifiers and prove correctness in the Coq proof assistant for three modal logics, namely: (1) the modal logic K, for which a pen-and-paper proof exists; (2) Gödel-Löb logic GL, for which our formalisation clarifies an important point in an existing, but incomplete, sequent-style proof; and (3) intuitionistic strong Löb logic iSL, for which this is the first proof-theoretic construction of uniform interpolants. Our work also yields verified programs that allow one to compute the propositional quantifiers on any formula in this logic
Retracing some paths in categorical semantics: From process-propositions-as-types to categorified reals and computers
The logical parallelism of propositional connectives and type constructors
extends beyond the static realm of predicates, to the dynamic realm of
processes. Understanding the logical parallelism of process propositions and
dynamic types was one of the central problems of the semantics of computation,
albeit not always clear or explicit. It sprung into clarity through the early
work of Samson Abramsky, where the central ideas of denotational semantics and
process calculus were brought together and analyzed by categorical tools, e.g.
in the structure of interaction categories. While some logical structures borne
of dynamics of computation immediately started to emerge, others had to wait,
be it because the underlying logical principles (mainly those arising from
coinduction) were not yet sufficiently well-understood, or simply because the
research community was more interested in other semantical tasks. Looking back,
it seems that the process logic uncovered by those early semantical efforts
might still be starting to emerge and that the vast field of results that have
been obtained in the meantime might be a valley on a tip of an iceberg.
In the present paper, I try to provide a logical overview of the gamut of
interaction categories and to distinguish those that model computation from
those that capture processes in general. The main coinductive constructions
turn out to be of this latter kind, as illustrated towards the end of the paper
by a compact category of all real numbers as processes, computable and
uncomputable, with polarized bisimulations as morphisms. The addition of the
reals arises as the biproduct, real vector spaces are the enriched
bicompletions, and linear algebra arises from the enriched kan extensions. At
the final step, I sketch a structure that characterizes the computable fragment
of categorical semantics.Comment: 63 pages, 40 figures; cut two words from the title, tried to improve
(without lengthening) Sec.8; rewrote a proof in the Appendi
A proof theory of right-linear (omega-)grammars via cyclic proofs
Right-linear (or left-linear) grammars are a well-known class of context-free
grammars computing just the regular languages. They may naturally be written as
expressions with (least) fixed points but with products restricted to letters
as left arguments, giving an alternative to the syntax of regular expressions.
In this work, we investigate the resulting logical theory of this syntax.
Namely, we propose a theory of right-linear algebras (RLA) over of this syntax
and a cyclic proof system CRLA for reasoning about them.
We show that CRLA is sound and complete for the intended model of regular
languages. From here we recover the same completeness result for RLA by
extracting inductive invariants from cyclic proofs, rendering the model of
regular languages the free right-linear algebra.
Finally, we extend system CRLA by greatest fixed points, nuCRLA, naturally
modelled by languages of omega-words thanks to right-linearity. We show a
similar soundness and completeness result of (the guarded fragment of) nuCRLA
for the model of omega-regular languages, employing game theoretic techniques.Comment: 34 pages, 3 figure
Fragments and frame classes:Towards a uniform proof theory for modal fixed point logics
This thesis studies the proof theory of modal fixed point logics. In particular, we construct proof systems for various fragments of the modal mu-calculus, interpreted over various classes of frames. With an emphasis on uniform constructions and general results, we aim to bring the relatively underdeveloped proof theory of modal fixed point logics closer to the well-established proof theory of basic modal logic. We employ two main approaches. First, we seek to generalise existing methods for basic modal logic to accommodate fragments of the modal mu-calculus. We use this approach for obtaining Hilbert-style proof systems. Secondly, we adapt existing proof systems for the modal mu-calculus to various classes of frames. This approach yields proof systems which are non-well-founded, or cyclic.The thesis starts with an introduction and some mathematical preliminaries. In Chapter 3 we give hypersequent calculi for modal logic with the master modality, building on work by Ori Lahav. This is followed by an Intermezzo, where we present an abstract framework for cyclic proofs, in which we give sufficient conditions for establishing the bounded proof property. In Chapter 4 we generalise existing work on Hilbert-style proof systems for PDL to the level of the continuous modal mu-calculus. Chapter 5 contains a novel cyclic proof system for the alternation-free two-way modal mu-calculus. Finally, in Chapter 6, we present a cyclic proof system for Guarded Kleene Algebra with Tests and take a first step towards using it to establish the completeness of an algebraic counterpart
- …