6,780 research outputs found
Southern Adventist University Undergraduate Catalog 2023-2024
Southern Adventist University\u27s undergraduate catalog for the academic year 2023-2024.https://knowledge.e.southern.edu/undergrad_catalog/1123/thumbnail.jp
UMSL Bulletin 2023-2024
The 2023-2024 Bulletin and Course Catalog for the University of Missouri St. Louis.https://irl.umsl.edu/bulletin/1088/thumbnail.jp
With the Participatory Consumer Audience in mind: exploring and developing professional brand identity designers reflexive practice
This PhD reflects upon first-hand unidirectional and passive consumer audience experience approaches prevalent in professional UK brand identity design. It explores: How brand identity designers might move towards an improved reflexive practice in the design of consumer audience experiences. This practice-led research focuses on the ideas generation stage of their design process.
An ongoing constructivist audience paradigm shift signals that when thinking about and using their positionality in relation to their consumer audience experiences, designers need reflexive practice to support critical reflection of themselves, their biases and assumptions. This research uncovered a lack of relevant theory regarding reflexive practice specific to the context of brand identity design. This insufficiency throws into doubt designers' relational, participatory and equitable approaches in their working practices and their abilities to address market imperatives, including client requirements connected to the ongoing audience paradigm shift.
Aligned with John Dewey's ethical pragmatism and drawing from Creswell, Tashakkori and Teddlie, my study adopts a mixed methods methodology. Alongside established qualitative and quantitative methods, this includes my practice via design visualisations, as discussed by Drucker, and builds upon Carl DiSalvo's approach of practice used to do inquiry and design as a method of inquiry. My practice enabled me to critically reflect, evaluate and construct reflexive practice knowledge, including the development of reflexive practice communications, to advance understanding of and improve other designers' reflexive practice, and to communicate my process of reflexive design practice research.
Thirty UK-based professional brand identity designers participated in this research: nineteen participants in Phase One, a questionnaire, and six in Phase Two semi-structured interviews. Phase One and Two findings identified a gap in that designers are not employing a reflexive design practice and lack the resources to do so. Seeking to improve these shortcomings, eighteen initial reflexive design practice principles were explored and tested in Phase Three, a workshop involving five design participants. Results showed that the principles facilitated participants to advance prior thinking and engage in a reflexive design practice.
Further reflections and insights from the same five Phase Three participants uncovered a need to refine and reduce the principles and communicate them in a guide. Eight revised overarching and eighteen sub-principles in a prototype guide were explored in Phase Four in applied practice by three brand identity designers involved in Phase Three. Results corroborated workshop findings and provided further recommendations.
Contributions of this research are three-fold. First, offering an advanced understanding of professional brand identity designers' reflexive practice and process knowledge. Second, it produced a reflexive design guide with eight overarching and eighteen sub-reflexive design principles and corresponding digital app, thereby offering a preliminary new design practice method. This method offers a way to improve designers' thinking about and operation of their relational positionality, participatory consumer audience experience approaches, and reflexive design practice actions. Third, it provides a contribution to knowledge via its methodology, which integrates design visualisation practice into a mixed methods approach
Conversations on Empathy
In the aftermath of a global pandemic, amidst new and ongoing wars, genocide, inequality, and staggering ecological collapse, some in the public and political arena have argued that we are in desperate need of greater empathy — be this with our neighbours, refugees, war victims, the vulnerable or disappearing animal and plant species. This interdisciplinary volume asks the crucial questions: How does a better understanding of empathy contribute, if at all, to our understanding of others? How is it implicated in the ways we perceive, understand and constitute others as subjects? Conversations on Empathy examines how empathy might be enacted and experienced either as a way to highlight forms of otherness or, instead, to overcome what might otherwise appear to be irreducible differences. It explores the ways in which empathy enables us to understand, imagine and create sameness and otherness in our everyday intersubjective encounters focusing on a varied range of "radical others" – others who are perceived as being dramatically different from oneself. With a focus on the importance of empathy to understand difference, the book contends that the role of empathy is critical, now more than ever, for thinking about local and global challenges of interconnectedness, care and justice
Integration of new methodologies/methods/examples of best practices in the pedagogy studies process
Project:
Optimizing the Network of Higher
Education Institutions and Improving the
Quality of Studies by Merging Šiauliai
University and Vilnius University SFMIS No: 09.3.1-ESFA-V-738-03-0001, funded by European Structural
Funds Agenc
Reshaping Higher Education for a Post-COVID-19 World: Lessons Learned and Moving Forward
No abstract available
Do We Fully Understand Students' Knowledge States? Identifying and Mitigating Answer Bias in Knowledge Tracing
Knowledge tracing (KT) aims to monitor students' evolving knowledge states
through their learning interactions with concept-related questions, and can be
indirectly evaluated by predicting how students will perform on future
questions. In this paper, we observe that there is a common phenomenon of
answer bias, i.e., a highly unbalanced distribution of correct and incorrect
answers for each question. Existing models tend to memorize the answer bias as
a shortcut for achieving high prediction performance in KT, thereby failing to
fully understand students' knowledge states. To address this issue, we approach
the KT task from a causality perspective. A causal graph of KT is first
established, from which we identify that the impact of answer bias lies in the
direct causal effect of questions on students' responses. A novel
COunterfactual REasoning (CORE) framework for KT is further proposed, which
separately captures the total causal effect and direct causal effect during
training, and mitigates answer bias by subtracting the latter from the former
in testing. The CORE framework is applicable to various existing KT models, and
we implement it based on the prevailing DKT, DKVMN, and AKT models,
respectively. Extensive experiments on three benchmark datasets demonstrate the
effectiveness of CORE in making the debiased inference for KT.Comment: 13 page
A Closer Look into Recent Video-based Learning Research: A Comprehensive Review of Video Characteristics, Tools, Technologies, and Learning Effectiveness
People increasingly use videos on the Web as a source for learning. To
support this way of learning, researchers and developers are continuously
developing tools, proposing guidelines, analyzing data, and conducting
experiments. However, it is still not clear what characteristics a video should
have to be an effective learning medium. In this paper, we present a
comprehensive review of 257 articles on video-based learning for the period
from 2016 to 2021. One of the aims of the review is to identify the video
characteristics that have been explored by previous work. Based on our
analysis, we suggest a taxonomy which organizes the video characteristics and
contextual aspects into eight categories: (1) audio features, (2) visual
features, (3) textual features, (4) instructor behavior, (5) learners
activities, (6) interactive features (quizzes, etc.), (7) production style, and
(8) instructional design. Also, we identify four representative research
directions: (1) proposals of tools to support video-based learning, (2) studies
with controlled experiments, (3) data analysis studies, and (4) proposals of
design guidelines for learning videos. We find that the most explored
characteristics are textual features followed by visual features, learner
activities, and interactive features. Text of transcripts, video frames, and
images (figures and illustrations) are most frequently used by tools that
support learning through videos. The learner activity is heavily explored
through log files in data analysis studies, and interactive features have been
frequently scrutinized in controlled experiments. We complement our review by
contrasting research findings that investigate the impact of video
characteristics on the learning effectiveness, report on tasks and technologies
used to develop tools that support learning, and summarize trends of design
guidelines to produce learning video
- …