An improvement in support vector machine classification model using grey relational analysis for cancer diagnosis

To further improve the accuracy of classifier for cancer diagnosis, a hybrid model called GRA-SVM which comprises Support Vector Machine classifier and filter feature selection Grey Relational Analysis is proposed and tested against Wisconsin Breast Cancer Dataset (WBCD) and BUPA Disorder Dataset. The performance of GRA-SVM is compared to SVM’s in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and Area under Curve (AUC). The experimental results reveal that GRA-SVM improves the SVM accuracy of about 0.48 by using only two features for the WBCD dataset. For BUPA dataset, GRA-SVM improves the SVM accuracy of about 0.97 by using four features. Besides improving the accuracy performance, GRA-SVM also produces a ranking scheme that provides information about the priority of each feature. Therefore, based on the benefits gained, GRA-SVM is recommended as a new approach to obtain a better and more accurate result for cancer diagnosis

Breast cancer diagnosis using a hybrid genetic algorithm for feature selection based on mutual information

Feature Selection is the process of selecting a subset of relevant features (i.e. predictors) for use in the construction of predictive models. This paper proposes a hybrid feature selection approach to breast cancer diagnosis which combines a Genetic Algorithm (GA) with Mutual Information (MI) for selecting the best combination of cancer predictors, with maximal discriminative capability. The selected features are then input into a classifier to predict whether a patient has breast cancer. Using a publicly available breast cancer dataset, experiments were performed to evaluate the performance of the Genetic Algorithm based on the Mutual Information approach with two different machine learning classifiers, namely the k-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), and Support vector machine (SVM), each tuned using different distance measures and kernel functions, respectively. The results revealed that the proposed hybrid approach is highly accurate for predicting breast cancer, and it is very promising for predicting other cancers using clinical data

Improved Machine Learning-Based Predictive Models for Breast Cancer Diagnosis

Breast cancer death rates are higher than any other cancer in American women. Machine learning-based predictive models promise earlier detection techniques for breast cancer diagnosis. However, making an evaluation for models that efficiently diagnose cancer is still challenging. In this work, we proposed data exploratory techniques (DET) and developed four different predictive models to improve breast cancer diagnostic accuracy. Prior to models, four-layered essential DET, e.g., feature distribution, correlation, elimination, and hyperparameter optimization, were deep-dived to identify the robust feature classification into malignant and benign classes. These proposed techniques and classifiers were implemented on the Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer (WDBC) and Breast Cancer Coimbra Dataset (BCCD) datasets. Standard performance metrics, including confusion matrices and K-fold cross-validation techniques, were applied to assess each classifier’s efficiency and training time. The models’ diagnostic capability improved with our DET, i.e., polynomial SVM gained 99.3%, LR with 98.06%, KNN acquired 97.35%, and EC achieved 97.61% accuracy with the WDBC dataset. We also compared our significant results with previous studies in terms of accuracy. The implementation procedure and findings can guide physicians to adopt an effective model for a practical understanding and prognosis of breast cancer tumors.publishedVersio

Optimized Machine Learning Performance with Feature Selection for Breast Cancer Disease Classification

The prevalence of breast cancer is relatively high among adults worldwide. Particularly in Indonesia, according to the latest data from the World Health Organization (WHO), breast cancer accounts for 1.41% of all deaths and continues to increase. In order to address this growing issue, a proactive approach becomes essential. Therefore, the objective of this study is to classify the diagnosis of breast cancer into two categories: Benign and Malignant. Moreover, this classification pattern can serve as a benchmark for early detection and is expected to reduce mortality and cancer rates in breast cancer cases. The dataset used in this study is obtained from Kaggle and consists of 569 rows with 32 attributes. Various machine learning algorithms, such as Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Logistic Regression (LR), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Naïve Bayes (NB), are employed for the classification analysis in this disease. . This study uses Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for optimized feature selection techniques with dimension reduction are employed on the dataset prior to modeling the data. Our highest accuracy model is the Support Vector Machine (SVM) with an RBF kernel, utilizing c-value selection. Additionally, the Logistic Regression (LR) model achieves an accuracy of 97.3%. However, it is worth noting that the precision and recall of the SVM model are both 100%. Moreover, the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve indicates that the SVM graph surpasses the LR graph, which can be attributed to the results obtained from the confusion matrix calculation, where the False Positive Rate is found to be 0. Consequently, the overall performance evaluation of the SVM model with an RBF kernel, along with the utilization of the c-value selection approach, is significantly superior. This is primarily due to the fact that the SVM model does not make any incorrect predictions by classifying something as positive when it is actually negative

A Comparative Analysis of Data Mining Techniques on Breast Cancer Diagnosis Data using WEKA Toolbox

Abstract—Breast cancer is considered the second most common cancer in women compared to all other cancers. It is fatal in less than half of all cases and is the main cause of mortality in women. It accounts for 16% of all cancer mortalities worldwide. Early diagnosis of breast cancer increases the chance of recovery. Data mining techniques can be utilized in the early diagnosis of breast cancer. In this paper, an academic experimental breast cancer dataset is used to perform a data mining practical experiment using the Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis (WEKA) tool. The WEKA Java application represents a rich resource for conducting performance metrics during the execution of experiments. Pre-processing and feature extraction are used to optimize the data. The classification process used in this study was summarized through thirteen experiments. Additionally, 10 experiments using various different classification algorithms were conducted. The introduced algorithms were: Naïve Bayes, Logistic Regression, Lazy IBK (Instance-Bases learning with parameter K), Lazy Kstar, Lazy Locally Weighted Learner, Rules ZeroR, Decision Stump, Decision Trees J48, Random Forest and Random Trees. The process of producing a predictive model was automated with the use of classification accuracy. Further, several experiments on classification of Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer and Wisconsin Breast Cancer, were conducted to compare the success rates of the different methods. Results conclude that Lazy IBK classifier k-NN can achieve 98% accuracy among other classifiers. The main advantages of the study were the compactness of using 13 different data mining models and 10 different performance measurements, and plotting figures of classifications errors

Comparative Study of Classification Techniques on Breast Cancer FNA Biopsy Data

Accurate diagnostic detection of the cancerous cells in a patient is critical and may alter the subsequent treatment and increase the chances of survival rate. Machine learning techniques have been instrumental in disease detection and are currently being used in various classification problems due to their accurate prediction performance. Various techniques may provide different desired accuracies and it is therefore imperative to use the most suitable method which provides the best desired results. This research seeks to provide comparative analysis of Support Vector Machine, Bayesian classifier and other Artificial neural network classifiers (Backpropagation, linear programming, Learning vector quantization, and K nearest neighborhood) on the Wisconsin breast cancer classification problem