1,360 research outputs found
Probabilistic CTL* : the deductive way
Complex probabilistic temporal behaviours need to be guaranteed in robotics and various other control domains, as well as in the context of families of randomized protocols. At its core, this entails checking infinite-state probabilistic systems with respect to quantitative properties specified in probabilistic temporal logics. Model checking methods are not directly applicable to infinite-state systems, and techniques for infinite-state probabilistic systems are limited in terms of the specifications they can handle.
This paper presents a deductive approach to the verification of countable-state systems against properties specified in probabilistic CTL ∗ , on models featuring both nondeterministic and probabilistic choices. The deductive proof system we propose lifts the classical proof system by Kesten and Pnueli to the probabilistic setting. However, the soundness arguments are completely distinct and go via the theory of martingales. Completeness results for the finite-state case and an infinite-state example illustrate the effectiveness of our approach
Modelling and Verification of Multiple UAV Mission Using SMV
Model checking has been used to verify the correctness of digital circuits,
security protocols, communication protocols, as they can be modelled by means
of finite state transition model. However, modelling the behaviour of hybrid
systems like UAVs in a Kripke model is challenging. This work is aimed at
capturing the behaviour of an UAV performing cooperative search mission into a
Kripke model, so as to verify it against the temporal properties expressed in
Computation Tree Logic (CTL). SMV model checker is used for the purpose of
model checking
Deciding Full Branching Time Logic by Program Transformation
We present a method based on logic program transformation, for verifying Computation Tree Logic (CTL*) properties of finite state reactive systems. The finite state systems and the CTL* properties we want to verify, are encoded as logic programs on infinite lists. Our verification method consists of two steps. In the first step we transform the logic program that encodes the given system and the given property, into a monadic ω -program, that is, a stratified program defining nullary or unary predicates on infinite lists. This transformation is performed by applying unfold/fold rules that preserve the perfect model of the initial program. In the second step we verify the property of interest by using a proof method for monadic ω-program
On relating CTL to Datalog
CTL is the dominant temporal specification language in practice mainly due to
the fact that it admits model checking in linear time. Logic programming and
the database query language Datalog are often used as an implementation
platform for logic languages. In this paper we present the exact relation
between CTL and Datalog and moreover we build on this relation and known
efficient algorithms for CTL to obtain efficient algorithms for fragments of
stratified Datalog. The contributions of this paper are: a) We embed CTL into
STD which is a proper fragment of stratified Datalog. Moreover we show that STD
expresses exactly CTL -- we prove that by embedding STD into CTL. Both
embeddings are linear. b) CTL can also be embedded to fragments of Datalog
without negation. We define a fragment of Datalog with the successor build-in
predicate that we call TDS and we embed CTL into TDS in linear time. We build
on the above relations to answer open problems of stratified Datalog. We prove
that query evaluation is linear and that containment and satisfiability
problems are both decidable. The results presented in this paper are the first
for fragments of stratified Datalog that are more general than those containing
only unary EDBs.Comment: 34 pages, 1 figure (file .eps
Real-time and Probabilistic Temporal Logics: An Overview
Over the last two decades, there has been an extensive study on logical
formalisms for specifying and verifying real-time systems. Temporal logics have
been an important research subject within this direction. Although numerous
logics have been introduced for the formal specification of real-time and
complex systems, an up to date comprehensive analysis of these logics does not
exist in the literature. In this paper we analyse real-time and probabilistic
temporal logics which have been widely used in this field. We extrapolate the
notions of decidability, axiomatizability, expressiveness, model checking, etc.
for each logic analysed. We also provide a comparison of features of the
temporal logics discussed
Applying Formal Methods to Networking: Theory, Techniques and Applications
Despite its great importance, modern network infrastructure is remarkable for
the lack of rigor in its engineering. The Internet which began as a research
experiment was never designed to handle the users and applications it hosts
today. The lack of formalization of the Internet architecture meant limited
abstractions and modularity, especially for the control and management planes,
thus requiring for every new need a new protocol built from scratch. This led
to an unwieldy ossified Internet architecture resistant to any attempts at
formal verification, and an Internet culture where expediency and pragmatism
are favored over formal correctness. Fortunately, recent work in the space of
clean slate Internet design---especially, the software defined networking (SDN)
paradigm---offers the Internet community another chance to develop the right
kind of architecture and abstractions. This has also led to a great resurgence
in interest of applying formal methods to specification, verification, and
synthesis of networking protocols and applications. In this paper, we present a
self-contained tutorial of the formidable amount of work that has been done in
formal methods, and present a survey of its applications to networking.Comment: 30 pages, submitted to IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorial
Generalization Strategies for the Verification of Infinite State Systems
We present a method for the automated verification of temporal properties of
infinite state systems. Our verification method is based on the specialization
of constraint logic programs (CLP) and works in two phases: (1) in the first
phase, a CLP specification of an infinite state system is specialized with
respect to the initial state of the system and the temporal property to be
verified, and (2) in the second phase, the specialized program is evaluated by
using a bottom-up strategy. The effectiveness of the method strongly depends on
the generalization strategy which is applied during the program specialization
phase. We consider several generalization strategies obtained by combining
techniques already known in the field of program analysis and program
transformation, and we also introduce some new strategies. Then, through many
verification experiments, we evaluate the effectiveness of the generalization
strategies we have considered. Finally, we compare the implementation of our
specialization-based verification method to other constraint-based model
checking tools. The experimental results show that our method is competitive
with the methods used by those other tools. To appear in Theory and Practice of
Logic Programming (TPLP).Comment: 24 pages, 2 figures, 5 table
Transformational Verification of Linear Temporal Logic
We present a new method for verifying Linear Temporal
Logic (LTL) properties of finite state reactive systems based on logic programming and program transformation. We encode a finite state system and an LTL property which we want to verify as a logic program on infinite lists. Then we apply a verification method consisting of two steps. In the first step we transform the logic program that encodes the given system and the given property into a new program belonging to the class of the so-called linear monadic !-programs (which are stratified, linear recursive programs defining nullary predicates or unary predicates on infinite lists). This transformation is performed by applying rules that preserve correctness. In the second step we verify the property of interest by using suitable proof rules for linear monadic !-programs. These proof rules can be encoded as a logic program which always terminates, if evaluated by using tabled resolution. Although our method uses standard
program transformation techniques, the computational complexity of the derived verification algorithm is essentially the same as the one of the Lichtenstein-Pnueli algorithm [9], which uses sophisticated ad-hoc techniques
CTL+FO Verification as Constraint Solving
Expressing program correctness often requires relating program data
throughout (different branches of) an execution. Such properties can be
represented using CTL+FO, a logic that allows mixing temporal and first-order
quantification. Verifying that a program satisfies a CTL+FO property is a
challenging problem that requires both temporal and data reasoning. Temporal
quantifiers require discovery of invariants and ranking functions, while
first-order quantifiers demand instantiation techniques. In this paper, we
present a constraint-based method for proving CTL+FO properties automatically.
Our method makes the interplay between the temporal and first-order
quantification explicit in a constraint encoding that combines recursion and
existential quantification. By integrating this constraint encoding with an
off-the-shelf solver we obtain an automatic verifier for CTL+FO
- …