2,773 research outputs found
Approximate Consensus in Highly Dynamic Networks: The Role of Averaging Algorithms
In this paper, we investigate the approximate consensus problem in highly
dynamic networks in which topology may change continually and unpredictably. We
prove that in both synchronous and partially synchronous systems, approximate
consensus is solvable if and only if the communication graph in each round has
a rooted spanning tree, i.e., there is a coordinator at each time. The striking
point in this result is that the coordinator is not required to be unique and
can change arbitrarily from round to round. Interestingly, the class of
averaging algorithms, which are memoryless and require no process identifiers,
entirely captures the solvability issue of approximate consensus in that the
problem is solvable if and only if it can be solved using any averaging
algorithm. Concerning the time complexity of averaging algorithms, we show that
approximate consensus can be achieved with precision of in a
coordinated network model in synchronous
rounds, and in rounds when
the maximum round delay for a message to be delivered is . While in
general, an upper bound on the time complexity of averaging algorithms has to
be exponential, we investigate various network models in which this exponential
bound in the number of nodes reduces to a polynomial bound. We apply our
results to networked systems with a fixed topology and classical benign fault
models, and deduce both known and new results for approximate consensus in
these systems. In particular, we show that for solving approximate consensus, a
complete network can tolerate up to 2n-3 arbitrarily located link faults at
every round, in contrast with the impossibility result established by Santoro
and Widmayer (STACS '89) showing that exact consensus is not solvable with n-1
link faults per round originating from the same node
Tight Bounds for Asymptotic and Approximate Consensus
We study the performance of asymptotic and approximate consensus algorithms
under harsh environmental conditions. The asymptotic consensus problem requires
a set of agents to repeatedly set their outputs such that the outputs converge
to a common value within the convex hull of initial values. This problem, and
the related approximate consensus problem, are fundamental building blocks in
distributed systems where exact consensus among agents is not required or
possible, e.g., man-made distributed control systems, and have applications in
the analysis of natural distributed systems, such as flocking and opinion
dynamics. We prove tight lower bounds on the contraction rates of asymptotic
consensus algorithms in dynamic networks, from which we deduce bounds on the
time complexity of approximate consensus algorithms. In particular, the
obtained bounds show optimality of asymptotic and approximate consensus
algorithms presented in [Charron-Bost et al., ICALP'16] for certain dynamic
networks, including the weakest dynamic network model in which asymptotic and
approximate consensus are solvable. As a corollary we also obtain
asymptotically tight bounds for asymptotic consensus in the classical
asynchronous model with crashes.
Central to our lower bound proofs is an extended notion of valency, the set
of reachable limits of an asymptotic consensus algorithm starting from a given
configuration. We further relate topological properties of valencies to the
solvability of exact consensus, shedding some light on the relation of these
three fundamental problems in dynamic networks
A Characterization of Consensus Solvability for Closed Message Adversaries
Distributed computations in a synchronous system prone to message loss can be modeled as a game between a (deterministic) distributed algorithm versus an omniscient message adversary. The latter determines, for each round, the directed communication graph that specifies which messages can reach their destination. Message adversary definitions range from oblivious ones, which pick the communication graphs arbitrarily from a given set of candidate graphs, to general message adversaries, which are specified by the set of sequences of communication graphs (called admissible communication patterns) that they may generate. This paper provides a complete characterization of consensus solvability for closed message adversaries, where every inadmissible communication pattern has a finite prefix that makes all (infinite) extensions of this prefix inadmissible. Whereas every oblivious message adversary is closed, there are also closed message adversaries that are not oblivious. We provide a tight non-topological, purely combinatorial characterization theorem, which reduces consensus solvability to a simple condition on prefixes of the communication patterns. Our result not only non-trivially generalizes the known combinatorial characterization of the consensus solvability for oblivious message adversaries by Coulouma, Godard, and Peters (Theor. Comput. Sci., 2015), but also provides the first combinatorial characterization for this important class of message adversaries that is formulated directly on the prefixes of the communication patterns
Gathering in Dynamic Rings
The gathering problem requires a set of mobile agents, arbitrarily positioned
at different nodes of a network to group within finite time at the same
location, not fixed in advanced.
The extensive existing literature on this problem shares the same fundamental
assumption: the topological structure does not change during the rendezvous or
the gathering; this is true also for those investigations that consider faulty
nodes. In other words, they only consider static graphs. In this paper we start
the investigation of gathering in dynamic graphs, that is networks where the
topology changes continuously and at unpredictable locations.
We study the feasibility of gathering mobile agents, identical and without
explicit communication capabilities, in a dynamic ring of anonymous nodes; the
class of dynamics we consider is the classic 1-interval-connectivity.
We focus on the impact that factors such as chirality (i.e., a common sense
of orientation) and cross detection (i.e., the ability to detect, when
traversing an edge, whether some agent is traversing it in the other
direction), have on the solvability of the problem. We provide a complete
characterization of the classes of initial configurations from which the
gathering problem is solvable in presence and in absence of cross detection and
of chirality. The feasibility results of the characterization are all
constructive: we provide distributed algorithms that allow the agents to
gather. In particular, the protocols for gathering with cross detection are
time optimal. We also show that cross detection is a powerful computational
element.
We prove that, without chirality, knowledge of the ring size is strictly more
powerful than knowledge of the number of agents; on the other hand, with
chirality, knowledge of n can be substituted by knowledge of k, yielding the
same classes of feasible initial configurations
- …