206,420 research outputs found

    Competitively tight graphs

    Full text link
    The competition graph of a digraph DD is a (simple undirected) graph which has the same vertex set as DD and has an edge between two distinct vertices xx and yy if and only if there exists a vertex vv in DD such that (x,v)(x,v) and (y,v)(y,v) are arcs of DD. For any graph GG, GG together with sufficiently many isolated vertices is the competition graph of some acyclic digraph. The competition number k(G)k(G) of a graph GG is the smallest number of such isolated vertices. Computing the competition number of a graph is an NP-hard problem in general and has been one of the important research problems in the study of competition graphs. Opsut [1982] showed that the competition number of a graph GG is related to the edge clique cover number ΞΈE(G)\theta_E(G) of the graph GG via ΞΈE(G)βˆ’βˆ£V(G)∣+2≀k(G)≀θE(G)\theta_E(G)-|V(G)|+2 \leq k(G) \leq \theta_E(G). We first show that for any positive integer mm satisfying 2≀mβ‰€βˆ£V(G)∣2 \leq m \leq |V(G)|, there exists a graph GG with k(G)=ΞΈE(G)βˆ’βˆ£V(G)∣+mk(G)=\theta_E(G)-|V(G)|+m and characterize a graph GG satisfying k(G)=ΞΈE(G)k(G)=\theta_E(G). We then focus on what we call \emph{competitively tight graphs} GG which satisfy the lower bound, i.e., k(G)=ΞΈE(G)βˆ’βˆ£V(G)∣+2k(G)=\theta_E(G)-|V(G)|+2. We completely characterize the competitively tight graphs having at most two triangles. In addition, we provide a new upper bound for the competition number of a graph from which we derive a sufficient condition and a necessary condition for a graph to be competitively tight.Comment: 10 pages, 2 figure

    The competition numbers of ternary Hamming graphs

    Get PDF
    It is known to be a hard problem to compute the competition number k(G) of a graph G in general. Park and Sano [13] gave the exact values of the competition numbers of Hamming graphs H(n,q) if 1≀n≀31 \leq n \leq 3 or 1≀q≀21 \leq q \leq 2. In this paper, we give an explicit formula of the competition numbers of ternary Hamming graphs.Comment: 6 pages, 2 figure

    μƒνƒœκ³„μ—μ„œμ˜ 경쟁 κ΄€μ μœΌλ‘œ κ·Έλž˜ν”„μ™€ 유ν–₯κ·Έλž˜ν”„μ˜ ꡬ쑰 연ꡬ

    Get PDF
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ(박사) -- μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅λŒ€ν•™μ› : μ‚¬λ²”λŒ€ν•™ μˆ˜ν•™κ΅μœ‘κ³Ό, 2023. 2. κΉ€μ„œλ Ή.In this thesis, we study m-step competition graphs, (1, 2)-step competition graphs, phylogeny graphs, and competition-common enemy graphs (CCE graphs), which are primary variants of competition graphs. Cohen [11] introduced the notion of competition graph while studying predator-prey concepts in ecological food webs.An ecosystem is a biological community of interacting species and their physical environment. For each species in an ecosystem, there can be m conditions of the good environment by regarding lower and upper bounds on numerous dimensions such as soil, climate, temperature, etc, which may be represented by an m-dimensional rectangle, so-called an ecological niche. An elemental ecological truth is that two species compete if and only if their ecological niches overlap. Biologists often describe competitive relations among species cohabiting in a community by a food web that is a digraph whose vertices are the species and an arc goes from a predator to a prey. In this context, Cohen [11] defined the competition graph of a digraph as follows. The competition graph C(D) of a digraph D is defined to be a simple graph whose vertex set is the same as V (D) and which has an edge joining two distinct vertices u and v if and only if there are arcs (u, w) and (v, w) for some vertex w in D. Since Cohen introduced this definition, its variants such as m-step competition graphs, (i, j)-step competition graphs, phylogeny graphs, CCE graphs, p-competition graphs, and niche graphs have been introduced and studied. As part of these studies, we show that the connected triangle-free m-step competition graph on n vertices is a tree and completely characterize the digraphs of order n whose m-step competition graphs are star graphs for positive integers 2 ≀ m < n. We completely identify (1,2)-step competition graphs C_{1,2}(D) of orientations D of a complete k-partite graph for some k β‰₯ 3 when each partite set of D forms a clique in C_{1,2}(D). In addition, we show that the diameter of each component of C_{1,2}(D) is at most three and provide a sharp upper bound on the domination number of C_{1,2}(D) and give a sufficient condition for C_{1,2}(D) being an interval graph. On the other hand, we study on phylogeny graphs and CCE graphs of degreebounded acyclic digraphs. An acyclic digraph in which every vertex has indegree at most i and outdegree at most j is called an (i, j) digraph for some positive integers i and j. If each vertex of a (not necessarily acyclic) digraph D has indegree at most i and outdegree at most j, then D is called an hi, ji digraph. We give a sufficient condition on the size of hole of an underlying graph of an (i, 2) digraph D for the phylogeny graph of D being a chordal graph where D is an (i, 2) digraph. Moreover, we go further to completely characterize phylogeny graphs of (i, j) digraphs by listing the forbidden induced subgraphs. We completely identify the graphs with the least components among the CCE graphs of (2, 2) digraphs containing at most one cycle and exactly two isolated vertices, and their digraphs. Finally, we gives a sufficient condition for CCE graphs being interval graphs.이 λ…Όλ¬Έμ—μ„œ κ²½μŸκ·Έλž˜ν”„μ˜ μ£Όμš” 변이듀 쀑 m-step κ²½μŸκ·Έλž˜ν”„, (1, 2)-step 경쟁 κ·Έλž˜ν”„, 계톡 κ·Έλž˜ν”„, κ²½μŸκ³΅μ κ·Έλž˜ν”„μ— λŒ€ν•œ 연ꡬ κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό μ’…ν•©ν–ˆλ‹€. Cohen [11]은 λ¨Ήμ΄μ‚¬μŠ¬μ—μ„œ ν¬μ‹μž-ν”Όμ‹μž κ°œλ…μ„ μ—°κ΅¬ν•˜λ©΄μ„œ κ²½μŸκ·Έλž˜ν”„ κ°œλ…μ„ κ³ μ•ˆν–ˆλ‹€. μƒνƒœκ³„λŠ” μƒν˜Έμž‘μš©ν•˜λŠ” μ’…λ“€κ³Ό κ·Έλ“€μ˜ 물리적 ν™˜κ²½μ˜ 생물학적 체계이닀. μƒνƒœκ³„μ˜ 각 쒅에 λŒ€ν•΄μ„œ, ν† μ–‘, κΈ°ν›„, μ˜¨λ„ λ“±κ³Ό 같은 λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ μ°¨μ›μ˜ ν•˜κ³„ 및 상계λ₯Ό κ³ λ €ν•˜μ—¬ 쒋은 ν™˜κ²½μ„ m개의 μ‘°κ±΄λ“€λ‘œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚Ό 수 μžˆλŠ”λ° 이λ₯Ό μƒνƒœμ  μ§€μœ„(ecological niche)라고 ν•œλ‹€. μƒνƒœν•™μ  기본가정은 두 쒅이 μƒνƒœμ  μ§€μœ„κ°€ 겹치면 κ²½μŸν•˜κ³ (compete), κ²½μŸν•˜λŠ” 두 쒅은 μƒνƒœμ  μ§€μœ„κ°€ κ²ΉμΉœλ‹€λŠ” 것이닀. ν”νžˆ μƒλ¬Όν•™μžλ“€μ€ ν•œ μ²΄μ œμ—μ„œ μ„œμ‹ν•˜λŠ” μ’…λ“€μ˜ 경쟁적 관계λ₯Ό 각 쒅은 κΌ­μ§“μ μœΌλ‘œ, ν¬μ‹μžμ—μ„œ ν”Όμ‹μžμ—κ²ŒλŠ” 유ν–₯λ³€(arc)을 κ·Έμ–΄μ„œ λ¨Ήμ΄μ‚¬μŠ¬λ‘œ ν‘œν˜„ν•œλ‹€. μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ λ§₯λ½μ—μ„œ Cohen [11]은 λ‹€μŒκ³Ό 같이 유ν–₯κ·Έλž˜ν”„μ˜ 경쟁 κ·Έλž˜ν”„λ₯Ό μ •μ˜ν–ˆλ‹€. 유ν–₯κ·Έλž˜ν”„(digraph) D의 κ²½μŸκ·Έλž˜ν”„(competition graph) C(D) λž€ V (D)λ₯Ό 꼭짓점 μ§‘ν•©μœΌλ‘œ ν•˜κ³  두 꼭짓점 u, vλ₯Ό μ–‘ 끝점으둜 κ°–λŠ” 변이 μ‘΄μž¬ν•œλ‹€λŠ” 것과 꼭짓점 wκ°€ μ‘΄μž¬ν•˜μ—¬ (u, w),(v, w)κ°€ λͺ¨λ‘ Dμ—μ„œ 유ν–₯변이 λ˜λŠ” 것이 λ™μΉ˜μΈ κ·Έλž˜ν”„λ₯Ό μ˜λ―Έν•œλ‹€. Cohen이 κ²½μŸκ·Έλž˜ν”„μ˜ μ •μ˜λ₯Ό λ„μž…ν•œ μ΄ν›„λ‘œ κ·Έ λ³€μ΄λ“€λ‘œ m-step κ²½μŸκ·Έλž˜ν”„(m-step competition graph), (i, j)-step κ²½μŸκ·Έλž˜ν”„((i, j)-step competition graph), κ³„ν†΅κ·Έλž˜ν”„(phylogeny graph), κ²½μŸκ³΅μ κ·Έλž˜ν”„(competition-common enemy graph), p-κ²½μŸκ·Έλž˜ν”„(p-competition graph), 그리고 μ§€μœ„κ·Έλž˜ν”„(niche graph)κ°€ λ„μž…λ˜μ—ˆκ³  μ—°κ΅¬λ˜κ³  μžˆλ‹€. 이 λ…Όλ¬Έμ˜ 연ꡬ κ²°κ³Όλ“€μ˜ μΌλΆ€λŠ” λ‹€μŒκ³Ό κ°™λ‹€. μ‚Όκ°ν˜•μ΄ 없이 μ—°κ²°λœ m-step 경쟁 κ·Έλž˜ν”„λŠ” 트리(tree)μž„μ„ λ³΄μ˜€μœΌλ©° 2 ≀ m < n을 λ§Œμ‘±ν•˜λŠ” μ •μˆ˜ m, n에 λŒ€ν•˜μ—¬ κΌ­μ§“μ μ˜ κ°œμˆ˜κ°€ n개이고 m-step κ²½μŸκ·Έλž˜ν”„κ°€ λ³„κ·Έλž˜ν”„(star graph)κ°€ λ˜λŠ” 유ν–₯κ·Έλž˜ν”„λ₯Ό μ™„λ²½ν•˜κ²Œ νŠΉμ§•ν™” ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. k β‰₯ 3이고 λ°©ν–₯지어진 μ™„μ „ k-λΆ„ν•  κ·Έλž˜ν”„(oriented complete k-partite graph)의 (1, 2)-step κ²½μŸκ·Έλž˜ν”„ C_{1,2}(D)μ—μ„œ 각 뢄할이 μ™„μ „ λΆ€λΆ„ κ·Έλž˜ν”„λ₯Ό 이룰 λ•Œ, C_{1,2}(D)을 λͺ¨λ‘ νŠΉμ§•ν™” ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λ˜ν•œ, C_{1,2}(D)의 각 μ„±λΆ„(component)의 지름(diameter)의 길이가 μ΅œλŒ€ 3이며 C_{1,2}(D)의 μ§€λ°°μˆ˜(domination number)에 λŒ€ν•œ 상계와 μ΅œλŒ“κ°’μ„ κ΅¬ν•˜κ³  κ΅¬κ°„κ·Έλž˜ν”„(interval graph)κ°€ 되기 μœ„ν•œ μΆ©λΆ„ 쑰건을 κ΅¬ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μ°¨μˆ˜κ°€ μ œν•œλœ 유ν–₯회둜λ₯Ό 갖지 μ•ŠλŠ” 유ν–₯κ·Έλž˜ν”„(degree-bounded acyclic digraph)의 κ³„ν†΅κ·Έλž˜ν”„μ™€ κ²½μŸκ³΅μ κ·Έλž˜ν”„μ— λŒ€ν•΄μ„œλ„ μ—°κ΅¬ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μ–‘μ˜ μ •μˆ˜λ“€ i, j에 λŒ€ν•˜μ—¬ (i, j) 유ν–₯κ·Έλž˜ν”„λž€ 각 κΌ­μ§“μ μ˜ λ‚΄μ°¨μˆ˜λŠ” μ΅œλŒ€ i, μ™Έμ°¨μˆ˜λŠ” μ΅œλŒ€ j인 유ν–₯회둜 갖지 μ•ŠλŠ” 유ν–₯κ·Έλž˜ν”„μ΄λ‹€. λ§Œμ•½ 유ν–₯κ·Έλž˜ν”„ D에 각 꼭짓점이 λ‚΄μ°¨μˆ˜κ°€ μ΅œλŒ€ i, μ™Έμ°¨μˆ˜κ°€ μ΅œλŒ€ j 인 κ²½μš°μ— Dλ₯Ό hi, ji 유ν–₯κ·Έλž˜ν”„λΌ ν•œλ‹€. Dκ°€ (i, 2) 유ν–₯κ·Έλž˜ν”„μΌ λ•Œ, D의 κ³„ν†΅κ·Έλž˜ν”„κ°€ ν˜„κ·Έλž˜ν”„(chordal graph)κ°€ 되기 μœ„ν•œ D의 λ°©ν–₯을 κ³ λ €ν•˜μ§€ μ•Šκ³  μ–»μ–΄μ§€λŠ” κ·Έλž˜ν”„(underlying graph)μ—μ„œ 길이가 4이상인 회둜(hole)의 길이에 λŒ€ν•œ 좩뢄쑰건을 κ΅¬ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. κ²Œλ‹€κ°€ (i, j) 유ν–₯κ·Έλž˜ν”„μ˜ κ³„ν†΅κ·Έλž˜ν”„μ—μ„œ λ‚˜μ˜¬ 수 μ—†λŠ” 생성 λΆ€λΆ„ κ·Έλž˜ν”„(forbidden induced subgraph)λ₯Ό νŠΉμ§•ν™” ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. (2, 2) 유ν–₯κ·Έλž˜ν”„ D의 κ²½μŸκ³΅μ κ·Έλž˜ν”„ CCE(D)κ°€ 2개의 고립점(isolated vertex)κ³Ό μ΅œλŒ€ 1개의 회둜λ₯Ό κ°–μœΌλ©΄μ„œ κ°€μž₯ 적은 성뢄을 κ°–λŠ” 경우일 λ•Œμ˜ ꡬ쑰λ₯Ό 규λͺ…ν–ˆλ‹€. λ§ˆμ§€λ§‰μœΌλ‘œ, CCE(D)κ°€ κ΅¬κ°„κ·Έλž˜ν”„κ°€ 되기 μœ„ν•œ μ„±λΆ„μ˜ κ°œμˆ˜μ— λŒ€ν•œ 좩뢄쑰건을 κ΅¬ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€.1 Introduction 1 1.1 Graph theory terminology and basic concepts 1 1.2 Competition graphs and its variants 6 1.2.1 A brief background of competition graphs 6 1.2.2 Variants of competition graphs 8 1.2.3 m-step competition graphs 10 1.2.4 (1, 2)-step competition graphs 13 1.2.5 Phylogeny graphs 14 1.2.6 CCE graphs 16 1.3 A preview of the thesis 17 2 Digraphs whose m-step competition graphs are trees 19 2.1 The triangle-free m-step competition graphs 23 2.2 Digraphs whose m-step competition graphs are trees 29 2.3 The digraphs whose m-step competition graphs are star graphs 38 3 On (1, 2)-step competition graphs of multipartite tournaments 47 3.1 Preliminaries 48 3.2 C1,2(D) with a non-clique partite set of D 51 3.3 C1,2(D) without a non-clique partite set of D 66 3.4 C1,2(D) as a complete graph 74 3.5 Diameters and domination numbers of C1,2(D) 79 3.6 Disconnected (1, 2)-step competition graphs 82 3.7 Interval (1, 2)-step competition graphs 84 4 The forbidden induced subgraphs of (i, j) phylogeny graphs 90 4.1 A necessary condition for an (i, 2) phylogeny graph being chordal 91 4.2 Forbidden subgraphs for phylogeny graphs of degree bounded digraphs 99 5 On CCE graphs of (2, 2) digraphs 122 5.1 CCE graphs of h2, 2i digraphs 128 5.2 CCE graphs of (2, 2) digraphs 134 Abstract (in Korean) 168 Acknowledgement (in Korean) 170λ°•

    The (1,2)-Step Competition Graph of a Tournament

    Get PDF
    The competition graph of a digraph, introduced by Cohen in 1968, has been extensively studied. More recently, in 2000, Cho, Kim, and Nam defined the m-step competition graph. In this paper, we offer another generalization of the competition graph. We define the (1,2)-step competition graph of a digraph D, denoted C1,2(D), as the graph on V(D) where {x,y}∈E(C1,2(D)) if and only if there exists a vertex zβ‰ x,y, such that either dDβˆ’y(x,z)=1 and dDβˆ’x(y,z)≀2 or dDβˆ’x(y,z)=1 and dDβˆ’y(x,z)≀2. In this paper, we characterize the (1,2)-step competition graphs of tournaments and extend our results to the (i,k)-step competition graph of a tournament

    On p-competition graphs of loopless Hamiltonian digraphs without symmetric arcs and graph operations

    Get PDF
    For a digraph DD, the pp-competition graph Cp(D)C_{p}(D) of DD is the graph satisfying the following: V(Cp(D))=V(D)V(C_{p}(D))=V(D), for x,y∈V(Cp(D))x,y \in V(C_{p}(D)), xy∈E(Cp(D))xy \in E(C_{p}(D)) if and only if there exist distinct pp vertices v1,v_{1}, v2,v_{2}, ...,..., vpv_{p} ∈\in V(D)V(D) such that xβ†’vix \rightarrow v_{i}, yβ†’viy \rightarrow v_{i} ∈\in A(D)A(D) for each i=1,2,i=1,2, ...,..., pp. We show the H1βˆͺH2H_1 \cup H_2 is a pp-competition graph of a loopless digraph without symmetric arcs for pβ‰₯2p \geq 2, where H1H_1 and H2H_2 are pp-competition graphs of loopless digraphs without symmetric arcs and V(H1)∩V(H2)V(H_1) \cap V(H_2) == {Ξ±}\{ \alpha \}. For pp-competition graphs of loopless Hamiltonian digraphs without symmetric arcs, we obtain similar results. And we show that a star K1,nK_{1,n} is a pp-competition graph of a loopless Hamiltonian digraph without symmetric arcs if nβ‰₯2p+3n \geq 2p+3 and pβ‰₯3p \geq 3. Based on these results, we obtain conditions such that spiders, caterpillars and cacti are pp-competition graphs of loopless digraphs without symmetric arcs. We also obtain conditions such that these graphs are pp-competition graphs of loopless Hamiltonian digraphs without symmetric arcs

    The Competition Numbers of Johnson Graphs with Diameter Four

    Full text link
    In 2010, Kim, Park and Sano studied the competition numbers of Johnson graphs. They gave the competition numbers of J(n,2) and J(n,3).In this note, we consider the competition number of J(n,4)

    d-λ°˜μˆœμ„œμ˜ κ²½μŸκ·Έλž˜ν”„μ˜ 연ꡬ

    Get PDF
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ (박사)-- μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› : μ‚¬λ²”λŒ€ν•™ μˆ˜ν•™κ΅μœ‘κ³Ό, 2018. 2. κΉ€μ„œλ Ή.The \emph{competition graph} C(D)C(D) of a digraph DD is defined to be a graph whose vertex set is the same as DD and which has an edge joining two distinct vertices xx and yy if and only if there are arcs (x,z)(x,z) and (y,z)(y,z) for some vertex zz in DD. Competition graphs have been extensively studied for more than four decades. Cohen~\cite{cohen1968interval, cohen1977food, cohen1978food} empirically observed that most competition graphs of acyclic digraphs representing food webs are interval graphs. Roberts~\cite{roberts1978food} asked whether or not Cohen's observation was just an artifact of the construction, and then concluded that it was not by showing that if GG is an arbitrary graph, then GG together with additional isolated vertices as many as the number of edges of GG is the competition graph of some acyclic digraph. Then he asked for a characterization of acyclic digraphs whose competition graphs are interval graphs. Since then, the problem has remained elusive and it has been one of the basic open problems in the study of competition graphs. There have been a lot of efforts to settle the problem and some progress has been made. While Cho and Kim~\cite{cho2005class} tried to answer his question, they could show that the competition graphs of doubly partial orders are interval graphs. They also showed that an interval graph together with sufficiently many isolated vertices is the competition graph of a doubly partial order. In this thesis, we study the competition graphs of dd-partial orders some of which generalize the results on the competition graphs of doubly partial orders. For a positive integer dd, a digraph DD is called a \emph{dd-partial order} if V(D) \subset \RR^d and there is an arc from a vertex x\mathbf{x} to a vertex y\mathbf{y} if and only if x\mathbf{x} is componentwise greater than y\mathbf{y}. A doubly partial order is a 22-partial order. We show that every graph GG is the competition graph of a dd-partial order for some nonnegative integer dd, call the smallest such dd the \emph{partial order competition dimension} of GG, and denote it by dim⁑poc(G)\dim_\text{poc}(G). This notion extends the statement that the competition graph of a doubly partial order is interval and the statement that any interval graph can be the competition graph of a doubly partial order as long as sufficiently many isolated vertices are added, which were proven by Cho and Kim~\cite{cho2005class}. Then we study the partial order competition dimensions of some interesting families of graphs. We also study the mm-step competition graphs and the competition hypergraph of dd-partial orders.1 Introduction 1 1.1 Basic notions in graph theory 1 1.2 Competition graphs 6 1.2.1 A brief history of competition graphs 6 1.2.2 Competition numbers 7 1.2.3 Interval competition graphs 10 1.3 Variants of competition graphs 14 1.3.1 m-step competition graphs 15 1.3.2 Competition hypergraphs 16 1.4 A preview of the thesis 18 2 On the competition graphs of d-partial orders 1 20 2.1 The notion of d-partial order 20 2.2 The competition graphs of d-partial orders 21 2.2.1 The regular (d βˆ’ 1)-dimensional simplex β–³ dβˆ’1 (p) 22 2.2.2 A bijection from H d + to a set of regular (d βˆ’ 1)-simplices 23 2.2.3 A characterization of the competition graphs of d-partial orders 25 2.2.4 Intersection graphs and competition graphs of d-partial orders 27 2.3 The partial order competition dimension of a graph 29 3 On the partial order competition dimensions of chordal graphs 2 38 3.1 Basic properties on the competition graphs of 3-partial orders 39 3.2 The partial order competition dimensions of diamond-free chordal graphs 42 3.3 Chordal graphs having partial order competition dimension greater than three 46 4 The partial order competition dimensions of bipartite graphs 3 53 4.1 Order types of two points in R 3 53 4.2 An upper bound for the the partial order competition dimension of a graph 57 4.3 Partial order competition dimensions of bipartite graphs 64 5 On the m-step competition graphs of d-partial orders 4 69 5.1 A characterization of the m-step competition graphs of dpartial orders 69 5.2 Partial order m-step competition dimensions of graphs 71 5.3 dim poc (Gm) in the aspect of dim poc (G) 76 5.4 Partial order competition exponents of graphs 79 6 On the competition hypergraphs of d-partial orders 5 81 6.1 A characterization of the competition hypergraphs of d-partial orders 81 6.2 The partial order competition hyper-dimension of a hypergraph 82 6.3 Interval competition hypergraphs 88 Abstract (in Korean) 99Docto

    λ°©ν–₯ 지어진 μ™„μ „ 이뢄 κ·Έλž˜ν”„μ˜ m-step 경쟁 κ·Έλž˜ν”„

    Get PDF
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ (석사)-- μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› : μ‚¬λ²”λŒ€ν•™ μˆ˜ν•™κ΅μœ‘κ³Ό, 2018. 2. κΉ€μ„œλ Ή.In this thesis, we study the m-step competition graphs of bipartite tournaments. We compute the number of distinct bipartite tournaments by Polya's theory of counting. Then we study the competition indices and competition periods of bipartite tournaments. We characterize the pairs of graphs that can be represented as the m-step competition graphs of bipartite tournaments. Finally, we present the maximum number of edges and the minimum number of edges which the m-step competition graph of a bipartite tournament might have.1 Introduction 1 1.1 Basic graph terminology 1 1.2 Competition graph and its variants 3 1.3 m-step competition graphs 5 1.4 Polya's theory of counting 6 1.5 Competition indices and competition periods 9 1.6 Preview of thesis 10 2 The number of distinct bipartite tournaments 12 3 Properties of m-step competition graphs of bipartite tournaments 18 4 m-step competition realizable pairs 23 5 Extremal cases 31 6 Concluding remarks 36Maste

    Minimizing Direct Competitions in Complete Components of (1,2)-Step Competition Graphs

    Get PDF
    Graph theory is a useful tool for studying systems of food webs, a concept from ecology that models the predator-prey relationships between species in an ecosystem. We have used this concept to inform and motivate our exploration of graph theory. In particular we examine the characteristics of (1,2)-step competition graphs developed by Factor and Merz in 2010, which are an extension of normal competition graphs first introduced by Cohen in 1968. Factor and Merz define the (1,2)-step competition graph of a digraph D, denoted by C1,2(D), as the graph with the same vertex set as D and an edge between vertices x and y if and only if there exists some z in V(D) for which either dD\{x}(y, z) = 1 and dD\{y}(x, z) =\u3c 2 or, dD\{y}(x, z) = 1 and dD\{x}(y, z) =\u3c 2. We extend this definition and say that given x, y in V(D) such that (x, y) in E(C1,2), x and y compete directly if there exists a vertex z in D such that d(y, z) = 1 and d(x, z) = 1. We then call the edge (x, y) in E(C1,2) a direct competition between x and y. Otherwise, we say that x and y compete indirectly and we call the edge (x, y) in E(C1,2) an indirect competition between x and y. We have developed a family of digraphs that induce complete components in their (1,2)-step competition graphs that appear to have a minimum number of direct competitions
    • …
    corecore