56,920 research outputs found
Изучение и внедрение качество-ориентированного образования в колледже для девушек
На основе метафоры птицы-феникс в традиционной китайской культуре и на базе "четырехгранного" развития женщины в китайской культуре (самоуважение, уверенность в себе, независимость, саморазвитие) формулируется новая философия образования, которая призвана помочь девушкам-студенткам стать здоровыми, независимыми, элегантными, мудрыми и счастливыми. Описана образовательная модель "четыре в одном"; она включает пример, изучение курса, волонтерскую деятельность, проектную деятельность. Эта философия подтверждает, что в Педагогическом университете Гуанси плодотворно развиваются качества студентов-девушек
Современная наука и научное познание в зеркале философской рефлексии
Рассматривается современная философия науки. Представлены основные подходы, определяющие проблемное поле этой сферы философии, в которой пересекаются методология науки, социология науки, когнитивная психология, философия техники, история науки, эпистемология
Філософія права як самосвідомість нації
Какова нация, такова ее философия права и справедливости. Однако, великая философия права может сотворить и великую нацию. Есть все основания для разработки и создания украинской национальной философии права.Like nation like philosophy of law and justice. However, great philosophy may create great nation. All necessary grounds are available to create and develop the Ukrainian national philosophy of law
Mead and Husserl on the Self and Identification of the Subject
Out of many different strategies in the philosophy of the early 20th century the author compares
two completely different philosophies: G. H. Mead’s social behaviorism and E. Husserl’s transcendental
phenomenology with respect to the self-arising problem. For Mead, the initial point of his theory is
the social conduct or person’s behavior, whereas for Husserl, the life of the isolated transcendental
Ego is of greatest value. The author emphasizes, though the main ideas of both philosophers have
different methodological grounds, one finds, that the matter of primary importance for them. This is
the question of who is an executor of the social acts (Mead) and the transcendental phenomenological
act (Husserl)? Through an analysis of the main ideas of both philosophers (‘I’ and ‘Me’ as principles
of the subject by Mead, and intentionality, time analysis, and intersubjectivity by Husserl) the author
demonstrates, firstly, how the question of self-identity is solved in both conceptions, and, secondly,
how to argue the advantages of phenomenology. The article leads to the conclusion: methodologically
Mead’s social behaviorism is relativistic, as far as his theory of subjectivity depends on the social
context. Husserl’s method, despite its complexity, offers a clear subject structure and therefore can be
regarded as more productive for the theory of self. Refs 15
Философия аргументации Х. Вольраппа
Философия аргументации Х. Вольрапп
The Birth of the Idea of Perfectibility: From the Enlightenment to Transhumanism
Starting from the Age of Enlightenment, a person’s ability of self-improvement, or perfectibility, is usually seen as a fundamental human feature. However, this term, introduced into the philosophical vocabulary by J.-J. Rousseau, gradually acquired additional meaning – largely due to the works of N. de Condorcet, T. Malthus and C. Darwin. Owing to perfectibility, human beings are not only able to work on themselves: by improving their abilities, they are also able to change their environment (both social and natural) and create favorable conditions for their existence. It is no coincidence that perfectibility became the key concept of the idea of social progress proposed by French thinkers in the Age of Enlightenment, despite the fact that later it was criticized, above all, by English authors, who justified its organic and biological nature and gave a different evolutionary interpretation to this concept, without excluding perfectibility from the philosophical vocabulary. In this article, we address the opposition and mutual counterarguments of these two positions. Beyond that, we draw a parallel with some of the ideas of S. Kapitsa, who proved to be not only a critic of Malthusianism but also a direct disciple of Condorcet. In the modern age, the ideas of human self-improvement caused the development of transhumanist movement. Condorcet is more relevant than ever, and today his theory of the progress of the human mind, which influenced the genesis of modern historical science, needs a re-thinking in the newest perspective of improving the mental and physical human nature with the help of modern technologies
Место истории философии в системе философского знания
ФИЛОСОФИЯ /ИСТФИЛОСОФСКОЕ ЗНАНИ
- …