Proceedings : A Forest Based Economy - Carrying A Tradition Into the Future

Proceedings : A Forest Based Economy - Carrying A Tradition Into the Future Blaine House Conference on Forestry (December 6-7, 1984) Department of Conservation, State House Station 22, Augusta, Maine 04333, August 1986. Contents: Table of Contents / Letter of Transmittal / The Forest 2020--Visions Of A Sustainable Forest / Forestry Resurvey: What Does It Say? How Can We Use It? / Can We Improve Maine\u27s Timber Supply? / Atmospheric Deposition And Forests Of The Northeast / A National Perspective: What Is Maine\u27s Competitive Niche? / The Future of Hardwood Markets / The Future of Softwood Markets / The State Of Our Forest / Trends In Maine\u27s Forest Transport System / Future Employment In The Maine Woods: Situation, Forces And Outlook / How Great Is The Threat From Canadian Labor? / The Threat From Imported Canadian Labor Is Alive and Well / Woods Labor Training Needs / A Condensed Report Of Wood Harvesting At The State\u27s VTI\u27s And What Is A Woodsman? / Safety and Workers Compensation / A Brief History Of Northern Woods Logging Association / A Maine Woodcutter Talks About Safety In the Woods / Maine\u27s Forest In The Global Context / Riding The Winds Of Change In Maine\u27s Foresthttps://digitalcommons.usm.maine.edu/me_collection/1172/thumbnail.jp

State Highlights 6/7/1950

This is the student newspaper from Western State High School, the high school that was on the campus of Western Michigan University, then called State Highlights, in 1950

The Cowl - v.7 - n.6 - Nov 7, 1941

The Cowl - student newspaper of Providence College. Volume 7, Number 6 - Nov 7, 1941. 4 pages

Towards a Theory of Constrained Relativism: Comparing and Combining the Work of Pierre Bourdieu, Mary Douglas and Michael Thompson, and Alan Fiske

In this article, I seek to compare Pierre Bourdieu\'s theory of practice, the cultural theory developed by Mary Douglas and Michael Thompson, and the relational models theory pioneered by Alan Fiske, and attempt to sketch how these theories could possibly be combined. I argue that the three theories are among the most interesting conceptual enterprises in the social sciences of the last few decades, as they all represent –quite similar– syntheses of long-standing social-science dualisms, such as objectivism vs. subjectivism, social structure vs. free will, functionalism vs. social conflict, etc. Besides these commonalities, I spell out the relative strengths and weaknesses of each of these approaches. This allows me to conclude by considering whether, and how, it might be possible to synthesise these syntheses by picking the most interesting features of the three theories, and avoiding their less appealing ones.[No keywords]