120 research outputs found

    ์ „์ž์ง€๋ฐฉ์ •๋ถ€ ๊ตฌํ˜„์„ ์œ„ํ•œ GIS ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ(Strategies for implementing GIS-based local E-government)

    Get PDF
    ๋…ธํŠธ : ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ์˜ ๋‚ด์šฉ์€ ๊ตญํ† ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์›์˜ ์ž์ฒด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฌผ๋กœ์„œ ์ •๋ถ€์˜ ์ •์ฑ…์ด๋‚˜ ๊ฒฌํ•ด์™€๋Š” ์ƒ๊ด€์—†์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค

    ๊ตญ๋‚ด์™ธ ๊ณต๊ฐ„๋น…๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ •์ฑ… ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋™ํ–ฅ

    Get PDF
    ๋…ธํŠธ : [ํŠน์ง‘ | ๊ณต๊ฐ„๋น…๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์™€ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ตญํ† ๊ฐ€์น˜ ์ฐฝ์ถœ 4

    ๊ตญ๊ฐ€GIS ์ค‘์žฅ๊ธฐ ์ •์ฑ…๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ(Vision and policy issues for national geographic information system in Korea)

    Get PDF
    ๋…ธํŠธ : ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ์˜ ๋‚ด์šฉ์€ ๊ตญํ† ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์›์˜ ์ž์ฒด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฌผ๋กœ์„œ ์ •๋ถ€์˜ ์ •์ฑ…์ด๋‚˜ ๊ฒฌํ•ด์™€๋Š” ์ƒ๊ด€์—†์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค

    ๊ณต๊ฐ„๋น…๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์ฒด๊ณ„ ๊ตฌ์ถ•, ํ™œ์šฉ ์ •์ฑ…๋ฐฉํ–ฅ

    Get PDF
    ๋…ธํŠธ : [ํŠน์ง‘ | ๊ณต๊ฐ„๋น…๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์™€ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ตญํ† ๊ฐ€์น˜ ์ฐฝ์ถœ 1

    ๊ธฐ์—…์˜ ๊ณต๊ฐ„๋น…๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ํ™œ์šฉ์‚ฌ๋ก€

    Get PDF
    ๋…ธํŠธ : [ํŠน์ง‘ | ๊ณต๊ฐ„๋น…๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์™€ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ตญํ† ๊ฐ€์น˜ ์ฐฝ์ถœ 3

    Quantitative Kinetic Energy Estimated from Disdrometer Signal

    Get PDF
    The kinetic energy of the rain drops was predicted in a relation between the rain rate and rain quantity, derived directly from the rain drop size distribution (DSD), which had been measured by a disdrometer located in the eastern state of Alagoas-Brazil. The equation in the form of exponential form suppressed the effects of large drops at low rainfall intensity observed at the beginning and end of the rainfall. The kinetic energy of the raindrop was underestimated in almost rain intensity ranges and was considered acceptable by the performance indicators such as coefficient of determination, average absolute error, percent relative error, mean absolute error, root mean square error, Willmott's concordance index and confidence index

    ๋Œ€ํ˜• ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ๋Ÿ‰ ์‚ฐ์ •์„ ์œ„ํ•œ UAS์™€ TLS ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด ๊ตฌ์ถ•๊ธฐ๋ฒ• ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)--์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :ํ™˜๊ฒฝ๋Œ€ํ•™์› ํ˜‘๋™๊ณผ์ • ์กฐ๊ฒฝํ•™,2019. 8. ์ด๋™๊ทผ.๋Œ€ํ˜•์žฌ๋‚œ ๋ฐœ์ƒ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‚ฌ์ „์˜ˆ๋ฐฉ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋Œ€์‘๋‹จ๊ณ„๊นŒ์ง€ ์ „๊ณผ์ •์˜ ์ฒด๊ณ„์ ์ด๊ณ  ํšจ์œจ์ ์ธ ๋Œ€์ฒ˜๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ธ๋ช…, ์žฌ์‚ฐ, ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ๋“ฑ์˜ ํ”ผํ•ด๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•˜์—ฌ์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋Œ€ํ˜•์žฌ๋‚œ ๋ฐœ์ƒ ์‹œ ๋Œ€์‘ ๊ณผ์ • ์ค‘ ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ๋Ÿ‰ ์‚ฐ์ •์— ์ง‘์ค‘ํ•˜์—ฌ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋Œ€ํ˜•ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ๋Ÿ‰ ์‚ฐ์ •์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ณผ๊ฑฐ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ ์‹ค์งˆ์ ์ธ ์ธก์ •์ด ์–ด๋ ต๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋ฐœ์ƒ ์ด์ „์˜ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง, ์›๊ฒฉํƒ์‚ฌ ๋“ฑ์˜ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ๋Ÿ‰์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ๋‹ค์ˆ˜ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ตœ๊ทผ ํ™œ๋ฐœํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ด์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” UAS (Unmanned Aerial System)๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ๋Ÿ‰์„ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋ฉฐ ๊ธฐ์กด ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๊ณผ์˜ ๋น„๊ต์™€ ๋ถ„์„์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. UAS๋Š” UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle)๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์˜์ƒ์„ ์ทจ๋“ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๋Š” ์ „๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ๊ณผ์ •์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. UAS๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ๊ณผ๊ฑฐ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ฃผ๋กœ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ถ„์•ผ์— ์ ์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์™€ ์œ ์‚ฌํ•˜๊ฒŒ TLS (Terrestrial Laser Scanning)๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š”๋ฐ ์ธก๋Ÿ‰ ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ ์ฃผ๋กœ ์ด์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ๊ทธ ์ •ํ™•์„ฑ ๋˜ํ•œ ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹์ƒ, ๊ฑด์ถ•, ํ† ๋ชฉ, ๋ฌธํ™”์žฌ, ์ง€ํ˜•์ธก๋Ÿ‰ ๋“ฑ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ ๋„๋ฆฌ ์ด์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋Œ€ํ˜•ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ๋Ÿ‰ ๋˜ํ•œ TLS๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด ๊ตฌ์ถ• ํ›„ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ ๋น„์šฉ, ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋“ฑ์˜ ์ œ์•ฝ์‚ฌํ•ญ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ํ™œ์šฉ์ด ๋ถˆ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋‹ค๊ณ  ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ํฌ๊ฒŒ 3๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ถ€๋ถ„์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ๋ถ„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ๋Š” UAS๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด ๊ตฌ์ถ•๊ณผ ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ๋Ÿ‰ ์‚ฐ์ • ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ ๋ชจ์ƒ‰์ด๋‹ค. UAS๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด ๊ตฌ์ถ•๊นŒ์ง€์˜ ๊ณผ์ •์„ ์ •๋ฐ€ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ๋น„ํ–‰๋ณ€์ˆ˜์™€ ๊ธฐํƒ€ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๋„์ถœํ•˜์—ฌ ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ๋Ÿ‰ ์‚ฐ์ •์˜ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ๋Š” TLS ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๊ณผ UAS ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด์˜ ๋น„๊ต์™€ ๋ถ„์„์ด๋‹ค. ๊ฐ๊ฐ์˜ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ M3C2์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ๋Ÿ‰ ์‚ฐ์ • ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ ์„ธ ๋ฒˆ์งธ๋Š” 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด์˜ ์œตํ•ฉ๊ณผ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ ๋ถ„์„์ด๋‹ค. ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ์œตํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•˜๊ณ  ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์—ฌ UAS, TLS, ์œตํ•ฉ๊ธฐ๋ฒ• ์„ธ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ฐจ์ด์™€ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ๋Ÿ‰ ์‚ฐ์ • ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ฃผ์š” ๋น„ํ–‰๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋Š” ๋น„ํ–‰๊ณ ๋„์™€ ์˜์ƒ์˜ ์ค‘๋ณต๋„์ด๋ฉฐ ์ด์™ธ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋Š” ์ง€์ƒ๊ธฐ์ค€์  ๊ฐœ์ˆ˜์ด๋‹ค. ์ด ์™ธ์—๋„ ์นด๋ฉ”๋ผ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ํ‘œ์ •, ์ง๋ฒŒ์˜ ํ”๋“ค๋ฆผ ์ •๋„๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด 56๊ฐœ์˜ ์ผ€์ด์Šค ์ค‘ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๋„์ถœํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ๊ณผ๊ฑฐ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์™€๋Š” ๋‹ค๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ๊ณ ๋„์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์ด ๋‚˜๋Š” ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ ์ง€์—ญ์—์„œ๋Š” DW (Distance covered on the ground by on image in Width direction)์— ์˜ํ•ด ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ๋„์ถœ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ ๋„๊ฐ€ ๋‚ฎ์„์ˆ˜๋ก ๋†’์€ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋Š” 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ณ ๋„๊ฐ€ ๋‚ฎ์„์ˆ˜๋ก ์ •ํ™•๋„๊ฐ€ ๋‚ฎ์•„์ง€๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. 56๊ฐœ์˜ ์ผ€์ด์Šค ๋ชจ๋‘ ์ •ํ™•๋„ ๋ถ„์„์„ ์‹ค์‹œํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ •ํ™•๋„์™€ ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ๋Ÿ‰๊ฐ„์˜ ์ƒ๊ด€์„ฑ์ด ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด์˜ ์ •ํ™•๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’์„์ˆ˜๋ก ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•œ ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ๋Ÿ‰์ด ์œ ์‚ฌํ–ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ด์™€ ๋ฐ˜๋Œ€๋กœ ์ •ํ™•๋„๊ฐ€ ๋‚ฎ์€ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด๋“ค์—์„œ๋Š” ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ๋Ÿ‰์ด ์ œ๊ฐ๊ฐ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ผ๋ จ์˜ ๊ณผ์ •์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ๋Ÿ‰ ์‚ฐ์ •์„ ์œ„ํ•œ UAS ์ตœ์  ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๋„์ถœํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ๋Ÿ‰ ์‚ฐ์ • ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. M3C2์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ UAS์™€ TLS ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด, ๊ฐ๊ฐ์˜ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ์žฅ๋‹จ์ ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ •ํ™•๋„์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, UAS๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด์˜ RMSE๋Š” 0.032m, TLS์˜ RMSE๋Š” 0.202m๋กœ UAS์˜ ์ •ํ™•๋„๊ฐ€ ๋” ๋†’์€ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ์œตํ•ฉํ•œ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด์˜ RMSE๋Š” 0.030m๋กœ์จ ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก  ์ค‘์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋†’์€ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ๋ถ„์„ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, UAS ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด๊ฐ€ ๋‹จ์‹œ๊ฐ„์— ๋†’์€ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋Š” ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋กœ ๋„์ถœ๋จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ๋Œ€ํ˜•ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ๋Ÿ‰ ์‚ฐ์ •์— ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋œ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๊ณผ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์™ธ์—๋„ ๋น„์šฉ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, UAS ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ 3์ฐจ์› ๋ชจํ˜• ๊ตฌ์ถ•๊นŒ์ง€ ์†Œ๋น„๋œ ๋น„์šฉ์ด TLS์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์ ์€ ๋น„์šฉ์ด ์†Œ๋น„๋œ ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋Œ€ํ˜•์žฌ๋‚œ ์‹œ ๋น„๊ต์  ๋‹จ์‹œ๊ฐ„์— ๋Œ€์‘ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ”ผํ•ด๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œํ™” ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์˜์‚ฌ๊ฒฐ์ •์„ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ, ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋„์ถœํ•œ UAS ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด ๊ตฌ์ถ• ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์€ ๋Œ€ํ˜• ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ๋Ÿ‰์‚ฐ์ •๊ณผ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์  ์˜์‚ฌ๊ฒฐ์ •์— ํ™œ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€ํ•œ๋‹ค.Damage to people, property, and the environment must be minimized through systematic and efficient handling of large-scale disasters throughout the entire process from prevention to the response stage. This study focused on the waste quantity calculations that are part of the response process during large-scale disasters. Studies on large-scale waste quantity calculations have been performed in the past, but actual measurements are difficult. Therefore, many studies are being performed on using information from previous instances to perform modeling and using technologies such as remote sensing to estimate waste quantities. This study calculated waste quantities based on UAS (unmanned aerial system), which is a technology that is often used these days. It evaluated the accuracy of this technology, and it analyzed and compared the technology with existing technologies. UAS can be seen as an overall process of using UAVs (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle) to capture images and analyzing them. Studies have been conducted in the past on using UAS to build 3D spatial information and evaluate accuracy, and they are being used integrally in a variety of fields. Similarly, 3D spatial information can be built using TLS (Terrestrial Laser Scanning), and these are chiefly used in the surveying field. This methods accuracy is excellent, and it is widely used in a variety of fields such as vegetation, construction, civil engineering, cultural assets, and topographical surveys. Large-scale waste can also be calculated by using TLS to build a 3D spatial information, but it is seen as unfeasible to use due to cost and time limitations. This study is broadly divided into 3 parts. The first part is examining the feasibility of using UAS to build a 3D spatial information and calculate waste quantity. The process up to the point of using UAS to build a 3D spatial information was analyzed in detail, and optimal flight variables and other variables were found in order to examine the feasibility of calculating waste quantity. The second part is comparing and analyzing 3D spatial information based on TLS and UAS technology. The 3D spatial information were compared and analyzed using the M3C2 algorithm, and the optimal waste quantity calculation methods were found. Finally, the third part is analyzing a combination of the 3D spatial information and the 3D spatial information efficiency. The two technologies were combined to build a 3D spatial information, and their efficiency was analyzed to find the differences between the three methodologies (UAS, TLS, and the combined method), as well as find the optimal waste quantity calculation method. The major flight variables are the flight altitude and image overlap. Another variable is the number of ground control points. In addition to this, the camera interior orientation and degree of gimbal shaking were analyzed. Through this study, the optimal variables among 56 cases were found. Unlike past studies, it was discovered that the results were contrary to previous studies due to the DW (Distance covered on the ground by on image in Width direction) in waste regions with a lot of altitude differences. Normally, as the altitude becomes lower, the accuracy of the 3D spatial information becomes higher, but in this study it was found that the accuracy became lower as the altitude became lower. The accuracy of all 56 cases was analyzed, and it was found that there is a correlation between accuracy and the amount of waste. As the accuracy of the 3D spatial information increased, the calculated waste amounts became similar. Conversely, in 3D spatial information with low accuracy, it was found that the waste amounts were different. Through this sequential process, the optimal UAS variables for calculating waste amounts were found, and it was possible to confirm the feasibility of calculating waste amounts based on 3D spatial iformation. The M3C2 algorithm was used to compare the UAS and TLS-based 3D spatial information, and by doing so, it was possible to confirm the advantages and disadvantages of each model. As for accuracy, the RMSE of the UAS-based 3D spatial information was 0.032 m, and the RMSE of the TLS model was 0.202, making the UAS models accuracy higher. The RMSE of the 3D spatial information which combined the two technologies was 0.030 m, and it showed the highest accuracy of the three methodologies. However, in terms of efficiency, the analyzed results were able to confirm that the UAS-based 3D spatial information had the optimal technology and methodology for large-scale waste amount calculations by creating a model which shows high accuracy in a short time. In addition, cost analysis results were able to confirm that the cost of building the UAS-based 3D spatial information was lower than that of TLS. During large-scale disasters, it is necessary to respond in a relatively short time to minimize damage and perform a variety of decision-making. The UAS-based 3D spatial information building method found in this study can be used for large-scale waste amount calculations and spatial decision-making.I. Introduction 1 II. Literature Review 7 1. Studies on Applying the UAS to Disaster Management 7 2. Accuracy of UAS-based 3D Model Construction 14 3. Disaster Waste Quantity 26 III. Materials and Methods 34 1. Optimal Flight Parameters for UAV Generating 3D Spatial Information 36 1.1. Design of UAV Flight 36 1.2. Photogrammetric Processing for the Acquisition of 3D Spatial Information 41 1.3. Assessment of the 3D Spatial Information Accuracy 43 1.4. Computation of the Amount of Waste 45 2. Comparison and Analysis of TLS and UAS Methodology for Optimal Volume Computation 47 2.1. TLS and UAS-based 3D Spatial Information Generation and Volume Computation 49 2.2. Comparison and Analysis of 3D Spatial Information 55 3. Multispace Fusion Methodology-based 3D Spatial Information Generating and Efficiency Analysis 57 3.1. Multispace Fusion Methodology-based 3D Spatial Information 57 3.2. Efficiency Analysis of 3D Spatial Information for Responding to Large-scale Disasters 58 III. Result and Discussion 59 1. Optimal Flight Parameters for UAV Generating 3D Spatial Information and Investigation of Feasibility 59 1.1. Generation of 3D Spatial Information using UAS 59 1.2. Assessment of the 3D Spatial Information Accuracy 64 1.3. Computation of the Amount of Waste and Optimal flights parameters 76 2. Comparison and Analysis of TLS and UAS-based 3D Spatial Information 84 2.1. Generation of 3D Spatial Information and Volume Computation using UAS 84 2.2. Spatial Comparison and Analysis 88 3. Multispace Fusion Methodology-based 3D Spatial Information Generating and Efficiency Analysis 93 3.1. Multispace Fusion Methodology-based 3D Spatial Information 93 3.2. 3D Spatial information Efficiency Analysis for Responding to Large-scale Disasters 96 IV. Conclusion 100 V. Bibliography 103Docto

    Hyperspectral Irradiance Data for a Comparison and an Analysis of Optical Satellite Spectral Observation: Based on Seogwipo Forest Flux Tower

    Get PDF
    Comparison with ground-truth data is essential for developing and applying remote sensing algorithm towards the Earth surface. Unfortunately, major sources of domestic ground-truth data are depending on field-campaign with limited period because of insufficient all-time observation facilities within a domestic region. Korea Aerospace Research Institute, KARI, is planning to construct and operate surface observation tower to provide remote sensing infrastructure. This study was conducted as a pilot program of the observation tower construction and targeted to observe surface reflectance. The observation was made for about 21 months from May 2017. Two hyper-spectroradiometers were installed on top of a forest flux tower at Mt. Halla to measure hyperspectral up/down-welling irradiance, and surface reflectance was derived simply from their ratio. The derived surface reflectance was compared to surface reflectance values estimated from LANDSAT8 VNIR images, and the two surface reflectances coincided while showing effectiveness of the derived surface reflectance. The data acquired from this study would be able to provide background information for the expected surface observation tower, as well as actual ground-truth data for remote sensing application upon Mt. Halla area

    Chlorophyll and Total Suspended Materials Concentrations and Remote Sensing Reflectance Data measured at the Red Tide Area of Jinhae, Geoje, and East Sea during August from 1998 to 2003 and August 2013

    Get PDF
    The chlorophyll and total suspended materials concentrations and remote sensing reflectance data were observed for red tides occurring every summer in waters around the Korean Peninsula. In observation area and date, the field survey were performed (1) in the Jinhae and Geoje coasts during August 1998, August 1999, August 2001, and August 2003, (2) in East Sea coast during August 2013. The remote sensing reflectance data were obtained from portable spectroradiometer. The chlorophyll concentration data were obtained from spectrophotometric method and the total suspended materials concentration data were obtained from filter-weight difference method. The remote sensing reflectance data were validated using Moon et al.(2012). The chlorophyll concentration data were validated using baseline correction and subtraction of 750 nm value, and the total suspended materials concentration data were validated using variation of humidity
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore