Quantifying Variation in Gait Features from Wearable Inertial Sensors Using Mixed Effects Models

The emerging technology of wearable inertial sensors has shown its advantages in collecting continuous longitudinal gait data outside laboratories. This freedom also presents challenges in collecting high-fidelity gait data. In the free-living environment, without constant supervision from researchers, sensor-based gait features are susceptible to variation from confounding factors such as gait speed and mounting uncertainty, which are challenging to control or estimate. This paper is one of the first attempts in the field to tackle such challenges using statistical modeling. By accepting the uncertainties and variation associated with wearable sensor-based gait data, we shift our efforts from detecting and correcting those variations to modeling them statistically. From gait data collected on one healthy, non-elderly subject during 48 full-factorial trials, we identified four major sources of variation, and quantified their impact on one gait outcome—range per cycle—using a random effects model and a fixed effects model. The methodology developed in this paper lays the groundwork for a statistical framework to account for sources of variation in wearable gait data, thus facilitating informative statistical inference for free-living gait analysis

Automated gait segmentation and tracking using inertial measurement units

Abstract. In this thesis, a methodology is presented to automate the labelling, event detection, segmentation, tracking, and parameter extraction of IMU gait data for sensors placed on the feet and shanks. The algorithms presented were tested using IMU data from three different styles of gait, normal gait, antalgic gait, and limited mobility gait. The algorithms developed were found effective for all of the simulated gait styles without mislabelling or detecting erroneous gait segments. The resultant gait trajectories and parameters were analyzed and were found to accurately depict the differences between each of the different styles of gait. The methodology presented can be used for the rapid and accurate processing of gait data for multiple styles of gait. This quantification of gait data can enable the collection of IMU gait data on a larger scale. This provides an accessible, low-cost option for out-of-laboratory gait data collection

Quantitative Gait and Balance Outcomes for Ataxia Trials: Consensus Recommendations by the Ataxia Global Initiative Working Group on Digital-Motor Biomarkers

\ua9 2023, The Author(s).With disease-modifying drugs on the horizon for degenerative ataxias, ecologically valid, finely granulated, digital health measures are highly warranted to augment clinical and patient-reported outcome measures. Gait and balance disturbances most often present as the first signs of degenerative cerebellar ataxia and are the most reported disabling features in disease progression. Thus, digital gait and balance measures constitute promising and relevant performance outcomes for clinical trials. This narrative review with embedded consensus will describe evidence for the sensitivity of digital gait and balance measures for evaluating ataxia severity and progression, propose a consensus protocol for establishing gait and balance metrics in natural history studies and clinical trials, and discuss relevant issues for their use as performance outcomes

Quantitative gait and balance outcomes for ataxia trials: consensus recommendations by the Ataxia Global Initiative Working Group on Digital-Motor Biomarkers

With disease-modifying drugs on the horizon for degenerative ataxias, ecologically valid, finely granulated, digital health measures are highly warranted to augment clinical and patient-reported outcome measures. Gait and balance disturbances most often present as the first signs of degenerative cerebellar ataxia and are the most reported disabling features in disease progression. Thus, digital gait and balance measures constitute promising and relevant performance outcomes for clinical trials.This narrative review with embedded consensus will describe evidence for the sensitivity of digital gait and balance measures for evaluating ataxia severity and progression, propose a consensus protocol for establishing gait and balance metrics in natural history studies and clinical trials, and discuss relevant issues for their use as performance outcomes