1,115 research outputs found

    Schlafregulation

    Get PDF
    Zusammenfassung: Die Zirkadianrhythmik und die Schlafhomöostase regulieren die zeitliche Abfolge und die Struktur des Schlafes bei Mensch und Tier. Beim Menschen fĂŒhrt das Zusammenspiel dieser 2Prozesse zu einer konsolidierten Wachepisode von etwa 16h und einer konsolidierten Schlafepisode von etwa 8h. Dabei wirkt ein zirkadian reguliertes Wachsignal dem sich aufbauenden Schlafdruck (Schlafhomöostat) wĂ€hrend der Wachzeit entgegen. Störungen in diesem Zusammenspiel können zu kognitiven Leistungseinbußen, TagesschlĂ€frigkeit und Schlafproblemen fĂŒhren, was oft bei Schichtarbeitern, Jetlag, Ă€lteren Leuten, und Patienten, die am verzögerten oder verfrĂŒhten Schlafphasen-Syndrom leiden, der Fall ist. Ergebnisse aus der Molekularbiologie und Zellphysiologie dieser beiden Prozesse fĂŒhrten zu folgenden Erkenntnissen: Die suprachiasmatischen Kerne (SCN) reprĂ€sentieren den zentralen zirkadianen Schrittmacher. Es gibt eine RĂŒckkopplung zu den SCN ĂŒber das Neurohormon Melatonin. Das ventrolaterale prĂ€optische Areal (VLPO) ist besonders wichtig fĂŒr die Initiation des Schlafes. Das Nukleosid Adenosin triggert das VLPO. Ein ultradianer Oszillator im mesopontinen Hirnstamm steuert den regelmĂ€ĂŸigen Wechsel zwischen NREM- und REM-Schlaf. Der Schlaf-Wach-Zyklus und der NREM-REM-Schlaf-Zyklus induzieren regelmĂ€ĂŸig auftretende neuromodulatorische VerĂ€nderungen in Vorderhirnstrukture

    Schlaf und zirkadiane Rhythmik im Alter

    Get PDF
    Zusammenfassung: Mit steigendem Alter nimmt die nĂ€chtliche Schlafkonsolidierung ab, kurze Nickerchen ĂŒber den Tag nehmen zu, und die Schlafzeit verschiebt sich in frĂŒhere Stunden. Die Schlafregulation hĂ€ngt von der Interaktion zwischen einem zirkadianen Schrittmacher (biologische Uhr) und dem Schlafhomöostaten (je lĂ€nger die Wachphase, desto grĂ¶ĂŸer der Schlafdruck) ab. Wir konnten an gesunden Ă€lteren Personen zeigen, dass sich die Amplitude zirkadianer Rhythmen (z. B. die Melatonin-Sekretion) und die Tiefschlafdauer verringert. Gleichzeitig nimmt die MĂŒdigkeit am Nachmittag zu, wie auch die Tendenz—im Gegensatz zu jĂŒngeren Personen—am frĂŒhen Abend einzuschlafen. Da Licht der Hauptzeitgeber ist, um die biologische Uhr zu stabilisieren, brauchen Ă€ltere Menschen tagsĂŒber und am Abend genĂŒgend Licht und sollten wĂ€hrend des Tages keine oder nur kurze Nickerchen machen, um in der Folge den Schlaf in der Nacht zu verbesser

    In Athletes, the Diurnal Variations in Maximum Oxygen Uptake Are More Than Twice as Large as the Day-to-Day Variations

    Get PDF
    In competitive sports any substantial individual differences in diurnal variations in maximal performance are highly relevant. Previous studies have exclusively focused on how the time of day affects performance and disregarded the maximal individual diurnal variation of performance. Thus, the aims of this study were (1) to investigate the maximum diurnal variation in maximum oxygen uptake (VO2max), (2) to compare the diurnal variation of VO2max during the day to the day-to-day variation in VO2max, and (3) to investigate if there is a time-of-day effect on VO2max. Ten male and seven female athletes (mean VO2max: 58.2 ± 6.9 ml/kg/min) performed six maximal cardiopulmonary exercise tests including a verification-phase at six different times of the day (i.e., diurnal variation) and a seventh test at the same time the sixth test took place (i.e., day-to-day variation). The test times were 7:00, 10:00, 13:00, 16:00, 19:00, and 21:00. The order of exercise tests was the same for all participants to ensure sufficient recovery but the time of day of the first exercise test was randomized. We used paired t-tests to compare the nadir and peak of diurnal variations, day-to-day variations and the difference between diurnal and day-to-day variations. The mean difference in VO2max was 5.0 ± 1.9 ml/kg/min (95% CI: 4.1, 6.0) for the diurnal variation and 2.0 ± 1.0 ml/kg/min (95% CI: 1.5, 2.5) for the day-to-day variation. The diurnal variation was significantly higher than the day-to-day variation with a mean difference of 3.0 ± 2.1 ml/kg/min (95% CI: 1.9, 4.1). The linear mixed effects model revealed no significant differences in VO2max for any pairwise comparison between the different times of the day (all p > 0.11). This absence of a time-of-day effect is explained by the fact that peak VO2max was achieved at different times of the day by different athletes. The diurnal variations have meaningful implications for competitive sports and need to be considered by athletes. However, the results are also relevant to research. To increase signal-to-noise-ratio in intervention studies it is necessary to conduct cardiopulmonary exercise testing at the same time of the day for pre- and post-intervention exercise tests

    Circadian rhythms in cognitive performance: Methodological constraints, protocols, theoretical underpinnings

    Get PDF
    Abstract The investigation of time-of-day effects on cognitive performance began in the early days of psychophysiological performance assessments. Since then, standardised, highly controlled protocols (constant routine and forced desynchrony) and a standard performance task (psychomotor vigilance task) have been developed to quantify sleep-wake homeostatic and internal circadian time-dependent effects on human cognitive performance. However, performance assessment in this field depends on a plethora of factors. The roles of task difficulty, task duration and complexity, the performance measure per se, practice effects, inter-individual differences, and ageing are all relevant aspects. Therefore, welldefined theoretical approaches and standard procedures are needed for tasks pinpointing higher cortical functions along with more information about time-dependent changes in the neural basis of task performance. This promises a fascinating challenge for future research on sleep-wake related and circadian aspects of different cognitive domains

    Non-24-Hour Sleep-Wake Disorder Revisited – A Case Study

    Get PDF
    The human sleep-wake cycle is governed by two major factors: a homeostatic hourglass process (process S), which rises linearly during the day, and a circadian process C, which determines the timing of sleep in a ~24-h rhythm in accordance to the external light–dark (LD) cycle. While both individual processes are fairly well characterized, the exact nature of their interaction remains unclear. The circadian rhythm is generated by the suprachiasmatic nucleus (“master clock”) of the anterior hypothalamus, through cell-autonomous feedback loops of DNA transcription and translation. While the phase length (tau) of the cycle is relatively stable and genetically determined, the phase of the clock is reset by external stimuli (“zeitgebers”), the most important being the LD cycle. Misalignments of the internal rhythm with the LD cycle can lead to various somatic complaints and to the development of circadian rhythm sleep disorders (CRSD). Non-24-hour sleep-wake disorders (N24HSWD) is a CRSD affecting up to 50% of totally blind patients and characterized by the inability to maintain a stable entrainment of the typically long circadian rhythm (tau > 24.5 h) to the LD cycle. The disease is rare in sighted individuals and the pathophysiology less well understood. Here, we present the case of a 40-year-old sighted male, who developed a misalignment of the internal clock with the external LD cycle following the treatment for Hodgkin’s lymphoma (ABVD regimen, four cycles and AVD regimen, four cycles). A thorough clinical assessment, including actigraphy, melatonin profiles and polysomnography led to the diagnosis of non-24-hour sleep-wake disorders (N24HSWD) with a free-running rhythm of tau = 25.27 h. A therapeutic intervention with bright light therapy (30 min, 10,000 lux) in the morning and melatonin administration (0.5–0.75 mg) in the evening failed to entrain the free-running rhythm, although a longer treatment duration and more intense therapy might have been successful. The sudden onset and close timely connection led us to hypothesize that the chemotherapy might have caused a mutation of the molecular clock components leading to the observed elongation of the circadian period

    Effects of scale, question location, order of response alternatives, and season on self-reported noise annoyance using ICBEN scales : a field experiment

    Get PDF
    The type of noise annoyance scale and aspects of its presentation such as response format or location within a questionnaire and other contextual factors may affect self-reported noise annoyance. By means of a balanced experimental design, the effect of type of annoyance question and corresponding scale (5-point verbal vs. 11-point numerical ICBEN (International Commission on Biological Effects of Noise) scale), presentation order of scale points (ascending vs. descending), question location (early vs. late within the questionnaire), and survey season (autumn vs. spring) on reported road traffic noise annoyance was investigated in a postal survey with a stratified random sample of 2386 Swiss residents. Our results showed that early appearance of annoyance questions was significantly associated with higher annoyance scores. Questionnaires filled out in autumn were associated with a significantly higher annoyance rating than in the springtime. No effect was found for the order of response alternatives. Standardized average annoyance scores were slightly higher using the 11-point numerical scale whereas the percentage of highly annoyed respondents was higher based on the 5-point scale, using common cutoff points. In conclusion, placement and presentation of annoyance questions within a questionnaire, as well as the time of the year a survey is carried out, have small but demonstrable effects on the degree of self-reported noise annoyance

    Predicting melatonin suppression by light in humans:Unifying photoreceptor-based equivalent daylight illuminances, spectral composition, timing and duration of light exposure

    Get PDF
    Light‐induced melatonin suppression data from 29 peer‐reviewed publications was analysed by means of a machine‐learning approach to establish which light exposure characteristics (ie photopic illuminance, five α‐opic equivalent daylight illuminances [EDIs], duration and timing of the light exposure, and the dichotomous variables pharmacological pupil dilation and narrowband light source) are the main determinants of melatonin suppression. Melatonin suppression in the data set was dominated by four light exposure characteristics: (1) melanopic EDI, (2) light exposure duration, (3) pupil dilation and (4) S‐cone‐opic EDI. A logistic model was used to evaluate the influence of each of these parameters on the melatonin suppression response. The final logistic model was only based on the first three parameters, since melanopic EDI was the best single (photoreceptor) predictor that was only outperformed by S‐cone‐opic EDI for (photopic) illuminances below 21 lux. This confirms and extends findings on the importance of the metric melanopic EDI for predicting biological effects of light in integrative (human‐centric) lighting applications. The model provides initial and general guidance to lighting practitioners on how to combine spectrum, duration and amount of light exposure when controlling non‐visual responses to light, especially melatonin suppression. The model is a starting tool for developing hypotheses on photoreceptors’ contributions to light's non‐visual responses and helps identifying areas where more data are needed, like on the S‐cone contribution at low illuminances

    Preliminary evidence that both blue and red light can induce alertness at night

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>A variety of studies have demonstrated that retinal light exposure can increase alertness at night. It is now well accepted that the circadian system is maximally sensitive to short-wavelength (blue) light and is quite insensitive to long-wavelength (red) light. Retinal exposures to blue light at night have been recently shown to impact alertness, implicating participation by the circadian system. The present experiment was conducted to look at the impact of both blue and red light at two different levels on nocturnal alertness. Visually effective but moderate levels of red light are ineffective for stimulating the circadian system. If it were shown that a moderate level of red light impacts alertness, it would have had to occur via a pathway other than through the circadian system.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Fourteen subjects participated in a within-subject two-night study, where each participant was exposed to four experimental lighting conditions. Each night each subject was presented a high (40 lx at the cornea) and a low (10 lx at the cornea) diffuse light exposure condition of the same spectrum (blue, λ<sub>max </sub>= 470 nm, or red, λ<sub>max </sub>= 630 nm). The presentation order of the light levels was counterbalanced across sessions for a given subject; light spectra were counterbalanced across subjects within sessions. Prior to each lighting condition, subjects remained in the dark (< 1 lx at the cornea) for 60 minutes. Electroencephalogram (EEG) measurements, electrocardiogram (ECG), psychomotor vigilance tests (PVT), self-reports of sleepiness, and saliva samples for melatonin assays were collected at the end of each dark and light periods.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Exposures to red and to blue light resulted in increased beta and reduced alpha power relative to preceding dark conditions. Exposures to high, but not low, levels of red and of blue light significantly increased heart rate relative to the dark condition. Performance and sleepiness ratings were not strongly affected by the lighting conditions. Only the higher level of blue light resulted in a reduction in melatonin levels relative to the other lighting conditions.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>These results support previous findings that alertness may be mediated by the circadian system, but it does not seem to be the only light-sensitive pathway that can affect alertness at night.</p
    • 

    corecore