3 research outputs found

    Estimulación del ventrículo izquierdo a través del seno coronario en un niño con válvula tricúspide mecánica.

    Get PDF
    El bloqueo auriculoventricular completo que requiere la implantación de un marcapasos permanente es una de las complicaciones del reemplazo de la válvula tricúspide. En estas circunstancias, se recomienda la estimulación epicárdica; sin embargo, un umbral más alto podría limitar la estimulación exitosa. En este informe se describe a un paciente joven de 10 años con prótesis de válvula tricúspide y bloqueo cardíaco a quien se le implantó un marcapasos epicárdico. La presencia de bloqueo de salida debido al aumento del umbral obliga a estimular el ventrículo izquierdo a través del seno coronario con un cable diseñado para la terapia de resincronización cardíac

    Terapia de resincronización cardíaca: Índice del QRS como predictor de respuesta

    No full text
    Introduction:Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an indication in heart failure with wide QRS and severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction.Objectives: To define the response predictors favorable to CRT. Method: An observational, descriptive, retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the QRS index (difference between the QRS width before and after implantation, divided by its value before implantation, multiplied by 100) as a predictor of favorable response to CRT. Electrocardiograms were performed before the procedure, at 6 and 12 months after implantation. The measurements were made by two independent observers, the first digital on the operating room monitor and the rest manual.Results: A total of 91 patients (mean age 61.2 years, 76% men) were included, with QRS wider than 120 ms and ejection fraction less than 35%. A favorable response was obtained in 59%. There were no significant pre-implant differences in the QRS duration between responders and non-responders (151.3 ms vs. 151.34 ms, p=0.98), but there were differences post-implant (100 vs. 115 ms, p<0.0001), as well as in the QRS percentage of decrease (33.2% vs. 24.3%, p<0.0001). The ROC curve showed that a cut-off value of the QRS index of 30% was sensitive (62%) and specific (75%) in order to predict a favorable response.Conclusions: The decrease in the QRS width after the CRT implant is related to a favorable response to it.Introducción: La terapia de resincronización cardíaca (TRC) es indicación en la insuficiencia cardíaca con QRS ancho y disminución grave de la fracción de eyección del ventrículo izquierdo.Objetivo: Definir los predictores de respuesta favorable a la TRC.Método: Se realizó un estudio observacional, descriptivo, retrospectivo, para evaluar el índice del QRS (diferencia entre anchura del QRS antes y después del implante, dividido entre su valor antes del implante, multiplicado por 100) como predictor de respuesta favorable a la TRC. Se realizaron electrocardiogramas antes del procedimiento, a los 6 y a los 12 meses del implante. Las mediciones se hicieron por dos observadores independientes, la primera digital en el monitor del salón de operaciones y el resto manual. Resultados: Se incluyeron 91 pacientes (edad media 61,2 años, 76% hombres), QRS mayor de 120 ms y fracción de eyección menor de 35%. Se obtuvo respuesta favorable en un 59%. No hubo diferencias significativas pre-implante en la duración del QRS entre respondedores y no respondedores (151,3 ms vs 151,34 ms, p=0,98), pero sí post-implante (100 vs 115 ms, p<0,0001), así como en el porcentaje de disminución del QRS (33,2% vs 24,3%, p<0,0001). La curva ROC mostró que un valor de corte del índice de QRS del 30% fue sensible (62%) y específico (75%), para predecir respuesta favorable.Conclusiones: La disminución de la anchura del QRS luego del implante de la TRC se relaciona con una respuesta favorable a la misma

    Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention to reduce anastomotic leak following right colectomy (EAGLE): pragmatic, batched stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial in 64 countries

    Get PDF
    Background Anastomotic leak affects 8 per cent of patients after right colectomy with a 10-fold increased risk of postoperative death. The EAGLE study aimed to develop and test whether an international, standardized quality improvement intervention could reduce anastomotic leaks. Methods The internationally intended protocol, iteratively co-developed by a multistage Delphi process, comprised an online educational module introducing risk stratification, an intraoperative checklist, and harmonized surgical techniques. Clusters (hospital teams) were randomized to one of three arms with varied sequences of intervention/data collection by a derived stepped-wedge batch design (at least 18 hospital teams per batch). Patients were blinded to the study allocation. Low- and middle-income country enrolment was encouraged. The primary outcome (assessed by intention to treat) was anastomotic leak rate, and subgroup analyses by module completion (at least 80 per cent of surgeons, high engagement; less than 50 per cent, low engagement) were preplanned. Results A total 355 hospital teams registered, with 332 from 64 countries (39.2 per cent low and middle income) included in the final analysis. The online modules were completed by half of the surgeons (2143 of 4411). The primary analysis included 3039 of the 3268 patients recruited (206 patients had no anastomosis and 23 were lost to follow-up), with anastomotic leaks arising before and after the intervention in 10.1 and 9.6 per cent respectively (adjusted OR 0.87, 95 per cent c.i. 0.59 to 1.30; P = 0.498). The proportion of surgeons completing the educational modules was an influence: the leak rate decreased from 12.2 per cent (61 of 500) before intervention to 5.1 per cent (24 of 473) after intervention in high-engagement centres (adjusted OR 0.36, 0.20 to 0.64; P &lt; 0.001), but this was not observed in low-engagement hospitals (8.3 per cent (59 of 714) and 13.8 per cent (61 of 443) respectively; adjusted OR 2.09, 1.31 to 3.31). Conclusion Completion of globally available digital training by engaged teams can alter anastomotic leak rates. Registration number: NCT04270721 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov)
    corecore