1,261 research outputs found
Global citizenship as the completion of cosmopolitanism
A conception of global citizenship should not be viewed as separate from, or synonymous with, the cosmopolitan moral orientation, but as a primary component of it. Global citizenship is fundamentally concerned with individual
moral requirements in the global frame. Such requirements, framed here as belonging to the category of individual cosmopolitanism, offer guidelines on right action in the context of global human community. They are complementary
to the principles of moral cosmopolitanism â those to be used in assessing the justice of global institutions and practices â that have been emphasised by cosmopolitan political theorists. Considering principles of individual and moral cosmopolitanism together can help to provide greater clarity concerning individual duties in the absence of fully global institutions, as well as clarity on individual obligations of justice in relation to emerging and still-developing trans-state institutions
Principles of Stakes Fairness in Sport
Fairness in sport is not just about assigning the top prizes to the worthiest competitors. It is also about the way the prize structure itself is organised. For many sporting competitions, although it may be acceptable for winners to receive more than losers, it can seem unfair for winners to take everything and for losers to get nothing. Yet this insight leaves unanswered some difficult questions about what stakes fairness requires and which principles of stakes fairness are appropriate for particular competitions. In this article I specify a range of different principles of stakes fairness (ten in total) that could regulate sporting competitions. I also put forward a theoretical method for pairing up appropriate principles of stakes fairness with given sporting competitions. Specifically, I argue that the underlying rationales for holding sporting competitions can provide useful guides for identifying appropriate principles of stakes fairness. I then seek to clarify and work through some of the implications of this method for a sample of real world controversies over sporting prize structures. I also attempt to refine the method in response to two possible objections from indeterminacy and relativism. Finally, I compare and contrast my conclusions with more general philosophical debates about justice
Claimed Co-ethnics and Kin-State Citizenship in Southeastern Europe
The paper introduces the often neglected concept of 'claimed co-ethnics' in the analysis of citizenship policies. It argues that this is an interstitial category that further complicates the triadic nexus between national minorities, nationalising states and kin-states. The 'claimed co-ethnics' are defined as people who are recognised by the citizenship (or ethnizenship) conferring state as belonging to its main ethnic group, although they themselves do not embrace that definition. In addition to bringing the issue of claimed co-ethnics into focus, the paper elucidates how citizenship policies can affect groups that challenge the exact fit between ethnicity and nation, showing how national governments through particular citizenship policies and categorisation practices engage in the construction of these groups. The paper shows that the triadic nexus framework, which has had a strong influence on citizenship and minorities scholarship, needs to be revised to include unidirectional relations between the elements of the triadic nexus. The paper is based on the comparison between the cases of ethnic Vlachs (in the context of Albania and Greece) and Bunjevci (in the context of Serbia and Croatia).European Commission - Seventh Framework Programme (FP7
Global equality of resources and the problem of valuation
The principle that every individual on the planet has a claim to an equal share of Earthâs natural resources has an intuitive attraction. Yet the Principle of Natural Resource Equality is not without its problems. This article focuses on the problem of valuation. Unless and until its adherents are able to develop an adequate theoretical mechanism for determining the comparative value of two or more bundles of natural resources the principle lacks applicability and persuasive force. Three adequacy constraints on such a mechanism are presented and then applied to a theorisation of the Principle of Natural Resource Equality that I have already expounded elsewhere: Global Equality of Resources. In each case I try to argue that Global Equality of Resources could satisfy the adequacy constraint, provided that both this theory and the relevant constraint are properly understood
The interlayer cohesive energy of graphite from thermal desorption of polyaromatic hydrocarbons
We have studied the interaction of polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) with the
basal plane of graphite using thermal desorption spectroscopy. Desorption
kinetics of benzene, naphthalene, coronene and ovalene at sub-monolayer
coverages yield activation energies of 0.50 eV, 0.85 eV, 1.40 eV and 2.1 eV,
respectively. Benzene and naphthalene follow simple first order desorption
kinetics while coronene and ovalene exhibit fractional order kinetics owing to
the stability of 2-D adsorbate islands up to the desorption temperature.
Pre-exponential frequency factors are found to be in the range
- as obtained from both Falconer--Madix (isothermal
desorption) analysis and Antoine's fit to vapour pressure data. The resulting
binding energy per carbon atom of the PAH is 5 meV and can be identified
with the interlayer cohesive energy of graphite. The resulting cleavage energy
of graphite is ~meV/atom which is considerably larger than previously
reported experimental values.Comment: 8 pages, 4 figures, 2 table
The âspirit of sportâ, WADAs code review, and the search for an overlapping consensus
In this paper, we argue for the recognition that anti-doping is in itself first and foremost an ethical position. The current World Anti-doping Code formulation of âthe spirit of sportâ is an acknowledgement of this point and a counterweight against scientific and technicist understandings of the nature of anti-doping itself. We critically review the Code formulations on âthe spirit of sportâ. Based on a theoretical background of various approaches to normative agreement and consensus in a setting of diversity of âcomprehensive viewsâ, we argue for revision of the Code. Specifically, we argue for a re-formulation of âthe spirit of sportâ in terms of athlete protection and the preservation of the integrity of sporting competition that could meet requirements on an overlapping consensus among all WADA stakeholders. This is not just a matter of formality and Code acceptance. An overlapping consensus is not a mere modus vivendi but a normative consensus based on fair, honest, and transparent discourse in which participants deliberate in a setting of mutual respect and trust, and of âdecencyâ, which is a basis for a consensus that cultivates authentic stakeholder commitment
- âŚ