Sacituzumab govitecan as second-line treatment for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer—phase 3 ASCENT study subanalysis

Breast cancer; Second-line treatmentCáncer de mama; Tratamiento de segunda líneaCàncer de mama; Tractament de segona líniaPatients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who relapse early after (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy have more aggressive disease. In the ASCENT trial, sacituzumab govitecan (SG), an antibody-drug conjugate composed of an anti-Trop–2 antibody coupled to SN-38 via a hydrolyzable linker, improved outcomes over single-agent chemotherapy of physician’s choice (TPC) in metastatic TNBC (mTNBC). Of 468 patients without known baseline brain metastases, 33/235 vs 32/233 patients (both 14%) in the SG vs TPC arms, respectively, received one line of therapy in the metastatic setting and experienced disease recurrence ≤12 months after (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. SG prolonged progression-free survival (median 5.7 vs 1.5 months [HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.22–0.76]) and overall survival (median 10.9 vs 4.9 months [HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.28–0.91]) vs TPC, with a manageable safety profile in this subgroup consistent with the overall population. In this second-line setting, as with later-line therapy, SG improved survival over conventional chemotherapy for patients with mTNBC.This study was sponsored by Gilead Sciences, Inc

Efficacy and Safety of Trastuzumab Emtansine Plus Capecitabine vs Trastuzumab Emtansine Alone in Patients With Previously Treated ERBB2 (HER2)-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer A Phase 1 and Randomized Phase 2 Trial

Importance: ERBB2 (HER2)-targeted therapy provides benefits in metastatic breast cancer (mBC) and gastric cancer, but additional treatments are needed to maximize efficacy and quality of life. Objective: To determine maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) plus capecitabine in patients with previously treated ERBB2-positive mBC and locally advanced/metastatic gastric cancer (LA/mGC) (phase 1) and the efficacy and safety of this combination vs T-DM1 alone in patients with mBC (phase 2). Design, setting, and participants: The MTD in phase 1 was assessed using a 3 + 3 design with capecitabine dose modification. Phase 2 was an open-label, randomized, international multicenter study of patients with mBC treated with T-DM1 plus capecitabine or T-DM1 alone. Eligible patients had previously treated ERBB2-positive mBC or LA/mGC with no prior chemotherapy treatment for advanced disease. Interventions: Patients in the phase 1 mBC cohort received capecitabine (750 mg/m2, 700 mg/m2, or 650 mg/m2 twice daily, days 1-14 of a 3-week cycle) plus T-DM1 3.6 mg/kg every 3 weeks. Patients with LA/mGC received capecitabine at the mBC phase 1 MTD, de-escalating as needed, plus T-DM1 2.4 mg/kg weekly. In phase 2, patients with mBC were randomized (1:1) to receive capecitabine (at the phase 1 MTD) plus T-DM1 or T-DM1 alone. Main outcomes and measures: The phase 1 primary objective was to identify the MTD of capecitabine plus T-DM1. The phase 2 primary outcome was investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR). Results: In phase 1, the median (range) age was 54.0 (37-71) and 57.5 (53-70) years for patients with mBC and patients with LA/mGC, respectively. The capecitabine MTD was identified as 700 mg/m2 in 11 patients with mBC and 6 patients with LA/mGC evaluable for dose-limiting toxic effects. In phase 2, between October 2014 and April 2016, patients with mBC (median [range] age, 52.0 [28-80] years) were randomized to receive combination therapy (n = 81) or T-DM1 (n = 80). The ORR was 44% (36 of 81 patients) and 36% (29 of 80 patients) in the combination and T-DM1 groups, respectively (difference, 8.2%; 90% CI, -4.5 to 20.9; P = .34; clinical cutoff, May 31, 2017). Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 78 of 82 patients (95%) in the combination group, with 36 (44%) experiencing grade 3-4 AEs, and 69 of 78 patients (88%) in the T-DM1 group, with 32 (41%) experiencing grade 3-4 AEs. No grade 5 AEs were reported. Conclusions and relevance: Adding capecitabine to T-DM1 did not statistically increase ORR associated with T-DM1 in patients with previously treated ERBB2-positive mBC. The combination group reported more AEs, but with no unexpected toxic effects

Теоремы сходимости и компактности для уравнений Бельтрами

Доведено ряд теорем збіжності та компактності класів регулярних розв'язків вироджених рівнянь Бельтрамі з обмеженнями інтегрального типу на дилатацію.A number of convergence and compactness theorems for classes of regular solutions of the degenerate Beltrami equations with restrictions of the integral type on a dilatation is proved

ATTAIN: Phase III study of etirinotecan pegol versus treatment of physician's choice in patients with metastatic breast cancer and brain metastases

The increasing incidence of breast cancer brain metastases is a major clinical problem with its associated poor prognosis and limited treatment options. The long-acting topoisomerase-1 inhibitor, etirinotecan pegol, was designed to preferentially accumulate in tumor tissue including brain metastases, providing sustained cytotoxic SN38 levels. Motivated by improved survival findings from subgroup analyses from the Phase III BEACON trial, this ongoing randomized, Phase III trial compares etirinotecan pegol to drugs commonly used for advanced breast cancer in patients with stable, treated breast cancer brain metastases who have been previously treated with an anthracycline, taxane and capecitabine. The primary end point is overall survival. Secondary end points include objective response rate, progression-free survival and time to CNS disease progression or recurrence in patients with/without CNS lesions present at study entry. Trial registration number: NCT02915744

ASSOCIATION 5 FLUORO-URACILE (5FU)- VINORELBINE (NAVELBINE) EN 2EME LIGNE DE CHIMIOTHERAPIE DES CANCERS DU SEIN AU STADE METASTATIQUE TRAITES EN PREMIERE LIGNE PAR UNE ASSOCIATION TAXANE - ANTHRACYCLINE (ETUDE RETROSPECTIVE SUR 34 CAS A L'INSTITUT CURIE ; REVUE DE LA LITTERATURE)

LILLE2-BU Santé-Recherche (593502101) / SudocPARIS-BIUM (751062103) / SudocSudocFranceF

Real-world survival outcomes of heavily pretreated patients with refractory HR+, HER2−metastatic breast cancer receiving single-agent chemotherapy—a comparison with MONARCH 1

Abemaciclib; Càncer de mama metastàsic; Supervivència globalAbemaciclib; Cáncer de mama metastásico; Supervivencia globalAbemaciclib; Metastatic breast cancer; Overall survivalPurpose In MONARCH 1 (NCT02102490), single-agent abemaciclib demonstrated promising efficacy activity and tolerability in a population of heavily pretreated women with refractory HR+, HER2− metastatic breast cancer (MBC). To help interpret these results and put in clinical context, we compared overall survival (OS) and duration of therapy (DoT) between MONARCH 1 and a real-world single-agent chemotherapy cohort. Methods The real-world chemotherapy cohort was created from a Flatiron Health electronic health records-derived database based on key eligibility criteria from MONARCH 1. The chemotherapies included in the cohort were single-agent capecitabine, gemcitabine, eribulin, or vinorelbine. Results were adjusted for baseline demographics and clinical differences using Mahalanobis distance matching (primary analysis) and entropy balancing (sensitivity analysis). OS and DoT were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression. Results A real-world single-agent chemotherapy cohort (n = 281) with eligibility criteria similar to the MONARCH 1 population (n = 132) was identified. The MONARCH 1 (n = 108) cohort was matched to the real-world chemotherapy cohort (n = 108). Median OS was 22.3 months in the abemaciclib arm versus 13.6 months in the matched real-world chemotherapy cohort with an estimated hazard ratio (HR) of 0.54. The median DoT was 4.1 months in MONARCH 1 compared to 2.9 months in the real-world chemotherapy cohort with HR of 0.76. Conclusions This study demonstrates an approach to create a real-world chemotherapy cohort suitable to serve as a comparator for trial data. These exploratory results suggest a survival advantage and place the benefit of abemaciclib monotherapy in clinical context.This study was funded by Eli Lilly and Company

Trastuzumab (T) and everolimus (E) pharmacokinetics (PK) in HER2 positive (+) primary breast cancer (BC) patients (pts): Unicancer RADHER trial results

International audienceBackground: T has greatly modified the prognosis of HER2+ BC, but few studies have analyzed its PK. The RADHER study evaluated the interest of adding E to T as preoperative therapy for primary HER2+ BC. It also aimed at describing the PK of T and studying the impact of E with T in primary BC. Methods: Eligible pts with HER2+ operable primary BC were randomized to receive T alone (loading dose 4 mg/kg, then 2 mg/kg/week (W)) or T + E (10 mg/day (D)) for a 6-W pre-operative treatment. Blood samples were collected to measure T and E concentrations. For T, plasma samples were collected in all pts before each infusion, and at Hour (H) 1, D1, D3, W1, W2, W4, W8 and W12 after the last infusion. E concentrations were determined on whole blood collected at H0, H0.5, H1, H2, H4, H6, H12 and H24 after the first T infusion, and again after the last E intake. T and E PK were described using population compartment analyses. Results: From 82 pts randomized, 79 were evaluable for T and 22 for E PK. Mean estimated PK parameters of T were (interindividual coefficient of variation %): central (Vc) and peripheral (Vp) volumes of distribution = 2 L (24%) and 1.3 L (39%), systemic (CL) and intercompartment (Q) clearances = 0.22 L/day (19%) and 0.36 L/day, respectively. Vc increased with body weight and decreased with age, while CL increased with body weight and with tumor volume. Elimination half-life was 11 days, a value lower than that previously reported in metastatic BC (28 days). E PK was best described by a two-compartment model. Mean estimated PK parameters (RSE%) of E were: CL = 3.96 L/h (22%), Q = 29.1 L/h (7%), Vc = 119 L (11%), Vp = 1530 L (24%). E did not influence T PK. E PK was similar to that previously reported in other indications. Conclusions: This is the first study describing the PK of T and E in primary BC. Notably, T CL increases with tumor volume and the elimination half-life is only 11 days, lower than expected from previous results in metastatic BC. The differences in PK between primary and metastatic BC might lead to take a second look at trastuzumab dose regimen in primary BC. Clinical trial information: NCT00674414

Vandetanib as a potential new treatment for estrogen receptor-negative breast cancers

International audienceThe receptor tyrosine kinase RET is implicated in the progression of luminal breast cancers (BC) but its role in estrogen receptor (ER) negative tumors is unknown. Here we investigated the expression of RET in breast cancer patients tumors and patient-derived xenografts (PDX) and evaluated the therapeutic potential of Vandetanib, a tyrosin kinase inhibitor with strong activity against RET, EGFR and VEGFR2, in ER negative breast cancer PDX. The RT-PCR analysis of RET expression in breast tumors of 446 patients and 57 PDX, showed elevated levels of RET in ER+ and HER2+ subtypes and in a small subgroup of triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC). The activity of Vandetanib was tested in vivo in three PDX models of TNBC and one model of HER2+ BC with different expression levels of RET and EGFR. Vandetanib induced tumor regression in PDX models with high expression of RET or EGFR. The effect was associated with inhibition of RET/EGFR phosphorylation and MAP kinase pathway and increased necrosis. In a PDX model with no expression of RET nor EGFR, Vandetanib slowed tumor growth without inducing tumor regression. In addition, treatment by Vandetanib decreased expression of murine Vegf receptors and the endothelial marker Cd31 in the four PDX models tested, suggesting inhibition of tumor vascularization. In summary, these preclinical results suggest that Vandetanib treatment could be useful for patients with ER negative breast cancers overexpressing Vandetanib's main targets. What's new? Tyrosine kinase receptors have emerged as key targets in breast cancer treatment. Here the authors examine the role of REarranged during Transfection (RET) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in estrogen receptor-negative breast cancers. They show tumor regression induced by the multikinase inhibitor Vandetanib in cancers with high expression of RET or EGFR. In two cohorts of primary breast cancer and patient-derived xenografts, one third of tumors showed expression of at least one of the two kinase receptors, underscoring Vandetanib's potential as an effective treatment option for estrogen receptor-negative breast cancers with high expression of RET or EGFR