Growth of the thoracic aorta in the smoking population: The Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial

Background: Although the descending aortic diameter is larger in smokers, data about thoracic aortic growth is missing. Our aim is to present the distribution of thoracic aortic growth in smokers and to compare it with literature of the general population. Methods: Current and ex-smokers aged 50–70 years from the longitudinal Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial, were included. Mean and 95th percentile of annual aortic growth of the ascending aortic (AA) and descending aortic (DA) diameters were calculated with the first and last non-contrast computed tomography scans during follow-up. Determinants of change in aortic diameter over time were investigated with linear mixed models. Results: A total of 1987 participants (56% male, mean age 57.4 ± 4.8 years) were included. During a median follow-up of 48 months, mean AA and DA growth rates were comparable between males (AA 0.12 ± 0.31 mm/year and DA 0.10 ± 0.30 mm/year) and females (AA 0.11 ± 0.29 mm/year and DA 0.13 ± 0.27 mm/year). The 95th percentile ranged from 0.42 to 0.47 mm/year, depending on sex and location. Aortic growth was comparable between current and ex-smokers and aortic growth was not associated with pack-years. Our findings are consistent with aortic growth rates of 0.08 to 0.17 mm/years in the general population. Larger aortic growth was associated with lower age, increased height, absence of medication for hypertension or hypercholesterolemia and lower Agatston s

Impact of endothelin blockade on acute exercise-induced changes in blood flow and endothelial function in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Item does not contain fulltextPositive vascular effects of exercise training are mediated by acute increases in blood flow. Type 2 diabetes patients show attenuated exercise-induced increases in blood flow, possibly mediated by the endothelin pathway, preventing an optimal stimulus for vascular adaptation. We examined the impact of endothelin receptor blockade (bosentan) on exercise-induced blood flow in the brachial artery and on pre- and postexercise endothelial function in type 2 diabetes patients (n = 9, 60 +/- 7 years old) and control subjects (n = 10, 60 +/- 5 years old). Subjects reported twice to the laboratory to perform hand-grip exercise in the presence of endothelin receptor blockade or placebo. We examined brachial artery endothelial function (via flow-mediated dilatation) before and after exercise, as well as blood flow during exercise. Endothelin receptor blockade resulted in a larger increase in blood flow during exercise in type 2 diabetes patients (P = 0.046), but not in control subjects (P = 0.309). Exercise increased shear rate across the exercise protocol, unaffected by endothelin receptor blockade. Exercise did not alter brachial artery diameter in either group, but endothelin receptor blockade resulted in a larger brachial artery diameter in type 2 diabetes patients (P = 0.033). Exercise significantly increased brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation in both groups, unaffected by endothelin receptor blockade. Endothelin receptor blockade increased exercise-induced brachial artery blood flow in type 2 diabetes patients, but not in control subjects. Despite this effect of endothelin receptor blockade on blood flow, we found no impact on baseline or post-exercise endothelial function in type 2 diabetes patients or control subjects, possibly related to normalization of the shear stimulus during exercise. The successful increase in blood flow during exercise in type 2 diabetes patients through endothelin receptor blockade may have beneficial effects in repeated exercise training

Comparison of breast cancer mucin (BCM) and CA 15-3 in human breast cancer

The Breast Cancer Mucin (BCM) enzyme immunoassay utilizes two monoclonal antibodies (Mab), M85/34 and F36/22, for the identification of a mucin-like glycoprotein in serum of breast cancer patients. We have compared BCM with CA 15-3, another member of the human mammary epithelial antigen family. Serum BCM was evaluated in 151 and CA 15-3 in 134 patients with breast cancer, in 30 normal controls, in 9 pregnant women, and in 13 cancer patients (non-breast). Neither the normal controls nor the pregnant women had BCM levels > 25 U/ml. In contrast, 87 of 115 patients (75%) with metastatic breast cancer had BCM levels > 25 U/ml. All control persons had CA 15-3 levels 25 U/ml. Seventy-four out of 97 patients (76%) with metastatic breast cancer had CA 15-3 levels > 25 U/ml. A statistically significant correlation was found between BCM and CA 15-3 in the breast cancer patient group (r = 0.883, p < 0.001, n = 134) and in the normal control group (r = 0.743, p < 0.001, n = 30). BCM and CA 15.3 both showed no correlation with CEA in breast cancer patients (r = 0.060, n = 81; and r = 0.146, n = 78, respectively). BCM had a range of sensitivity similar to that of the CA 15-3 RIA. Our results suggest that BCM may be a useful new marker for monitoring the clinical course of patients with breast cancer. Furthermore, in the evaluation of breast cancer patients, marker pands depending on disease stage may be a better choice than any single parameter in the evaluation of breast cancer patients

Report of the IFCC Working Group for Standardization of Thyroid Function Tests; part 3: total thyroxine and total triiodothyronine.

Item does not contain fulltextBACKGROUND: Because total thyroid hormone testing is performed on many automated clinical chemistry instruments, the IFCC Scientific Division commissioned the Working Group for Standardization of Thyroid Function Tests to include total thyroxine (TT4) and total triiodothyronine (TT3) in its standardization efforts. METHODS: Existing SI-traceable reference measurement procedures (RMPs) were used to assign TT4 and TT3 values to 40 single-donor serum samples for subsequent use in a method comparison study with 11 TT4 and 12 TT3 immunoassays. Data from comparison of each immunoassay with the RMPs provided a basis for mathematical assay recalibration. RESULTS: Seven TT4 assays had a mean bias within 10% of the RMP, but 2 deviated by an average of -12% and another 2 by +17%. All TT3 assays showed positive biases, 4 within and 8 outside 10%, up to 32%. Mathematical recalibration effectively eliminated assay-specific biases, but sample-related effects remained, particularly for TT3. Correlation coefficients with the RMPs ranged from 0.82 to 0.97 for TT4 and from 0.32 to 0.92 for TT3. The within-run and total imprecision ranges for TT4 were 1.4% to 9.1% and 3.0% to 9.4%, respectively, and for TT3 2.1% to 7.8% and 2.8% to 12.7%, respectively. Approximately one-half of the assays matched the internal QC targets within approximately 5%; however, we observed within-run drifts/shifts. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that of the assays we examined, only 4 TT4 but the majority of the TT3 assays needed establishment of calibration traceability to the existing RMPs. Most assays performed well, but some would benefit from improved precision, within-run stability, and between-run consistency.1 juni 201

Report of the IFCC Working Group for Standardization of Thyroid Function Tests; part 2: free thyroxine and free triiodothyronine.

Item does not contain fulltextBACKGROUND: Free thyroxine (FT4) and free triiodothyronine (FT3) measurements are useful in the diagnosis and treatment of a variety of thyroid disorders. The IFCC Scientific Division established a Working Group to resolve issues of method performance to meet clinical requirements. METHODS: We compared results for measurement of a panel of single donor sera using clinical laboratory procedures based on equilibrium dialysis-isotope dilution-mass spectrometry (ED-ID-MS) (2 for FT4, 1 for FT3) and immunoassays from 9 manufacturers (15 for FT4, 13 for FT3) to a candidate international conventional reference measurement procedure (cRMP) also based on ED-ID-MS. RESULTS: For FT4 (FT3), the mean bias of 2 (4) assays was within 10% of the cRMP, whereas for 15 (9) assays, negative biases up to -42% (-30%) were seen; 1 FT3 assay was positively biased by +22%. Recalibration to the cRMP eliminated assay-specific biases; however, sample-related effects remained, as judged from difference plots with biologic total error limits. Correlation coefficients to the cRMPs ranged for FT4 (FT3) from 0.92 to 0.78 (0.88 to 0.30). Within-run and total imprecision ranged for FT4 (FT3) from 1.0% to 11.1% (1.8% to 9.4%) and 1.5% to 14.1% (2.4% to 10.0%), respectively. Approximately half of the manufacturers matched the internal QC targets within approximately 5%; however, within-run instability was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that most assays had bias largely correctable by establishing calibration traceability to a cRMP and that the majority performed well. Some assays, however, would benefit from improved precision, within-run stability, and between-run consistency.1 juni 201

Report of the IFCC Working Group for Standardization of Thyroid Function Tests; part 1: thyroid-stimulating hormone.

Item does not contain fulltextBACKGROUND: Laboratory testing of serum thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) is an essential tool for the diagnosis and management of various thyroid disorders whose collective prevalence lies between 4% and 8%. However, between-assay discrepancies in TSH results limit the application of clinical practice guidelines. METHODS: We performed a method comparison study with 40 sera to assess the result comparability and performance attributes of 16 immunoassays. RESULTS: Thirteen of 16 assays gave mean results within 10% of the overall mean. The difference between the most extreme means was 39%. Assay-specific biases could be eliminated by recalibration to the overall mean. After recalibration of singlicate results, all assays showed results within the biological total error goal (22.8%), except for 1 result in each of 4 assays. For a sample with a TSH concentration of 0.016 mIU/L, 6 assays either did not report results or demonstrated CVs >20%. Within-run and total imprecision ranged from 1.5% to 5.5% and 2.5% to 7.7%, respectively. Most assays were able to match the internal QC targets within 5%. Within-run drifts and shifts were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Harmonization of TSH measurements would be particularly beneficial for 3 of the 16 examined assays. These data demonstrate that harmonization may be accomplished by establishing calibration traceability to the overall mean values for a panel of patient samples. However, the full impact of the approach must be further explored with a wider range of samples. Although a majority of assays showed excellent quality of performance, some would benefit from improved within-run stability.1 juni 201

Measurement of free thyroxine in laboratory medicine--proposal of measurand definition.

Item does not contain fulltex