103 research outputs found

    Reversal of chronic stress-induced pain by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in an animal model

    Get PDF
    AbstractTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been suggested as a therapeutic tool for pain syndromes. Although initial results in human subjects are encouraging, it still remains unclear whether the effects of tDCS can reverse maladaptive plasticity associated with chronic pain. To investigate this question, we tested whether tDCS can reverse the specific behavioral effects of chronic stress in the pain system, and also those indexed by corticosterone and interleukin-1β levels in serum and TNFα levels in the hippocampus, in a well-controlled rat model of chronic restraint stress (CRS). Forty-one adult male Wistar rats were divided into two groups control and stress. The stress group was exposed to CRS for 11 weeks for the establishment of hyperalgesia and mechanical allodynia as shown by the hot plate and von Frey tests, respectively. Rats were then divided into four groups control, stress, stress+sham tDCS and stress+tDCS. Anodal or sham tDCS was applied for 20min/day over 8 days and the tests were repeated. Then, the animals were killed, blood collected and hippocampus removed for ELISA testing. This model of CRS proved effective to induce chronic pain, as the animals exhibited hyperalgesia and mechanical allodynia. The hot plate test showed an analgesic effect, and the von Frey test, an anti-allodynic effect after the last tDCS session, and there was a significant decrease in hippocampal TNFα levels. These results support the notion that tDCS reverses the detrimental effects of chronic stress on the pain system and decreases TNFα levels in the hippocampus

    Isoflurane and the analgesic effect of acupuncture and electroacupuncture in an animal model of neuropathic pain

    Get PDF
    The present study aimed to determine whether isoflurane interferes with the analgesic effects of acupuncture (Ac) and electroacupuncture (EA), using a neuropathic pain (NP) rat model. In total, 140 male Wistar rats were used; isoflurane-induced nociceptive response was evaluated using the von Frey test, serum calcium-binding protein b (S100b) levels and nerve growth factor (NGF) levels in the left sciatic nerve. The NP model was induced by chronic constriction injury of the sciatic nerve at 14 days after surgery. Treatment was initiated after NP induction with or without isoflurane anesthesia (20 min/ day/8 days). The von Frey test was performed at baseline, 14 days postoperatively, and immediately, 24 h, and 48 h after the last treatment. Results of the nociceptive test and three-way analysis of variance were analyzed by generalized estimating equations, the Bonferroni test, followed by StudenteNewmaneKeuls or Fisher’s least significant difference tests for comparing biochemical parameters (significance defined as p 0.05). At baseline, no difference was noted in the nociceptive response threshold among all groups. Fourteen days after surgery, compared with other groups, NP groups showed a decreased pain threshold, confirming establishment of NP. Ac and EA enhanced the mechanical pain threshold immediately after the last session in the NP groups, without anesthesia. Isoflurane administration caused increased nociceptive threshold in all groups, and this effect persisted for 48 h after the last treatment. There was an interaction between the independent variables: pain, treatments, and anesthesia in serum S100b levels and NGF levels in the left sciatic nerve. Isoflurane enhanced the analgesic effects of Ac and EA and altered serum S100b and left sciatic nerve NGF levels in rats with NP

    Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) reverts behavioral alterations and brainstem BDNF level increase induced by neuropathic pain model: Long-lasting effect

    Get PDF
    AbstractIntroductionNeuropathic pain (NP) is a chronic pain modality that usually results of damage in the somatosensory system. NP often shows insufficient response to classic analgesics and remains a challenge to medical treatment. The transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive technique, which induces neuroplastic changes in central nervous system of animals and humans. The brain derived neurotrophic factor plays an important role in synaptic plasticity process. Behavior changes such as decreased locomotor and exploratory activities and anxiety disorders are common comorbidities associated with NP.ObjectiveEvaluate the effect of tDCS treatment on locomotor and exploratory activities, and anxiety-like behavior, and peripheral and central BDNF levels in rats submitted to neuropathic pain model.MethodsRats were randomly divided: Ss, SsS, SsT, NP, NpS, and NpT. The neuropathic pain model was induced by partial sciatic nerve compression at 14days after surgery; the tDCS treatment was initiated. The animals of treated groups were subjected to a 20minute session of tDCS, for eight days. The Open Field and Elevated Pluz Maze tests were applied 24h (phase I) and 7days (phase II) after the end of tDCS treatment. The serum, spinal cord, brainstem and cerebral cortex BDNF levels were determined 48h (phase I) and 8days (phase II) after tDCS treatment by ELISA.ResultsThe chronic constriction injury (CCI) induces decrease in locomotor and exploratory activities, increases in the behavior-like anxiety, and increases in the brainstem BDNF levels, the last, in phase II (one-way ANOVA/SNK, P<0.05 for all). The tDCS treatment already reverted all these effects induced by CCI (one-way ANOVA/SNK, P<0.05 for all). Furthermore, the tDCS treatment decreased serum and cerebral cortex BDNF levels and it increased these levels in the spinal cord in phase II (one-way ANOVA/SNK, P<0.05).ConclusiontDCS reverts behavioral alterations associated to neuropathic pain, indicating possible analgesic and anxiolytic tDCS effects. tDCS treatment induces changes in the BDNF levels in different regions of the central nervous system (CNS), and this effect can be attributed to different cellular signaling activations

    Motor cortex excitability and BDNF levels in chronic musculoskeletal pain according to structural pathology

    Get PDF
    The central sensitization syndrome (CSS) encompasses disorders with overlapping symptoms in a structural pathology spectrum ranging from persistent nociception [e.g., osteoarthritis (OA)] to an absence of tissue injuries such as the one presented in fibromyalgia (FM) and myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). First, we hypothesized that these syndromes present differences in their cortical excitability parameters assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), namely motor evoked potential (MEP), cortical silent period (CSP), short intracortical inhibition (SICI) and short intracortical facilitation (SICF). Second, considering that the presence of tissue injury could be detected by serum neurotrophins, we hypothesized that the spectrum of structural pathology (i.e., from persistent nociception like in OA, to the absence of tissue injury like in FM and MPS), could be detected by differential efficiency of their descending pain inhibitory system, as assessed by the conditioned pain modulation (CPM) paradigm. Third, we explored whether brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) had an influence on the relationship between motor cortex excitability and structural pathology. This cross-sectional study pooled baseline data from three randomized clinical trials. We included females (n = 114), aged 19-65 years old with disability by chronic pain syndromes (CPS): FM (n = 19), MPS (n = 54), OA (n = 27) and healthy subjects (n = 14). We assessed the serum BDNF, the motor cortex excitability by parameters the TMS measures and the change on numerical pain scale [NPS (0-10)] during CPM-task. The adjusted mean (SD) on the SICI observed in the absence of tissue injury was 56.36% lower than with persistent nociceptive input [0.31(0.18) vs. 0.55 (0.32)], respectively. The BDNF was inversely correlated with the SICI and with the change on NPS (0-10) during CPM-task. These findings suggest greater disinhibition in the motor cortex and the descending pain inhibitory system in FM and MPS than in OA and healthy subjects. Likewise, the inteThis research was supported by grants and materials support from the following Brazilian agencies: (grants to; AD, JAD-S, FC) and material support. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development-CNPq (grants to ILdST, WC). Postgraduate Program in Medical Sciences at the School of Medicine of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (material support). International Cooperation Program-CAPES-PGI-project (023-11). CAPES 129/2013 material support and grant for FP as visiting professor (AD, WC, PP). Postgraduate Research Group at the Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre-PIPE HCPA (material support). Foundation for Support of Research at Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS) (material support). Brazilian Innovation Agency (FINEP) process number-1245/13 (ILdST, WC). Research grant: National Council for Scientific and Technological Development-CNPq (ILdS 302345/2011-6 and WC-301256/2013-6)

    Avaliação dos efeitos da acupuntura e da eletroacupuntura em modelo animal de dor neuropática : parâmetros comportamentais e bioquímicos

    Get PDF
    Dor neuropática (DN) é definida como “dor iniciada ou causada por lesão primária ou disfunção em sistema nervoso”, porém sua prevalência depende do tipo de trauma e da disfunção relacionada. Apesar desta condição dolorosa ser considerada altamente prevalente e debilitante, os tratamentos disponíveis são relacionados a efeitos adversos dificultando a adesão. Devido a isso, buscam-se alternativas não farmacológicas para o tratamento deste tipo de dor, entre elas, as técnicas de neuromodulação periférica, como acupuntura (AC) e eletroacupuntura (EA). Estas técnicas podem ser combinadas com intervenções farmacológicas e não farmacológicas e têm apresentado resultados promissores no tratamento da dor neuropática. No entanto, seus mecanismos de ação não estão totalmente elucidados, desta forma a utilização de modelos animais é de grande valia para o estudo destes mecanismos no tratamento da dor neuropática e da patofisiologia deste tipo de dor crônica. É importante salientar que a aplicação de AC e EA em animais acordados é complexa, visto que gera desconforto e pode alterar a analgesia induzida pelo tratamento. Em muitos estudos a anestesia com isoflurano é utilizada durante a aplicação dos tratamentos, porém sua utilização pode gerar um viés no estudo, considerando a possível interferência do fármaco nos resultados comportamentais e neuroquímicos. Outro importante foco de estudo consiste em comparar as duas técnicas, AC e EA, buscando determinar qual destas é a mais eficaz no tratamento da dor neuropática. Considerando o exposto acima, os objetivos desta tese foram: 1) avaliar os parâmetros comportamentais e neuroquímicos dos efeitos da utilização de anestesia na aplicação de AC e EA em ratos submetidos ao modelo de DN; 2) comparar os efeitos da AC e EA em modelo animal de DN por meio de parâmentros comportamentais, neuroquímicos e histológicos. Considerando os resultados obtidos nesta tese, concluímos que o isoflurano aumenta a analgesia promovida por AC e EA, provavelmente diminuindo o efeito do estresse gerado pela aplicação dos tratamentos em animais acordados, resultado que é corroborado pela diminuição do nível de S100β periférico (marcador de morte neuronal central); Por outro lado, o isoflurano diminuiu os níveis de fator de crescimento neuronal (NGF) no nervo periférico lesado, indicando diminuição do processo de regeneração neural, enquanto a EA aumentou. Ao mesmo tempo, o isoflurano alterou os efeitos dos tratamentos nos comportamentos exploratórios e nos níveis de N-metil D-aspartato em tronco encefáfio e medula espinhal. A AC apresentou-se mais eficaz no tratamento da DN em comparação à EA, porém nenhum dos tratamentos foi capaz de alterar os danos causados pela indução da DN no músculo gastrocnemio esquerdo dos animais demonstrado na histologia. Todavia, este resultado não alterou a analgesia gerada pelos tratamentos.Neuropathic pain (NP) is defined as "pain initiated or caused by primary injury or dysfunction in the nervous system," but its prevalence depends on the type of trauma and related dysfunction. Although this painful condition is considered to be highly prevalent and debilitating, the available treatments are related to adverse effects, making adherence difficult. Because of this, non-pharmacological alternatives for the treatment of this type of pain are sought, among them, the techniques of peripheral neuromodulation, such as acupuncture (AC) and electroacupuncture (EA). These techniques can be combined with pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions and have shown promising results in the treatment of neuropathic pain. However, its mechanisms of action are not fully elucidated, so the use of animal models is of great value for the study of these mechanisms in the treatment of neuropathic pain and the pathophysiology of this type of chronic pain. It is important to emphasize that the application of AC and EA in awake animals is complex, since it generates discomfort and can alter the analgesia induced by the treatment. In many studies, anesthesia with isoflurane is used during the application of the treatments, but its use may generate a bias in the study, considering the possible interference of the drug in the behavioral and neurochemical results. Another important focus of the study is to compare the two techniques, AC and EA, seeking to determine which is the most effective in the treatment of neuropathic pain. Considering the above, the objectives of this thesis were: 1) to evaluate the behavioral and neurochemical parameters of the effects of the use of anesthesia in the application of AC and EA in rats submitted to the DN model; 2) to compare the effects of AC and EA on animal model of DN by means of behavioral, neurochemical and morphological parameters. Considering the results obtained in this thesis, we conclude that isoflurane increases the analgesia promoted by AC and EA, probably decreasing the effect of the stress generated by the application of the treatments in agreed animals, a result that is corroborated by the decrease in the level of peripheral S100β (biomarker of central neuronal injury); On the other hand, isoflurane decreased the levels of neural grown factor (NGF) in the injured peripheral nerve, indicating a decrease in the neural regeneration process, while the EA increased. At the same time, isoflurane altered the effects of treatments on exploratory behaviors and N-metil-D-aspartato (NMDA) levels in the brainstem and spinal cord. AC was more effective in the treatment of DN compared to EA, but none of the treatments was able to alter the damage caused by DN induction in the left gastrocnemius muscle of the animals showed in histology. However, this result did not alter the analgesia generated by the treatments
    corecore