30 research outputs found
Defects in Antigen-Presenting Cells in the BB-DP Rat Model of Diabetes
Type-1 diabetes is the result of a T cell mediated
immune response against the insulin-producing β cells in the islet of
Langerhans. In humans, until now, the disease is only clearly
detectable at the onset of the disease. Therefore studies to identify
initial factors involved in the etio-pathogenesis are impossible in
humans prone to develop diabetes. In order to study the early,
prodromal phases of type-1 diabetes we used a spontaneous rodent
animal model of the disease, the Biobreeding-Diabetes Prone (BB-DP)
rat. This rat develops diabetes, because it is in particular defective
for a population of regulatory T cells, the ART2+ regulatory T cells
and because it possesses the disease-prone MHC haplotype RT1u (iddm1).
We investigated (Chapter 2) the myeloid dendritic cells (DC) in this
animal model, since DC, the antigen-presenting cells par excellence,
are able to elicit immune responses from naïve T cells and are known
to be involved in autoimmune responses because they are capable of
modulating immunity versus tolerance. We studied bone-marrow precursor
derived myeloid DC of three BB-DP rat sub-lines (Worcester, Groningen,
Seattle) to identify defects in these DC, which could be responsible
for the defective tolerance induction towards diabetes-associated
islet autoantigens in this rat model. We found that the myeloid DC
generated from bone-marrow precursors were defective in these three BB-
DP rat sub-lines, showing an immature, more macrophage-like phenotype,
a low MHC class II expression on their surface, a reduced T cell
stimulatory capacity, a reduced capability to differentiate
into fully mature DC and a reduced production of the immunosuppressive
cytokine IL-10 as compared to two control rat strains (Wistar, F344).
We assume that such DC defects contribute to the decreased tolerance
towards islet autoantigens in the autoimmune diabetes of the BB-DP
rat, since such defective DC are in particular defective to stimulate
ART2+ regulatory T cells sufficiently.
We
Down selecting adjuvanted vaccine formulations: a comparative method for harmonized evaluation.
The need for rapid and accurate comparison of panels of adjuvanted vaccine formulations and subsequent rational down selection, presents several challenges for modern vaccine development. Here we describe a method which may enable vaccine and adjuvant developers to compare antigen/adjuvant combinations in a harmonized fashion. Three reference antigens: Plasmodium falciparum apical membrane antigen 1 (AMA1), hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg), and Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigen 85A (Ag85A), were selected as model antigens and were each formulated with three adjuvants: aluminium oxyhydroxide, squalene-in-water emulsion, and a liposome formulation mixed with the purified saponin fraction QS21.
The nine antigen/adjuvant formulations were assessed for stability and immunogenicity in mice in order to provide benchmarks against which other formulations could be compared, in order to assist subsequent down selection of adjuvanted vaccines. Furthermore, mouse cellular immune responses were analyzed by measuring IFN-γ and IL-5 production in splenocytes by ELISPOT, and humoral responses were determined by antigen-specific ELISA, where levels of total IgG, IgG1, IgG2b and IgG2c in serum samples were determined.
The reference antigens and adjuvants described in this study, which span a spectrum of immune responses, are of potential use as tools to act as points of reference in vaccine development studies. The harmonized methodology described herein may be used as a tool for adjuvant/antigen comparison studies
Variable BCG efficacy in rhesus populations: Pulmonary BCG provides protection where standard intra-dermal vaccination fails
Pathogenesis and treatment of chronic pulmonary disease
Introgression of F344 Rat Genomic DNA on BB Rat Chromosome 4 Generates Diabetes-Resistant Lymphopenic BB Rats
Acute stress syndrome of the yellow European eel (Anguilla anguilla Linnaes) when exposed to a graded swimming-load
Contains fulltext :
223534.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access
