Brief Report: Prognostic Relevance of 3q Amplification in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung

INTRODUCTION: Amplification of 3q is the most common genetic alteration identified in squamous cell carcinoma of the lung (LUSC), with the most frequent amplified region being 3q26 to 3q28. METHODS: In this analysis, we aim to describe the prognostic relevance of 3q amplification by focusing on a minimal common region (MCR) of amplification constituted of 25 genes. We analyzed 511 cases of LUSC from The Cancer Genome Atlas and included 476 in the final analysis. RESULTS: We identified a 25-gene MCR that was amplified in 221 (44.3%) cases and was associated with better disease-specific survival (not reported [NR] versus 9.25 y, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.24-NR, log-rank p = 0.011) and a progression-free interval of 8 years (95% CI: 5.1-NR) versus 4.9 years (95% CI: 3.5-NR, log-rank p = 0.020). Multivariable analysis revealed that MCR amplification was associated with improved disease-specific survival and progression-free interval. CONCLUSIONS: Amplification of the 25-gene MCR within 3q was present in 44% of this cohort, consisting mainly of Caucasian patients with early stage LUSC. This analysis strongly indicates the prognostic relevance of the 25-gene MCR within 3q. We are further evaluating its prognostic and predictive relevance in a racially diverse patient population with advanced LUSC

Satisfaction of hem/onc patients with video visits during the COVID-19 pandemic at a tertiary care center in Michigan

Background: In early 2020, the WHO declared the COVID-19 pandemic a public health emergency. Consequently, medical institutions minimized health care services to facilitate social distancing and telemedicine became the forefront of patient-provider interaction. Herein, we present the results of our study that explored patient satisfaction with video visits during the pandemic at a tertiary care center. Methods: A 12-question survey (table) was emailed following a video visit with a Hem/Onc provider carried out between February and December 2020, questions were answered anonymously. The survey also collected patient demographics. The survey evaluated 5 aspects of telemedicine using a five-point graded scale. Results: A total of 1107 patients responded. Median age was 65 years (25-97) with 51.5% over 65, 64% were females and 36% males. Based on zip codes of primary residence and 2015-2019 US Census data, a significant proportion lived in inner-city Detroit, 77.3% were Caucasians, and 15.2% African Americans. Median household income was 66.8K (Michigan’s median is 57K). Regarding access: ease of scheduling appointments, ease of contacting the office and ability to schedule desired appointments, were respectively given positive responses (good, very good, or fair) by 97.61%, 97.32%, and 98.4%. Regarding CP: ability to explain problem, show concern for worries, include patients in decisions, and discussion of treatment plan, were respectively given positive responses by 99.09%, 99.26%, 98.9%, 99.35%. Regarding telemedicine technology: ease of talking to CP, quality of video, and audio connections, were respectively given positive responses by 94.27%, 90.77%, and 91.42%. For the overall visit assessment, 98.58% gave a positive response for the video staff performance. Regarding their comfort level to return to clinic: 78.75% were comfortable and 10.14% were not. Conclusions: Patients reported an overall high level of satisfaction with telemedicine. One area of improvement is the technological aspect. More than 50% were older than 65 years and a significant proportion lived in underserved areas which indicates that telemedicine is easily accessible. Moreover, around 80% were comfortable to return to clinic while 10% were not which highlights the importance of offering both telemedicine and in-person care

Brief Report: Prognostic Relevance of 3q Amplification in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung

Introduction: Amplification of 3q is the most common genetic alteration identified in squamous cell carcinoma of the lung (LUSC), with the most frequent amplified region being 3q26 to 3q28. Methods: In this analysis, we aim to describe the prognostic relevance of 3q amplification by focusing on a minimal common region (MCR) of amplification constituted of 25 genes. We analyzed 511 cases of LUSC from The Cancer Genome Atlas and included 476 in the final analysis. Results: We identified a 25-gene MCR that was amplified in 221 (44.3%) cases and was associated with better disease-specific survival (not reported [NR] versus 9.25 y, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.24–NR, log-rank p = 0.011) and a progression-free interval of 8 years (95% CI: 5.1–NR) versus 4.9 years (95% CI: 3.5–NR, log-rank p = 0.020). Multivariable analysis revealed that MCR amplification was associated with improved disease-specific survival and progression-free interval. Conclusions: Amplification of the 25-gene MCR within 3q was present in 44% of this cohort, consisting mainly of Caucasian patients with early stage LUSC. This analysis strongly indicates the prognostic relevance of the 25-gene MCR within 3q. We are further evaluating its prognostic and predictive relevance in a racially diverse patient population with advanced LUSC

Protocol for the development of a multidisciplinary clinical practice guideline for the care of patients with chronic subdural haematoma [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]

Introduction: A common neurosurgical condition, chronic subdural haematoma (cSDH) typically affects older people with other underlying health conditions. The care of this potentially vulnerable cohort is often, however, fragmented and suboptimal. In other complex conditions, multidisciplinary guidelines have transformed patient experience and outcomes, but no such framework exists for cSDH. This paper outlines a protocol to develop the first comprehensive multidisciplinary guideline from diagnosis to long-term recovery with cSDH.  Methods: The project will be guided by a steering group of key stakeholders and professional organisations and will feature patient and public involvement.  Multidisciplinary thematic working groups will examine key aspects of care to formulate appropriate, patient-centered research questions, targeted with evidence review using the GRADE framework.  The working groups will then formulate draft clinical recommendations to be used in a modified Delphi process to build consensus on guideline contents.  Conclusions: We present a protocol for the development of a multidisciplinary guideline to inform the care of patients with a cSDH, developed by cross-disciplinary working groups and arrived at through a consensus-building process, including a modified online Delphi

Effects of hospital facilities on patient outcomes after cancer surgery: an international, prospective, observational study

© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 licenseBackground: Early death after cancer surgery is higher in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) compared with in high-income countries, yet the impact of facility characteristics on early postoperative outcomes is unknown. The aim of this study was to examine the association between hospital infrastructure, resource availability, and processes on early outcomes after cancer surgery worldwide. Methods: A multimethods analysis was performed as part of the GlobalSurg 3 study—a multicentre, international, prospective cohort study of patients who had surgery for breast, colorectal, or gastric cancer. The primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and 30-day major complication rates. Potentially beneficial hospital facilities were identified by variable selection to select those associated with 30-day mortality. Adjusted outcomes were determined using generalised estimating equations to account for patient characteristics and country-income group, with population stratification by hospital. Findings: Between April 1, 2018, and April 23, 2019, facility-level data were collected for 9685 patients across 238 hospitals in 66 countries (91 hospitals in 20 high-income countries; 57 hospitals in 19 upper-middle-income countries; and 90 hospitals in 27 low-income to lower-middle-income countries). The availability of five hospital facilities was inversely associated with mortality: ultrasound, CT scanner, critical care unit, opioid analgesia, and oncologist. After adjustment for case-mix and country income group, hospitals with three or fewer of these facilities (62 hospitals, 1294 patients) had higher mortality compared with those with four or five (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3·85 [95% CI 2·58–5·75]; p<0·0001), with excess mortality predominantly explained by a limited capacity to rescue following the development of major complications (63·0% vs 82·7%; OR 0·35 [0·23–0·53]; p<0·0001). Across LMICs, improvements in hospital facilities would prevent one to three deaths for every 100 patients undergoing surgery for cancer. Interpretation: Hospitals with higher levels of infrastructure and resources have better outcomes after cancer surgery, independent of country income. Without urgent strengthening of hospital infrastructure and resources, the reductions in cancer-associated mortality associated with improved access will not be realised. Funding: National Institute for Health and Care Research