Implementação de uma unidade industrial para produção de requeijão com doce de abóbora

Este trabalho consiste na apresentação de um projeto, elaborado no âmbito académico da disciplina de Equipamentos e Instalações Industriais do curso de Engenharia Alimentar da Escola Superior Agrária de Viseu, que visa a implementação de uma unidade para produção de Requeijão com Doce de Abóbora. Inicialmente faz-se um breve enquadramento e descrição do processo que vai ser utilizado para a produção industrial. Depois apresentam-se alguns aspetos relacionados com a empresa o respetivos recursos humanos, seguindo-se-lhe a parte técnica que compreende as componentes de elaboração de balanços mássicos e diagramas de fabrico, equipamentos, layout e plantas e considerações relativas aos resíduos e/ou efluentes. Por fim é feita uma avaliação de viabilidade, baseada numa análise económica simplificada

Cladistic analysis of the subfamily Cteninae and revision of the genus Celaetycheus (Araneae, Cteninae)

A monofilia da subfamília Cteninae é testada com uma análise cladística usando o método da parcimônia. O resultado da análise demonstra que a subfamília é polifilética como atualmente delimitada. A monofilia de Cteninae requer a exclusão do gênero Celaetycheus e de cinco espécies de Ctenus, C. anahitiformis, C. bulimus, C. inazensis, C. miserabilis e C. tarsalis. A subfamília é composta por Ctenus, gênero que contém a espécie-tipo da família, e pelos gêneros Africactenus, Amauropelma, Anahita, Centroctenus, Isoctenus, Ohvida, Parabatinga, Petaloctenus, Phoneutria, Thoriosa, Trogloctenus e pelo menos mais sete linhagens independentes. A subfamília Cteninae pode ser reconhecida por uma sinapomorfia não-ambígua: campo mediano do epígino protuberante. O clado Cteninae também é sustentado por cinco sinapomorfias ambíguas: êmbolo fixo por membrana, apófise média em forma de copo, condutor hialino, mais largo que longo, quatro dentes na retromargem da quelícera e quelícera com dentículos intermarginais. Apenas duas sinapomorfias descritas acima estão presentes em todas as espécies de Cteninae usadas na análise: o setor mediano do epígino protuberante e a apófise média em forma de copo. O gênero Ctenus, com maior número de espécies da família (cerca de 240), aparece como um grupo polifilético como atualmente delimitado. A monofilia de Ctenus requer a exclusão de 22 espécies usadas nesta análise. As 12 espécies que permanecem em Ctenus sensu estrito formam um clado sustentado por duas sinapomorfias nãoambíguas: campo mediano do epígino com região da abertura de copula projetada e abertura de copulação como um lobo. Alguns padrões evolutivos observados na análise são discutidos. O gênero Celaetycheus Simon é revisado e transferido para a subfamília Calocteninae com base nos resultados da análise cladística de Cteninae. A espécie-tipo, Celaetycheus flavostriatus Simon, é redescrita e oito espécies novas são descritas, todas coletadas no Estado da Bahia, Brasil: Celaetycheus sp. 1 de Uruçuca e Barro Preto; Celaetycheus sp. 2 de Mascote, Pau Brasil, Jussari e Camacan; Celaetycheus sp. 3 de Coaraci, Itagibá e Jequié; Celaetycheus sp. 4 de Prado e Itamarajú; Celaetycheus sp. 5 de Salvador, Mata de São João, Cachoeira e Cruz das Almas; Celaetycheus sp. 6 de Porto Seguro; Celaetycheus sp. 7 de Ilhéus e Uruçuca; Celaetycheus sp. 8 de Camacan. A espécie Celaetycheus modestus Bryant é transferida para o gênero Ohvida Polotow & Brescovit. Um mapa de distribuição das espécies é fornecido.A cladistic analysis using the parcimony method is used to test the monophyly of the subfamily Cteninae. The results of the analysis indicate that the subfamily is poliphiletic as currently delimited. The monophyly of Cteninae requires the exclusion of the genus Celaetycheus and five Ctenus species, C. anahitiformis, C. bulimus, C. inazensis, C. miserabilis and C. tarsalis. The subfamily is composed by Ctenus, the genus which contain the type species of the family, and by the genera Africactenus, Amauropelma, Anahita, Centroctenus, Isoctenus, Ohvida, Parabatinga, Petaloctenus, Phoneutria, Thoriosa, Trogloctenus and at least more seven independent lineages. The subfamily Cteninae can be recognized by one non-ambiguous synapomorphy: swollen median field of the epigynum. The Cteninae clade is also supported by five ambiguous synapomophies: embolus fixed by membranous area, cup-shaped median apophysis, hyaline conductor wider than long, four teeth in the chelicerae retromargin and chelicerae with intermarginal denticles. Only two of the synapomorphies described above are present in all Cteninae species used in the analysis: swollen median field of the epigynum and cup-shaped median apophysis. The genus Ctenus, with the high number of species of the family (about 240), appears as a poliphylec group as currently delimited. The monophyly of Ctenus requires the exclusion of 22 species used in this analysis. The 12 species which remain in Ctenus sensu strict form a clade supported by two non-ambiguous synapomorphies: median field of the epigynum with area of the copulatory opening projected and copulatory opening as a lobe. Some evolutive patterns observed in the analysis are discussed. The genus Celaetycheus Simon is revised and trasferred to the subfamily Calocteninae with basis on the new results of the cladistic analysis of Cteninae. The type species, Celaetycheus flavostriatus Simon is redescribed and eight new species are described, all collected in the State of Bahia, Brazil: Celaetycheus sp. 1 from Uruçuca and Barro Preto; Celaetycheus sp. 2 from Mascote, Pau Brasil, Jussari and Camacan; Celaetycheus sp. 3 from Coaraci, Itagibá and Jequié; Celaetycheus sp. 4 from Prado and Itamarajú; Celaetycheus sp. 5 from Salvador, Mata de São João, Cachoeira and Cruz das Almas; Celaetycheus sp. 6 from Porto Seguro; Celaetycheus sp. 7 from Ilhéus and Uruçuca; Celaetycheus sp. 8 from Camacan. The species Celaetycheus modestus Bryant is transferred to Ohvida Polotow & Brescovit. A distribution map is provided

Chinja chinja Polotow & Griswold 2018, sp. nov.

<i>Chinja chinja</i> sp. nov. <p>Figures 1, 2B–C, 3, 5, 6, 7, 10</p> <p> <b>Type material.</b> Holotype male from East Usambara Mountains at Amani, 5°5.7'S, 38°38'E, elev. 950 m, lringa</p> <p>Region, Tanzania, collected 1–10 November 1995 by C. Griswold, D. Ubick, and N. Scharff, CASENT9006127, deposited in CAS.</p> <p> <b>Etymology.</b> The species epithet is an arbitrary combination of letters.</p> <p> <b>Diagnosis.</b> Males of <i>C. chinja</i> can be distinguished from those of <i>C. scharffi</i> by having the apex of the embolus jagged or irregular in outline (Figs 3B, 7F), with the proximal margin of the embolus entire (Figs 3A, 7A, E), in having a retrodorsal projection middorsally on the palpal tibia (Fig. 3C), and the RTA with the ventral branch broad and the retrobasal branch pointed (Fig. 3C). The females of <i>C. chinja</i> can be distinguished from those of <i>C. scharffi</i> by having the epigynum lateral teeth narrower (Fig. 3D) and the median plate not extending as far posteriad (Figs 3D, 6A) as in <i>C. scharffi</i> (Fig. 4D).</p> <p> <b>Description.</b> Male (holotype): Total length 3.40. Markings as in Fig. 1A. Carapace 2.05 long, 1.30 wide, 0.75 high; clypeus 0.90 high. Eye diameters: AME 0.06, ALE 0.10, PME 0.09, PLE 0.10. Chelicerae 0.70 long; sternum 0.95 long, 0.90 wide; labium 0.30 long, 0.30 wide; palpal coxae 0.55 long, 0.25 wide. Spination: palp: d0-0-1, p0- 0-1, r0-0-1; leg I: femur d1-1-1, p0-0-2, tibia p0-1-1-0, v2-2 -2-2, metatarsus p0-1-0, v2-2 -2; leg II: femur d1-1-1, p0-0-1, tibia p0-1-1-0, r0-1-0-0, v2-2 -2-2 [retroventral spines much stouter than proventral], metatarsus p0-1-2-0, r0-1-1-0, v2-2 -2; leg III: femur d0-1-1-1, p0-1-1-0, r0-0-2, tibia d0-1-1-0, p0-1-1-0, r0-1-1-0, v2-2 -2, metatarsus d1-0-0-0, r0-1-2-0, v2-2 -2; leg IV: femur d0-1-1-1, p0-0-1-2, r0-0-1-1, tibia d0-1-1-0, p0-0-1-1, r0-0-1-1, v2-2 -2, metatarsus p1-1-1, r0-1-1, v2-2 -2. Leg measurements (Femur + Patella + Tibia + Metatarsus + Tarsus = [Total]): I: 1.80 + 0.80 + 1.70 + 1.30 + 0.90 = [6.50]; II: 1.60 + 0.80 + 1.30 + 1.15 + 0.80 = [5.65]; III: 1.50 + 0.65 + 1.10 + 1.30 + 0.75 = [5.30]; IV: 1.95 + 0.80 + 1.65 + 1.95 +1.15 = [7.50]; palpus: 0.80 + 0.30 + 0.40 + NA + 0.70 = [2.20]. Palp: palpal cymbium 0.88 femur length, tibia with a retrodorsal projection middorsally (Fig. 3C), and RTA with ventral branch broad and the retrobasal branch pointed (Fig. 3C); tegulum with large prolateral projection (Fig. 3A); MA short, less than ½ length of tegulum, with an apical hook (Figs 3A, C, 7D–G); apex of embolus jagged or irregular in outline (Figs 3B, 7F), with proximal margin of the embolus entire (Figs 3A, 7A, E); prolateral locking lobe present (Fig. 3B). Female (Amani, CASENT9006132): Total length 3.70. Markings as in male and as in Figs 1B, 2B–C. Carapace 1.75 long, 1.35 wide, 0.56 high; clypeus 0.03 high. Eye diameters: AME 0.05, ALE 0.10, PME 0.09, PLE 0.11. Chelicerae 0.84 long; sternum 0.95 long, 0.85 wide; labium 0.30 long and wide; palpal coxae 0.60 long, 0.25 wide. Spination: palp: femur d0-0-1-1, tibia d0-1-0, p0-1-0, tarsus d0-1-0, p0-2-1-0; leg I: femur d0-0-0-1, tibia v2-2 -2, metatarsus v2-2 -2; leg II: femur d10-0-0, tibia v2-2 -2-2 [retroventral spines much stouter than proventral], metatarsus v2-2 -2; leg III: femur d1-1-1, tibia d0-1-0, p1-0-1-0, r1-0-1-0, v1 [pv.]-2-2, metatarsus p0-1-0-2, r0-1-0-0, v2-2 -2; leg IV: femur d1-0-0-0, r0-0-0-1, tibia d0-1-1-0, p1-0-0-1, r0-1-0-1, v1 [pv.]-2-2, metatarsus d1-0-0-0, p1-0-0-2, r0-1-0-2, v0-2-2-2. Leg measurements (Femur + Patella + Tibia + Metatarsus + Tarsus = [Total]): I: 1.50 + 0.70 + 1.25 + 1.00 + 0.75 = [5.20]; II: 1.20 + 0.70 + 1.00 + 0.95 + 0.90 = [4.75]; III: 1.20 + 0.55 + 0.85 + 1.00 + 0.70 = [4.30]; IV: 1.55 + 0.65 + 1.40 + 1.60 + 0.90 = [6.10]; palpus: 0.65 + 0.35 + 0.35 + NA + 0.60 = [1.95]. Epigynum lateral teeth narrow (Fig. 3D) and median lobe not extending as far posteriad (Figs 3D, 6A) as in <i>C. scharffi</i> (Fig. 4D); vulva as in Fig. 3E.</p> <p> <b>Variation.</b> Male (N=10): total length 2.40–3.80; ratios of carapace length/width1.30–1.38, carapace width/ height 2.07–2.90, PER/AER 1.21–1.34, OAL/OQL 1.07–1.33, cheliceral length/clypeal height 18.67–30.00, sternum length/width 1.06–1.40, length femur I/carapace length 0.80–0.93, palpal tarsus/femur 0.85–1.20. Female (N=10): total length 3.70–5.00; ratios of carapace length/width 1.30–1.57, carapace width/height 1.91–2.88, PER/ AER 1.20–1.37, OAL/OQL 1.00–1.27, cheliceral length/clypeal height 25.00–36.67, sternum length/width 1.06– 1.22, length femur I/carapace length 0.74–0.89, palpal tarsus/femur 0.87–1.00.</p> <p> <b>Material examined. TANZANIA</b>: <i>lringa Region</i>: East Usambara Mts., Amani, 5°5.7'S, 38°38'E, elev. 950 m, [palpus drawn] 1–10 November 1995, C. Griswold, D. Ubick, and N. Scharff leg., holotype ♂, CASENT9006127 (CAS); 1♂, 2♀, CASENT9006126 (CAS); 1♂, 1♀, CASENT9065520 (CAS); collected by sifting leaf litter from tree buttress, [measured], 1♀, CASENT9006132 (CAS); pitfall traps, 1–10 November 1995, C. Griswold, D. Ubick, and N. Scharff leg., 1♂, CASENT9006130 (CAS); Amani, East Usambara Mts., elev. 1000m, [SEM preparation 16-8], 15 June 1980, M. Stoltze & N. Scharff leg., 1♂, CASENT9006135 (ZMUC); Sangarawe Forest, 5°6.5'S, 38°35.7'E, elev. 990 m, 5–6 November 1995, C. Griswold, D. Ubick, and N. Scharff leg., 1♀, CASENT9006133 (CAS); 1♂, CASENT9006123 (CAS); 12 km SE Amani, Kihuhwi-Zigi Forest Reserve, 5°6.3'S, 38°40.6'E, 400–450 m elev., [female habitus drawn, JS], 2–4 November 1995, C. Griswold, D. Ubick, and N. Scharff leg., 1♀, CASENT9006139 (CAS); 1♀, CASENT9006138 (CAS), [SEM preparation, ♀ opisthosoma, stub 19-1], 1♀, CASENT9006140 (CAS); 2♀, 3 juveniles, CASENT9006124 (CAS); 2♀, 2 juveniles, CASENT9006125 (CAS); sifting leaf litter, 4 November 1995, D. Ubick, 1♀, CASENT9006134 (CAS); <i>Tanga Region</i>: Muheza District, Marimba Forest Reserve, 5°01'S, 38°41'E, 1995, Frontier Tanzania Expeditions leg., 1♂, CASENT9065521 (ZMUC); Kambai Forest Reserve, 4°59'S, 38°41'E, 1995, pitfall traps in vegetation plot #27, Frontier Tanzania Expeditions leg., 4♂, CASENT9006137 (ZMUC); pitfall traps in vegetation plot #30, Frontier Tanzania Expeditions leg., 2♂, CASENT9006136 (ZMUC).</p> <p> <b>Natural history</b>. This species occurs in the leaf litter and on the soil surface of closed-canopy, moist forest.</p> <p> <b>Distribution.</b> Eastern Usambara Mountains, Tanzania (Fig. 10).</p>Published as part of <i>Polotow, Daniele & Griswold, Charles, 2018, Chinja, a new genus of spider from the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania (Araneae, Zoropsidae), pp. 545-562 in Zootaxa 4472 (3)</i> on pages 548-552, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4472.3.7, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/1440327">http://zenodo.org/record/1440327</a&gt

Zoropsidae

ZOROPSIDAE BERTKAU, 1882 <p> Type genus <i>Zoropsis</i> Simon, 1878: 327 (Type species by monotypy: <i>Dolomedes spinimanus</i> Dufour, 1820)</p> <p> <b>Diagnosis.</b> Zoropsidae are consistently supported by molecular data (Polotow <i>et al.</i> 2015) as well as by three homoplastic morphological synapomorphies on the male palp: presence of a type 2 ventral tibial process, a rounded to oval cymbium and a cymbial retrolateral process. <i>Chinja</i> has the last two of these synapomorphies (Figs 3A, C, 4A, C, 7B, C, 8F).</p> <p> <b>Composition.</b> The living Zoropsidae include 26 genera and 180 species (World Spider Catalog 2018). Wunderlich (2017) recognizes four genera and 16 Palaeogene, extinct species from Bitterfeld and Baltic amber.</p> <p> <b>Distribution.</b> Worldwide.</p>Published as part of <i>Polotow, Daniele & Griswold, Charles, 2018, Chinja, a new genus of spider from the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania (Araneae, Zoropsidae), pp. 545-562 in Zootaxa 4472 (3)</i> on pages 546-547, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4472.3.7, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/1440327">http://zenodo.org/record/1440327</a&gt

Campostichomma harasbedda Polotow & Griswold 2017, sp. nov.

<i>Campostichomma harasbedda</i> sp. nov. <p>Figures 6, 8C–D, 14</p> <p> <b>Type material.</b> Female holotype from Sri Lanka, Central Province, 14.5 km (9 miles) NE Nuwara-Eliya, Harasbedda, 1 female, 15.III.1962, (CASENT9024159), deposited in Lund University.</p> <p> <b>Etymology.</b> The species epithet is a noun in apposition from the type locality.</p> <p> <b>Diagnosis.</b> Females of <i>C. harasbedda</i> can be diagnosed from those of other species by the small median lobe of the epigynum and the lateral teeth of the lateral lobes large and located at inner margins of lateral lobes (Figs 6D, 8C); and by the vulva with two ascending spirals (Figs 6E, 8D).</p> <p> <b>DesCription.</b> Female (holotype): Total length 7.20 (estimated, carapace and abdomen are separated). Markings as in Fig. 6A, B. Carapace 2.80 long, 2.10 wide, 1.10 high; clypeus 0.09 high. Eye diameters: AME 0.09, ALE 0.18, PME 0.12, PLE 0.20. Chelicerae 1.50 long; sternum 1.30 long, 1.10 wide; labium 0.55 long; palpal coxae 1.00 long. Spination as in genus description. Leg measurements (Femur + Patella + Tibia + Metatarsus + Tarsus = [Total]): I: 1.90 + 0.90 + 1.60 + 1.30 + 0.90 = 6.60; II: 1.80 + 0.80 + 1.50 + 1.30 + 0.80 = 6.20; III: 1.70 + 0.80 + 1.10 + 1.40 + 0.80 = 5.80; IV: 2.20 + 0.80 + 1.70 + 2.40 + 1.10 = 8.20. Leg formula 4123. Epigynum: median lobe small; lateral lobes with small teeth (Figs 6D, 8C). Vulva with elongated and sinuous copulatory ducts; spermathecae large, with projections and small fertilization ducts (Figs 6E, 8D); vulva with two ascending spirals (Figs 6E, 8D).</p> <p> <b>Male</b>. Unknown.</p> <p> <b>Material examined.</b> Only the types.</p> <p> <b>Natural history:</b> The holotype was collected at 1300 m elevation in a narrow, sheltered ravine near a small stream. The area was surrounded by tea estates, with fragments of montane forest at slightly higher elevation (Brinck <i>et al.</i> 1971: 34).</p> <p> <b>Distribution.</b> Known only from the type locality at Harasbedda near Nuwara Eliya in Sri Lanka (Fig. 14).</p>Published as part of <i>Polotow, Daniele & Griswold, Charles, 2017, Cleaning old cabinets: revealing the taxonomy of Sri Lankan wolf spiders (Araneae, Udubidae and Zoropsidae), pp. 51-74 in Zootaxa 4362 (1)</i> on pages 60-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4362.1.3, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/1076176">http://zenodo.org/record/1076176</a&gt

Cleaning old cabinets: revealing the taxonomy of Sri Lankan wolf spiders (Araneae, Udubidae and Zoropsidae)

Polotow, Daniele, Griswold, Charles (2017): Cleaning old cabinets: revealing the taxonomy of Sri Lankan wolf spiders (Araneae, Udubidae and Zoropsidae). Zootaxa 4362 (1): 51-74, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4362.1.

Cleaning old cabinets: revealing the taxonomy of Sri Lankan wolf spiders (Araneae, Udubidae and Zoropsidae)

The fauna of Udubidae and Zoropsidae of Sri Lanka is reviewed, the families are diagnosed and a distribution map is provided. The udubid genus Campostichomma Karsch, 1892 is diagnosed and redescribed, C. manicatum Karsch, 1892 is redescribed, and we propose three new species, based on females: C. harasbedda sp. nov., C. mudduk sp. nov. and C. alawala sp. nov. The zoropsid genus Devendra Lehtinen, 1967 is diagnosed and redescribed, D. seriatus (Simon, 1898), D. pumilus (Simon, 1898) and D. pardalis (Simon, 1898), are redescribed, and two new species are proposed: D. saama sp. nov. and D. amaiti sp. nov.436215174FUNDAÇÃO DE AMPARO À PESQUISA DO ESTADO DE SÃO PAULO - FAPESP2015/22000-8; 2017/01294-

Kiekie barrocolorado Polotow & Brescovit 2018, new species

Kiekie barrocolorado new species Figs 12 A–B, 15A Type material. Male holotype from Panama, Canal Zone, Barro Colorado Island (9.15, -79.85), VI–VII.1936, A.M. Chickering coll., deposited in MCZ 79093. Etymology. The species name is a toponym in apposition referring to the type locality. Diagnosis. Males of Kiekie barrocolorado (Fig. 12 A–B) resemble those of K. garifuna (Fig. 7 A–B) by the shape of embolus and conductor, but can be distinguished by the RTA position, which is distant from the apical border of the tibia, and the shape of the median apophysis, with a narrow and longer base. Description. Male (MCZ 79093). Total length 14.10. Carapace 7.60 long and 6.10 wide. Clypeus 0.30 high. Eye diameters: AME 0.22, ALE 0.20, PME 0.27, PLE 0.27. Leg measurements: I: femur 7.60/ patella 3.40/ tibia 6.70/ metatarsus 6.50/ tarsus 2.30/ total 26.50; II: 7.20/ 3.30/ 5.50/ 6.10/ 2.20/ 24.30; III: 6.40/ 2.80/ 5.40/ 5.90/ 2.00/ 22.50; IV: 7.70/ 3.10/ 7.50/ 8.80/ 2.50/ 29.60. Leg formula 4123. Leg spination: tibia I–II v2-2 -2-2-2, r1-1-0, p1-1-1-0, III–IV v2-2 -2, r1-1, p1-1; metatarsus I, II v2-2 -2, r1-1-0, p-1-1-0, III v2-2 -2, r1-1-1, p1-1-1, IV v2-1 -1-2, r1-1, p1-1. Palp (Fig. 12 A–B): RTA with large base, perpendicular to the tibia and slightly curved forward; embolus elongated and laminar, with a large base with a projection, narrowing in the middle to the tip; median apophysis oval and short; conductor with large base and apex, with a furrow that fit the tip of embolus. Female. Unknown Additional material examined. None. Distribution. Panama, Canal Zone (Fig. 15C).Published as part of Polotow, Daniele & Brescovit, Antonio D., 2018, Kiekie, a new Neotropical spider genus of Ctenidae (Cteninae, Araneae), pp. 353-373 in Zootaxa 4531 (3) on pages 367-368, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4531.3.2, http://zenodo.org/record/261470

Chinja, a new genus of spider from the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania (Araneae, Zoropsidae)

Polotow, Daniele, Griswold, Charles (2018): Chinja, a new genus of spider from the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania (Araneae, Zoropsidae). Zootaxa 4472 (3): 545-562, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4472.3.

Devendra amaiti Polotow & Griswold 2017, sp. nov.

<i>Devendra amaiti</i> sp. nov. <p>Figures 13D–F, 14</p> <p> <i>Campostichomma seriatum</i> SImOn, 1898A: 8 (mIsIdEntIFIcAtIOn) <b>Type material.</b> Female holotype (syntype of <i>D. seriatus</i>), #18337 (part) from Nuwara Eliya, Sri Lanka deposited in the MNHN.</p> <p> <b>Etymology</b>. The species name is a noun in apposition taken from the Tamil word for “peace.”</p> <p> <b>Diagnosis.</b> Females of <i>D. amaiti</i> can be diagnosed from females of other <i>Devendra</i> species by having the median lobe of epigynum trapezoidal, angularly convex posteriorly (Fig. 13D) and the vulva with the head of the spermathecae sessile on the main spermathecae and the fertilization ducts arising from an elongate tube (Fig. 13E, F).</p> <p> <b>DesCription.</b> Female (holotype): Total length 4.67. Markings as in Fig. 9A, D. Carapace 2.42 long, 1.75 wide, 0.83 high; clypeus 0.07 high. Eyes diameter: AME 0.07, ALE 0.10, PME 0.09, PLE 0.10. Chelicerae 1.00 long; sternum 1.08 long, 0.96 wide; labium 0.40 long; palpal coxae 0.76 long. Spination as in genus description. Leg measurements (Femur + Patella + Tibia + Metatarsus + Tarsus = [Total]): I: 1.71 + 0.79 + 1.33 + 1.17 + 0.92 = 5.92; II: 1.42 + 0.75 + 1.12 + 1.12 + 0.92 = 5.33; III: 1.37 + 0.67 + 0.96 + 1.25 + 0.83 = 5.08; IV: 1.83 + 0.75 + 1.46 + 2.33 + 1.17 = 7.54. Leg formula 4123. Epigynum: large epigynal plate; curved fold dividing median lobe and lateral lobes (Fig. 13D, E). Spermathecae small and with an apical glandular opening (Fig. 13F).</p> <p> <b>Male</b>. Unknown.</p> <p> <b>Material examined.</b> Only the type.</p> <p> <b>Distribution.</b> Known only from the type locality at Nuwara Eliya in Sri Lanka (Fig. 14).</p>Published as part of <i>Polotow, Daniele & Griswold, Charles, 2017, Cleaning old cabinets: revealing the taxonomy of Sri Lankan wolf spiders (Araneae, Udubidae and Zoropsidae), pp. 51-74 in Zootaxa 4362 (1)</i> on pages 70-71, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4362.1.3, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/1076176">http://zenodo.org/record/1076176</a&gt