104 research outputs found

    Causative agent distribution and antibiotic therapy assessment among adult patients with community acquired pneumonia in Chinese urban population

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Knowledge of predominant microbial patterns in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) constitutes the basis for initial decisions about empirical antimicrobial treatment, so a prospective study was performed during 2003–2004 among CAP of adult Chinese urban populations.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Qualified patients were enrolled and screened for bacterial, atypical, and viral pathogens by sputum and/or blood culturing, and by antibody seroconversion test. Antibiotic treatment and patient outcome were also assessed.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Non-viral pathogens were found in 324/610 (53.1%) patients among whom <it>M. pneumoniae </it>was the most prevalent (126/610, 20.7%). Atypical pathogens were identified in 62/195 (31.8%) patients carrying bacterial pathogens. Respiratory viruses were identified in 35 (19%) of 184 randomly selected patients with adenovirus being the most common (16/184, 8.7%). The nonsusceptibility of <it>S. pneumoniae </it>to penicillin and azithromycin was 22.2% (Resistance (R): 3.2%, Intermediate (I): 19.0%) and 79.4% (R: 79.4%, I: 0%), respectively. Of patients (312) from whom causative pathogens were identified and antibiotic treatments were recorded, clinical cure rate with β-lactam antibiotics alone and with combination of a β-lactam plus a macrolide or with fluoroquinolones was 63.7% (79/124) and 67%(126/188), respectively. For patients having mixed <it>M. pneumoniae </it>and/or <it>C. pneumoniae </it>infections, a better cure rate was observed with regimens that are active against atypical pathogens (e.g. a β-lactam plus a macrolide, or a fluoroquinolone) than with β-lactam alone (75.8% vs. 42.9%, <it>p </it>= 0.045).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>In Chinese adult CAP patients, <it>M. pneumoniae </it>was the most prevalent with mixed infections containing atypical pathogens being frequently observed. With <it>S. pneumoniae</it>, the prevalence of macrolide resistance was high and penicillin resistance low compared with data reported in other regions.</p

    Increased Cardiovascular Reactivity to Acute Stress and Salt-Loading in Adult Male Offspring of Fat Fed Non-Obese Rats

    Get PDF
    Diet-induced obesity in rat pregnancy has been shown previously to be associated with consistently raised blood pressure in the offspring, attributed to sympathetic over-activation, but the relative contributions to this phenotype of maternal obesity versus raised dietary fat is unknown. Sprague-Dawley female rats were fed either a control (4.3% fat, n = 11) or lard-enriched (23.6% fat, n = 16) chow 10 days prior to mating, throughout pregnancy and lactation. In conscious adult (9-month-old) offspring cardiovascular parameters were measured (radiotelemetry). The short period of fat-feeding did not increase maternal weight versus controls and the baseline blood pressure was similar in offspring of fat fed dams (OF) and controls (OC). However, adult male OF showed heightened cardiovascular reactivity to acute restraint stress (p<0.01; Δ systolic blood pressure (SBP) and Δheart rate (HR)) with a prolonged recovery time compared to male OC. α1/β-adrenergic receptor blockade normalised the response. Also, after dietary salt-loading (8%-NaCl ad libitum for 1 week) male OF demonstrated higher SBP (p<0.05) in the awake phase (night-time) and increased low/high frequency ratio of power spectral density of HR variability versus OC. Baroreflex gain and basal power spectral density components of the heart rate or blood pressure were similar in male OF and OC. Minor abnormalities were evident in female OF. Fat feeding in the absence of maternal obesity in pregnant rats leads to altered sympathetic control of cardiovascular function in adult male offspring, and hypertension in response to stressor stimuli

    Reasons for not intensifying antihypertensive treatment (RIAT): a primary care antihypertensive intervention study

    No full text
    OBJECTIVE: Hypertension is often poorly controlled, despite its importance and despite the availability of very effective treatments. An under-recognized problem is the failure of consensus guidelines to acknowledge the important difference between efficacy in clinical trials and effectiveness in clinical practice. The present survey was designed to prospectively assess what is the target blood pressure (BP) goal defined by a general practitioner (GP) for an individual patient, and what are the reasons for not modifying an antihypertensive drug regimen, when pre-defined individual BP goals are not achieved. DESIGN: Family practice based, open intervention survey. SUBJECTS: Participating GPs enrolled 2621 hypertensive patients. At the first visit each physician was required to assess the cardiovascular risk profile of each patient and to define individual BP targets. INTERVENTIONS: Treatment was started with irbesartan alone or in fixed combination with hydrochlorothiazide. Follow-up visits were suggested after 1 month, 2 months and 4 months. Physicians were asked to report BP values under the new treatment regimen and to indicate whether in their opinion pre-defined BP targets set at baseline were achieved or not and whether the antihypertensive regimen was modified or maintained in relation to whether target BP was reached or not. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: To provide reasons for not changing the treatment even though BP goals were missed. RESULTS: Average target BP values defined by the physicians at baseline were 138 +/- 8 mmHg for systolic and 84 +/- 5 mmHg for diastolic BP. Among GPs, defined target BP values did not depend on individual risk stratification, but rather depended on baseline BP values. At baseline systolic and diastolic BP averaged 165/97 +/- 17/10 mmHg, while at the last visit achieved BP averaged 140/84 +/- 14/8 mmHg. There were three main reasons for not intensifying antihypertensive treatment when BP targets were not achieved. These reasons were: (1). the assumption that the time after starting the new drug was too short to appreciate its full effect (44% at first, 14% at last follow-up), (2). that there was a clear improvement or the target BP was almost reached (24% at first, 34% at last follow-up) or (3). that self-measurements were considered satisfactorily (10% at the last visit). CONCLUSIONS: Failure of physicians to follow guidelines is apparently dependent on the belief that baseline BP dictates the target, that a clear improvement in BP might be sufficient and that the full drug effect may take up to 4 months or more to be attained
    corecore