50 research outputs found
Distribution Records of Some Uncommonly Recorded Spiders in Ireland including a New Irish Record: Meioneta mollis (O.P. -Cambridge, 1871) (Araneae: Linyphiidae)
Irish spiders (Arachnida: Araneae) collected during a five-year, island-wide study including 696 new county records
Grazing and scrub clearance promote open dune habitat regeneration in pine plantation canopy gaps in Merseyside, UK
Macrohabitat associations and phenology of carrion beetles (Coleoptera: Silphidae, Leiodidae: Cholevinae)
New records and rare invertebrate specimens recorded during a decade of forest biodiversity research in Ireland
Can mixed stands of native and non-native tree species enhance diversity of epigaeic arthropods in plantation forests?
Natural succession and clearcutting as drivers of environmental heterogeneity and beta diversity in North American boreal forests
<div><p>Clear-cutting alters natural ecosystem processes by reducing landscape heterogeneity. It is the dominant harvesting technique across the boreal zone, yet understanding of how environmental heterogeneity and beta diversity are structured in forest ecosystems and post-clear cut is lacking. We use ground-dwelling arthropods as models to determine how natural succession (progression from deciduous to mixed to coniferous cover types) and clear-cutting change boreal forests, exploring the role of environmental heterogeneity in shaping beta diversity across multiple spatial scales (<i>between-cover types</i> and <i>between-stands of the same cover type</i> (1600 to 8500 m), <i>between-plots</i> (100 to 400 m) and <i>within-plots</i> (20 to 40 m)). We characterise environmental heterogeneity as variability in combined structural, vegetational and soil parameters, and beta diversity, as variability in assemblage composition. Clear-cutting homogenised forest environments across all spatial scales, reducing total environmental heterogeneity by 35%. Arthropod beta diversity reflected these changes at larger scales suggesting that environmental heterogeneity is useful in explaining beta diversity both <i>between-cover types</i> and <i>between-stands</i> of the same cover type. However, at smaller scales, <i>within-</i> and <i>between-plots</i> spider beta diversity reflected the lower environmental heterogeneity in regenerating stands, whereas staphylinid and carabids assemblages were not homogenised 12 years post-harvest. Differences in environmental heterogeneity and staphylinid beta diversity between cover types were also important at small scales. In regenerating stands, we detected a subtle yet notable effect of pre-felling cover type on environmental heterogeneity and arthropods, where pre-felling cover type accounted for a significant amount of variance in beta diversity, indicating that biological legacies (e.g. soil pH reflecting pre-harvest conditions) may have a role in driving beta diversity even 12 years post-harvest. This study highlights the importance of understanding site history when predicting impacts of change in forest ecosystems. Further, to understand drivers of beta diversity we must identify biological legacies shaping community structure.</p></div