6 research outputs found

    The Grizzly, December 6, 1985

    Get PDF
    Contemporary Women Playwrites Recent Lecture Focus • Faculty Carries Heavy Work Load • A Radio Station in the Making • Letters: RA System not Fair for Anyone; Does our School Paper Have a Monopoly? • Campus Memo: Learn to say no Effectively • In Search of Success: Mary Lou Happy as Claims Adjuster • Campus Briefs: Financial Aid Office Sends out Survey; Davidson Conducts Workshop on Athletic Tech.; Open Dailog Considers Scrapping U.S. Constitution • CPP Offers Lecture on Careers in Sales • Lady Bears Battle Tough Division II Competition • Matmen Finish Third in Invitational • Women\u27s Gymnastics Drops to Montclair State • Final Exam Schedule • Boxing Brother: Hammerin\u27 Hankhttps://digitalcommons.ursinus.edu/grizzlynews/1154/thumbnail.jp

    Comments on the paper "A statistical assessment of differences and equivalences between genetically modified and reference plant varieties" by van der Voet et al. 2011

    No full text
    Abstract van der Voet et al. (2011) describe statistical methodology that the European Food Safety Authority expects an applicant to adopt when making a GM crop regulatory submission. Key to their proposed methodology is the inclusion of reference varieties in the experimental design to provide a measure of natural variation amongst commercially grown crops. While taking proper account of natural variation amongst commercial varieties in the safety assessment of GM plants makes good sense, the methodology described by the authors is shown here to be fundamentally flawed and consequently cannot be considered fit for purpose in its current form.</p
    corecore