180 research outputs found
Formalizing evasion attacks against machine learning security detectors
Recent work has shown that adversarial examples can bypass machine learning-based threat detectors relying on static analysis by applying minimal perturbations.
To preserve malicious functionality, previous attacks either apply trivial manipulations (e.g. padding), potentially limiting their effectiveness, or require running computationally-demanding validation steps to discard adversarial variants that do not correctly execute in sandbox environments.
While machine learning systems for detecting SQL injections have been proposed in the literature, no attacks have been tested against the proposed solutions to assess the effectiveness and robustness of these methods.
In this thesis, we overcome these limitations by developing RAMEn, a unifying framework that (i) can express attacks for different domains, (ii) generalizes previous attacks against machine learning models, and (iii) uses functions that preserve the functionality of manipulated objects.
We provide new attacks for both Windows malware and SQL injection detection scenarios by exploiting the format used for representing these objects.
To show the efficacy of RAMEn, we provide experimental results of our strategies in both white-box and black-box settings.
The white-box attacks against Windows malware detectors show that it takes only the 2% of the input size of the target to evade detection with ease.
To further speed up the black-box attacks, we overcome the issues mentioned before by presenting a novel family of black-box attacks that are both query-efficient and functionality-preserving, as they rely on the injection of benign content, which will never be executed, either at the end of the malicious file, or within some newly-created sections, encoded in an algorithm called GAMMA.
We also evaluate whether GAMMA transfers to other commercial antivirus solutions, and surprisingly find that it can evade many commercial antivirus engines.
For evading SQLi detectors, we create WAF-A-MoLE, a mutational fuzzer that that exploits random mutations of the input samples, keeping alive only the most promising ones.
WAF-A-MoLE is capable of defeating detectors built with different architectures by using the novel practical manipulations we have proposed.
To facilitate reproducibility and future work, we open-source our framework and corresponding attack implementations.
We conclude by discussing the limitations of current machine learning-based malware detectors, along with potential mitigation strategies based on embedding domain knowledge coming from subject-matter experts naturally into the learning process
Practical Attacks on Machine Learning: A Case Study on Adversarial Windows Malware
While machine learning is vulnerable to adversarial examples, it still lacks
systematic procedures and tools for evaluating its security in different
application contexts. In this article, we discuss how to develop automated and
scalable security evaluations of machine learning using practical attacks,
reporting a use case on Windows malware detection
Explaining Machine Learning DGA Detectors from DNS Traffic Data
One of the most common causes of lack of continuity of online systems stems from a widely popular Cyber Attack known as Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS), in which a network of infected devices (botnet) gets exploited to flood the computational capacity of services through the commands of an attacker. This attack is made by leveraging the Domain Name System (DNS) technology through Domain Generation Algorithms (DGAs), a stealthy connection strategy that yet leaves suspicious data patterns. To detect such threats, advances in their analysis have been made. For the majority, they found Machine Learning (ML) as a solution, which can be highly effective in analyzing and classifying massive amounts of data. Although strongly performing, ML models have a certain degree of obscurity in their decision-making process. To cope with this problem, a branch of ML known as Explainable ML tries to break down the black-box nature of classifiers and make them interpretable and human-readable. This work addresses the problem of Explainable ML in the context of botnet and DGA detection, which at the best of our knowledge, is the first to concretely break down the decisions of ML classifiers when devised for botnet/DGA detection, therefore providing global and local explanations
WAF-A-MoLE: An adversarial tool for assessing ML-based WAFs
Abstract Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) are plug-and-play security gateways that promise to enhance the security of a (potentially vulnerable) system with minimal cost and configuration. In recent years, machine learning-based WAFs are catching up with traditional, signature-based ones. They are competitive because they do not require predefined rules; instead, they infer their rules through a learning process. In this paper, we present WAF-A-MoLE, a WAF breaching tool. It uses guided mutational-based fuzzing to generate adversarial examples. The main applications include WAF ( i ) penetration testing, ( i i ) benchmarking and ( i i i ) hardening
Robust Machine Learning for Malware Detection over Time
The presence and persistence of Android malware is an on-going threat that plagues this information era, and machine learning technologies are now extensively used to deploy more effective detectors that can block the majority of these malicious programs. However, these algorithms have not been developed to pursue the natural evolution of malware, and their performances significantly degrade over time because of such concept-drift.
Currently, state-of-the-art techniques only focus on detecting the presence of such drift, or they address it by relying on frequent updates of models. Hence, there is a lack of knowledge regarding the cause of the concept drift, and ad-hoc solutions that can counter the passing of time are still underinvestigated.
In this work, we commence to address these issues as we propose (i) a drift-analysis framework to identify which characteristics of data are causing the drift, and (ii) SVM-CB, a time-aware classifier that leverages the drift-analysis information to slow down the performance drop. We highlight the efficacy of our contribution by comparing its degradation over time with a state-of-the-art classifier, and we show that SVM-CB better withstand the distribution changes that naturally characterizes the malware domain.
We conclude by discussing the limitations of our approach and how our contribution can be taken as a first step towards more time-resistant classifiers that not only tackle, but also understand the concept drift that affect data
Living-off-The-Land Reverse-Shell Detection by Informed Data Augmentation
The living-off-the-land (LOTL) offensive methodologies rely on the
perpetration of malicious actions through chains of commands executed by
legitimate applications, identifiable exclusively by analysis of system logs.
LOTL techniques are well hidden inside the stream of events generated by common
legitimate activities, moreover threat actors often camouflage activity through
obfuscation, making them particularly difficult to detect without incurring in
plenty of false alarms, even using machine learning. To improve the performance
of models in such an harsh environment, we propose an augmentation framework to
enhance and diversify the presence of LOTL malicious activity inside legitimate
logs. Guided by threat intelligence, we generate a dataset by injecting attack
templates known to be employed in the wild, further enriched by malleable
patterns of legitimate activities to replicate the behavior of evasive threat
actors. We conduct an extensive ablation study to understand which models
better handle our augmented dataset, also manipulated to mimic the presence of
model-agnostic evasion and poisoning attacks. Our results suggest that
augmentation is needed to maintain high-predictive capabilities, robustness to
attack is achieved through specific hardening techniques like adversarial
training, and it is possible to deploy near-real-time models with almost-zero
false alarms
Adversarial ModSecurity: Countering Adversarial SQL Injections with Robust Machine Learning
ModSecurity is widely recognized as the standard open-source Web Application
Firewall (WAF), maintained by the OWASP Foundation. It detects malicious
requests by matching them against the Core Rule Set, identifying well-known
attack patterns. Each rule in the CRS is manually assigned a weight, based on
the severity of the corresponding attack, and a request is detected as
malicious if the sum of the weights of the firing rules exceeds a given
threshold. In this work, we show that this simple strategy is largely
ineffective for detecting SQL injection (SQLi) attacks, as it tends to block
many legitimate requests, while also being vulnerable to adversarial SQLi
attacks, i.e., attacks intentionally manipulated to evade detection. To
overcome these issues, we design a robust machine learning model, named
AdvModSec, which uses the CRS rules as input features, and it is trained to
detect adversarial SQLi attacks. Our experiments show that AdvModSec, being
trained on the traffic directed towards the protected web services, achieves a
better trade-off between detection and false positive rates, improving the
detection rate of the vanilla version of ModSecurity with CRS by 21%. Moreover,
our approach is able to improve its adversarial robustness against adversarial
SQLi attacks by 42%, thereby taking a step forward towards building more robust
and trustworthy WAFs
Robustness-Congruent Adversarial Training for Secure Machine Learning Model Updates
Machine-learning models demand for periodic updates to improve their average
accuracy, exploiting novel architectures and additional data. However, a
newly-updated model may commit mistakes that the previous model did not make.
Such misclassifications are referred to as negative flips, and experienced by
users as a regression of performance. In this work, we show that this problem
also affects robustness to adversarial examples, thereby hindering the
development of secure model update practices. In particular, when updating a
model to improve its adversarial robustness, some previously-ineffective
adversarial examples may become misclassified, causing a regression in the
perceived security of the system. We propose a novel technique, named
robustness-congruent adversarial training, to address this issue. It amounts to
fine-tuning a model with adversarial training, while constraining it to retain
higher robustness on the adversarial examples that were correctly classified
before the update. We show that our algorithm and, more generally, learning
with non-regression constraints, provides a theoretically-grounded framework to
train consistent estimators. Our experiments on robust models for computer
vision confirm that (i) both accuracy and robustness, even if improved after
model update, can be affected by negative flips, and (ii) our
robustness-congruent adversarial training can mitigate the problem,
outperforming competing baseline methods
Explaining Vulnerabilities of Deep Learning to Adversarial Malware Binaries
Recent work has shown that deep-learning algorithms for malware detection are also susceptible to adversarial examples, i.e., carefully-crafted perturbations to input malware that enable misleading classification. Although this has questioned their suitability for this task, it is not yet clear why such algorithms are easily fooled also in this particular application domain. In this work, we take a first step to tackle this issue by leveraging explainable machine-learning algorithms developed to interpret the black-box decisions of deep neural networks. In particular, we use an explainable technique known as feature attribution to identify the most influential input features contributing to each decision, and adapt it to provide meaningful explanations to the classification of malware binaries. In this case, we find that a recently-proposed convolutional neural network does not learn any meaningful characteristic for malware detection from the data and text sections of executable files, but rather tends to learn to discriminate between benign and malware samples based on the characteristics found in the file header. Based on this finding, we propose a novel attack algorithm that generates adversarial malware binaries by only changing few tens of bytes in the file header. With respect to the other state-of-the-art attack algorithms, our attack does not require injecting any padding bytes at the end of the file, and it is much more efficient, as it requires manipulating much fewer bytes
Phantom Sponges: Exploiting Non-Maximum Suppression to Attack Deep Object Detectors
Adversarial attacks against deep learning-based object detectors have been studied extensively in the past few years. Most of the attacks proposed have targeted the model's integrity (i.e., caused the model to make incorrect predictions), while adversarial attacks targeting the model's availability, a critical aspect in safety-critical domains such as autonomous driving, have not yet been explored by the machine learning research community. In this paper, we propose a novel attack that negatively affects the decision latency of an end-to-end object detection pipeline. We craft a universal adversarial perturbation (UAP) that targets a widely used technique integrated in many object detector pipelines - non-maximum suppression (NMS). Our experiments demonstrate the proposed UAP's ability to increase the processing time of individual frames by adding "phantom" objects that overload the NMS algorithm while preserving the detection of the original objects which allows the attack to go undetected for a longer period of time
- …