32 research outputs found

    From individual vital rates to population dynamics: An integral projection model for European native oysters in a marine protected area

    Get PDF
    Following an 85% decline in global oyster populations, there has been a recent resurgence in interest in the restoration of the European native oyster Ostrea edulis. Motivations for restoration from environmental stakeholders most often include recovering lost habitats and associated biodiversity and supporting ecosystem function. In coastal communities, another important justification is recovery of traditional and low‐impact fisheries but this has received less attention. Many restoration projects across Europe focus on the translocation of adult stocks, under the assumption that the limit to population growth and recovery is adult growth and survival. This may not necessarily be the case, especially where knowledge of large extant adult populations exists as in the Blackwater, Crouch, Roach and Colne Marine Conservation Zone in Essex, UK. Identifying what limits population growth for restoration and recovery is an important conservation tool. Here, the first size‐dependent survival, growth and fecundity data for free‐living O. edulis from a novel field experiment are used to parameterize an Integral Projection Model that examines the sensitivity of a flat oyster population to variation in individual vital rates and to potential harvesting – an original objective of a coastal community‐led restoration project. Given the high adult fecundity in this species, population recovery is most sensitive to changes in recruitment success; however, elasticity (proportional sensitivity of the population) is more evenly spread across other parameters when recruitment is already high. Based on locally agreed management objectives, recovery to double the current stock biomass should take 16–66 years (mean = 30 years) without active intervention. At that point, harvest rates could be sustained below 5% of the harvestable adult size whilst ensuring λs remains above 1

    Defeating crypsis: detection and learning of camouflage strategies.

    Get PDF
    Camouflage is perhaps the most widespread defence against predators in nature and an active area of interdisciplinary research. Recent work has aimed to understand what camouflage types exist (e.g. background matching, disruptive, and distractive patterns) and their effectiveness. However, work has almost exclusively focused on the efficacy of these strategies in preventing initial detection, despite the fact that predators often encounter the same prey phenotype repeatedly, affording them opportunities to learn to find those prey more effectively. The overall value of a camouflage strategy may, therefore, reflect both its ability to prevent detection by predators and resist predator learning. We conducted four experiments with humans searching for hidden targets of different camouflage types (disruptive, distractive, and background matching of various contrast levels) over a series of touch screen trials. As with previous work, disruptive coloration was the most successful method of concealment overall, especially with relatively high contrast patterns, whereas potentially distractive markings were either neutral or costly. However, high contrast patterns incurred faster decreases in detection times over trials compared to other stimuli. In addition, potentially distractive markings were sometimes learnt more slowly than background matching markings, despite being found more readily overall. Finally, learning effects were highly dependent upon the experimental paradigm, including the number of prey types seen and whether subjects encountered targets simultaneously or sequentially. Our results show that the survival advantage of camouflage strategies reflects both their ability to avoid initial detection (sensory mechanisms) and predator learning (perceptual mechanisms)

    Sea bed disturbance increases flat oyster recruitment for low to moderate stock densities

    Get PDF
    1. It has long been suggested by commercial fishing interests that the sea bed benefits from being trawled or disturbed. Evidence to support increased benthic food web productivity in areas disturbed by trawling has suggested that this is the case, and that some mobile consumers can benefit from this increased productivity. 2. The same hypothesis has been put forward for shellfish recruitment, that disturbance of the sea bed, e.g. ‘harrowing’, increases the exposure of suitable settlement substrates for shellfish larvae. This is an approach often taken in shellfish mariculture in private fisheries, and has led to calls for support of expanding such activities into publicly managed areas to promote shellfish recovery and restoration. 3. Increased seabed disturbance, however, may not align with conservation policy or societal objectives for natural recovery of the seabed landscape. Furthermore, evidence for increased shellfish recruitment from seabed disturbance is mixed, and many attempts to elucidate whether relationships exist receive criticism for operating at small spatial and temporal scales. 4. An analysis is presented from 3 years of data (2016–2018) from a stock survey of a private European flat oyster, Ostrea edulis, fishery operating in the Blackwater estuary, Essex, UK. Using data for adult and recruit oyster abundance and distribution in 2018, with ‘harrowing’ effort from 2016–2018, it is asked whether oyster recruitment was related to disturbance effort. 5.It was found that oyster recruitment is positively related to increased seabed disturbance, but only up to intermediate adult oyster abundance equivalent to 60 oysters/100 m dredge, beyond which harrowing results in recruitment declines. This has implications for approaches to oyster fishery recovery, but also for restoration projects seeking evidence-led guidance on which ways may be appropriate to kick-start natural recovery in historical oyster areas that are habitat limited

    Color change and camouflage in juvenile shore crabs Carcinus maenas

    Get PDF
    Camouflage is perhaps the most widespread anti-predator defense in nature, with many different types thought to exist. Of these, resembling the general color and pattern of the background (background matching) is likely to be the most common. Background matching can be achieved by adaptation of individual appearance to different habitats or substrates, behavioral choice, and color change. Although the ability to change coloration for camouflage over a period of hours or days is likely to be widely found among animals, few studies have quantified this against different backgrounds. Here, we test whether juvenile shore crabs (Carcinus maenas) are capable of color change for camouflage by placing them on either black or white (experiment 1) or red and green (experiment 2) backgrounds. We find that crabs are capable of significant changes in brightness, becoming lighter on white backgrounds and darker on black backgrounds. Using models of predator (avian) vision, we show that these differences are large enough in many individuals to lead to perceptible changes in appearance. Furthermore, comparisons of crabs with the backgrounds show that changes are likely to lead to significant improvements in camouflage and potentially reduced detection probabilities. Crabs underwent some changes on the red and green backgrounds, but visual modeling indicated that these changes were very small and unlikely to be detectable. Our experiment shows that crabs are able to adjust their camouflage by changes in brightness over a period of hours, and that this could influence detection probability by predators

    Rockpool gobies change colour for camouflage.

    No full text
    Camouflage is found in a wide range of species living in numerous habitat types, offering protection from visually guided predators. This includes many species from the intertidal zone, which must cope with background types diverse in appearance and with multiple predator groups foraging at high and low tide. Many animals are capable of either relatively slow (hours, days, weeks) or rapid (seconds and minutes) colour change in order to better resemble the background against which they are found, but most work has been restricted to a few species or taxa. It is often suggested that many small intertidal fish are capable of colour change for camouflage, yet little experimental work has addressed this. Here, we test rock gobies (Gobius paganellus) for colour change abilities, and whether they can tune their appearance to match the background. In two experiments, we place gobies on backgrounds of different brightness (black or white), and of different colours (red and blue) and use digital image analysis and modelling of predator (avian) vision to quantify colour and luminance (perceived lightness) changes and camouflage. We find that gobies are capable of rapid colour change (occurring within one minute), and that they can change their luminance on lighter or darker backgrounds. When presented on backgrounds of different colours, gobies also change their colour (hue and saturation) while keeping luminance the same. These changes lead to predicted improvements in camouflage match to the background. Our study shows that small rockpool fish are capable of rapid visual change for concealment, and that this may be an important mechanism in many species to avoid predation, especially in complex heterogeneous environments

    Data from: Defeating crypsis: detection and learning of camouflage strategies

    No full text
    Camouflage is perhaps the most widespread defence against predators in nature and an active area of interdisciplinary research. Recent work has aimed to understand what camouflage types exist (e.g. background matching, disruptive, and distractive patterns) and their effectiveness. However, work has almost exclusively focused on the efficacy of these strategies in preventing initial detection, despite the fact that predators often encounter the same prey phenotype repeatedly, affording them opportunities to learn to find those prey more effectively. The overall value of a camouflage strategy may, therefore, reflect both its ability to prevent detection by predators and resist predator learning. We conducted four experiments with humans searching for hidden targets of different camouflage types (disruptive, distractive, and background matching of various contrast levels) over a series of touch screen trials. As with previous work, disruptive coloration was the most successful method of concealment overall, especially with relatively high contrast patterns, whereas potentially distractive markings were either neutral or costly. However, high contrast patterns incurred faster decreases in detection times over trials compared to other stimuli. In addition, potentially distractive markings were sometimes learnt more slowly than background matching markings, despite being found more readily overall. Finally, learning effects were highly dependent upon the experimental paradigm, including the number of prey types seen and whether subjects encountered targets simultaneously or sequentially. Our results show that the survival advantage of camouflage strategies reflects both their ability to avoid initial detection (sensory mechanisms) and predator learning (perceptual mechanisms)

    Results of the discriminant function analysis, classifying crabs into their respective sites based on the color, brightness, and pattern metrics.

    No full text
    <p>For both juveniles and adults, crabs from Falmouth (mainly rockpool) and Helford (mainly mudflat) are classified with high fidelity. In contrast, crabs from Godrevy (mussel bed) and St Mawes (rockpools) are classified with much less accuracy.</p><p>Results of the discriminant function analysis, classifying crabs into their respective sites based on the color, brightness, and pattern metrics.</p

    Differences in the brightness of crabs among sites at different heights of the shore.

    No full text
    <p>As well as showing significant differences in brightness (overall carapace reflectance) among sites, there were clear effects of shore height at Falmouth and St Mawes. At the former, crabs are brighter lower down the shore, whereas at the latter there is the opposite relationship. Crabs from Godrevy and Helford show little relationship between brightness and shore height.</p

    Camouflage and Individual Variation in Shore Crabs (<i>Carcinus maenas</i>) from Different Habitats

    No full text
    <div><p>Camouflage is widespread throughout the natural world and conceals animals from predators in a vast range of habitats. Because successful camouflage usually involves matching aspects of the background environment, species and populations should evolve appearances tuned to their local habitat, termed phenotype-environment associations. However, although this has been studied in various species, little work has objectively quantified the appearances of camouflaged animals from different habitats, or related this to factors such as ontogeny and individual variation. Here, we tested for phenotype-environment associations in the common shore crab (<i>Carcinus maenas</i>), a species highly variable in appearance and found in a wide range of habitats. We used field surveys and digital image analysis of the colors and patterns of crabs found in four locations around Cornwall in the UK to quantify how individuals vary with habitat (predominantly rockpool, mussel bed, and mudflat). We find that individuals from sites comprising different backgrounds show substantial differences in several aspects of color and pattern, and that this is also dependent on life stage (adult or juvenile). Furthermore, the level of individual variation is dependent on site and life stage, with juvenile crabs often more variable than adults, and individuals from more homogenous habitats less diverse. Ours is the most comprehensive study to date exploring phenotype-environment associations for camouflage and individual variation in a species, and we discuss the implications of our results in terms of the mechanisms and selection pressures that may drive this.</p></div

    Differences in the appearance of adult and juvenile crabs from four different sites.

    No full text
    <p>Crabs show a wide range of significant differences among sites and life stages. Brightness is the overall reflectance of the carapace, saturation can be considered as the amount of a given color type compared to white light or color richness, and hue is the color type and is based on a ratio of color channel values (see main text), with lower values meaning that crabs are more blue-green in color. Proportion energy relates to how much one marking size dominates the crab patterns (larger values mean one or a few markings are prevalent), total energy equates to the contrast of the patterns (higher values mean more contrasting markings), and marking size is the predominant marking size found on the crabs. Small thumbnail images of crabs correspond to example individuals from the entire dataset (across all sites and life stages) with the maximum (top images), minimum (bottom images), and approximately average (middle images) values for each appearance metric.</p
    corecore