General theory for the mechanics of confined microtubule asters

In cells, dynamic microtubules organize into asters or spindles to assist positioning of organelles. Two types of forces are suggested to contribute to the positioning process: (i) microtubule-growth based pushing forces ; and (ii) motor protein mediated pulling forces. In this paper, we present a general theory to account for aster positioning in a confinement of arbitrary shape. The theory takes account of microtubule nucleation, growth, catastrophe, slipping, as well as interaction with cortical force generators. We calculate microtubule distributions and forces acting on microtubule organizing centers in a sphere and in an ellipsoid. Positioning mechanisms based on both pushing forces and pulling forces can be distinguished in our theory for different parameter regimes or in different geometries. In addition, we investigate positioning of microtubule asters in the case of asymmetric distribution of motors. This analysis enables us to characterize situations relevant for Caenorrhabditis elegans embryos

Optimality in superselective surface binding by multivalent DNA nanostars

Weak multivalent interactions govern a large variety of biological processes like cell-cell adhesion and virus-host interactions. These systems distinguish sharply between surfaces based on receptor density, known as superselectivity. Earlier experimental and theoretical work provided insights into the control of selectivity: Weak interactions and a high number of ligands facilitate superselectivity. Present experimental studies typically involve tens or hundreds of interactions, resulting in a high entropic contribution leading to high selectivities. However, if, and if so how, systems with few ligands, such as multi-domain proteins and virus binding to a membrane, show superselective behavior is an open question. Here, we address this question with a multivalent experimental model system based on star shaped branched DNA nanostructures (DNA nanostars) with each branch featuring a single stranded overhang that binds to complementary receptors on a target surface. Each DNA nanostar possesses a fluorophore, to directly visualize DNA nanostar surface adsorption by total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy (TIRFM). We observe that DNA nanostars can bind superselectively to surfaces and bind optimally at a valency of three. We quantitatively explain this optimum by extending the current theory with interactions between DNA nanostar binding sites (ligands). Our results add to the understanding of multivalent interactions, by identifying microscopic mechanisms that lead to optimal selectivity, and providing quantitative values for the relevant parameters. These findings inspire additional design rules which improve future work on selective targeting in directed drug delivery.Comment: 14 pages, 4 figure

Predicting evolution using regulatory architecture

The limits of evolution have long fascinated biologists. However, the causes of evolutionary constraint have remained elusive due to a poor mechanistic understanding of studied phenotypes. Recently, a range of innovative approaches have leveraged mechanistic information on regulatory networks and cellular biology. These methods combine systems biology models with population and single-cell quantification and with new genetic tools, and they have been applied to a range of complex cellular functions and engineered networks. In this article, we review these developments, which are revealing the mechanistic causes of epistasis at different levels of biological organization¤mdash¤in molecular recognition, within a single regulatory network, and between different networks¤mdash¤providing first indications of predictable features of evolutionary constraint

Evolutionary adaptation after crippling cell polarization follows reproducible trajectories

Cells are organized by functional modules, which typically contain components whose removal severely compromises the module's function. Despite their importance, these components are not absolutely conserved between parts of the tree of life, suggesting that cells can evolve to perform the same biological functions with different proteins. We evolved Saccharomyces cerevisiae for 1000 generations without the important polarity gene BEM1. Initially the bem1∆ lineages rapidly increase in fitness and then slowly reach >90% of the fitness of their BEM1 ancestors at the end of the evolution. Sequencing their genomes and monitoring polarization reveals a common evolutionary trajectory, with a fixed sequence of adaptive mutations, each improving cell polarization by inactivating proteins. Our results show that organisms can be evolutionarily robust to physiologically destructive perturbations and suggest that recovery by gene inactivation can lead to rapid divergence in the parts list for cell biologically important functions. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09638.00

Cortical Dynein Controls Microtubule Dynamics to Generate Pulling Forces that Position Microtubule Asters

Dynein at the cortex contributes to microtubulebased positioning processes such as spindle positioning during embryonic cell division and centrosome positioning during fibroblast migration. To investigate how cortical dynein interacts with microtubule ends to generate force and how this functional association impacts positioning, we have reconstituted the ‘cortical ’ interaction between dynein and dynamic microtubule ends in an in vitro system using microfabricated barriers. We show that barrierattached dynein captures microtubule ends, inhibits growth, and triggers microtubule catastrophes, thereby controlling microtubule length. The subsequent interaction with shrinking microtubule ends generates pulling forces up to several pN. By combinin

General theory for the mechanics of confined microtubule asters

In cells, dynamic microtubules organize into asters or spindles to assist positioning of organelles. Two types of forces are suggested to contribute to the positioning process: (i) microtubule-growth based pushing forces ; and (ii) motor protein mediated pulling forces. In this paper, we present a general theory to account for aster positioning in a confinement of arbitrary shape. The theory takes account of microtubule nucleation, growth, catastrophe, slipping, as well as interaction with cortical force generators. We calculate microtubule distributions and forces acting on microtubule organizing centers in a sphere and in an ellipsoid. Positioning mechanisms based on both pushing forces and pulling forces can be distinguished in our theory for different parameter regimes or in different geometries. In addition, we investigate positioning of microtubule asters in the case of asymmetric distribution of motors. This analysis enables us to characterize situations relevant for Caenorrhabditis elegans embryos

Global DNA Compaction in Stationary-Phase Bacteria Does Not Affect Transcription

In stationary-phase Escherichia coli, Dps (DNA-binding protein from starved cells) is the most abundant protein component of the nucleoid. Dps compacts DNA into a dense complex and protects it from damage. Dps has also been proposed to act as a global regulator of transcription. Here, we directly examine the impact of Dps-induced compaction of DNA on the activity of RNA polymerase (RNAP). Strikingly, deleting the dps gene decompacted the nucleoid but did not significantly alter the transcriptome and only mildly altered the proteome during stationary phase. Complementary in vitro assays demonstrated that Dps blocks restriction endonucleases but not RNAP from binding DNA. Single-molecule assays demonstrated that Dps dynamically condenses DNA around elongating RNAP without impeding its progress. We conclude that Dps forms a dynamic structure that excludes some DNA-binding proteins yet allows RNAP free access to the buried genes, a behavior characteristic of phase-separated organelles. Despite markedly condensing the bacterial chromosome, the nucleoid-structuring protein Dps selectively allows access by RNA polymerase and transcription factors at normal rates while excluding other factors such as restriction endonucleases.</p