418 research outputs found

    Why are we seeing an increasing incidence of infective endocarditis in the UK?

    Get PDF
    The increasing incidence of infective endocarditis in England is real, and education is critical to ensure swift diagnosis and best clinical outcomes. Factors responsible remain speculative, but multiple explanations are likely

    Management and Outcome of Permanent Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Infections

    Get PDF
    ObjectivesWe describe the management and outcome of permanent pacemaker (PPM) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) infections in a large cohort of patients seen at a tertiary care facility with expertise in device lead extraction.BackgroundInfection is a serious complication of PPM and ICD implantation. Optimal care of patients with these cardiac device infections (CDI) is not well defined.MethodsA retrospective review of all patients with CDI admitted to Mayo Clinic Rochester between January 1, 1991, and December 31, 2003, was conducted. Demographic and clinical data were collected, and descriptive analysis was performed.ResultsA total of 189 patients met the criteria for CDI (138 PPM, 51 ICD). The median age of the patients was 71.2 years. Generator pocket infection (69%) and device-related endocarditis (23%) were the most common clinical presentations. Coagulase-negative staphylococci and Staphylococcus aureus, in 42% and 29% of cases, respectively, were the leading pathogens for CDI. Most patients (98%) underwent complete device removal. Duration of antibiotic therapy after device removal was based on clinical presentation and causative organism (median duration of 18 days for pocket infection vs. 28 days for endocarditis; 28 days for S. aureusinfection vs. 14 days for coagulase-negative staphylococci infection [p < 0.001]). Median follow-up after hospital discharge was 175 days. Ninety-six percent of patients were cured with both complete device removal and antibiotic administration.ConclusionsCure of CDI is achievable in the large majority of patients treated with an aggressive approach of combined antimicrobial treatment and complete device removal. Based on findings of our large retrospective institutional survey and previously published data, we submit proposed management guidelines of CDI

    Antibiotic prophylaxis and incidence of endocarditis before and after the 2007 AHA recommendations

    Get PDF
    Background The American Heart Association updated its recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) to prevent infective endocarditis (IE) in 2007, advising that AP cease for those at moderate risk of IE, but continue for those at high risk. Objectives The authors sought to quantify any change in AP prescribing and IE incidence. Methods High-risk, moderate-risk, and unknown/low-risk individuals with linked prescription and Medicare or commercial health care data were identified in the Truven Health MarketScan databases from May 2003 through August 2015 (198,522,665 enrollee-years of data). AP prescribing and IE incidence were evaluated by Poisson model analysis. Results By August 2015, the 2007 recommendation change was associated with a significant 64% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 59% to 68%) estimated fall in AP prescribing for moderate-risk individuals and a 20% (95% CI: 4% to 32%) estimated fall for those at high risk. Over the same period, there was a barely significant 75% (95% CI: 3% to 200%) estimated increase in IE incidence among moderate-risk individuals and a significant 177% estimated increase (95% CI: 66% to 361%) among those at high risk. In unknown/low-risk individuals, there was a significant 52% (95% CI: 46% to 58%) estimated fall in AP prescribing, but no significant increase in IE incidence. Conclusions AP prescribing fell among all IE risk groups, particularly those at moderate risk. Concurrently, there was a significant increase in IE incidence among high-risk individuals, a borderline significant increase in moderate-risk individuals, and no change for those at low/unknown risk. Although these data do not establish a cause–effect relationship between AP reduction and IE increase, the fall in AP prescribing in those at high risk is of concern and, coupled with the borderline increase in IE incidence among those at moderate risk, warrants further investigation

    Analysis of prosthetic joint infections following invasive dental procedures in England

    Get PDF
    Importance Dentists in the United States are under pressure from orthopaedic surgeons and their patients with prosthetic joints to provide antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) before invasive dental procedures (IDP) to reduce the risk of late prosthetic joint infection (LPJI). This has been a common practice for decades despite a lack of evidence for an association between IDP and LPJI, a lack of evidence of AP efficacy, cost of providing AP, and risk of both adverse drug reactions and the potential for promoting antibiotic resistance. Objective Our objective was to quantify if there is any temporal association between IDP and subsequent LPJI. Design A case-crossover and time trend study of any potential association between IDP and LPJI. Setting The population of England (55 million) was chosen because AP has never been recommended to prevent LPJI in England and any association between IDP and LPJI would therefore be fully exposed. Participants All patients admitted to hospital in England for LPJI from December 25th, 2011, through March 31st, 2017, for whom dental records were available. Analyses were performed between May 2018 and June 2021. Exposures Exposure to IDP Main Outcomes and Measures A case-crossover analysis comparing the incidence IDP in the 3-months before LPJI hospital admission (case-period) with the incidence in the 12-months before that (control-period). Results We identified 9,427 LPJI hospital admissions with dental records (mean age 67), including 4,897 (52%) men. Of these, 2,385 (25.3%) had hip, 3,168 (33.6%) knee, 259 (2.8%) other and 3,615 (38.4%) unknown prosthetic joint types. Despite having sufficient statistical power to detect a clinically significant association, our analysis identified no significant temporal association between IDP and subsequent LPJI. Indeed, there was a lower incidence of IDP in the three months prior to LPJI (incidence rate ratio = 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.82 to 0.96, p=0.002). Conclusions and Relevance In the absence of a significant positive association between IDP and LPJI, there is no rationale to administer AP before IDP in patients with prosthetic joints. Maintenance of good oral hygiene, however, may be important in preventing the small number of LPJI cases where oral bacterial species are implicated

    The association between histamine 2 receptor antagonist use and Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Get PDF
    Background Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a major health problem. Epidemiological evidence suggests that there is an association between acid suppression therapy and development of CDI. Purpose We sought to systematically review the literature that examined the association between histamine 2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) and CDI. Data source We searched Medline, Current Contents, Embase, ISI Web of Science and Elsevier Scopus from 1990 to 2012 for all analytical studies that examined the association between H2RAs and CDI. Study selection Two authors independently reviewed the studies for eligibility. Data extraction Data about studies characteristics, adjusted effect estimates and quality were extracted. Data synthesis Thirty-five observations from 33 eligible studies that included 201834 participants were analyzed. Studies were performed in 6 countries and nine of them were multicenter. Most studies did not specify the type or duration of H2RAs therapy. The pooled effect estimate was 1.44, 95% CI (1.22–1.7), I2 = 70.5%. This association was consistent across different subgroups (by study design and country) and there was no evidence of publication bias. The pooled effect estimate for high quality studies was 1.39 (1.15–1.68), I2 = 72.3%. Meta-regression analysis of 10 study-level variables did not identify sources of heterogeneity. In a speculative analysis, the number needed to harm (NNH) with H2RAs at 14 days after hospital admission in patients receiving antibiotics or not was 58, 95% CI (37, 115) and 425, 95% CI (267, 848), respectively. For the general population, the NNH at 1 year was 4549, 95% CI (2860, 9097). Conclusion In this rigorous systematic review and meta-analysis, we observed an association between H2RAs and CDI. The absolute risk of CDI associated with H2RAs is highest in hospitalized patients receiving antibiotics

    Group B Streptococcal Endocarditis in Obstetric and Gynecologic Practice

    Get PDF
    Background: We describe a case and review ten other instances of group B streptococcal endocarditis in the setting of obstetric and gynecologic practice reported since the last review in 1985. Case: Abortion remains a common antecedent event, but in contrast to earlier reports, most patients did not have underlying valvular disease, the tricuspid valve was most often involved, and mortality was low. Patients with tricuspid valve infection tended to have a subacute course, whereas those with aortic or mitral involvement typically had a more acute, fulminant course. Conclusion: Despite an improvement in mortality, morbidity remains high, with 8 of 11 patients having clinically significant emboli
    • …
    corecore