22 research outputs found

    Comparing Two Stress Reducing Interventions for College Students Significance of the Research Project

    No full text
    Anxiety and stress are common among college students and come from many sources such as the pressures of making new friends, coping with lifestyle changes, and the pressure to be successful academically (Lent et al., 2002; Ross, Neibling, & Heckert, 1999). Britz and Pappas (2010) found that 51% of undergraduate students stated they are “often” or “always” stressed. As a result of the high levels of stress and anxiety and their negative effects, it is important to identify effective interventions that can help reduce these levels for college students. One effective class of interventions for addressing stress and anxiety is mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs). MBIs emphasize the regulation of attention with a focus on being present, open, and accepting (Carsley, Heath, & Fajnerova, 2015). The research within this area is generally promising. Therefore, it is important to compare stress reducing techniques within the college setting. This study compared a brief MBI (coloring a mandala) to a brief stress reduction seminar in a sample of 83 college-aged adults. Participants were randomly assigned to either condition. They completed the State Trait Anxiety Inventory to determine their stress state, and a survey of perceived effectiveness and use of MBIs before and after the intervention. Both interventions significantly reduced stress state and trait levels for all participants. The participants stated that each condition was acceptable, and that they would easily be able to practice mindfulness-based activities

    Improving Students’ Writing Skills By Providing Choice and Performance Feedback

    No full text
    Writing is a valuable skill one uses throughout his or her life. Writing lays the foundation at a young age to assist learning in other areas of academics and contributes to success. Unfortunately, writing has become a neglected skill in schools with 72% of fourth grade students not reaching proficient levels of writing (Hier & Eckert, 2014). This low level of performance highlights the need for improvements in writing instruction. Therefore, it is important for researchers to identify effective interventions that will improve the writing performance of elementary school students. Two interventions, performance feedback and choice, have been shown to improve students\u27 writing skills. The proposed study will contribute to the research on interventions for students struggling in writing by combining these two interventions and evaluating the impact of students\u27 academic productivity. Participants will be third grade elementary school students nominated by the teacher as struggling writers. All participants will be exposed to a control condition and a combined interventions condition. It is hypothesized that students will increase their academic productivity in the combined condition when compared to the control condition. Results of the study and their implications will be discussed

    Test–Retest Reliability of Microlinguistic Information Derived From Spoken Discourse in Persons With Chronic Aphasia

    No full text
    Purpose: Characterize test-retest reliability of discourse measures across a battery of common tasks in individuals with aphasia and prospectively matched adults without brain damage. Methods: We collected spoken discourse during five monologue tasks at two time-points (test and retest; within two weeks apart) in an Aphasia group (N=23) and non-brain-damaged peer group (“NBD” group; N=24). We evaluated test-retest reliability for: percentage of correct information units, correct information units per minute, mean length of utterance, verbs per utterance, noun/verb ratio, open/closed class word ratio, tokens, sample duration (seconds), propositional idea density, type-token ratio, and words per minute. We explored reliability’s relationship with sample length and aphasia severity. Results: Rater reliability was excellent. Across tasks, both groups demonstrated discourse measures with poor, moderate, and good reliability, with the Aphasia group having measures demonstrating excellent test-retest reliability. When evaluating measures within each task, test-retest reliability again ranged from poor-to-excellent for both groups. Across groups and task, measures that appeared most reliable appeared to reflect lexical, informativeness, or fluency information. Sample length and aphasia severity impacted reliability, and this differed across and by task. Conclusions: We identified several discourse measures that were reliable across and within tasks. Test-retest statistics are intimately linked to the specific sample, emphasizing the importance of multiple baseline studies. Task itself should be considered an important variable, and it should not be assumed that discourse measures found to be reliable across several tasks (averaged) are likewise reliable for a single task

    The development of a method for the global health community to assess the proportion of food and beverage companies’ sales that are derived from unhealthy foods

    No full text
    Abstract Context Corporate engagement with food and beverage companies who produce food associated with health harms is a divisive topic in the global nutrition community, with high-profile cases of conflict of interest increasingly coming under scrutiny. There is a need for an agreed method to support health organizations in deciding whether and how to engage with large food and beverage manufacturers. Aim The aim of this study was to develop a method to quantify the proportion of sales from food and beverage companies that are derived from unhealthy foods to support organizations in determining which companies might be considered high-risk for engagement. Methods The 2015 WHO Euro nutrient profile model was applied to 35,550 products from 1294 brands manufactured by the top 20 global food and beverage companies from seven countries (Australia, Brazil, China, India, South Africa, UK and USA). For the purpose of this study, products that met the WHO Euro criteria were classified as “healthier” and those that failed were classified as “unhealthy”. Products were grouped by brand and weighted by the brand’s value sales for 2020. The primary outcome was the proportion of each company’s sales that were classified as unhealthy and healthier by company and category. Results Overall, 89% of the top 20 companies’ brand sales were classified as unhealthy. For every USD10spentonthetop20companies’brands,only10 spent on the top 20 companies’ brands, only 1.10 was spent on products considered healthier. All companies saw the majority of their sales come from unhealthy foods, including soft drinks, confectionery and snacks. None of Red Bull or Ferrero’s sales were classified as healthier and less than 5% of total sales were healthier for Mondelēz, Mars, and PepsiCo. Some companies had higher proportions of sales deriving from healthier products, including Grupo Bimbo (48%), Danone (34%) and Conagra (32%), although the majority of their sales were still derived from unhealthy foods. Discussion The results presented in this study highlight the reliance the leading food and beverage companies have on sales of unhealthy products that are contributing to diet-related disease globally. The method and steps we have laid out here could be used by organizations in the global health community to identify companies that have conflicts of interest when it comes to engaging with governments, international organizations and public health bodies on issues of policy and regulation

    Contribution of dorsal horn CGRP-expressing interneurons to mechanical sensitivity

    No full text
    Primary sensory neurons are generally considered the only source of dorsal horn calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), a neuropeptide critical to the transmission of pain messages. Using a tamoxifen-inducible CalcaCreER transgenic mouse, here we identified a distinct population of CGRP-expressing excitatory interneurons in lamina III of the spinal cord dorsal horn and trigeminal nucleus caudalis. These interneurons have spine-laden, dorsally directed, dendrites, and ventrally directed axons. As under resting conditions, CGRP interneurons are under tonic inhibitory control, neither innocuous nor noxious stimulation provoked significant Fos expression in these neurons. However, synchronous, electrical non-nociceptive Aβ primary afferent stimulation of dorsal roots depolarized the CGRP interneurons, consistent with their receipt of a VGLUT1 innervation. On the other hand, chemogenetic activation of the neurons produced a mechanical hypersensitivity in response to von Frey stimulation, whereas their caspase-mediated ablation led to mechanical hyposensitivity. Finally, after partial peripheral nerve injury, innocuous stimulation (brush) induced significant Fos expression in the CGRP interneurons. These findings suggest that CGRP interneurons become hyperexcitable and contribute either to ascending circuits originating in deep dorsal horn or to the reflex circuits in baseline conditions, but not in the setting of nerve injury
    corecore