Personal non-commercial use only

ABSTRACT. Objective. To compare the Quantiferon-TB Gold test (QTF-G) with the tuberculin skin test (TST) for the detection of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS), with reevaluation of the patients treated with tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) antagonists in the followup. Methods. The study involved 140 consecutive patients, 82 with RA and 58 with AS. Thirty patients were evaluated with QTF-G for detection of LTBI before and after 6 months of TNF-α antagonist treatment. QTF-G was also performed on 49 healthy controls. QTF-G results were recorded as positive, negative, or indeterminate. A positive TST was defined as ≥ 5 mm for RA and AS. Results. The percentages of positive QTF-G were comparable in RA and AS (37% vs 32%). The rate of positive QTF-G in healthy controls (29%) was also similar to RA and AS. In contrast to QTF-G results, a high rate of TST positivity was observed in AS compared to RA (82% vs 55%; p = 0.02). The total agreement between QTF-G and TST was observed to be 61% (κ = 0.29) in the whole group, 70% (κ = 0.42) in RA, and 49% (κ = 0.14) in AS. After 6 months of treatment with TNF-α antagonists, a high rate of QTF-G change was observed in patients with indeterminate results (23% vs 3%; p = 0.03)

Agreement between quantiferon-TB gold test and tuberculin skin test in the identification of latent tuberculosis infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis

ABSTRACT. Objective. To compare the Quantiferon-TB Gold test (QTF-G) with the tuberculin skin test (TST) for the detection of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS), with reevaluation of the patients treated with tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) antagonists in the followup. Methods. The study involved 140 consecutive patients, 82 with RA and 58 with AS. Thirty patients were evaluated with QTF-G for detection of LTBI before and after 6 months of TNF-α antagonist treatment. QTF-G was also performed on 49 healthy controls. QTF-G results were recorded as positive, negative, or indeterminate. A positive TST was defined as ≥ 5 mm for RA and AS. Results. The percentages of positive QTF-G were comparable in RA and AS (37% vs 32%). The rate of positive QTF-G in healthy controls (29%) was also similar to RA and AS. In contrast to QTF-G results, a high rate of TST positivity was observed in AS compared to RA (82% vs 55%; p = 0.02). The total agreement between QTF-G and TST was observed to be 61% (κ = 0.29) in the whole group, 70% (κ = 0.42) in RA, and 49% (κ = 0.14) in AS. After 6 months of treatment with TNF-α antagonists, a high rate of QTF-G change was observed in patients with indeterminate results (23% vs 3%; p = 0.03)

Effectiveness of TNF-inhibitors, abatacept, IL6-inhibitors and JAK-inhibitors in 31 846 patients with rheumatoid arthritis in 19 registers from the 'JAK-pot' collaboration

Background JAK-inhibitors (JAKi), recently approved in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), have changed the landscape of treatment choices. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of four current second-line therapies of RA with different modes of action, since JAKi approval, in an international collaboration of 19 registers. Methods In this observational cohort study, patients initiating tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), interleukin-6 inhibitors (IL-6i), abatacept (ABA) or JAKi were included. We compared the effectiveness of these treatments in terms of drug discontinuation and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) response rates at 1 year. Analyses were adjusted for patient, disease and treatment characteristics, including lines of therapy and accounted for competing risk. Results We included 31 846 treatment courses: 17 522 TNFi, 2775 ABA, 3863 IL-6i and 7686 JAKi. Adjusted analyses of overall discontinuation were similar across all treatments. The main single reason of stopping treatment was ineffectiveness. Compared with TNFi, JAKi were less often discontinued for ineffectiveness (adjusted HR (aHR) 0.75, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.83), as was IL-6i (aHR 0.76, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.85) and more often for adverse events (aHR 1.16, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.33). Adjusted CDAI response rates at 1 year were similar between TNFi, JAKi and IL-6i and slightly lower for ABA. Conclusion The adjusted overall drug discontinuation and 1 year response rates of JAKi and IL-6i were similar to those observed with TNFi. Compared with TNFi, JAKi were more often discontinued for adverse events and less for ineffectiveness, as were IL-6i.Peer reviewe