36 research outputs found

    Medical student teaching in the UK: how well are newly qualified doctors prepared for their role caring for patients with cancer in hospital?

    Get PDF
    A number of studies have identified problems with undergraduate oncology teaching. We have investigated how well prepared newly qualified doctors (first foundation year, or FY1 doctors) are for treating patients with cancer. Twenty-five FY1 doctors and 15 senior doctors participated in interviews. We turned the emergent themes into a questionnaire for all 5143 UK FY1 doctors in 2005. The response rate was 43% (2062 responses). Sixty-one percent of FY1 doctors had received oncology teaching at medical school, but 31% recalled seeing fewer than 10 patients with cancer. Forty percent of FY1 doctors felt prepared for looking after patients with cancer. Sixty-five percent felt prepared for diagnosing cancer, 15% felt they knew enough about chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and 11% felt prepared for dealing with oncological emergencies. Respondents believed medical students should learn about symptom control (71%) and communication skills (41%). Respondents who had received oncology teaching were more likely to feel prepared for looking after patients with cancer (OR 1.52; 95% CI 1.14–2.04). Preparedness also correlated with exposure to patients with cancer (OR 1.48; 95% CI 1.22–1.79). We have found worryingly low levels of exposure of medical students to patients with cancer. First foundation year doctors lack knowledge about cancer care and symptom control. Oncologists should maintain involvement in undergraduate teaching, and encourage greater involvement of patients in this teaching

    Electroweak parameters of the z0 resonance and the standard model

    Get PDF
    Contains fulltext : 124399.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access

    Functional analysis of a potassium-chloride co-transporter 3 (SLC12A6) promoter polymorphism leading to an additional DNA methylation site

    No full text
    The human potassium-chloride co-transporter 3 (KCC3, SLC12A6) is involved in cell proliferation and in electro-neutral movement of ions across the cell membrane. The gene (SLC12A6) is located on chromosome 15q14, a region that has previously shown linkage with bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, rolandic epilepsy, idiopathic generalized epilepsy, autism and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Furthermore, recessively inherited mutations of SLC12A6 cause Andermann syndrome, characterized by agenesis of the corpus callosum, which is associated with peripheral neuropathy and psychoses. Recently, we have demonstrated the association of two G/A promoter polymorphisms of SLC12A6 with bipolar disorder in a case–control study, and familial segregation of the rare variants as well as a trend toward association with schizophrenia. To investigate functional consequences of these polymorphisms, lymphocyte DNA was extracted, bisulfite modified, and subsequently sequenced. To investigate SLC12A6 promoter activity, various promoter constructs were generated and analyzed by luciferase reporter gene assays. We provide evidence that the G- allele showed a significant reduction of reporter gene expression. In human lymphocytes, the allele harboring the rare upstream G nucleotide was found to be methylated at the adjacent C position, possibly accountable for tissue-specific reduction in gene expression in vivo. Here we demonstrate functionality of an SNP associated with psychiatric disease and our results may represent a functional link between genetic variation and an epigenetic modification

    High-Resolution Molecular Imaging and Its Applications in Brain and Synapses

    No full text
    The molecular organization of the brain and its synapses is highly regulated and closely related to their biological functions. In this chapter, we introduce several super-resolution imaging technologies for brain and synapses, including optical microscopy (STED, STORM), expansion microscopy, and secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS, NanoSIMS). Super-resolution microscopy allows for visualization of the localization and dynamics of fluorescently labeled molecules whereas mass spectrometry imaging provides information on chemical structure and molecular turnover of the brain and synapses. The general principle, pros and cons of each technology as well as experimental considerations, such as labeling and sample preparation methods, are presented. In addition, correlative optical and mass spectrometry imaging, which appears as a recent trend of brain and synaptic imaging, is also discussed together with selected relevant applications in this research area. © 2020, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
    corecore