1,296 research outputs found
Free-riding on liquidity
Do financial market participants free-ride on liquidity? To address this question, we construct a dynamic general equilibrium model where agents face idiosyncratic preference and technology shocks. A secondary financial market allows agents to adjust their portfolio of liquid and illiquid assets in response to these shocks. The opportunity to do so reduces the demand for the liquid asset and, hence, its value. The optimal policy response is to restrict (but not eliminate) access to the secondary financial market. The reason for this result is that the portfolio choice exhibits a pecuniary externality: An agent does not take into account that by holding more of the liquid asset, he not only acquires additional insurance but also marginally increases the value of the liquid asset which improves insurance to other market participants.Monetary policy, liquidity, financial markets
Arriving on a Different Planet: Navigating College and Employer Expectations while on the Autism Spectrum
This workshop explores the process of entering college and then the work force from the perspective of someone who is on the Autism Spectrum. From your child learning to be an independent individual on the college scene (joining clubs, making friends, and in other social situations) and succeeding in his or her college classrooms. We will also be exploring what it is like to enter the work force after leaving college and how someone who is on the Autism Spectrum looks for work and how she or he learns to work in a new environment. Topics include getting your outfit ready for work, getting along with their coworkers and boss, and giving good customer service in one’s own profession. We will also be exploring how parents of autistic children can learn to incrementally step back to allow their children to independently learn what the world has offer adults in college and in a work environment. Sam will also discuss how he personally overcame such challenges as a young adult on the Autism Spectrum, providing a fresh understanding of what it’s like to be a young adult on the Autism Spectrum, and inspire others to let autistic people grab hold of their own lives and thrive
Temperature dependent removal of sodium chloride (NaCl) from synthetic nitrified urine
Urine is the source of the major part of plant nutrients in municipal
wastewater. Therefore, full nutrient recovery from source-separated
urine is an attractive option for both treating wastewater and gaining
a valuable fertilizer product. Full nutrient recovery can be achieved
by first stabilizing collected urine by nitrification and then
concentrating the urine by distillation. Since concentrations of all
salts in urine increase with increasing removal of water also the
sodium chloride (NaCl) content is high in the end. There are two
problems related to NaCl, the first being the synergistic
decomposition of ammonium nitrate by chloride and the second being
soil salinity and sodicity related problems when applying the product
as fertilizer. Solubility experiments using synthetic nitrified urine
were carried out in the temperature range between 40 and 90°C. The
synthetic urine solution contained seven inorganic ions at constant
composition (NH4+ , Na+, K+ // NO3- , SO4-- , PO4--- , Cl- - H2O) and
different water contents in order to determine the achievable extend
of NaCl removal. The aim was to find the conditions, at which a
maximal amount of sodium chloride can be removed with minimal loss of
other nutrients, especially nitrogen. The underlying hypothesis was,
that the solubility of ammonium chloride (NH4Cl) shows a much stronger
temperature dependence compared to NaCl and therefore selective NaCl
removal can be achieved at elevated temperatures. The analysis of the
solids showed, that mainly Cl-, SO4-- , Na- and to a lower extend NH4+
were present. At higher temperatures, more Cl- relative to NH+4 was
present in the solids. At 40°C, only NH4Cl was found while for all
temperatures above 60°C no NH4+ was observed at similar water
contents. The maximal removal of sodium chloride was achieved at a
water content of 7.1 % and was around 50 %. Na+ removal was as high as
33 %. Nitrogen losses as NH4Cl precipitate were around 11 %, while
basically no potassium or phosphate was lost. It was concluded, that
selective removal of NaCl is possible at elevated temperatures. The
maximal removal of Cl-, however, might not be sufficient to affect
ammonium nitrate decomposition significantly. With regard to soil
salinization, the achieved NaCl removal might well have a relevant
impact. In order to rationalize results, two numerical models for
electrolyte solutions, Pitzer and extended Uniquac, were applied. Both
models could only give rough estimates for concentrations, at which
crystallization started, as well as for the identities of solid
phases. This result might be due to various reason, one being the very
high ionic strengths in the nitrified urine system. Some preliminary
results for full nitrification using sodium hydroxide (NaOH) were
obtained, and this process alternative circumventing the problem of
ammonium nitrate decomposition is discussed. Future investigations
should focus on the following topics: the applicability of the results
for synthetic urine on real urine; the effect of varying nitrogen
contents in urine on NaCl removal; the mechanisms responsible for the
loss of nitrogen during collection and storage of urine; full
nitrification as an alternative process; further development of
numerical models for electrolyte solutions at high ionic strengths
Centralized trading of corporate bonds
In the post-crisis period, increased regulation of financial intermediaries led to a significant decline in corporate bond market liquidity. In order to stabilize these markets, policy makers recently proposed that the trading of corporate bonds should be more centralized. In this paper, we show that a centralization of corporate bond markets always leads to an inferior outcome when compared with the initial over-the-counter structure. The regulator may achieve a superior allocation only if it is feasible for him to also affect market liquidity, by either increasing or decreasing it
Degreasing the wheels of finance
Can there be too much trading in financial markets? To address this question, we construct a dynamic general equilibrium model, where agents face idiosyncratic preference and technology shocks. A financial market allows agents to adjust their portfolio of liquid and illiquid assets in response to these shocks. The opportunity to do so reduces the demand for the liquid asset and, hence, its value. The optimal policy response is to restrict (but not eliminate) access to the financial market. The reason for this result is that the portfolio choice exhibits a pecuniary externality: An agent does not take into account that by holding more of the liquid asset, he not only acquires additional insurance but also marginally increases the value of the liquid asset which improves insurance for other market participants
The societal benefits of a financial transaction tax
We investigate the positive and normative implications of a tax on financial market transactions in a dynamic general equilibrium model, where agents face idiosyncratic liquidity shocks and financial trading is essential. Our main finding is that agents' portfolio choices display a pecuniary externality which results in too much trading. We calibrate the model to U.S. data and find an optimal tax rate of 2.5 percent. Imposing this tax reduces trading in financial markets by 30 percent
Limited commitment and the demand for money in the UK
In the United Kingdom, money demand deviates from the convex relationship suggested by monetary theory. Limited commitment of borrowers via banks can explain this observation. Our finding is based on a microfounded monetary model, where a money market provides insurance against idiosyncratic liquidity shocks by offering short-term loans and by paying interest on money market deposits. We calibrate the model to U.K. data and show that limited commitment significantly improves the fit between the theoretical money demand function and the data. Limited commitment can also explain the "liquidity trap"; i.e., why the ratio of credit to M1 is currently so low, despite the fact that nominal interest rates are at their lowest recorded levels
- …