The Relationship between Science and Mathematics Student Learning Outcomes

This article discusses the relationship between mathematics learning outcomes and natural science learning outcomes at East Teluk Jambe 1 Public Middle School in 227 students from nine classes at the end of the odd semester of the 2022/2023 Academic Year. The relationship between these two subjects can be seen from the results of mathematics learning scores and science learning scores by looking at the relationship that occurs based on student ability categories, namely the High Mathematics Category (HMC) and the Low Mathematics Category (LMC), the High Science Category (HSC), the Low Science Category (LSC) is then also seen based on the overall value of mathematics and science. The statistical test used is a correlation test to see each relationship. The results obtained the overall value of mathematics learning outcomes will have a sufficient influence on the overall value of science learning outcomes and vice versa, the effect of a sufficient relationship in the value of mathematics learning outcomes on science or vice versa occurs when students' learning abilities in mathematics or science are high. The overall mathematics learning result is 83.20 while the average science learning result is 85.63, and the science score is higher than the math score. Students who study mathematics will have an influence on learning science, and vice versa students who study mathematics will have an influence on learning mathematics so that these two subjects must be given to student

DESKRIPSI KEMAMPUAN REPRESENTASI MATEMATIS SISWA SMP DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL PADA MATERI SEGI EMPAT

Mathematical representation skills are very important for students, because with the ability of representation students can understand a concept or problem and turn it into a concrete form. This study describes the ability of mathematical representation of junior high school students in solving problems in rectangular materials, a question that was given adopted from a government book entitled Mathematics smp grade VII Semester 2 Revised Edition 2017. The research was conducted at SMP Negeri 1 Kotabaru School Year 2020/2021. The study also used descriptive qualitative methods in the next category of student mathematical representation test results on quadrilateral-related questions through a categorization system based on average grades and deviation standards after which they were divided into high, medium and low categories. The results of this article will present students' answers on the question of mathematical representation based on three indicators, namely verbal, image and symbolic representations

Kecerdasan Logis Matematis Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Kelas IX SMP

The aim of the present study was to portray students' mathematical logical intelligence in class VIII at one of the junior high school in Karawang Regency. Mathematical logical intelligence is a skill that can help students solve math problems. Students' inability to calculate and use reasoning is still a concern in learning mathematics. Skills in processing words and numbers, utilize reasoning, analyzing problems logically, finding formulas and conducting scientific investigations are intelligence that students must have. The research used descriptive qualitative approach. The subjects in this article are 3 students out of 40 students taken randomly purposive sampling of the criteria of high, medium, and low levels of logical-mathematical intelligence based on the results of the selected tests to observe and analyze logical-mathematical abilities. The instrument used in this study was a logical mathematical intelligence test instrument tailored to indicators of mathematical logical intelligence, namely: 1) ability to process numbers and solve calculations problems, 2) ability to use mathematical analysis, and 3) ability to solve problems using thinking skills, 4) ability to solve math problem related to patterns and relationships, and 5) ability in inductive and deductive thinking. The results showed that the average ability of students' logical-mathematical intelligence was still in the moderate categor

PROFIL KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN ANALOGI MATEMATIS SISWA SMA PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI LENGKUNG

Mathematical analogy reasoning ability can help students solve two math problems that have the same concept but with different problem forms. Therefore, this article aims to reveal and describe the mathematical analogy reasoning abilities of high school students in solving curved side geometrical problems. This research is a qualitative research with descriptive method. The subjects used were 3 students out of 30 students in class X-3 SMA Negeri 2 Karawang which were obtained from the results of categorizing mathematical analogy reasoning abilities. The data collection technique used was a written test. This ability is measured based on the stages of analogical reasoning, namely encoding, inferring, mapping and applying. Then data analysis is carried out by reducing data, presenting data, and making conclusions. The results of this article show that of the three subjects who can fulfill the stages of encoding, inferring, mapping and applying, only KA students. NZ students are only able to achieve two stages of analogical reasoning, namely encoding and mapping. Meanwhile, VA students have not been able to fulfill all the stages of mathematical analogy reasoning given. Therefore, efforts are needed to improve students' mathematical analogy reasoning abilities

KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR ALJABAR SISWA SMP PADA MATERI SISTEM PERSAMAAN LINEAR DUA VARIABEL (SPLDV)

Algebraic thinking skills are very important to be mastered by students, by thinking algebra students can better understand and solve problems that occur in daily life, especially problems related to the form of algebra. The research aims to analyze and describe the algebraic thinking ability of junior high school students in solving problems in SPLDV material. This research was conducted at SMP Negeri 2 Karawang Barat School Year 2020/2021, with the subject of the study as many as 30 junior high school students in grade VIII. The method used in this study is descriptive qualitative, with instruments in the form of description tests as many as 2 SPLDV questions and documentation. The data analysis techniques in this study were conducted by reducing data, presenting data, and drawing conclusions. From the results of the study found that there are still many students who have not been able to meet the Graduate Competency Standards that indicate that students' algebraic thinking ability is still low, it is due to the lack of understanding of students about the concept of algebra. Evidently, from 2 points of algebra thinking given to students obtained percentage data of 20% of students thinking high algebra, 16.67% of students thinking moderate algebra and 13.33% of students thinking low algebra

Responsi Siswa Terhadap Bahan Ajar E-Lkpd Matematika Dalam Materi Persamaan Garis Lurus

Artikel ini bertujuan untuk memperlihatkan beberapa respon siswa terhadap bahan ajar e-LKPD matematika dalam materi persamaan garis lurus yang mengacu pada standar pembuatan bahan ajar menurut depdiknas yaitu pada aspek tampilan, aspek materi, aspek komponen aspek penyajian, aspek kebahasaan, dan aspek tujuan pembelajaran. Metode yang digunakan dalam artikel ini yaitu dengan menggunakan metode deskriptif dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Subjek yang digunakan dalam artikel ini yaitu enam siswa kelas X di salah satu SMA di Kabupaten Bekasi. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan dalam artikel ini yaitu instrumen angket respon siswa. Adapun teknik analisis data yang digunakan pada lembar penilaian respon siswa adalah menggunakan angket semi tertutup yaitu Skala Diferensi Semantik. Hasil responsi siswa terhadap bahan ajar e-LKPD matematika dalam materi persamaan garis lurus yang diperoleh dari aspek-aspek menurut depdiknas memperoleh kriteria “Baik sekali” dengan persentase rata-rata 90%

Kemampuan Generalisasi Matematis Siswa SMP pada Materi Segiempat dan Segitiga

Kemampuan generalisasi matematis adalah bagian dari kemampuan yang harus dimiliki oleh siswa dalam mempersepsi sebuah pola, struktur, gambar, data ataupun suku berikutnya dan merumuskan bentuk umum secara simbolis. Oleh karena itu perlu adanya penalaran yang jelas dalam belajar matematika, kemampuan generalisasi ini dibutuhkan untuk proses mengambil suatu kesimpulan berdasarkan pengamatan atau fakta. Penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian kualitatif metode deskriptif, dengan tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mendeskripsikan kemampuan generalisasi matematis siswa kelas VIII pada salah satu SMP Negeri 2 Karawang dalam menyelesaikan masalah materi segiempat dan segitiga. Subjek dalam penelitian ini yaitu 3 siswa dari 30 siswa yang didapat dari hasil pengkategorian kemampuan generalisasi matematis. Teknis analisis data dilakukan melalui tes tertulis, kemampuan ini diukur berdasarkan tahapan generalisasi yaitu Perception of generality, Expression of generality, Symbolic of generality, Manipulation of generality. Berdasarkan hasil analisis jawaban, diperoleh informasi bahwa MA mampu 1) identifikasi pola, 2) menentukan suku berikutnya, 3) menghasilkan pola umum, 4) menggunakan hasil generalisasi untuk menyelesaikan masalah. Sedangkan NB hanya mampu 1) menemukan suku ke-n, 2) membuat pola umum. Sedangkan DC hanya mampu mengidentifikasi pola

KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS SISWA MTS DALAM MENYELESAIKAN MASALAH BANGUN DATAR SEGIEMPAT

The importance of critical thinking skills is possessed by every student in order to be able to solve math problems appropriately. This article aims to provide an overview of the ability of MTs students in critical thinking in solving quadrilateral material problems. The picture to be studied related to students' ability to interpretation, analysis, evaluation, inference, and explanation. The subject in this article is class IX students in one of the MTs in Karawang Regency with a total of 16 students who will be categorized based on high, medium, and low. Data collection technique using tests in the form of 5 questions of description in quadrilateral material and interviews. The method used is qualitative descriptive. The data analysis techniques in this article based on Miles &Huberman, namely collecting data, data reduction, data presentation, and verification. The results showed that students' critical thinking skills were in 3 categories, namely 6% in high categories, 75% in moderate categories, and 19% in low categories. This shows that the ability to think students in completing quadrilateral problems is relatively moderate, meaning that students' ability to complete quadrilateral based on critical thinking steps has not been maximized

KEMAMPUAN SISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL BANGUN RUANG GABUNGAN

This study aims to see how students' ability to solve problems related to surface area and volume of combined space builds. The research method used was qualitative descriptive involving 15 grade VIII students at a junior high school in Karawang Regency. The results showed that there was a variation in students' abilities, only a small percentage of students were able to solve the problem well, while most students still had difficulties. Common mistakes encountered are related to calculations and understanding the concept of building space that has not been fully mastered by most students. This information becomes an important basis for improving the quality of geometry learning in schools, focusing on areas that cause difficulties for students

ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN PEMAHAMAN MATEMATIS SISWA SMA PADA MATERI INTEGRAL

In this research, the researcher wanted to analyze the students' mathematical understanding ability on integral material by using a descriptive qualitative approach. One of the class XII students of SMAN 1 Cikarang Barat was made the subject of this research. The instrument used in this research is a test instrument, which is in the form of an integral material description test question which consists of 7 questions. The results of problem solving by students will be analyzed based on indicators of mathematical understanding, namely interpreting, exemplifying (giving examples), classifying, summarizing, inferring, comparing, and explaining. The results showed that the research subjects were only able to answer 3 questions correctly, which means they were only able to fulfill 3 of the 7 indicators of mathematical understanding. Indicators of mathematical understanding that can be fulfilled by research subjects are summarizing, classifying, and exemplifying (giving examples)