7 research outputs found

    Prevalence, associated factors and outcomes of pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: the DecubICUs study

    Get PDF
    Funder: European Society of Intensive Care Medicine; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100013347Funder: Flemish Society for Critical Care NursesAbstract: Purpose: Intensive care unit (ICU) patients are particularly susceptible to developing pressure injuries. Epidemiologic data is however unavailable. We aimed to provide an international picture of the extent of pressure injuries and factors associated with ICU-acquired pressure injuries in adult ICU patients. Methods: International 1-day point-prevalence study; follow-up for outcome assessment until hospital discharge (maximum 12 weeks). Factors associated with ICU-acquired pressure injury and hospital mortality were assessed by generalised linear mixed-effects regression analysis. Results: Data from 13,254 patients in 1117 ICUs (90 countries) revealed 6747 pressure injuries; 3997 (59.2%) were ICU-acquired. Overall prevalence was 26.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.9–27.3). ICU-acquired prevalence was 16.2% (95% CI 15.6–16.8). Sacrum (37%) and heels (19.5%) were most affected. Factors independently associated with ICU-acquired pressure injuries were older age, male sex, being underweight, emergency surgery, higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, Braden score 3 days, comorbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, immunodeficiency), organ support (renal replacement, mechanical ventilation on ICU admission), and being in a low or lower-middle income-economy. Gradually increasing associations with mortality were identified for increasing severity of pressure injury: stage I (odds ratio [OR] 1.5; 95% CI 1.2–1.8), stage II (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.4–1.9), and stage III or worse (OR 2.8; 95% CI 2.3–3.3). Conclusion: Pressure injuries are common in adult ICU patients. ICU-acquired pressure injuries are associated with mainly intrinsic factors and mortality. Optimal care standards, increased awareness, appropriate resource allocation, and further research into optimal prevention are pivotal to tackle this important patient safety threat

    Tutorial multimedia para el manejo de aspectos formales de los trabajos de investigación

    No full text
    El objetivo del estudio consistió en el diseño de un prototipo de tutorial multimedia para la instrucción en el manejo de los aspectos formales de los documentos de trabajos de grado cumpliendo con las normativas vigentes de una institución de educación superior pública del área metropolitana de Caracas, Venezuela. El método empleado correspondió al de Proyecto Factible descrito por la Universidad Pedagógica Experimental Libertador UPEL (2006), como una propuesta de acción para resolver un problema práctico o satisfacer una necesidad. Para el diseño de instrucción se siguió el modelo de Aguilar (2005), quien lo define como un proceso apoyado en un enfoque sistémico que organiza los componentes de naturaleza instruccional para satisfacer necesidades y metas educativas. Se consideró el enfoque conductual del aprendizaje como base del modelo pedagógico dada la naturaleza tutorial del prototipo y el uso de las Tecnologías de Información y Comunicación (TIC) para apoyar el diseño. La técnica de recolección de datos empleada fue la entrevista a un informante clave (Nieves, 2010); los datos fueron categorizados e interpretados para concluir que un 90 % de los trabajos recibidos presentan inconsistencias de forma, lo que justificó el desarrollo del referido prototipo de tutorial multimedia. Palabras Clave: Trabajos de investigación, aplicación multi- media, Tecnologías de Información y Comunicación (TIC

    Correction to: Prevalence, associated factors and outcomes of pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: the DecubICUs study (Intensive Care Medicine, (2021), 47, 2, (160-169), 10.1007/s00134-020-06234-9)

    No full text
    The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The members of the ESICM Trials Group Collaborators were not shown in the article but only in the ESM. The full list of collaborators is shown below. The original article has been corrected
    corecore