Post-approval quality-related regulatory actions for biopharmaceuticals approved in the European Union and the United States between 1995 and 2019

The quality of biopharmaceuticals is carefully monitored by manufacturers and regulators to ensure safety and efficacy throughout the entire product life cycle. Quality defects can lead to post-approval regulatory actions (RAs) to inform healthcare professionals (HCPs). The present study identified quality-related RAs for biopharmaceuticals approved in the European Union and United States between 1995 and 2019. Quality-related RAs were issued due to various quality defects and required different actions by HCPs. The quality defects were not identified due to a negative impact on efficacy and/or safety, which is reassuring. The findings reflect the capability of the stringent regulatory system and quality control to capture and counter various quality defects before the affected product and batches can harm patients

Post-approval quality-related regulatory actions for biopharmaceuticals approved in the European Union and the United States between 1995 and 2019

The quality of biopharmaceuticals is carefully monitored by manufacturers and regulators to ensure safety and efficacy throughout the entire product life cycle. Quality defects can lead to post-approval regulatory actions (RAs) to inform healthcare professionals (HCPs). The present study identified quality-related RAs for biopharmaceuticals approved in the European Union and United States between 1995 and 2019. Quality-related RAs were issued due to various quality defects and required different actions by HCPs. The quality defects were not identified due to a negative impact on efficacy and/or safety, which is reassuring. The findings reflect the capability of the stringent regulatory system and quality control to capture and counter various quality defects before the affected product and batches can harm patients

Drug-drug interactions with metronidazole and itraconazole in patients using acenocoumarol

PURPOSE: Various population-based cohort studies have shown that antimicrobial agents increase the risk of overanticoagulation in patients using coumarins. In this study, we assessed this association in hospitalized patients. METHODS: We included all patients hospitalized in the Spaarne Gasthuis (Haarlem/Hoofddorp, the Netherlands), who started using an antimicrobial agent during acenocoumarol treatment or vice versa between 1 January 2015 and 1 July 2019. Patients were followed from start of concomitant therapy until 48 h after termination of the concomitant therapy or discharge, whichever came first. We analyzed the association between the antimicrobial agents and the risk of overanticoagulation, defined as an interpolated INR above 6, using Cox regression analysis. We corrected for multiple testing with the Bonferroni correction. Patients who started using acenocoumarol and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid were used as reference group. RESULTS: In the study population, sixteen antimicrobial agents were started frequently concomitantly with acenocoumarol treatment. We included 2157 interaction episodes in 1172 patients. Patients who started using the combination of co-trimoxazole (HR 3.76; 95% CI 1.47-9.62; p = 0.006), metronidazole (HR 2.55; 95% CI 1.37-4.76; p = 0.003), or itraconazole (HR 4.11; 95% CI 1.79-9.45; p = 0.001) concomitantly with acenocoumarol treatment had an increased risk of overanticoagulation compared with patients using acenocoumarol and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid concomitantly. The associations for metronidazole (p = 0.045) and itraconazole (p = 0.015) remained statistically significant after correction for multiple testing. CONCLUSION: Co-trimoxazole, metronidazole, and itraconazole increase the risk of overanticoagulation in patients using acenocoumarol. These combinations should be avoided if possible or otherwise acenocoumarol doses should be reduced and INR measured more frequently

Nature and timing of post-approval manufacturing changes of tumour necrosis factor α inhibitor products: A 20-year follow-up study of originators and biosimilars

The manufacturing of biopharmaceuticals is complex, and minor changes in the process may affect quality attributes (QAs) that may, in turn, impact clinical outcomes. Regulatory documents from the European Medicines Agency were used to characterize two aspects, nature and timing, of post-approval MCs for originators and biosimilars TNF-α inhibitors that were on the European market up to May 2021. The nature of MCs was evaluated in two ways: (1) the type of MCs related to the drug substance (DS) or drug product (DP), classified as manufacturing, quality control, composition, packaging, or stability with various subtypes; and (2) the risk level according to the potential impact of the MCs on QAs, classified as low, medium, or high. Timing was defined as the date of the regulatory decision on the MC in relation to the approval date. We identified 801 post-approval MCs implemented to originators (mean: 137, range: 112-175) and biosimilars (mean: 30, range: 0-133). Most of implemented MCs for originators and biosimilars were classified as low and medium risk (88.1%), and a small fraction were considered high-risk (11.9%). The average incidence rates were comparable for both originators and biosimilars (7.0/year for MCs, 0.8/year for high-risk MCs). In 20% of MCs introduced to biosimilars, the DP manufacturing site was involved (9% for originators). In contrast, 16% of MCs introduced to originators were related to the DS manufacturing processes (only 7% for biosimilars). In conclusion, while the overall MC incidence rate and the risk level of MCs was not substantially different between TNF-α inhibitor products, we observed some differences in a few types of MCs related to DS manufacturing process and DP manufacturing site between originators and biosimilars. As far as our data shows there is no reasons to assume that post-approval MCs will lead to differences between TNF-α-i originators and biosimilars in clinical practice

Recommendations on TNFα inhibitor biosimilar use in clinical practice: a comparison of European gastroenterology IBD guidance

Background: Professional associations publish guidance advising gastroenterologists on prescribing biosimilars; however, guidelines differ between countries and change over time. This study aimed to map the presence and content of guidance from European gastroenterology associations on TNFα inhibitor biosimilar use and its development over time. Research design and methods: Guidelines on biosimilar prescribing from national gastroenterology associations in the European Economic Area (EEA) partnered with the European Crohn’s and Colitis Organization (ECCO) were collected. Treatment guidelines and biosimilar position papers from 2010 to 2022 were included. Data were extracted using a template. Results: 26 of 30 EEA countries have an ECCO-partnered gastroenterology association, of which 14 (53.8%) had national guidelines addressing biosimilars, four (15.4%) followed ECCO’s position, and three (11.6%) had treatment guidelines without mentioning biosimilars. From five countries (19.2%) no guidelines were retrieved. Among 18 countries with guidance, 14 (77.8%) associations endorsed initiating biological treatment with biosimilars, and 13 (72.2%) endorsed transitioning from originator to biosimilar. Nine associations published multiple guidelines over time addressing biosimilars; overall, their positions became more encouraging. Conclusions: The majority of gastroenterology associations endorsed biosimilar use. The lack of (up-to-date) guidelines for some associations indicates an area of improvement to support biosimilar use in clinical practice

Discontinuation of infliximab treatment in patients with inflammatory bowel disease who retransitioned to originator and those who remained on biosimilar

BACKGROUND: Many patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have transitioned from an infliximab originator to a biosimilar. However, some patients retransition to the originator (i.e. stop biosimilar and reinitiate the originator). Whether this sign of potential unsatisfactory treatment response is specifically related to the infliximab biosimilar or the patient and/or the disease including patients' beliefs on the biosimilar is unclear. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare the risk of and reasons for infliximab discontinuation between retransitioned patients and those remaining on biosimilar. DESIGN: Non-interventional, multicentre cohort study. METHODS: IBD patients who transitioned from infliximab originator to biosimilar between January 2015 and September 2019 in two Dutch hospitals were eligible for this study. Retransitioned patients (retransitioning cohort) were matched with patients remaining on biosimilar (biosimilar remainder cohort). Reasons for discontinuation were categorised as the unwanted response (i.e. loss of effect or adverse events) or remission. Risk of unwanted discontinuation was compared using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Patients in the retransitioning cohort ( n  = 44) were younger (median age 39.9 versus 44.0 years), more often female (65.9% versus 48.9%) and had shorter dosing intervals (median 48.5 versus 56.0 days) than in the biosimilar remainder cohort ( n  = 127). Infliximab discontinuation due to unwanted response was 22.7% in the retransitioning and 13.4% in the biosimilar remainder cohort, and due to remission was 2.3% and 9.4%, respectively. Retransitioned patients are at increased risk of discontinuing due to unwanted response compared with biosimilar remainder patients (adjusted HR 3.7, 95% CI: 1.0-13.9). Patients who retransitioned due to an increase in objective disease markers had higher discontinuation rates than patients who retransitioned due to symptoms only (66.7% versus 23.7%). CONCLUSION: Retransitioned patients are at increased risk of infliximab discontinuation due to unwanted response. Retransitioning appeared related to the patient and/or disease and not the product. Clinicians might switch patients opting for retransitioning to other treatment regimens

Discontinuation of infliximab treatment in patients with inflammatory bowel disease who retransitioned to originator and those who remained on biosimilar

BACKGROUND: Many patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have transitioned from an infliximab originator to a biosimilar. However, some patients retransition to the originator (i.e. stop biosimilar and reinitiate the originator). Whether this sign of potential unsatisfactory treatment response is specifically related to the infliximab biosimilar or the patient and/or the disease including patients' beliefs on the biosimilar is unclear. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare the risk of and reasons for infliximab discontinuation between retransitioned patients and those remaining on biosimilar. DESIGN: Non-interventional, multicentre cohort study. METHODS: IBD patients who transitioned from infliximab originator to biosimilar between January 2015 and September 2019 in two Dutch hospitals were eligible for this study. Retransitioned patients (retransitioning cohort) were matched with patients remaining on biosimilar (biosimilar remainder cohort). Reasons for discontinuation were categorised as the unwanted response (i.e. loss of effect or adverse events) or remission. Risk of unwanted discontinuation was compared using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Patients in the retransitioning cohort (n = 44) were younger (median age 39.9 versus 44.0 years), more often female (65.9% versus 48.9%) and had shorter dosing intervals (median 48.5 versus 56.0 days) than in the biosimilar remainder cohort (n = 127). Infliximab discontinuation due to unwanted response was 22.7% in the retransitioning and 13.4% in the biosimilar remainder cohort, and due to remission was 2.3% and 9.4%, respectively. Retransitioned patients are at increased risk of discontinuing due to unwanted response compared with biosimilar remainder patients (adjusted HR 3.7, 95% CI: 1.0-13.9). Patients who retransitioned due to an increase in objective disease markers had higher discontinuation rates than patients who retransitioned due to symptoms only (66.7% versus 23.7%). CONCLUSION: Retransitioned patients are at increased risk of infliximab discontinuation due to unwanted response. Retransitioning appeared related to the patient and/or disease and not the product. Clinicians might switch patients opting for retransitioning to other treatment regimens

Reporting of quality attributes in scientific publications presenting biosimilarity assessments of (intended) biosimilars: a systematic literature review

Publisher's version (útgefin grein)Last years, more than 46 unique biosimilars were approved by EMA and/or US-FDA following patent expiration of reference products. Biosimilars are not identical like generics, but highly similar versions where demonstrating biosimilarity of quality attributes (QAs) to a reference product is the basis of development and regulatory approval. Information on QAs assessed to establish biosimilarity may not always be publicly available, although this information is imperative to understand better the science behind biosimilars approval. This study aims to identify QA types reported in publications presenting biosimilarity assessments of (intended) biosimilars over time. English full-text publications presenting biosimilarity assessments of QAs for (intended) biosimilars between 2000 and 2019 identified from PubMed and EMBASE. Publication characteristics and QAs classified into: structural (physicochemical properties, primary structure, higher-order structures (HOSs), post-translational modifications (PTMs), and purity and impurities) and functional (biological and immunochemical activities) were extracted from publications. Seventy-nine publications were identified (79% open-access, 75% industry-sponsored, 62% including unapproved biosimilars, and 66% involving antibodies). Reporting frequencies varied for QA types: biological activity (94%), physicochemical properties (81%), PTMs (79%), primary structure (77%) purity and impurities (73%), HOSs (58%), and immunochemical activity (41%). The number of publications increased from 6 (7%) during 2009–2011 to 62 (79%) during 2015–2019. Eighteen (28%) publications reported all QA types relevant to an active-biological-substance. Reporting of most QA types increased over time that most evidenced by immunochemical activity (from 0% to 47%) which occured after EMA monoclonal antibody (mAbs) guidline in 2012 and more publications on mAbs later on when compared to earlier period. Biosimilarity assessments of QAs have been published in peer-reviewed publications for about 60% of approved biosimilars. Publishing biosimilarity assessments and reporting QAs over time appears to be affected by regulatory actions that occurred in 2012-2015, including regulatory approval and development of regulatory guidelines for biosimilars. Availability of a complete, publicly accessible and unbiased biosimilarity assessment of QAs, as part of a trusted and transparent regulatory process, will contribute to increased confidence and acceptance of biosimilars in clinical practice.This study was funded by the Saudi Food and Drug Authority(SFDA) through the Saudi Arabian cultural mission (SACM), the Hague,Netherlands as a part of a Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) project for AMA.The SFDA has no role in any aspect of the study, including the pre-paration, review, the approval of the manuscript, nor the decision topublish the manuscript.Peer Reviewe

Patients Retransitioning from Biosimilar TNFα Inhibitor to the Corresponding Originator After Initial Transitioning to the Biosimilar: A Systematic Review Dataset

Dataset related to the paper 'Patients Retransitioning from Biosimilar TNFα Inhibitor to the Corresponding Originator After Initial Transitioning to the Biosimilar: A Systematic Review'. The dataset contains the results of the search queries and which of these were ultimately included in the systematic review

Patients Retransitioning from Biosimilar TNFα Inhibitor to the Corresponding Originator After Initial Transitioning to the Biosimilar: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Transitioning patients from an originator to a corresponding biosimilar has been extensively studied in both randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Although transitioning is considered well-tolerated, with no negative impacts on efficacy and/or safety, 2.6-25.8% of patients restart treatment with the originator (retransitioning). Retransitioning to the originator can be considered an indication of biosimilar treatment failure or dissatisfaction with biosimilar treatment. Increasing our knowledge of patients who retransition might help to reduce the number of patients retransitioning. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to estimate the cumulative incidence of patients who retransitioned from a tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitor biosimilar to originator and to explore potential patient, disease, and treatment and implementation strategy factors associated with retransitioning. METHOD: We conducted a systematic literature search in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of controlled trials databases until March 2021. Studies on TNFα inhibitors, biosimilar transitioning, and retransitioning were included. Transitioning was defined as switching from an originator to a biosimilar, and retransitioning was defined as switching from an originator to a biosimilar and back to the originator. Characteristics of the studies were descriptively analyzed. Studies were weighted by the number of patients transitioning, and the primary outcome was the median cumulative incidence of retransitioning. For each of the factors related to patient, disease, and treatment and implementation strategy, studies were stratified according to the categories of that factor. The weighted medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs) of the cumulative incidence of retransitioning in these studies were calculated and compared to explore whether a potential association existed between these factors and the cumulative incidence of retransitioning. RESULTS: Of 994 screened publications, 37 were included. The weighted median cumulative incidence of retransitioning was 7.6% (IQR 6.8-17.2). Studies that included only patients with inflammatory bowel disease (6.6 vs. 15.1-17.7% for other indications), included only patients with stable disease (7.0 vs. 13.7% for including all patients), and did not offer retransitioning at the introduction of the biosimilar (7.0 vs. 11.1% for studies that offered retransitioning) reported less retransitioning. In addition, the incidence of retransitioning was lower when extra laboratory monitoring was part of the implementation strategy (1.6 vs. 6.1%) and when gainsharing (patients' healthcare directly benefits from financial savings from transitioning) (1.4 vs. 7.2% for studies without gainsharing) was applied. CONCLUSIONS: In studies on transitioning patients from TNFα originator to biosimilar, 8% of patients retransitioned. Retransitioning appeared to be lower in studies that included only patients with stable disease and in studies that did not offer patients the option of retransitioning at the introduction of the biosimilar. In addition, retransitioning appeared to be lower in studies that implemented extra laboratory monitoring as part of the biosimilar implementation strategy. Clinicians should consider implementing these suggestions as they might reduce retransitioning rates and improve the introduction of biosimilars in clinical practice. PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42021226381