Special Section on Pediatric Drug Disposition and Pharmacokinetics-Minireview Ontogeny of Hepatic Drug Transporters and Relevance to Drugs Used in Pediatrics

ABSTRACT Most of the pharmacokinetic studies conducted to calculate pediatric drug doses are based on scaling from adult data using various allometric parameters related to body size. However, these uniform scaling methods cannot account for all physiologic changes occurring during maturation, which influence various drugs in different ways. The ontogeny of physiologic and biologic functions accompanying the progression from infancy to childhood to adulthood does not proceed in a simple monotonic rate with body size for various elimination pathways. The transporters and their interplay with enzymes have a substantial role in drug metabolism and disposition. Although much is known about enzymes and their ontogeny, there is a scarcity of information on the ontogenic profile of drug transporters, particularly during the early years of human life. These ontogeny data are required for the enhancement of physiologically based pharmacokinetic models, and consequently for the prediction of pharmacokinetic profiles of new therapeutic compounds in pediatric populations. This review points to the relative ontogeny rate for enzymes and transporters and how these may confound our understanding of the role that transporters may or may not play in childhood compared with adulthood

Global wealth disparities drive adherence to COVID-safe pathways in head and neck cancer surgery

Peer reviewe

The impact of surgical delay on resectability of colorectal cancer: An international prospective cohort study

AIM: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has provided a unique opportunity to explore the impact of surgical delays on cancer resectability. This study aimed to compare resectability for colorectal cancer patients undergoing delayed versus non-delayed surgery. METHODS: This was an international prospective cohort study of consecutive colorectal cancer patients with a decision for curative surgery (January-April 2020). Surgical delay was defined as an operation taking place more than 4 weeks after treatment decision, in a patient who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy. A subgroup analysis explored the effects of delay in elective patients only. The impact of longer delays was explored in a sensitivity analysis. The primary outcome was complete resection, defined as curative resection with an R0 margin. RESULTS: Overall, 5453 patients from 304 hospitals in 47 countries were included, of whom 6.6% (358/5453) did not receive their planned operation. Of the 4304 operated patients without neoadjuvant therapy, 40.5% (1744/4304) were delayed beyond 4 weeks. Delayed patients were more likely to be older, men, more comorbid, have higher body mass index and have rectal cancer and early stage disease. Delayed patients had higher unadjusted rates of complete resection (93.7% vs. 91.9%, P = 0.032) and lower rates of emergency surgery (4.5% vs. 22.5%, P < 0.001). After adjustment, delay was not associated with a lower rate of complete resection (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.90-1.55, P = 0.224), which was consistent in elective patients only (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.69-1.27, P = 0.672). Longer delays were not associated with poorer outcomes. CONCLUSION: One in 15 colorectal cancer patients did not receive their planned operation during the first wave of COVID-19. Surgical delay did not appear to compromise resectability, raising the hypothesis that any reduction in long-term survival attributable to delays is likely to be due to micro-metastatic disease