Voices from the Frontlines:Teachers' Perceptions of High-Stakes Testing

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether teachers perceived Florida’s high-stakes testing program to be taking public schools in the right direction. More importantly, we sought to understand why teachers perceived the tests to be taking schools in the right or wrong direction. Based on the survey results of 708 teachers, we categorized their concerns and praises of high-stakes testing into ten themes. Most of the teachers believed that the testing program was not taking schools in the right direction. They commented that the test was used improperly and that the one-time test scores were not an accurate assessment of students’ learning and development. In addition, they cited negative effects on the curriculum, teaching and learning, and student and teacher motivation. The positive effects cited were much fewer in number and included the fact that the testing held students, educators, and parents accountable for their actions. Interestingly, teachers were not opposed to accountability, but rather, opposed the manner in which it was currently implemented. Only by understanding these positive and negative effects of the testing program can policymakers hope to improve upon it. To this end, we discuss several implications of these findings, including: limiting the use of test scores, changing the school grading criteria, using alternative assessments, modifying the curriculum, and taking steps to reduce teaching to the test

Rural Elementary Administrators’ Views of High-Stakes Testing

This study examines how rural elementary school administrators perceive the effects of high-stakes testing in comparison to suburban and urban elementary administrators. High-stakes testing had a greater impact, both positively and negatively, on rural administrators than on their counterparts in suburban and urban schools. Specifically, the positive effects were that rural administrators were more motivated by the testing program to do a better job, found the test results more useful in assessing teachers, and found the test results more useful in meeting the academic needs of students. The negative effects were that rural administrators felt more pressure than urban administrators to improve test scores and found their school rating to more negatively affect their ability to attract high quality teachers than administrators in suburban schools

Can Accountability Be Inviting? An Assessment of Administrators’ Professionally and Personally Inviting Behaviors

The purpose of this study was to assess administrators’ professionally and personallyinviting behaviors and examine whether administrators’ reported behaviorswere correlated with school rankings, job satisfaction, school climate, ortime spent on instructional leadership. Overall, both principals and assistantprincipals reported engaging in high levels of professionally and personallyinviting behaviors. This suggests that, with respect to inviting leadership behaviors,administrators believe that they have adjusted to the demands of Florida’stest-based accountability system and are able to be inviting leaders