18 research outputs found

    Cortical iron accumulation in MAPT- and C9orf 72-associated frontotemporal lobar degeneration

    Get PDF
    Neuroinflammation has been implicated in frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) pathophysiology, including in genetic forms with microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) mutations (FTLD-MAPT) or chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9orf72) repeat expansions (FTLD-C9orf72). Iron accumulation as a marker of neuroinflammation has, however, been understudied in genetic FTLD to date. To investigate the occurrence of cortical iron accumulation in FTLD-MAPT and FTLD-C9orf72, iron histopathology was performed on the frontal and temporal cortex of 22 cases (11 FTLD-MAPT and 11 FTLD-C9orf72). We studied patterns of cortical iron accumulation and its colocalization with the corresponding underlying pathologies (tau and TDP-43), brain cells (microglia and astrocytes), and myelination. Further, with ultrahigh field ex vivo MRI on a subset (four FTLD-MAPT and two FTLD-C9orf72), we examined the sensitivity of T2*-weighted MRI for iron in FTLD. Histopathology showed that cortical iron accumulation occurs in both FTLD-MAPT and FTLD-C9orf72 in frontal and temporal cortices, characterized by a diffuse mid-cortical iron-rich band, and by a superficial cortical iron band in some cases. Cortical iron accumulation was associated with the severity of proteinopathy (tau or TDP-43) and neuronal degeneration, in part with clinical severity, and with the presence of activated microglia, reactive astrocytes and myelin loss. Ultra-high field T2*-weighted MRI showed a good correspondence between hypointense changes on MRI and cortical iron observed on histology. We conclude that iron accumulation is a feature of both FTLD-MAPT and FTLD-C9orf72 and is associated with pathological severity. Therefore, in vivo iron imaging using T2*-weighted MRI or quantitative susceptibility mapping may potentially be used as a noninvasive imaging marker to localize pathology in FTLD.</p

    Clinical Value of Longitudinal Serum Neurofilament Light Chain in Prodromal Genetic Frontotemporal Dementia

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Elevated serum neurofilament light chain (NfL) is used to identify carriers of genetic frontotemporal dementia (FTD) pathogenic variants approaching prodromal conversion. Yet, the magnitude and timeline of NfL increase are still unclear. Here, we investigated the predictive and early diagnostic value of longitudinal serum NfL for the prodromal conversion in genetic FTD. METHODS: In a longitudinal observational cohort study of genetic FTD pathogenic variant carriers, we examined the diagnostic accuracy and conversion risk associated with cross-sectional and longitudinal NfL. Time periods relative to prodromal conversion (&gt;3, 3-1.5, 1.5-0 years before; 0-1.5 years after) were compared with values of participants who did not convert. Next, we modeled longitudinal NfL and MRI volume trajectories to determine their timeline.RESULTS: We included 21 participants who converted (5 chromosome 9 open-reading frame 72 [C9orf72], 10 progranulin [GRN], 5 microtubule-associated protein tau [MAPT], and 1 TAR DNA-binding protein [TARDBP]) and 61 who did not (20 C9orf72, 30 GRN, and 11 MAPT). Participants who converted had higher NfL levels at all examined periods before prodromal conversion (median values 14.0-18.2 pg/mL; betas = 0.4-0.7, standard error [SE] = 0.1, p &lt; 0.046) than those who did not (6.5 pg/mL) and showed further increase 0-1.5 years after conversion (28.4 pg/mL; beta = 1.0, SE = 0.1, p &lt; 0.001). Annualized longitudinal NfL change was only significantly higher in participants who converted (vs. participants who did not) 0-1.5 years after conversion (beta = 1.2, SE = 0.3, p = 0.001). Diagnostic accuracy of cross-sectional NfL for prodromal conversion (vs. nonconversion) was good-to-excellent at time periods before conversion (area under the curve range: 0.72-0.92), improved 0-1.5 years after conversion (0.94-0.97), and outperformed annualized longitudinal change (0.76-0.84). NfL increase in participants who converted occurred earlier than frontotemporal MRI volume change and differed by genetic group and clinical phenotypes. Higher NfL corresponded to increased conversion risk (hazard ratio: cross-sectional = 6.7 [95% CI 3.3-13.7]; longitudinal = 13.0 [95% CI 4.0-42.8]; p &lt; 0.001), but conversion-free follow-up time varied greatly across participants. DISCUSSION: NfL increase discriminates individuals who convert to prodromal FTD from those who do not, preceding significant frontotemporal MRI volume loss. However, NfL alone is limited in predicting the exact timing of prodromal conversion. NfL levels also vary depending on underlying variant-carrying genes and clinical phenotypes. These findings help to guide participant recruitment for clinical trials targeting prodromal genetic FTD.</p

    Modelling the cascade of biomarker changes in progranulin‐related frontotemporal dementia

    Get PDF
    AbstractBackgroundProgranulin related frontotemporal dementia (FTD‐GRN) is a fast progressive disorder, in which pathophysiological changes precede overt clinical symptoms in only a short time period. Modelling the cascade of multimodal biomarker changes aids in understanding the etiology of this disease, enables monitoring of individual mutation carriers, and would give input for disease‐modifying treatments. In this cross‐sectional study, we estimated the temporal cascade of biomarker changes for FTD‐GRN, in a data‐driven way.MethodWe included 56 presymptomatic and 35 symptomatic GRN mutation carriers, and 35 healthy non‐carriers. Of the symptomatic subjects, 17 had behavioural variant FTD (bvFTD), 16 presented as non‐fluent variant primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA). The selected biomarkers for establishing the cascade of changes were neurofilament light chain, regional grey matter volumes, fractional anisotropy of white matter tracts, and cognitive domains. We used a data‐driven analysis called discriminative event‐based modelling (Venkatraghavan, NeuroImage, 2019) with a novel modification to its Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) called Siamese GMM, to estimate the cascade of biomarker changes for FTD‐GRN. Using cross‐validation, we estimated disease severities of individual mutation carriers in the test set based on their progression along the biomarker cascade established on the training set.ResultNeurofilament light chain and white matter tracts were the earliest biomarkers to become abnormal in FTD‐GRN mutation carriers. Attention and executive functioning were also affected early on in the disease process. Based on the estimated individual disease severities, presymptomatic mutation carriers could be distinguished from symptomatic mutation carriers with a sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 100% in the cross‐validation experiment. There was a high correlation (r=0.94, p<0.001) between estimated disease severity and years since symptom onset in nfvPPA, but not in bvFTD (r=0.33, p=0.46).ConclusionIn this study, we unravelled the temporal cascade of multimodal biomarker changes for FTD‐GRN. Our results suggest that axonal degeneration is one of the first disease events in FTD‐GRN, which calls for designing disease modifying treatments that strengthens the axons. We also demonstrated a good delineation between symptomatic and presymptomatic carriers using the estimated disease severities, which suggest that our model could enable monitoring of individual mutation carriers

    Elevated CSF and plasma complement proteins in genetic frontotemporal dementia: results from the GENFI study

    Get PDF
    Background: Neuroinflammation is emerging as an important pathological process in frontotemporal dementia (FTD), but biomarkers are lacking. We aimed to determine the value of complement proteins, which are key components of innate immunity, as biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma of presymptomatic and symptomatic genetic FTD mutation carriers. Methods: We measured the complement proteins C1q and C3b in CSF by ELISAs in 224 presymptomatic and symptomatic GRN, C9orf72 or MAPT mutation carriers and non-carriers participating in the Genetic Frontotemporal Dementia Initiative (GENFI), a multicentre cohort study. Next, we used multiplex immunoassays to measure a panel of 14 complement proteins in plasma of 431 GENFI participants. We correlated complement protein levels with corresponding clinical and neuroimaging data, neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP). Results: CSF C1q and C3b, as well as plasma C2 and C3, were elevated in symptomatic mutation carriers compared to presymptomatic carriers and non-carriers. In genetic subgroup analyses, these differences remained statistically significant for C9orf72 mutation carriers. In presymptomatic carriers, several complement proteins correlated negatively with grey matter volume of FTD-related regions and positively with NfL and GFAP. In symptomatic carriers, correlations were additionally observed with disease duration and with Mini Mental State Examination and Clinical Dementia Rating scaleÂź plus NACC Frontotemporal lobar degeneration sum of boxes scores. Conclusions: Elevated levels of CSF C1q and C3b, as well as plasma C2 and C3, demonstrate the presence of complement activation in the symptomatic stage of genetic FTD. Intriguingly, correlations with several disease measures in presymptomatic carriers suggest that complement protein levels might increase before symptom onset. Although the overlap between groups precludes their use as diagnostic markers, further research is needed to determine their potential to monitor dysregulation of the complement system in FTD

    A data-driven disease progression model of fluid biomarkers in genetic frontotemporal dementia

    Get PDF
    Several CSF and blood biomarkers for genetic frontotemporal dementia have been proposed, including those reflecting neuroaxonal loss (neurofilament light chain and phosphorylated neurofilament heavy chain), synapse dysfunction [neuronal pentraxin 2 (NPTX2)], astrogliosis (glial fibrillary acidic protein) and complement activation (C1q, C3b). Determining the sequence in which biomarkers become abnormal over the course of disease could facilitate disease staging and help identify mutation carriers with prodromal or early-stage frontotemporal dementia, which is especially important as pharmaceutical trials emerge. We aimed to model the sequence of biomarker abnormalities in presymptomatic and symptomatic genetic frontotemporal dementia using cross-sectional data from the Genetic Frontotemporal dementia Initiative (GENFI), a longitudinal cohort study. Two-hundred and seventy-five presymptomatic and 127 symptomatic carriers of mutations in GRN, C9orf72 or MAPT, as well as 247 non-carriers, were selected from the GENFI cohort based on availability of one or more of the aforementioned biomarkers. Nine presymptomatic carriers developed symptoms within 18 months of sample collection (\u27converters\u27). Sequences of biomarker abnormalities were modelled for the entire group using discriminative event-based modelling (DEBM) and for each genetic subgroup using co-initialized DEBM. These models estimate probabilistic biomarker abnormalities in a data-driven way and do not rely on previous diagnostic information or biomarker cut-off points. Using cross-validation, subjects were subsequently assigned a disease stage based on their position along the disease progression timeline. CSF NPTX2 was the first biomarker to become abnormal, followed by blood and CSF neurofilament light chain, blood phosphorylated neurofilament heavy chain, blood glial fibrillary acidic protein and finally CSF C3b and C1q. Biomarker orderings did not differ significantly between genetic subgroups, but more uncertainty was noted in the C9orf72 and MAPT groups than for GRN. Estimated disease stages could distinguish symptomatic from presymptomatic carriers and non-carriers with areas under the curve of 0.84 (95% confidence interval 0.80-0.89) and 0.90 (0.86-0.94) respectively. The areas under the curve to distinguish converters from non-converting presymptomatic carriers was 0.85 (0.75-0.95). Our data-driven model of genetic frontotemporal dementia revealed that NPTX2 and neurofilament light chain are the earliest to change among the selected biomarkers. Further research should investigate their utility as candidate selection tools for pharmaceutical trials. The model\u27s ability to accurately estimate individual disease stages could improve patient stratification and track the efficacy of therapeutic interventions

    Molecular pathways involved in frontotemporal lobar degeneration with tdp‐43 proteinopathy: What can we learn from proteomics?

    No full text
    Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is a neurodegenerative disorder clinically characterized by behavioral, language, and motor symptoms, with major impact on the lives of patients and their families. TDP‐43 proteinopathy is the underlying neuropathological substrate in the majority of cases, referred to as FTLD‐TDP. Several genetic causes have been identified, which have revealed some components of its pathophysiology. However, the exact mechanisms driving FTLD‐ TDP remain largely unknown, forestalling the development of therapies. Proteomic approaches, in particular high‐throughput mass spectrometry, hold promise to help elucidate the pathogenic molecular and cellular alterations. In this review, we describe the main findings of the proteomic profiling studies performed on human FTLD‐TDP brain tissue. Subsequently, we address the major biological pathways implicated in FTLD‐TDP, by reviewing these data together with knowledge derived from genomic and transcriptomic literature. We illustrate that an integrated perspective, encompassing both proteomic, genetic, and transcriptomic discoveries, is vital to unravel core disease processes, and to enable the identification of disease biomarkers and therapeutic targets for this devastating disorder

    Progranulin Levels in Plasma and Cerebrospinal Fluid in Granulin Mutation Carriers

    No full text
    Background: Pathogenic mutations in the granulin gene (GRN) are causative in 5-10% of patients with frontotemporal dementia (FTD), mostly leading to reduced progranulin protein (PGRN) levels. Upcoming therapeutic trials focus on enhancing PGRN levels. Methods: Fluctuations in plasma PGRN (n = 41) and its relationship with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF, n = 32) and specific single nucleotide polymorphisms were investigated in pre- and symptomatic GRN mutation carriers and controls. Results: Plasma PGRN levels were lower in carriers than in controls and showed a mean coefficient of variation of 5.3% in carriers over 1 week. Although plasma PGRN correlated with CSF PGRN in carriers (r = 0.54, p = 0.02), plasma only explained 29% of the variability in CSF PGRN. rs5848, rs646776 and rs1990622 genotypes only partly explained the variability of PGRN levels between subjects. Conclusions: Plasma PGRN is relatively stable over 1 week and therefore seems suitable for treatment monitoring of PGRN-enhancing agents. Since plasma PGRN only moderately correlated with CSF PGRN, CSF sampling will additionally be needed in therapeutic trials

    Single-subject classification of presymptomatic frontotemporal dementia mutation carriers using multimodal MRI

    No full text
    Background: Classification models based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may aid early diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) but have only been applied in established FTD cases. Detection of FTD patients in earlier disease stages, such as presymptomatic mutation carriers, may further advance early diagnosis and treatment. In this study, we aim to distinguish presymptomatic FTD mutation carriers from controls on an individual level using multimodal MRI-based classification. Methods: Anatomical MRI, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and resting-state functional MRI data were collected in 55 presymptomatic FTD mutation carriers (8 microtubule-associated protein Tau, 35 progranulin, and 12 chromosome 9 open reading frame 72) and 48 familial controls. We calculated grey and white matter density features from anatomical MRI scans, diffusivity features from DTI, and functional connectivity features from resting-state functional MRI. These features were applied in a recently introduced multimodal behavioural variant FTD (bvFTD) classification model, and were subsequently used to train and test unimodal and multimodal carrier-control models. Classification performance was quantified using area under the receiver operator characteristic curves (AUC). Results: The bvFTD model was not able to separate presymptomatic carriers from controls beyond chance level (AUC = 0.570, p = 0.11). In contrast, one unimodal and several multimodal carrier-control models performed significantly better than chance level. The unimodal model included the radial diffusivity feature and had an AUC of 0.646 (p = 0.021). The best multimodal model combined radial diffusivity and white matter density features (AUC = 0.680, p = 0.005). Conclusions: FTD mutation carriers can be separated from controls with a modest AUC even before symptom-onset, using a newly created carrier-control classification model, while this was not possible using a recent bvFTD classification model. A multimodal MRI-based classification score may therefore be a useful biomarker to aid earlier FTD diagnosis. The exclusive selection of white matter features in the best performing model suggests that the earliest FTD-related pathological processes occur in white matter. Keywords: Frontotemporal dementia, MAPT protein, human, GRN protein, human, C9orf72, human, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, Resting-state functional MRI, Multimodal MRI, classification, machine learnin

    Underlying genetic variation in familial frontotemporal dementia : sequencing of 198 patients

    Get PDF
    Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) presents with a wide variability in clinical syndromes, genetic etiologies, and underlying pathologies. Despite the discovery of pathogenic variants in several genes, many familial cases remain unsolved. In a large FTD cohort of 198 familial patients, we aimed to determine the types and frequencies of variants in genes related to FTD. Pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were revealed in 74 (37%) patients, including 4 novel variants. The repeat expansion in C9orf72 was most common (21%), followed by variants in MAPT (6%), GRN (4.5%), and TARDBP (3.5%). Other pathogenic variants were found in VCP, TBK1, PSEN1, and a novel homozygous variant in OPTN. Furthermore, we identified 15 variants of uncertain significance, including a promising variant in TUBA4A and a frameshift in VCP, for which additional research is needed to confirm pathogenicity. The patients without identified genetic cause demonstrated a wide clinical and pathological variety. Our study contributes to the clinical characterization of the genetic subtypes and confirms the value of whole-exome sequencing in identifying novel genetic variants
    corecore