Resource distribution in disturbed landscapes – the effect of clearcutting on berry abundance and their use by brown bears

To survive winter hibernation, brown bears (Ursus arctos) need to store excess energy during late summer and autumn. Scandinavian brown bears usually have an abundance of berries to feed on, but their distribution varies depending on forest structure and age. Especially on newly cut clearcuts, berry distribution is patchy, but berry production in these patches is exceptionally high. My aim was to model fine-scale temporal variation in berry production in the first years after forest cutting and determine whether bears adjust their space according to forage on clearcuts where berries are abundant. Using plot surveys on clearcuts in south-central Sweden, I collected bilberries (Vaccinium myrtillus) and lingonberries (Vaccinium vitis-idea) from 935 plots and found a nonlinear temporal dynamic of berry presence and abundance following a clearcutting procedure. On young clearcuts, berry production was depressed, it then peaked on clearcuts after around 8 years, and dropped again in later stages of succession. Additionally, bilberry and lingonberry abundance was greater on steeper slopes, with a linear relationship for bilberry and a non-linear relationship for lingonberry, which had a slight decrease at very steep slopes. I found that bears adapted to spatial and temporal dynamics of berry production by selecting for clearcuts of high bilberry presence and especially abundance. This trend was not observed in selection for lingonberry, most likely due to the smaller size of lingonberries and wider availably of bilberries in the year of study. Selection for clearcuts overall was low, with only around 10% of all recorded bear GPS positions being on clearcuts. This is potentially due to perceived hunting risk on open clearcuts and high availability of bilberries also in mature forest. Overall, clearcutting as a method of commercial harvesting of forest landscapes was found to have significant effects on berry production on clearcuts and bears adjusted their space to forage on patches with a high abundance of bilberries

Effect of drought and pine weevil damage on mechanically protected Norway spruce seedlings

Pine weevils (Hylobius abietis L.) pose a significant threat to conifer seedlings by feeding on the bark, thus damaging or killing seedlings. Historically, insecticides were used to suppress such damage, but were slowly phased out in Sweden due to environmental and health concerns. This study aimed to assess field performance of an alternative protection method: mechanical coating applied to the stem of planted Norway spruce (Picea abies) seedlings. Field trials were conducted on 14 sites in south Sweden, using four different types of mechanical protection (Cambiguard, Conniflex, Ekovax, Hylonox), standard insecticide (Merit Forest), and ambient control. Seven sites were established in the drought year of 2018 and seven more in 2019. This allowed for additional investigation of the effect of drought on seedling establishment and possible interaction with pine weevil damage. Seedlings were surveyed for survival and height after the first, second and fourth growing season. Results show drought as the main source of damage for seedlings planted in 2018, with no significant effect of insecticide or mechanical protection on survival of seedlings. However, mechanical protections performed equally well as insecticide and positively increased survival by 30 %, compared to untreated, four growing seasons after planting for seedlings planted in 2019. Seedling height was not significantly affected by planting year or any of the treatments, suggesting no adverse effects of coating application. However, a synergistic effect between pine weevil damage and drought was observed, where even low levels of pine weevil damage resulted in high mortality for seedlings planted in 2018, compared to those planted in 2019. Additionally, for seedlings planted in 2019, damage to the top of the stem did not result in significant mortality, until high damage levels were reached (40 % and above). The opposite was found for seedlings planted in a 2018 drought year, where both damage to the top and the bottom of the stem followed a linear response. In conclusion, we show that investigated mechanical protection methods can be considered a viable replacement for insecticides, but our results also highlight the importance of considering multiple environmental stressors such as drought and pest damage on seedling establishment

Large-scale assessment of artificially coated seeds for forest regeneration across Sweden

We report the results of two years' field performance of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) seedlings regenerated using artificially coated seeds. The coated seeds were used for regeneration on 12 clearcut sites, covering a 1000 km latitudinal gradient across Sweden. The coating was either combined with arginine-phosphate fertilizer (10 mg N per seed) or had no additions. Interactions with environmental variables associated with sites were also assessed. Coated seeds were deployed in May-June 2017 and surveyed in August-September of 2018 and 2019. After two years, the mean establishment rate of seedlings from coated seeds was 56 +/- 4% across the 12 sites. The fertilizer addition did not affect survival, and the biomass response to fertilizer varied significantly between sites. Maximum precipitation and wind speed during the first six weeks after deployment were correlated with seedling survival, regardless of fertilization treatment. Establishment increased with increasing precipitation and decreased with increasing wind speed. This highlights the importance of initial weather conditions for the seeds' establishment. Our data suggest that Scots pine regeneration using coated seeds can be practiced in boreal forests, but also that the method is sensitive to the weather conditions at the time of deployment of the seeds

A human-induced landscape of fear influences foraging behavior of brown bears

Animals adapt their foraging behavior to variations in food availability and predation risk. In Sweden, brown bears (Ursus arctos) depend on a nearly continuous intake of berries, especially bilberries (Vaccinium myrtillus) during late summer and early autumn to fatten up prior to hibernation. This overlaps with the bear hunting season that starts on 21 August. Bilberry occurrence varies across space, as does human-induced mortality risk. Here, we hypothesize that brown bears select for areas with a high probability of bilberry occurrence across a boreal forest ecosystem in Sweden (H1), and that human-induced mortality risk reduces bear selection for bilberries (H2). In addition, we hypothesized that bears that survived the hunting season avoided bilberry areas associated with high risk, whereas bears that were later killed selected more strongly for berries and less against risk prior to the hunting season (H3). To evaluate our hypotheses, we used resource selection functions to contrast bear GPS relocation data (N = 35, 2012–2015) and random positions within the bearś home range with generalized linear mixed effect models against two focal variables: a map predicting bilberry occurrence and a map predicting human-induced mortality risk. We found that bears selected for areas with a high probability of bilberry occurrence (supporting H1), but avoided these areas if they were associated with and high risk of hunting mortality (supporting H2). The killed and surviving bears did not differ in their selection for bilberries, but they did differ in their selection against risk (partially supporting H3). Surviving bears strongly avoided high risk areas, whereas killed bears responded less to risk and selected for high-risk areas with a low probability of bilberry occurrence. This suggests that killed bears selected for other food sources than berries in high risk areas, which exposed them to human hunters. We conclude that bears respond to a landscape of fear during the berry season and that different foraging strategies may have a direct impact on individual mortality during the hunting season.acceptedVersio

Adapting Scots pine Regeneration to the Changing Climate : An investigation of the effects of seed coating, arginine addition, and planting position

In Sweden, new forest stands have long been artificially regenerated using conifer seedlings. While standardized and widely adopted, this approach may need to be further adapted to the predicted increases in variations in the weather, such as extended periods of drought. In light of this, coated seeds of Scots pine, as well as adding arginine phosphate to the coating, were tested across 12 sites in Sweden. The coatings should facilitate germination and establishment of seedlings, while the addition of arginine phosphate would enhance growth. In another study across 11 sites in Sweden, the effects of arginine phosphate addition on survival and growth of nursery grown seedlings planted into mineral soil or in capped mounds were tested. Seedlings planted in mineral soil may be better adapted to dry conditions but may suffer from lower availability of nutrients compared to the capped mounds. The results showed no difference in survival between seedlings from coated seeds with or without arginine (following three growing seasons), whereas survival of nursery grown seedlings increased as a result of arginine addition (following two growing seasons). Arginine phosphate addition increased growth, both for coated seeds and for nursery grown seedlings planted in mineral soil as well as in capped mounds. The importance of precipitation was demonstrated in both studies, with positive relationships between survival and precipitation in the month following deployment. Hence, of the methods tested here, planting nursery grown seedlings in mineral soil with an amendment of arginine phosphate appears to be the most valuable to enhance both survival and growth of seedlings subjected to dry weather conditions

Survival and growth of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) seedlings in north Sweden: effects of planting position and arginine phosphate addition

Forest regeneration by tree planting on harvested sites in the boreal forests of northern Europe is frequently preceded by site preparation to increase survival and growth of the seedlings. We studied whether a small addition of arginine phosphate (AP treatment) at the time of planting would further enhance the seedlings' early performance. Following two growth seasons, we investigated survival and growth of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) seedlings on 11 locations between latitudes 61.1 degrees N and 67.1 degrees N in the boreal forest of northern Sweden. The planting positions of seedlings were on capped mounds and bare mineral soil following mechanical site preparation, and in non-prepared soil. We found that seedling survival following site preparation increased with AP treatment. On capped mounds, seedling survival was more variable and appeared more dependent on precipitation during the first month after planting than seedlings positioned in the mineral soil. The positive effect of AP treatment on seedling growth differed between sites and was more pronounced on sites with longer growing seasons. AP treatment had no significant effect on survival of seedlings planted in non-prepared soil, while the positive effect on growth was more pronounced at sites with higher fertility using this planting position

A human-induced landscape of fear influences foraging behavior of brown bears

Animals adapt their foraging behavior to variations in food availability and predation risk. In Sweden, brown bears (Ursus arctos) depend on a nearly continuous intake of berries, especially bilberries (Vaccinium myrtillus) during late summer and early autumn to fatten up prior to hibernation. This overlaps with the bear hunting season that starts on 21 August. Bilberry occurrence varies across space, as does human-induced mortality risk. Here, we hypothesize that brown bears select for areas with a high probability of bilberry occurrence across a boreal forest ecosystem in Sweden (H1), and that human-induced mortality risk reduces bear selection for bilberries (H2). In addition, we hypothesized that bears that survived the hunting season avoided bilberry areas associated with high risk, whereas bears that were later killed selected more strongly for berries and less against risk prior to the hunting season (H3). To evaluate our hypotheses, we used resource selection functions to contrast bear GPS relocation data (N = 35, 2012–2015) and random positions within the bearś home range with generalized linear mixed effect models against two focal variables: a map predicting bilberry occurrence and a map predicting human-induced mortality risk. We found that bears selected for areas with a high probability of bilberry occurrence (supporting H1), but avoided these areas if they were associated with and high risk of hunting mortality (supporting H2). The killed and surviving bears did not differ in their selection for bilberries, but they did differ in their selection against risk (partially supporting H3). Surviving bears strongly avoided high risk areas, whereas killed bears responded less to risk and selected for high-risk areas with a low probability of bilberry occurrence. This suggests that killed bears selected for other food sources than berries in high risk areas, which exposed them to human hunters. We conclude that bears respond to a landscape of fear during the berry season and that different foraging strategies may have a direct impact on individual mortality during the hunting season

A human-induced landscape of fear influences foraging behavior of brown bears

Animals adapt their foraging behavior to variations in food availability and predation risk. In Sweden, brown bears (Ursus arctos) depend on a nearly continuous intake of berries, especially bilberries (Vaccinium myrtillus) during late summer and early autumn to fatten up prior to hibernation. This overlaps with the bear hunting season that starts on 21 August. Bilberry occurrence varies across space, as does human-induced mortality risk. Here, we hypothesize that brown bears select for areas with a high probability of bilberry occurrence across a boreal forest ecosystem in Sweden (H1), and that human-induced mortality risk reduces bear selection for bilberries (H2). In addition, we hypothesized that bears that survived the hunting season avoided bilberry areas associated with high risk, whereas bears that were later killed selected more strongly for berries and less against risk prior to the hunting season (H3). To evaluate our hypotheses, we used resource selection functions to contrast bear GPS relocation data (N = 35, 2012–2015) and random positions within the bearś home range with generalized linear mixed effect models against two focal variables: a map predicting bilberry occurrence and a map predicting human-induced mortality risk. We found that bears selected for areas with a high probability of bilberry occurrence (supporting H1), but avoided these areas if they were associated with and high risk of hunting mortality (supporting H2). The killed and surviving bears did not differ in their selection for bilberries, but they did differ in their selection against risk (partially supporting H3). Surviving bears strongly avoided high risk areas, whereas killed bears responded less to risk and selected for high-risk areas with a low probability of bilberry occurrence. This suggests that killed bears selected for other food sources than berries in high risk areas, which exposed them to human hunters. We conclude that bears respond to a landscape of fear during the berry season and that different foraging strategies may have a direct impact on individual mortality during the hunting season