Periprocedural antithrombotic management for lumbar puncture: Association of British Neurologists clinical guideline

Lumbar puncture (LP) is an important and frequently performed invasive procedure for the diagnosis and management of neurological conditions. There is little in the neurological literature on the topic of periprocedural management of antithrombotics in patients undergoing LP. Current practice is therefore largely extrapolated from guidelines produced by anaesthetic bodies on neuraxial anaesthesia, haematology groups advising on periprocedural management of antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants, and by neuroradiology on imaging-guided spinal procedures. This paper summarises the existing literature on the topic and offers recommendations to guide periprocedural antithrombotic management for LP, based on the consolidation of the best available evidence. ​. [Abstract copyright: © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Desmopressin for prevention of bleeding for thrombocytopenic, critically ill patients undergoing invasive procedures: A randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled feasibility trial

Thrombocytopenic patients have an increased risk of bleeding when undergoing invasive procedures. In a multicentre, phase II, blinded, randomised, controlled feasibility trial, critically ill patients with platelet count 100 × 109/L or less were randomised 1:1 to intravenous desmopressin (0.3 µg/kg) or placebo before an invasive procedure. Forty‐three participants (18.8% of those eligible) were recruited, with 41 eligible for analysis. Post‐procedure bleeding occurred in one of 22 (4.5%) in the placebo arm and zero of 19 in the desmopressin arm. Despite liberal inclusion criteria, there were significant feasibility challenges recruiting patients in the critical care setting prior to invasive procedures

The UK Pharmacy Care Plan service: Description, recruitment and initial views on a new community pharmacy intervention

Introduction: The UK government advocates person-centred healthcare which is ideal for supporting patients to make appropriate lifestyle choices and to address non-adherence. The Community Pharmacy Future group, a collaboration between community pharmacy companies and independents in the UK, introduced a person-centred service for patients with multiple long-term conditions in 50 pharmacies in Northern England. Objective: Describe the initial findings from the set up and delivery of a novel community pharmacy-based person-centred service. Method: Patients over fifty years of age prescribed more than one medicine including at least one for cardiovascular disease or diabetes were enrolled. Medication review and person-centred consultation resulted in agreed health goals and steps towards achieving them. Data were collated and analysed to determine appropriateness of patient recruitment process and quality of outcome data collection. A focus group of seven pharmacists was used to ascertain initial views on the service. Results: Within 3 months of service initiation, 683 patients had baseline clinical data recorded, of which 86.9% were overweight or obese, 53.7% had hypertension and 80.8% had high cardiovascular risk. 544 (77.2%) patients set at least one goal during the first consultation with 120 (22.1%) setting multiple goals. A majority of patients identified their goals as improvement in condition, activity or quality of life. Pharmacists could see the potential patient benefit and the extended role opportunities the service provided. Allowing patients to set their own goals occasionally identified gaps to be addressed in pharmacist knowledge. Conclusion: Pharmacists successfully recruited a large number of patients who were appropriate for such a service. Patients were willing to identify goals with the pharmacist, the majority of which, if met, may result in improvements in quality of life. While challenges in delivery were acknowledged, allowing patients to identify their own personalised goals was seen as a positive approach to providing patient services

Desmopressin for treatment of thrombocytopenia or platelet dysfunction

The objective of the work presented in this thesis was to explore the role of potential alternatives to platelet transfusions and specifically to investigate whether desmopressin could be used for treatment of thrombocytopenia or platelet dysfunction. Patients with thrombocytopenia or platelet dysfunction are often treated with platelet transfusions to treat or prevent bleeding. However the evidence for the efficacy of platelet transfusion is limited and there is some evidence of harm. I have focused on thrombocytopenic patients with haematological malignancies or critically ill patients, who are amongst the groups most commonly treated with platelet transfusions. The aims of this research were to determine: 1. If levels of Von Willebrand factor (VWF) or other measures of haemostasis are predictive of bleeding in severe thrombocytopenia; 2. Whether VWF compensates for thrombocytopenia in vitro; 3. The evidence for the efficacy of desmopressin in all patients undergoing surgery or invasive procedures; 4. The evidence for desmopressin for platelet dysfunction or thrombocytopenia; 5. If it is feasible to use desmopressin to treat critically ill thrombocytopenic patients in a clinical trial. To identify derangements of haemostasis that may signify candidates for alternatives to platelet transfusions, I analysed blood samples from an observational trial of fifty patients with haematological malignancies and profound thrombocytopenia due to intensive chemotherapy. I used a panel of tests to investigate measures of primary haemostasis, thrombin generation, cross-linked fibrin formation and fibrinolysis. Using multivariable logistic regression, I found no consistent correlation between any measures of haemostasis and the risk of clinically significant bleeding. VWF antigen levels were the best predictor of clinically significant bleeding on the same day (odds ratio 0.31, 95&percnt; confidence interval 0.10 to 0.98, p=0.047) but were not predictive of severe bleeding over the 24 hours after the test (odds ratio 0.48, 95&percnt; confidence interval 0.10 to 2.34, p=0.36). In a separate set of experiments, I evaluated thrombus formation under flow in thrombocytopenia. This technique was sensitive to the platelet count . Addition of exogenous VWF to thrombocytopenic blood resulted in improvement in thrombus formation, suggesting that agents that affect or influence VWF pathways might have a role. Desmopressin can be used to increase VWF levels, so leading on from my laboratory experiments; I used systematic reviews and meta-analyses to assess whether desmopressin could be used in unselected patients to reduce bleeding peri-operatively. I identified 62 randomised controlled trials. Overall there was no evidence of benefit for administering desmopressin to unselected patients. However further analysis of eleven randomised controlled trials that focused on patients with platelet dysfunction found that desmopressin resulted in transfusion of fewer units of red cells (equivalent to a 25&percnt; reduction compared to control), less blood loss (equivalent to a 23&percnt; reduction compared to control) and a lower risk of requiring a re-operation due to bleeding (Peto odds ratio 0.39, 95&percnt; confidence interval 0.18 to 0.84). There was no evidence for an increase in thrombotic events. There was no randomised controlled trial evidence for perioperative desmopressin for patients with thrombocytopenia. These specific research gaps were addressed by designing new clinical trials. I have commenced a randomised controlled feasibility trial of desmopressin versus placebo for critically ill patients with thrombocytopenia undergoing invasive procedures. This trial is ongoing and is the first randomised trial evaluating peri-procedural desmopressin in thrombocytopenia. The programme of work arising from this research has the potential to benefit a large number of patients by preventing bleeding and reducing exposure to allogeneic blood components such as platelets. The results presented in this thesis are exploratory but are an important step on a path towards larger trials using desmopressin as an alternative, or adjunct to platelet transfusion.</p

Desmopressin for treatment of thrombocytopenia or platelet dysfunction

The objective of the work presented in this thesis was to explore the role of potential alternatives to platelet transfusions and specifically to investigate whether desmopressin could be used for treatment of thrombocytopenia or platelet dysfunction. Patients with thrombocytopenia or platelet dysfunction are often treated with platelet transfusions to treat or prevent bleeding. However the evidence for the efficacy of platelet transfusion is limited and there is some evidence of harm. I have focused on thrombocytopenic patients with haematological malignancies or critically ill patients, who are amongst the groups most commonly treated with platelet transfusions. The aims of this research were to determine: 1. If levels of Von Willebrand factor (VWF) or other measures of haemostasis are predictive of bleeding in severe thrombocytopenia; 2. Whether VWF compensates for thrombocytopenia in vitro; 3. The evidence for the efficacy of desmopressin in all patients undergoing surgery or invasive procedures; 4. The evidence for desmopressin for platelet dysfunction or thrombocytopenia; 5. If it is feasible to use desmopressin to treat critically ill thrombocytopenic patients in a clinical trial. To identify derangements of haemostasis that may signify candidates for alternatives to platelet transfusions, I analysed blood samples from an observational trial of fifty patients with haematological malignancies and profound thrombocytopenia due to intensive chemotherapy. I used a panel of tests to investigate measures of primary haemostasis, thrombin generation, cross-linked fibrin formation and fibrinolysis. Using multivariable logistic regression, I found no consistent correlation between any measures of haemostasis and the risk of clinically significant bleeding. VWF antigen levels were the best predictor of clinically significant bleeding on the same day (odds ratio 0.31, 95&amp;percnt; confidence interval 0.10 to 0.98, p=0.047) but were not predictive of severe bleeding over the 24 hours after the test (odds ratio 0.48, 95&amp;percnt; confidence interval 0.10 to 2.34, p=0.36). In a separate set of experiments, I evaluated thrombus formation under flow in thrombocytopenia. This technique was sensitive to the platelet count . Addition of exogenous VWF to thrombocytopenic blood resulted in improvement in thrombus formation, suggesting that agents that affect or influence VWF pathways might have a role. Desmopressin can be used to increase VWF levels, so leading on from my laboratory experiments; I used systematic reviews and meta-analyses to assess whether desmopressin could be used in unselected patients to reduce bleeding peri-operatively. I identified 62 randomised controlled trials. Overall there was no evidence of benefit for administering desmopressin to unselected patients. However further analysis of eleven randomised controlled trials that focused on patients with platelet dysfunction found that desmopressin resulted in transfusion of fewer units of red cells (equivalent to a 25&amp;percnt; reduction compared to control), less blood loss (equivalent to a 23&amp;percnt; reduction compared to control) and a lower risk of requiring a re-operation due to bleeding (Peto odds ratio 0.39, 95&amp;percnt; confidence interval 0.18 to 0.84). There was no evidence for an increase in thrombotic events. There was no randomised controlled trial evidence for perioperative desmopressin for patients with thrombocytopenia. These specific research gaps were addressed by designing new clinical trials. I have commenced a randomised controlled feasibility trial of desmopressin versus placebo for critically ill patients with thrombocytopenia undergoing invasive procedures. This trial is ongoing and is the first randomised trial evaluating peri-procedural desmopressin in thrombocytopenia. The programme of work arising from this research has the potential to benefit a large number of patients by preventing bleeding and reducing exposure to allogeneic blood components such as platelets. The results presented in this thesis are exploratory but are an important step on a path towards larger trials using desmopressin as an alternative, or adjunct to platelet transfusion.</p

Management of surgery, menorrhagia and child-birth for patients with unclassified bleeding disorders: a systematic review of cohort studies.

Unclassified bleeding disorders account for 2.6% of all new bleeding disorder registrations in the UK. The management of the bleeding phenotype associated with these disorders is poorly described. Systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the bleeding rates associated with tranexamic acid, desmopressin, platelet transfusion, plasma transfusion and recombinant activated factor VII, for patients with unclassified bleeding disorders undergoing surgery, childbirth or with menorrhagia. We searched for randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, ISI Web of Science and the Transfusion Evidence Library from inception to 24 February 2020. Wherever appropriate, data were pooled using the metaprop function of STATA. Two studies with 157 participants with unclassified bleeding disorders were identified. The pooled risk of minor bleeding for patients undergoing surgery treated with peri-operative tranexamic acid was 11% (95% confidence interval 3--20%; n = 52; I2 = 0%); the risk for desmopressin and tranexamic acid in combination was 3% (95% confidence interval 0--7%; n = 71; I2 = 0%). There were no instances of major bleeding. In one procedure, 1 of 71 (1.4%), treated with a combination of desmopressin and tranexamic acid, the patient had a line-related deep vein thrombosis. There were too few patients treated to prevent postpartum haemorrhage or for menorrhagia to draw conclusions. The GRADE quality of evidence was very low suggesting considerable uncertainty over the results. However, both tranexamic acid, and the combination of tranexamic and desmopressin have high rates of haemostatic efficacy and have few adverse events. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42020169727