The Pharmaceutical Sciences in 2020: Report of a Conference Organized by the Board of Pharmaceutical Sciences of the International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP)

The Board of Pharmaceutical Sciences (BPS) of the International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP) has developed a view on the future of pharmaceutical sciences in 2020. This followed an international conference with invited participants from various fields (academicians, scientists, regulators, industrialists, venture capitalists) who shared their views on the forces that might determine how the pharmaceutical sciences will look in 2020. The commentary here provides a summary of major research activities that will drive drug discovery and development, enabling technologies for pharmaceutical sciences, paradigm shifts in drug discovery, development and regulations, and changes in education to meet the demands of academia, industry and regulatory institutions for pharmaceutical sciences in 2020

mRNA-lipid nanoparticle COVID-19 vaccines : structure and stability

A drawback of the current mRNA-lipid nanoparticle (LNP) COVID-19 vaccines is that they have to be stored at (ultra)low temperatures. Understanding the root cause of the instability of these vaccines may help to rationally improve mRNA-LNP product stability and thereby ease the temperature conditions for storage. In this review we discuss proposed structures of mRNA-LNPs, factors that impact mRNA-LNP stability and strategies to optimize mRNA-LNP product stability. Analysis of mRNA-LNP structures reveals that mRNA, the ionizable cationic lipid and water are present in the LNP core. The neutral helper lipids are mainly positioned in the outer, encapsulating, wall. mRNA hydrolysis is the determining factor for mRNA-LNP instability. It is currently unclear how water in the LNP core interacts with the mRNA and to what extent the degradation prone sites of mRNA are protected through a coat of ionizable cationic lipids. To improve the stability of mRNA-LNP vaccines, optimization of the mRNA nucleotide composition should be prioritized. Secondly, a better understanding of the milieu the mRNA is exposed to in the core of LNPs may help to rationalize adjustments to the LNP structure to preserve mRNA integrity. Moreover, drying techniques, such as lyophilization, are promising options still to be explored

The Storage and In-Use Stability of mRNA Vaccines and Therapeutics: Not A Cold Case

The remarkable impact of mRNA vaccines on mitigating disease and improving public health has been amply demonstrated during the COVID-19 pandemic. Many new mRNA-based vaccine and therapeutic candidates are in development, yet the current reality of their stability limitations requires their frozen storage. Numerous challenges remain to improve formulated mRNA stability and enable refrigerator storage, and this review provides an update on developments to tackle this multi-faceted stability challenge. We describe the chemistry underlying mRNA degradation during storage and highlight how lipid nanoparticle (LNP) formulations are a double-edged sword: while LNPs protect mRNA against enzymatic degradation, interactions with and between LNP excipients introduce additional risks for mRNA degradation. We also discuss strategies to improve mRNA stability both as a drug substance (DS) and a drug product (DP) including the (1) design of the mRNA molecule (nucleotide selection, primary and secondary structures), (2) physical state of the mRNA-LNP complexes, (3) formulation composition and purity of the components, and (4) DS and DP manufacturing processes. Finally, we summarize analytical control strategies to monitor and assure the stability of mRNA-based candidates, and advocate for an integrated analytical and formulation development approach to further improve their storage, transport, and in-use stability profiles

Overlooking Subvisible Particles in Therapeutic Protein Products: Gaps that may Compromise Product Quality

Therapeutic protein products provide unique and effective treatments for numerous human diseases and medical conditions. In many cases, these treatments are used chronically to slow disease progression, reduce morbidity and/or to replace essential proteins that are not produced endogenously in patients. Therefore, any factor that reduces or eliminates the effectiveness of the treatment can lead to patient suffering and even death. One means by which efficacy of therapeutic proteins can be compromised is by an immune response, resulting in antibody-mediated neutralization of the protein’s activity or alterations in bioavailability.1,2 For example, in the case of treatment of hemophilia A, neutralizing antibodies to Factor VIII can cause life-threatening bleeding episodes, resulting in significant morbidity and necessitating treatment with a prolonged course of a tolerance-inducing therapy to reverse immunity.3,4 In other cases, drug-induced antibodies to a therapeutic version of an endogenous protein can cross-react with and neutralize the patient’s endogenous protein. If the endogenous protein serves a non-redundant biological function, such an immune response can have devastating results. For example, pure red cell aplasia can result from neutralizing antibodies to epoetin alpha. 1,2 It is well established that protein aggregates in therapeutic protein products can enhance immunogenicity2, and such an effect is therefore an important risk factor to consider when assessing product quality. The purpose of this commentary is to accomplish the following: i. provide brief summaries on the factors affecting protein aggregation and the key aspects of protein aggregates that are associated with immunogenicity; ii. emphasize the current scientific gaps in understanding and analytical limitations for quantitation of species of large protein aggregates that are referred to as subvisible particles, with specific consideration of those particles 0.1–10 μm in size; iii. offer a rationale for why these gaps may compromise the safety and/or efficacy of a product; iv. provide scientifically sound, risked based recommendations/conclusions for assessment and control of such aggregate species

Stabilization of Peptide Vesicles by Introducing Inter-Peptide Disulfide Bonds

PURPOSE: Previously, we have shown that the amphiphilic oligopeptide SA2 (Ac-Ala-Ala-Val-Val-Leu-Leu-Leu-Trp-Glu-Glu-COOH) spontaneously self-assemble into nano-sized vesicles in aqueous environment. Relative weak individual intermolecular interactions dominate such oligopeptide assemblies. In this study we aimed at improving the stability of such peptide vesicles by covalently crosslinking the oligopeptide vesicles using disulfide bonds. Two and three cysteines were introduced in the SA2 peptide sequence to allow crosslinking (Ac-Ala-Cys-Val-Cys-Leu-(Leu/Cys)-Leu-Trp-Glu-Glu-COOH). RESULTS: Upon disulfide formation the crosslinked vesicles remained stable under conditions that disrupted the non-crosslinked peptide vesicles. The stabilized vesicles were more closely examined in terms of particle size (distribution) using atomic force microscopy, cryogenic electron microscopy, as well as dynamic light scattering analysis, showing an average particle radius in number between 15 and 20 nm. Using entrapment of calcein it was shown that intermolecular crosslinking of peptides within the vesicles did not affect the permeability for calcein. CONCLUSION: Introduction of cysteines into the hydrophobic domain of the SA2 amphiphilic oligopeptides is a feasible strategy for crosslinking the peptide vesicles. Such small crosslinked oligopeptide vesicles may hold promise for drug delivery applications

Controlled Release of Octreotide and Assessment of Peptide Acylation from Poly(D,L-lactide-co-hydroxymethyl glycolide) Compared to PLGA Microspheres

# The Author(s) 2011. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Purpose To investigate the in vitro release of octreotide acetate, a somatostatin agonist, from microspheres based on a hydrophilic polyester, poly(D,L-lactide-co-hydroxymethyl glycolide) (PLHMGA). Methods Spherical and non-porous octreotide-loaded PLHMGA microspheres (12 to 16 μm) and loading efficiency of 60–70% were prepared by a solvent evaporation. Octreotide release profiles were compared with commercial PLGA formulation (Sandostatin LAR ®); possible peptide modification with lactic, glycolic and hydroxymethyl glycolic acid units was monitored. Results PLHMGA microspheres showed burst release (~20%) followed by sustained release for 20–60 days, depending on the hydrophilicity of the polymer. Percentage of released loaded peptide was high (70–90%);>60 % of released peptide was native octreotide. PLGA microspheres did not show peptide release for the first 10 days, after which it was released in a sustained manner over the next 90 days;>75 % of released peptides were acylated adducts. Conclusions PLHMGA microspheres are promising controlled systems for peptides with excellent control over release kinetics. Moreover, substantially less peptide modification occurred in PLHMGA than in PLGA microspheres. KEY WORDS acylation. aliphatic polyester. controlle