Lack of Agreement in Pediatric Emergency Department Discharge Diagnoses from Clinical and Administrative Data Sources

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75409/1/j.1553-2712.2007.tb01852.x.pd

Observation‐status patients in children's hospitals with and without dedicated observation units in 2011

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/111995/1/jhm2339.pd

Pediatric observation status: Are we overlooking a growing population in children's hospitals?

BACKGROUND: Inpatient administrative datasets often exclude observation stays, as observation is considered to be outpatient care. The extent to which this status is applied to pediatric hospitalizations is not known. OBJECTIVE: To characterize trends in observation status code utilization and 1‐day stays among children admitted from the emergency department (ED), and to compare patient characteristics and outcomes associated with observation versus inpatient stays. DESIGN: Retrospective longitudinal analysis of the 2004–2009 Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS). SETTING: Sixteen US freestanding children's hospitals contributing outpatient and inpatient data to PHIS. PATIENTS: Admissions to observation or inpatient status following ED care in study hospitals. MEASUREMENTS: Proportions of observation and 1‐day stays among all admissions from the ED were calculated each year. Top ranking discharge diagnoses and outcomes of observation were determined. Patient characteristics, discharge diagnoses, and return visits were compared for observation and 1‐day stays. RESULTS: The proportion of short‐stays (including both observation and 1‐day stays) increased from 37% to 41% between 2004 and 2009. Since 2007, observation stays have outnumbered 1‐day stays. In 2009, more than half of admissions from the ED for 6 of the top 10 ranking discharge diagnoses were short‐stays. Fewer than 25% of observation stays converted to inpatient status. Return visits and readmissions following observation were no more frequent than following 1‐day stays. CONCLUSIONS: Children admitted under observation status make up a substantial proportion of acute care hospitalizations. Analyses of inpatient administrative databases that exclude observation stays likely result in an underestimation of hospital resource utilization for children. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2012; © 2012 Society of Hospital MedicinePeer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/93720/1/1923_ftp.pd

Recurrent and High‐frequency Use of the Emergency Department by Pediatric Patients

Objectives The authors sought to describe the epidemiology of and risk factors for recurrent and high‐frequency use of the emergency department (ED) by children. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study using a database of children aged 0 to 17 years, inclusive, presenting to 22 EDs of the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) during 2007, with 12‐month follow‐up after each index visit. ED diagnoses for each visit were categorized as trauma, acute medical, or chronic medical conditions. Recurrent visits were defined as any repeat visit; high‐frequency use was defined as four or more recurrent visits. Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) were used to measure the strength of associations between patient and visit characteristics and recurrent ED use. Results A total of 695,188 unique children had at least one ED visit each in 2007, with 455,588 recurrent ED visits in the 12 months following the index visits. Sixty‐four percent of patients had no recurrent visits, 20% had one, 8% had two, 4% had three, and 4% had four or more recurrent visits. Acute medical diagnoses accounted for most visits regardless of the number of recurrent visits. As the number of recurrent visits per patient rose, chronic diseases were increasingly represented, with asthma being the most common ED diagnosis. Trauma‐related diagnoses were more common among patients without recurrent visits than among those with high‐frequency recurrent visits (28% vs. 9%; p < 0.001). High‐frequency recurrent visits were more often within the highest severity score classifications. In multivariable analysis, recurrent visits were associated with younger age, black or Hispanic race or ethnicity, and public health insurance. Conclusions Risk factors for recurrent ED use by children include age, race and ethnicity, and insurance status. Although asthma plays an important role in recurrent ED use, acute illnesses account for the majority of recurrent ED visits. Resumen Objetivos Describir la epidemiología y los factores de riesgo de revista e hiperfrecuentación del servicio de urgencias (SU) por parte de los pacientes pediátricos. Metodología Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo mediante una base de datos de niños entre 0 y 17 años inclusive, que acudieron a 22 SU de la Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network durante 2007, con un seguimiento de 12 meses tras cada visita índice. Los diagnósticos del SU de cada visita se clasificaron como traumatológico, médico agudo o enfermedades médicas crónicas. Las revisitas se definieron como cualquier visita repetida; la hiperfrecuentación se definió como cuatro o más revisitas. Se utilizaron ecuaciones de estimación generalizada para medir la fuerza de las asociaciones entre las características al paciente y la visita y la revisita del SU. Resultados Un total de 695.188 niños tuvieron al menos una visita al SU en 2007, con 455.588 revisitas al SU en los 12 meses tras las visitas índice. Un 64% de los pacientes no tuvieron revisitas, un 20% tuvo una, un 8% tuvo dos, un 4% tuvo tres y un 4% tuvo cuatro o más revisitas. Los diagnósticos médicos agudos representan la mayoría de las visitas, con independencia del número de revisitas. A medida que el número de revisitas por paciente aumentaba, las enfermedades crónicas estaban más representadas, y el asma fue el diagnóstico más común en el SU. Los diagnósticos relacionados con lo traumatológico fueron más frecuentes entre los pacientes sin revisitas que entre aquéllos con hiperfrecuentación (28% vs. 9%; p < 0,001). La alta frecuencia de revisitas fue más frecuente en las clasificaciones de gravedad más altas. En el análisis multivariable, las revisitas se asociaron con una edad más joven, raza o etnia negra o hispana, y la tenencia de un seguro de salud público. Conclusiones Los factores de riesgo para la revisita al SU por los niños incluyen la edad, la raza o etnia, y el tipo de seguro médico. Aunque el asma juega un papel importante en la revisita al SU, las enfermedades agudas representan la mayoría de la revistas al SU.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/106853/1/acem12347.pd

Differences in designations of observation care in US freestanding children's hospitals: Are they virtual or real?

OBJECTIVE: To characterize practices related to observation care and to examine the current models of pediatric observation medicine in US children's hospitals. DESIGN: We utilized 2 web‐based surveys to examine observation care in the 42 hospitals participating in the Pediatric Health Information System database. We obtained information regarding the designation of observation status, including the criteria used to admit patients into observation. From hospitals reporting the use of observation status, we requested specific details relating to the structures of observation care and the processes of care for observation patients following emergency department treatment. RESULTS: A total of 37 hospitals responded to Survey 1, and 20 hospitals responded to Survey 2. Designated observation units were present in only 12 of 31 (39%) hospitals that report observation patient data to the Pediatric Health Information System. Observation status was variably defined in terms of duration of treatment and prespecified criteria. Observation periods were limited to <48 hours in 24 of 31 (77%) hospitals. Hospitals reported that various standards were used by different payers to determine observation status reimbursement. Observation care was delivered in a variety of settings. Most hospitals indicated that there were no differences in the clinical care delivered to virtual observation status patients when compared with other inpatients. CONCLUSIONS: Observation is a variably applied patient status, defined differently by individual hospitals. Consistency in the designation of patients under observation status among hospitals and payers may be necessary to compare quality outcomes and costs, as well as optimize models of pediatric observation care. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2012;. © 2011 Society of Hospital Medicine.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/91108/1/949_ftp.pd

Variation in Ancillary Testing among Pediatric Asthma Patients Seen in Emergency Departments

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/72605/1/j.aem.2007.01.016.pd

Implicit Review Instrument to Evaluate Quality of Care Delivered by Physicians to Children in Emergency Departments

Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/144238/1/hesr12800_am.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/144238/2/hesr12800.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/144238/3/hesr12800-sup-0001-AppendixSA1.pd

Patientâ level Factors and the Quality of Care Delivered in Pediatric Emergency Departments

ObjectiveQuality of care delivered to adult patients in the emergency department (ED) is often associated with demographic and clinical factors such as a patient’s race/ethnicity and insurance status. We sought to determine whether the quality of care delivered to children in the ED was associated with a variety of patientâ level factors.MethodsThis was a retrospective, observational cohort study. Pediatric patients (<18 years) who received care between January 2011 and December 2011 at one of 12 EDs participating in the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) were included. We analyzed demographic factors (including age, sex, and payment source) and clinical factors (including triage, chief complaint, and severity of illness). We measured quality of care using a previously validated implicit review instrument using chart review with a summary score that ranged from 5 to 35. We examined associations between demographic and clinical factors and quality of care using a hierarchical multivariable linear regression model with hospital site as a random effect.ResultsIn the multivariable model, among the 620 ED encounters reviewed, we did not find any association between patient age, sex, race/ethnicity, and payment source and the quality of care delivered. However, we did find that some chief complaint categories were significantly associated with lower than average quality of care, including fever (â 0.65 points in quality, 95% confidence interval [CI] = â 1.24 to â 0.06) and upper respiratory symptoms (â 0.68 points in quality, 95% CI = â 1.30 to â 0.07).ConclusionWe found that quality of ED care delivered to children among a cohort of 12 EDs participating in the PECARN was high and did not differ by patient age, sex, race/ethnicity, and payment source, but did vary by the presenting chief complaint.Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142981/1/acem13347_am.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142981/2/acem13347-sup-0001-DataSupplementS1.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142981/3/acem13347.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142981/4/acem13347-sup-0002-DataSupplementS2.pd

Development and Validation of the Phoenix Criteria for Pediatric Sepsis and Septic Shock

ImportanceThe Society of Critical Care Medicine Pediatric Sepsis Definition Task Force sought to develop and validate new clinical criteria for pediatric sepsis and septic shock using measures of organ dysfunction through a data-driven approach.ObjectiveTo derive and validate novel criteria for pediatric sepsis and septic shock across differently resourced settings.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsMulticenter, international, retrospective cohort study in 10 health systems in the US, Colombia, Bangladesh, China, and Kenya, 3 of which were used as external validation sites. Data were collected from emergency and inpatient encounters for children (aged &amp;amp;lt;18 years) from 2010 to 2019: 3 049 699 in the development (including derivation and internal validation) set and 581 317 in the external validation set.ExposureStacked regression models to predict mortality in children with suspected infection were derived and validated using the best-performing organ dysfunction subscores from 8 existing scores. The final model was then translated into an integer-based score used to establish binary criteria for sepsis and septic shock.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome for all analyses was in-hospital mortality. Model- and integer-based score performance measures included the area under the precision recall curve (AUPRC; primary) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC; secondary). For binary criteria, primary performance measures were positive predictive value and sensitivity.ResultsAmong the 172 984 children with suspected infection in the first 24 hours (development set; 1.2% mortality), a 4-organ-system model performed best. The integer version of that model, the Phoenix Sepsis Score, had AUPRCs of 0.23 to 0.38 (95% CI range, 0.20-0.39) and AUROCs of 0.71 to 0.92 (95% CI range, 0.70-0.92) to predict mortality in the validation sets. Using a Phoenix Sepsis Score of 2 points or higher in children with suspected infection as criteria for sepsis and sepsis plus 1 or more cardiovascular point as criteria for septic shock resulted in a higher positive predictive value and higher or similar sensitivity compared with the 2005 International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference (IPSCC) criteria across differently resourced settings.Conclusions and RelevanceThe novel Phoenix sepsis criteria, which were derived and validated using data from higher- and lower-resource settings, had improved performance for the diagnosis of pediatric sepsis and septic shock compared with the existing IPSCC criteria.</jats:sec

International Consensus Criteria for Pediatric Sepsis and Septic Shock.

ImportanceSepsis is a leading cause of death among children worldwide. Current pediatric-specific criteria for sepsis were published in 2005 based on expert opinion. In 2016, the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) defined sepsis as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, but it excluded children.ObjectiveTo update and evaluate criteria for sepsis and septic shock in children.Evidence reviewThe Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) convened a task force of 35 pediatric experts in critical care, emergency medicine, infectious diseases, general pediatrics, nursing, public health, and neonatology from 6 continents. Using evidence from an international survey, systematic review and meta-analysis, and a new organ dysfunction score developed based on more than 3 million electronic health record encounters from 10 sites on 4 continents, a modified Delphi consensus process was employed to develop criteria.FindingsBased on survey data, most pediatric clinicians used sepsis to refer to infection with life-threatening organ dysfunction, which differed from prior pediatric sepsis criteria that used systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria, which have poor predictive properties, and included the redundant term, severe sepsis. The SCCM task force recommends that sepsis in children be identified by a Phoenix Sepsis Score of at least 2 points in children with suspected infection, which indicates potentially life-threatening dysfunction of the respiratory, cardiovascular, coagulation, and/or neurological systems. Children with a Phoenix Sepsis Score of at least 2 points had in-hospital mortality of 7.1% in higher-resource settings and 28.5% in lower-resource settings, more than 8 times that of children with suspected infection not meeting these criteria. Mortality was higher in children who had organ dysfunction in at least 1 of 4-respiratory, cardiovascular, coagulation, and/or neurological-organ systems that was not the primary site of infection. Septic shock was defined as children with sepsis who had cardiovascular dysfunction, indicated by at least 1 cardiovascular point in the Phoenix Sepsis Score, which included severe hypotension for age, blood lactate exceeding 5 mmol/L, or need for vasoactive medication. Children with septic shock had an in-hospital mortality rate of 10.8% and 33.5% in higher- and lower-resource settings, respectively.Conclusions and relevanceThe Phoenix sepsis criteria for sepsis and septic shock in children were derived and validated by the international SCCM Pediatric Sepsis Definition Task Force using a large international database and survey, systematic review and meta-analysis, and modified Delphi consensus approach. A Phoenix Sepsis Score of at least 2 identified potentially life-threatening organ dysfunction in children younger than 18 years with infection, and its use has the potential to improve clinical care, epidemiological assessment, and research in pediatric sepsis and septic shock around the world